Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation of steel beam under ceiling jet based on a wind-fire-structure coupling model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For localized fires, it is necessary to consider the thermal and mechanical responses of building elements subject to uneven heating under the influence of wind. In this paper, the thermomechanical phenomena experienced by a ceiling jet and I-beam in a structural fire were simulated. Instead of applying the concept of adiabatic surface temperature (AST) to achieve fluid-structure coupling, this paper proposes a new computational fluid dynamics-finite element method numerical simulation that combines wind, fire, thermal, and structural analyses. First, to analyze the velocity and temperature distributions, the results of the numerical model and experiment were compared in windless conditions, showing good agreement. Vortices were found in the local area formed by the upper and lower flanges of the I-beam and the web, generating a local high-temperature zone and enhancing the heat transfer of convection. In an incoming-flow scenario, the flame was blown askew significantly; the wall temperature was bimodally distributed in the axial direction. The first temperature peak was mainly caused by radiative heat transfer, while the second resulted from convective heat transfer. In terms of mechanical response, the yield strength degradation in the highest-temperature region in windless conditions was found to be significant, thus explaining the stress distribution of steel beams in the fire field. The mechanical response of the overall elements considering the incoming flows was essentially elastic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang C, Li G Q, Wang Y C. Sensitivity study on using different formulae for calculating the temperature of insulated steel members in natural fires. Fire Technology, 2012, 48(2): 343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pesic D J, Blagojevic M, Zivkovic N V. Simulation of wind-driven dispersion of fire pollutants in a street canyon using FDS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2014, 21(2): 1270–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stern-Gottfried J, Rein G, Bisby L A, Torero J L. Experimental review of the homogeneous temperature assumption in postflashover compartment fires. Fire Safety Journal, 2010, 45(4): 249–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pignatta e Silva V. Determination of the steel fire protection material thickness by an analytical process—A simple derivation. Engineering Structures, 2005, 27(14): 2036–2043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization (CECS). Technical Code for Fire Safety of Steel Structure in Buildings. Beijing: China Planning Press, 2006 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  6. EC3-1-2. Eurocode 3: Design of Steel Structures—Part 1–2: General Rules—Structural Fire Design. London: British Standard, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rein G, Jahn W, Torero J. Modelling of the growth phase of Dalmarnock Fire Test One. In: Proceedings of 12th International Conference and Exhibition on Fire and Materials 2011. Hampshire: Interscience Communications, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rackauskaite E, Bonner M, Restuccia F, Anez N F, Christensen E G, Roenner N, Wegrzynski W, Turkowski P, Tofilo P, Heidari M, Kotsovinos P, Vermesi I, Richter F, Hu Y, Jeanneret C, Wadhwani R, Rein G. Fire experiments inside a very large and open-plan compartment: x-TWO. In: Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Structures in Fire. Brisbane: The University of Queensland, 2020

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zhang C, Silva J G, Weinschenk C, Kamikawa D, Hasemi Y. Simulation methodology for coupled fire-structure analysis: Modeling localized fire tests on a steel column. Fire Technology, 2016, 52(1): 239–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamikawa D, Hasemi Y, Wakamatsu T, Kagiya K. Experimental flame heat transfer and surface temperature correlations for a steel column adjacent to and surrounded by a pool fire. In: Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Fire Safety Science. London: International Association for Fire Safety Science, 2007, 989–1000

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang C, Choe L, Gross J, Ramesh S, Bundy M. Engineering approach for designing a thermal test of real-scale steel beam exposed to localized fire. Fire Technology, 2017, 53(4): 1535–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lineham S A, Thomson D, Bartlett A I, Bisby L A, Hadden R M. Structural response of fire-exposed cross-laminated timber beams under sustained loads. Fire Safety Journal, 2016, 85(10): 23–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiesner F, Peters G, Bisby L A, Hadden R. Structural steel columns subjected to localized fires. In: Proceedings of International Fire Safety Symposium. Naples: International Fire Safety Symposium, 2017

  14. Yokobayashi Y, Hasemi Y, Wakamatsu T, Wakamatsu T. Experimental study on the heating mechanism and thermal response of a steel beam under ceiling exposed to localized fires. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 1996, 498(498): 169–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alos-Moya J, Paya-Zaforteza I, Hospitaler A, Rinaudo P. Valencia bridge fire tests: Experimental study of a composite bridge under fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2017, 138: 538–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maraveas C, Vrakas A A. Design of concrete tunnel linings for fire safety. Structural Engineering International, 2014, 24(3): 319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Maraveas C. Local buckling of steel members under fire conditions: A review. Fire Technology, 2019, 55(1): 59–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Welch S, Miles S, Kumar S, Lemaire T, Chan A. FIRESTRUC-Integrating advanced three-dimensional modelling methodologies for predicting thermo-mechanical behavior of steel and composite structures subjected to natural fires. Fire Safety Science, 2008, 9: 1315–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Prasad K, Baum H R. Coupled fire dynamics and thermal response of complex building structures. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2005, 30(2): 2255–2262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luo C, Chen L, Lua J, Shi J. A 3D ABAQUS toolkit for thermal-mechanical damage prediction of composite sandwich structures subjected to fire. In: Proceedings of 50th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference. Reston: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2009, 1–20

