Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic effects on reinforcement load and lateral deformation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Current design methods for the internal stability of geosynthetic-reinforced soil (GRS) walls postulate seismic forces as inertial forces, leading to pseudo-static analyses based on active earth pressure theory, which yields unconservative reinforcement loads required for seismic stability. Most seismic analyses are limited to the determination of maximum reinforcement strength. This study aimed to calculate the distribution of the reinforcement load and connection strength required for each layer of the seismic GRS wall. Using the top-down procedure involves all of the possible failure surfaces for the seismic analyses of the GRS wall and then obtains the reinforcement load distribution for the limit state. The distributions are used to determine the required connection strength and to approximately assess the facing lateral deformation. For sufficient pullout resistance to be provided by each reinforcement, the maximum required tensile resistance is identical to the results based on the Mononobe-Okabe method. However, short reinforcement results in greater tensile resistances in the mid and lower layers as evinced by compound failure frequently occurring in GRS walls during an earthquake. Parametric studies involving backfill friction angle, reinforcement length, vertical seismic acceleration, and secondary reinforcement are conducted to investigate seismic impacts on the stability and lateral deformation of GRS walls.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Allen T M, Bathurst R J. Observed long-term performance of geosynthetic walls and implications for design. Geosynthetics International, 2002, 9(5–6): 567–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen T M, Bathurst R J. Performance of an 11 m high block-faced geogrid wall designed using the K-stiffness method. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2014, 51(1): 16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stuedlein A W, Bailey M, Lindquist D, Sankey J, Neely W J. Design and performance of a 46-m-high MSE wall. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(6): 786–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jiang Y, Han J, Parsons R L, Brennan J J. Field instrumentation and evaluation of modular-block MSE walls with secondary geogrid layers. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(12): 05016002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Salem M A, Hammad M A, Amer M I. Field monitoring and numerical modeling of 4.4 m-high mechanically stabilized earth wall. Geosynthetics International, 2018, 25(5): 545–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shishegaran A, Khalili M R, Karami B, Rabczuk T, Shishegaran A. Computational predictions for estimating the maximum deflection of reinforced concrete panels subjected to the blast load. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 2020, 139: 103527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shishegaran A, Ghasemi M R, Varaee H. Performance of a novel bent-up bars system not interacting with concrete. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(6): 1301–1315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M, Mohri Y, Matsushima K. Remedial treatment of soil structures using geosynthetic-reinforcing technology. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2007, 25(4–5): 204–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ling H I, Leshchinsky D, Chou N N S. Post-earthquake investigation on several geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls and slopes during the Ji-Ji earthquake of Taiwan (China). Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2001, 21(4): 297–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Steudle K T, Horsley J. AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications. 6th ed. Washington, D.C.: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Berg R R, Christopher B R, Samtani N C. Mechanically Stabilized Earth Walls and Reinforced Soil Slopes Design and Construction Guidelines. Washington, D.C.: Federal Highway Administration, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collin J G. Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls. 3rd ed. Herndon, VA: National Concrete Masonry Association, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baker R, Klein Y. An integrated limiting equilibrium approach for design of reinforced soil retaining structures: Part I—formulation. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2004, 22(3): 119–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Han J, Leshchinsky D. General analytical framework for design of flexible reinforced earth structures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2006, 132(11): 1427–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leshchinsky D, Zhu F, Meehan C L. Required unfactored strength of geosynthetic in reinforced earth structures. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2010, 136(2): 281–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ehrlich M, Mitchell J K. Working stress design method for reinforced soil walls. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1994, 120(4): 625–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liu H, Won M S. Stress dilatancy and reinforcement load of vertical-reinforced soil composite: analytical method. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2014, 140(3): 630–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrlich M, Mirmoradi S H. A simplified working stress design method for reinforced soil walls. Geotechnique, 2016, 66(10): 854–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Allen T M, Bathurst R J, Holtz R D, Walters D, Lee W F. A new working stress method for prediction of reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(5): 976–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bathurst R J, Allen T M, Walters D L. Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2005, 23(4): 287–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ling H I, Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M. Simulating performance of GRS-RW by finite-element procedure. