Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of core stiffness on the behavior of tall timber buildings subjected to wind loads

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyzes the feasibility of the use of cross-laminated timber (CLT) as a load-bearing structural element in a 40-story building based on Chinese design requirements. The proposed design of the high-rise concrete—CLT building utilizes the core—outrigger system. Concrete is used for the central core and outriggers, and CLT is used for the rest of the structure of the building. Finite element models with different types of connections were developed using SAP2000 to analyze the lateral behavior of the building under wind action. The finite element models with rigid connections deduce the wind load distributions on individual structural elements, which determine the total number and the stiffness of fasteners of the CLT panels. Accordingly, spring links with equivalent stiffness that simulate the mechanical fasteners were employed in SAP2000. The results indicate that CLT increases the lateral flexibility of the building. A closed concrete core was substituted by two half cores to measure the requirement of the maximum lateral deflection. However, the acceleration at the building top still exceeded the limitation prescribed in Chinese Code JGJ 3–2010 owing to the lightweight of CLT and decreased stiffness of the hybrid building. To restrict this top acceleration within the limit, further approaches to increase the stiffness in the weak direction of the building are required. Methods such as the modification of the floor layout, increase in the thickness of walls, and addition of extra damping capacity should be considered and verified in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ceccotti A, Sandhaas C, Yasumura M. Seismic Behaviour of Multistory Cross-Laminated Timber Buildings. Geneva: International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dujic B, Strus K, Zarnic R, Ceccotti A. Prediction of dynamic response of a 7-storey massive XLam wooden building tested on a shaking table. In: Proceedings of the World Conferemce on Timber Engineering. Riva del Garda: Trees and Timber Institute, National Research Council, 2010, 20–24

    Google Scholar 

  3. Xiong H, Jia G. Research on seismic behavior of wood-concrete hybrid structures. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Tokyo: International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  4. Smith I, Frangi A. Overview of design issues for tall timber buildings. Structural Engineering International, 2008, 18(2): 141–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van de Kuilen J W, Ceccotti A, Xia Z, He M. Very tall wooden buildings with cross laminated timber. Procedia Engineering, 2011, 14: 1621–1628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Connolly T, Loss C, Iqbal A, Tannert T. Feasibility study of mass-timber cores for the UBC tall wood building. Buildings, 2018, 8(8): 98–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Skidmore, Owings& Merrill (SOM), LLP. Timber Tower Research Project, Final Report. 2013

  8. SAP2000 v.16. CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSiBridge. California: Computers and Structures, Inc., 2013

    Google Scholar 

  9. GB 50009–2012. Load Code for the Design of Building Structures. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of PRC, 2012 (in Chinese)

  10. Jacob J P. Comprehensive Fire Protection and Safety with Concrete. Brusel: European Concrete Platform ASBL, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith B S, Coull A. Tall Building Structures: Analysis and Design. New York: John Willey & Sons, Inc., 1991, 364–371

    Google Scholar 

  12. Serrano E. Documentation of the Limnologen Project: Overview and Summaries of Sub Projects Results. Report No. 56. 2009

  13. Serrano E. Limnologen—Experiences from an 8-storey timber building. In: Internationales Holzbau-forum 09. Garmisch: Forum Holzbau, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. Van de Kuilen J W G, Xia Z. Lateral behavior of post-tensioned cross laminated timber walls using finite element analysis. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering. Quebec: Curran Associates, Inc., 2014

    Google Scholar 

  15. Waugh A, Weiss K H, Wells M. A Process Revealed: Auf Dem Holzweg. London: Murray & Sorrell FUEL, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  16. Blass H J, Fellmoser P. Design of solid wood panels with cross layers. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering. Lahti: Finnish Assoc. of Civil Engineers, 2004, 543–548

    Google Scholar 

  17. DIN EN 1194. Timber Structures-Glued Laminated Timber-Strength Classes and Determination of Characteristic values. German version. Brusel: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 1999 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  18. DIN EN 338. Structural Timber-Strength Classes. German version. Brusel: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2016 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dujic B, Klobcar S, Zarnic R. Shear capacity of cross-laminated wooden walls. In: Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering. Miyazaki: Engineered Wood Products Association, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gavric I, Ceccotti A, Fragiacomo M. Experimental cyclic tests on cross-laminated timber panels and typical connections. In: Proceedings of the ANIDIS Conference. Bari: L’Ingegneria Sismica in Italia, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  21. GB 50005–2003. Code for Design of Timber Structures. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of PRC, 2003 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. EN 1995–1-1:2010, Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures, Part 1–1: General—Common Rules and Rules for Buildings. Brusel: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2010

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ceccotti A, Sandhaas C, Yasumura M. Seismic behaviour of multistory cross-laminated timber buildings. In: Proceedings of the International Convention of Society of Wood Science and Technology and United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. Geneva: Timber Committee, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gavric I, Fragiacomo M, Ceccotti A. Cyclic behavior of CLT wall systems: Experimental tests and analytical prediction models. Structural Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. JGJ 3–2010. Technical Specification for Concrete Structures of Tall Building. Beijing: General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine; Standardization Administration of PRC, 2010 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hoenderkamp J C D. High-rise Structures: Preliminary Design for Lateral Load. 2nd ed. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  27. EN 1991–1-4. Eurocode 1: Actions on Structures-General Actions-Part 1–4 Wind Actions. Brusel: European Committee for Standardization (CEN), 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author gratefully acknowledges the European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST), Action FP1004 Management Committee, and the representatives of the COST office for their Short-term Scientific Mission grant, which contributed to the successful progress of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhouyan Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, Z., Van De Kuilen, JW.G., Polastri, A. et al. Influence of core stiffness on the behavior of tall timber buildings subjected to wind loads. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 15, 213–226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0692-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-021-0692-1

KeyWords

Navigation