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baum H R. Simulating fire effects on complex building structures. Mechanics Research Communications, 2011, 38(1): 1–11

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen L, Luo C, Lua J. FDS and Abaqus coupling toolkit for fire simulation and thermal and mass flow prediction. Fire Safety Science, 2011, 10: 1465–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wickström U, Duthinh D, Mcgratan K. Adiabatic surface temperature for calculating heat transfer to fire exposed structures. In: Proceedings of Interflam 2007 International Interflam Conference 11th Proceedings. London: Inter Science Communications Limited, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wickström U. Methods for Predicting Temperatures in Fire-Exposed Structures, in SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering. New York: Springer, 2016, 1102–1130

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. McGrattan K B, Hostikka S, McDermott R, Floyd J, Weinschenk C, Overholt K. Fire Dynamics Simulator Users Guide. 6th ed. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  26. ANSYS. ANSYS User Manual Version 14.0. 2012

  27. SIMULIA/Abaqus. Abaqus User’s Manual Version 6.10 edition. 2010

  28. Zhang C, Li G Q, Wang R. Using adiabatic surface temperature for thermal calculation of steel members exposed to localized fires. International Journal of Steel Structures, 2013, 13(3): 547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang C, Gross J L, McAllister T, Li G Q. Behavior of unrestrained and restrained bare steel columns subjected to localized fire. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2015, 141(10): 04014239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang C, Yu H X, Choe L, Gross J, Li G H. Simulating the fire-thermal-structural behavior in a localized fire test on a bare steel beam. Engineering Structures, 2018, 163: 61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang C, Zhang Z, Li G Q. Simple vs. sophisticated fire models to predict performance of SHS column in localized fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2016, 120: 62–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Silva J C G, Landesmann A, Ribeiro F L B. Performance-based analysis of cylindrical steel containment Vessels exposed to fire. Fire Safety Journal, 2014, 69: 126–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Silva J C G, Alexandre L, Fernando L B R. Interface model to fire-thermomechanical performance-based analysis of structures under fire conditions. In: Proceedings of Fire and Evacuation Modeling Technical Conference 2014. Manhattan: Thunderhead Engineering, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  34. Silva J C G, Landesmann A, Ribeiro F L B. Fire-thermomechanical interface model for performance-based analysis of structures exposed to fire. Fire Safety Journal, 2016, 83: 66–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Liu Z, Silva J C G, Huang Q, Hasemi Y, Huang Y, Guo Z. Coupled CFD-FEM simulation methodology for fire-exposed bridges. Journal of Bridge Engineering, 2021, 26(10): 04021074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Feenstra J A, Hofmeyer H, Van Herpen R A P, Mahendran M. Automated two-way coupling of CFD fire simulations to thermomechanical FE analyses at the overall structural level. Fire Safety Journal, 2018, 96: 165–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Malendowski M, Glema A. Development and implementation of coupling method for CFD-FEM analyses of steel structures in natural fire. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 172: 692–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Szymkuc W, Glema A, Malendowski M, Mielcarek A, Smardz P, Poteralski A Numerical investigation of fire and post-fire performance of CFT columns in an open car park fire. In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Structures in Fire. Belfast: Ulster University, 2018

