Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic response of precast reinforced concrete wall subjected to cyclic in-plane and constant out-of-plane loading

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides insight into the seismic behavior of a full-scale precast reinforced concrete wall under in-plane cyclic loading combined with out-of-plane loading replicated by sand backfill to simulate the actual condition of basement walls. The tested wall exhibited flexural cracks, owing to the high aspect ratio and considerable out-of-plane movement due to lateral pressure from the backfill. The wall performed satisfactorily by exhibiting competent seismic parameters and deformation characteristics governed by its ductile response in the nonlinear phase during the test with smaller residual drift. Numerical analysis was conducted to validate experimental findings, which complied with each other. The numerical model was used to conduct parametric studies to study the effect of backfill density and aspect ratio on seismic response of the proposed precast wall system. The in-plane capacity of walls reduced, while deformation characteristics were unaffected by the increase in backfill density. An increase in aspect ratio leads to a reduction in in-plane capacity and an increase in drift. Curves between the ratio of in-plane yield capacity and design shear load of walls are proposed for the backfill density, which may be adopted to determine the in-plane yield capacity of the basement walls based on their design shear.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singhal S, Chourasia A, Chellappa S, Parashar J. Precast reinforced concrete shear walls: State of the art review. Structural Concrete, 2019, 20(3): 886–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chourasia A, Singhal S, Parashar J. Seismic performance of prefab RC shear walls: A review. In: Proceedings of CISHR. Srinagar: National Institute of Technology Uttarakhand, 2017, 202–213

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brunesi E, Peloso S, Pinho R, Nascimbene R. Cyclic tensile testing of a three-way panel connection for precast wall-slab-wall structures. Structural Concrete, 2019, 20(4): 1307–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brunesi E, Peloso S, Pinho R, Nascimbene R. Shake-table testing of a full-scale two-story precast wall-slab-wall structure. Earthquake Spectra, 2019, 35(4): 1583–1609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brunesi E, Nascimbene R, Peloso S. Evaluation of the seismic response of precast wall connections: Experimental observations and numerical modeling. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 24(7): 1057–1082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Singhal S, Chourasia A, Parashar J. Anchorage behaviour of headed bars as connection system for precast reinforced concrete structural components. Structures, 2020, 27: 1405–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Singhal S, Chourasia A, Kajale Y, Singh D. Behaviour of precast reinforced concrete structural wall systems subjected to in-plane lateral loading. Engineering Structures, 2021, 241: 112474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jünemann R, de La Llera J C, Hube M A, Cifuentes L A, Kausel E. A statistical analysis of reinforced concrete wall buildings damaged during the 2010, Chile earthquake. Engineering Structures, 2015, 82: 168–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wood J H. Earthquake-induced soil pressures on structures. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. California: California Institute of Technology, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steedman R S, Zeng X. The seismic response of waterfront retaining walls. In: Proceedings of the ASCE specialty conference on design and performance of earth retaining structures. New York: Special Technical Publication 25, 1990, 872–886

  11. Veletsos A S, Younan A H. Dynamic response of cantilever retaining walls. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(2): 161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Younan A H, Veletsos A S. Dynamic response of flexible retaining walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2000, 29(12): 1815–1844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mansour M F, Abdel Motaal M A, Elsaba A A. Seismic response of basement walls as partially-yielding retaining walls. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 2021, 12(1): 181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kalasin T, Wood D M. Seismic analysis of retaining walls within plasticity framework. In: Proceedings of the 14th WCEE. Beijing: China Earthquake Administration, 2008, 12–17

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kim Y Y, Yoon M S, Han S J, Kim S S. Behavior analysis of reinforced soil retaining wall under cyclic loading. In: Proceedings of the 4th Asian Regional Conference on Geosynthetics. Shanghai: Springer, 2008, 639–644

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jia L, He S, Li N, Wang W, Yao K. Stability of reinforced retaining wall under seismic loads. Applied Sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2019, 9(11): 2175

    Google Scholar 

  17. Whitman R V. Seismic design of earth retaining structures. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics. Missouri: ASCE, 1991, 1767–1778

    Google Scholar 

  18. Taiebat M, Ahmadnia A, Finn W D L, Ventura C E, Naesgaard E, Devall R H. Seismic assessment of basement walls for different design criteria. In: Proceedings of the 14th Pan-am Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 64th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Toronto: Canadian Geotechnical Society, 2011, 1069

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amirzehni E, Taiebat M, Finn W D L, DeVall R H. Seismic Performance of Deep Basement Walls. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering. Christchurch: International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sitar N, Mikola R G, Candia G. Seismically induced lateral earth pressures on retaining structures and basement walls. In: GeoCongress 2012—Keynote lecture. California: ASCE, 2012, 335–358

    Google Scholar 

  21. Candia G, Mikola R G, Sitar N. Seismic response of retaining walls with cohesive backfill: Centrifuge model studies. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2016, 90: 411–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu H W, Yao L K, Li J. Influence factors on the seismic behavior and deformation modes of gravity retaining walls. Journal of Mountain Science, 2019, 16(1): 168–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Osouli A, Zamiran S. The effect of backfill cohesion on seismic response of cantilever retaining walls using fully dynamic analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 2017, 89: 143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma M. Seismic response of reduced scale soil retaining wall at varying backfill density. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Patiala: Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, 2019

    Google Scholar 

  25. Konai S, Sengupta A, Deb K. Seismic behavior of cantilever wall embedded in dry and saturated sand. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2020, 14(3): 690–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. IS 13920: 2016. Ductile Design and Detailing of Reinforced Concrete Structures Subjected Seismic Forces— Code of Practice. New Delhi: Bureau of Indian Standards, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yang M, Tang X. Rigid retaining walls with narrow cohesionless backfills under various wall movement modes. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2017, 17(11): 04017098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM. Standard Test Methods for Cyclic (reversed) Load Test for Shear Resistance of Vertical Elements of the Lateral Force Resisting Systems for Buildings. West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lubliner J, Oliver J, Oller S, Oñate E. A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1989, 25(3): 299–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nayal R, Rasheed H A. Tension stiffening model for concrete beams reinforced with steel and FRP bars. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2006, 18(6): 831–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Goh W I, Mohamad N, Abdullah R, Samad A A A. Finite element analysis of precast lightweight foamed concrete sandwich panel subjected to axial compression. Journal of Computer Science and Computational Mathematics, 2016, 6(1): 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Carrillo J. Damage index based on stiffness degradation of low-rise RC walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 2015, 44(6): 831–848

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. ASCE-41-17. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Virginia: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2017

    Google Scholar 

  34. Code P. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance— Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rodrigues H, Varum H, Arêde A, Costa A. A comparative analysis of energy dissipation and equivalent viscous damping of RC columns subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading. Engineering Structures, 2012, 35: 149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the Director, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, India for all the support and encouragement during the research work and permitting to publish the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Chourasia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singhal, S., Chourasia, A., Panigrahi, S.K. et al. Seismic response of precast reinforced concrete wall subjected to cyclic in-plane and constant out-of-plane loading. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 1128–1143 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0753-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0753-5

Keywords

Navigation