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1995, 121(4): 330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu H, Ling H I. A unified elastoplastic-viscoplastic bounding surface model of geosynthetics and its applications to geosynthetic reinforced soil-retaining wall analysis. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2007, 133(7): 801–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bathurst R J, Cai Z. Pseudo-static seismic analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining walls. Geosynthetics International, 1995, 2(5): 787–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao Y F, Yang S C, Wu Y X, Li D Y, Zhang F. Evaluation of oblique pullout resistance of reinforcements in soil wall subjected to seismic loads. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2014, 42(5): 515–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ling H I, Leshchinsky D. Effects of vertical acceleration on seismic design of geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. Geotechnique, 1998, 48(3): 347–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang S C, Gao Y F, Cui K, Zhang F, Wu D. Three-dimensional internal stability analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced earth structures considering seismic loading. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 130: 105979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohamed S B A, Yang K H, Hung W Y. Limit equilibrium analyses of geosynthetic-reinforced two-tiered walls: Calibration from centrifuge tests. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2013, 41: 1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sabermahani M, Ghalandarzadeh A, Fakher A. Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2009, 27(2): 121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cai Z, Bathurst R J. Seismic response analysis of geosynthetic reinforced soil segmental retaining walls by finite element method. Computers and Geotechnics, 1995, 17(4): 523–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren F, Zhang F, Xu C, Wang G. Seismic evaluation of reinforced-soil segmental retaining walls. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2016, 44(4): 604–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Fan C, Liu H, Cao J, Ling H I. Responses of reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to horizontal and vertical seismic loadings. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2020, 129: 105969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Leshchinsky D, Kang B, Han J, Ling H I. Framework for limit state design of geosynthetic-reinforced walls and slopes. Transportation Infrastructure Geotechnology, 2014, 1(2): 129–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Leshchinsky D, Leshchinsky B, Leshchinsky O. Limit state design framework for geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2017, 45(6): 642–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ling H I, Leshchinsky D. Failure analysis of modular-block reinforced-soil walls during earthquakes. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2005, 19(2): 117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mohamed S B A, Yang K H, Hung W Y. Finite element analyses of two-tier geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls: Comparison involving centrifuge tests and limit equilibrium results. Computers and Geotechnics, 2014, 61: 67–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Liu H. Internal stability analysis of segmental geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls subjected to seismic loading. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(2): 278–283 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou Y D, Zhang F, Wang J Q, Gao Y F, Dai G Y. Seismic stability of earth slopes with tension crack. Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering, 2019, 13(4): 950–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Yang S C, Leshchinsky B, Cui K, Zhang F, Gao Y F. Influence of failure mechanism on seismic bearing capacity factors for shallow foundations near slopes. Geotechnique, 2021, 71(7): 594–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang S C, Leshchinsky B, Cui K, Zhang F, Gao Y F. Unified approach toward evaluating bearing capacity of shallow foundations near slopes. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2019, 145(12): 04019110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhou Z, Gao Y F, Zhang F, Song J, Zou D G. Effects of soil dynamic response on post-earthquake deformation of slopes based on nested Newmark model. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2020, 19(3): 573–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhou Z, Zhang F, Gao Y F, Shu S. Nested Newmark model to estimate permanent displacement of seismic slopes with tensile strength cut-off. Journal of Central South University, 2019, 26(7): 1830–1839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhuang X Y, Zhou S W, Sheng M, Li G S. On the hydraulic fracturing in naturally-layered porous media using the phase field method. Engineering Geology, 2020, 266: 105306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou S W, Zhuang X Y, Rabczuk T. Phase field modeling of brittle compressive-shear fractures in rock-like materials: A new driving force and a hybrid formulation. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 2019, 355: 729–752

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhou S W, Zhuang X Y, Zhu H H, Rabczuk T. Phase field modelling of crack propagation, branching and coalescence in rocks. Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics, 2018, 96: 174–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52078185, 51878248, and 41630638).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanbo Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, F., Zhu, Y., Chen, Y. et al. Seismic effects on reinforcement load and lateral deformation of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 1001–1015 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0734-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0734-8

Keywords

Navigation