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hu L, Liu S, Xu Y, Li D. A wind tunnel experimental study on burning rate enhancement behavior of gasoline pool fires by cross air flow. Combustion and Flame, 2011, 158(3): 586–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hu L, Zhang X, Delichatsios M A, Wu L, Kuang C. Pool fire flame base drag behavior with cross flow in a sub-atmospheric pressure. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2017, 36(2): 3105–3112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hu L, Liu S, de Ris J L, Wu L. A new mathematical quantification of wind-blown flame tilt angle of hydrocarbon pool fires with a new global correlation model. Fuel, 2013, 106: 730–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen Y, Zhang X, Miao Y, Hu L. Effects of cross airflow and burner distance on temperature profile and flame morphology of dual tandem pool fires. Fuel, 2022, 317(1): 123220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Hu L, Liu S, Wu L. Flame radiation feedback to fuel surface in medium ethanol and heptane pool fires with cross air flow. Combustion and Flame, 2013, 160(2): 295–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hu L, Hu K, Ren F, Sun X. Facade flame height ejected from an opening of fire compartment under external wind. Fire Safety Journal, 2017, 92: 151–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu L, Hu J, Liu S, Tang W, Zhang X. Evolution of heat feedback in medium pool fires with cross air flow and scaling of mass burning flux by a stagnant layer theory solution. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2015, 35(3): 2511–2518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hu L, Tang F, Wang Q, Qiu Z. Burning characteristics of conduction-controlled rectangular hydrocarbon pool fires in a reduced pressure atmosphere at high altitude in Tibet. Fuel, 2013, 111: 298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Chen H, Liu N, Chow W. Wind effects on smoke motion and temperature of ventilation-controlled fire in a two-vent compartment. Building and Environment, 2009, 44(12): 2521–2526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Huang H, Ooka R, Liu N, Zhang L, Deng Z, Kato S. Experimental study of fire growth in a reduced-scale compartment under different approaching external wind conditions. Fire Safety Journal, 2009, 44(3): 311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Zhou Y, Wang H, Bi H, Liu X, Gou Q. Heat release rate of highspeed train fire in railway tunnels. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Yi L, Luan D, Yang L, Chen T, Tao H, Xu Z, Fan C. Flow field and fire characteristics inside a tunnel under the influence of canyon cross wind. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2020, 105: 103575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Huang H, Ooka R, Kato S, Otake H, Hayashi Y. CFD simulation of thermal plume and firebrands scattering in urban fire. Fire Science & Technology, 2004, 23(2): 152–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Huang H, Ooka R, Kato S, Hayashi Y. A numerical study of firebrands scattering in urban fire based on CFD and Firebrands aerodynamics measurements. Journal of Fire Sciences, 2016, 25(4): 355–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Alos-Moya J, Paya-Zaforteza I, Hospitaler A, Loma-Ossorio E. Valencia bridge fire tests: Validation of simplified and advanced numerical approaches to model bridge fire scenarios. Advances in Engineering Software, 2019, 128: 55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ma R, Cui C, Ma M, Chen A. Numerical simulation and simplified model of vehicle-induced bridge deck fire in the full-open environment considering wind effect. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 2020, 17(12): 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gajjar J. Introduction to theoretical aerodynamics and hydrodynamics. The Aeronautical Journal, 2012, 116(1177): 329–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kays W M, Crawford M E. Convective Heal and Mass Transfer. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  57. Peters N. Laminar diffusion flamelet models in non-premixed turbulent combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1984, 10(3): 319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Sivathanu Y R, Faeth G M. Generalized state relationships for scalar properties in Non-Premixed Hydrocarbon/AirFlames. Combustion and Flame, 1990, 82(2): 211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Theory Guide for ANSYS Fluent 12.1. 2009

  60. Prieler R, Demuth M, Spoljaric D, Hochenauer C. Evaluation of a steady flamelet approach for use in oxy-fuel combustion. Fuel, 2014, 118: 55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Li G Q, Zhang C. Creep effect on buckling of axially restrained steel columns in real fires. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2012, 71: 182–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Oh W, Kato S. The effect of airspeed and wind direction on human’s thermal conditions and air distribution around the body. Building and Environment, 2018, 141: 103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. G D Raithby, E H Chui. A finite-volume method for predicting a radiant heat transfer in enclosures with participating media. ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1990, 112(2): 415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Khan I M, Greeves G. A Method for Calculating the Formation and Combustion of Soot in Diesel Engines. Heat Transfer in Flames. Chapter 25. Washington, D.C.: Scripta, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  65. Eurocode 3: Design of steel structures—Part 1–2: General rules—Structural fire design. London: British Standard, 2005

  66. T F Smith, Z F Shen, J N Friedman. Evaluation of coefficients for the weighted sum of gray gases model. ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1982, 104(4): 602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Lie T T, Macaulay B A. Evaluation of the Fire Resistance of Protected Steel Columns. Internal Report No. 583. 1989

  68. Phan L T, Gross J L, McAllister T P. Best Practice Guidelines for Structural Fire Resistance Design of Concrete and Steel Buildings. Gaithersburg: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The financial supports from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant Nos. 52078380 and 51820105013) and the Top Discipline Plan of Shanghai Universities-Class I (No. 2022-3-YB-18) are gratefully acknowledged. This study was also supported by National Key Research and Development Program of 14th Five-Year Plan of China (Project No: 2022YFC3801904).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuanyi Zhou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, J., Zhou, X., Cong, B. et al. Simulation of steel beam under ceiling jet based on a wind-fire-structure coupling model. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 17, 78–98 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0936-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-022-0936-8

Keywords

Navigation