Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Application of random set method in a deep excavation: based on a case study in Tehran cemented alluvium

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The design of high-rise buildings often necessitates ground excavation, where buildings are in close proximity to the construction, thus there is a potential for damage to these structures. This paper studies an efficient user-friendly framework for dealing with uncertainties in a deep excavation in layers of cemented coarse grained soil located in Tehran, Iran by non-deterministic Random Set (RS) method. In order to enhance the acceptability of the method among engineers, a pertinent code was written in FISH language of FLAC2D software which enables the designers to run all simulations simultaneously, without cumbersome procedure of changing input variables in every individual analysis. This could drastically decrease the computational effort and cost imposed to the project, which is of great importance especially to the owners. The results are presented in terms of probability of occurrence and most likely values of the horizontal displacement at top of the wall at every stage of construction. Moreover, a methodology for assessing the credibility of the uncertainty model is presented using a quality indicator. It was concluded that performing RS analysis before the beginning of every stage could cause great economical savings, while improving the safety of the project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lacasse S, Nadim F. Uncertainties in characterizing soil properties. In: Shackelford C D, Nelson P P, Roth M J S, eds. Proceedings of Conference on Uncertainty in the Geologic Environment: From Theory to Practice (Uncertainty ‘96). American Society of Civil Engineers, 1996, 49–75

  2. Griffiths D V, Fenton G A. Influence of soil strength spatial variability on the stability of an undrained clay slope by finite elements. Geo-Denver Conf. on Soil Stability, Denver, Colorado, United States, 2000, 184–193

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fenton G A, Griffiths D V. Bearing capacity of spatially random c–φ soils. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Rotterdam, Balkema, 2001, 1411–1415

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ang A H S, Tang W H. Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning and Design: Volume I-Basic Principles. New York: Wiley & Sons, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  5. Harr M E. Reliability Based Design in Civil Engineering. New York: Dover publications, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haldar A, Mahadevan S. Probability, Reliability, and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design. New York: Wiley & Sons, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Keitel H, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of bulk properties of amorphous polyethylene based on molecular dynamics simulations. Mechanics of Materials, 2014a, 68: 70–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhang Y, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. Stochastic predictions of interfacial characteristic of polymeric nanocomposites (PNCs). Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2014b, 59: 80–95

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vu-Bac N, Silani M, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Rabczuk T. A unified framework for stochastic predictions of mechanical properties of polymeric nanocomposites. Computational Materials Science, 2015, 96: 520–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rackwitz R. Reviewing probabilistic soils modeling. Computers and Geotechnics, 2000, 26(3–4): 199–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phoon K, Kulhawy F H. Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1999, 36(4): 612–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Duncan J M. Factors of safety and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000, 126(4): 307–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee I K, White W, Ingles O G. Geotechnical Engineering. Boston: Pitman, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kulhway F H. On the evaluation of static soil properties. In: Proceedings of a Specialty ASCE Conference on Stability and Performance of Slopes and Embankments-II, Volume 1. Berkley, California, 1992, 95–115

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peschl G M, Schweiger H F. Reliability analysis in geotechnics with finite elements–comparison of probabilistic, stochastic and fuzzy set methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Imprecise Probabilities and Their Applications (ISIPTA_03). Canada: Carleton Scientific, 2003, 437–451

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ben-Haim Y, Elishakoff I. Convex Models of Uncertainty in Applied Mechanics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1990

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Oberguggenberger M, Fellin W. From probability to fuzzy sets: the struggle for meaning in geotechnical risk assessment. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Probabilistics in Geotech-nics–Technical and Economical Risk Estimation, Essen: VGE, 2002, 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  18. Peschl G M. Reliability Analyses in Geotechnics with the Random Set Finite Element Method. Dissertation for PhD degree. Graz University of Technology, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dubois D, Prade H. Consonant approximation of belief functions. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1990, 4(5–6): 419–449

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Dubois D, Prade H. Random sets and fuzzy interval analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1991, 42(1): 87–101

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Walley P. Statistical Reasoning with Imprecise Probabilities. London: Chapman and Hall, 1991

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325–339

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Tonon F, Bernardini A, Mammino A. Determination of parameters range in rock engineering by means of Random Ret Theory. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2000, 70(3): 241–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dong W, Shah H C. Vertex method for computing functions of fuzzy variables. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1987, 24(1): 65–78

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Cornell C A. First-order uncertainty analysis of soils deformation and stability. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability (ICASP1), 1971, 129–144

    Google Scholar 

  27. Alonso E E, Krizek R J. Stochastic formulation of soil profiles. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Applications of Statistics and Probability (ICASP2). Aachen, Germany, 1975, 9–32

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lumb P. Spatial variability of soil properties. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on the Application of Statistics and Probability to Soil and Structural Engineering (ICASP). Aachen, Germany, 1975, 397–421

    Google Scholar 

  29. Vanmarcke E H. Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 1977, 103: 1227–1246

    Google Scholar 

  30. Vanmarcke E H. Random Fields–Analysis and Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT-Press, 1983

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Itasca. FLAC2D (Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua) version 7.0 user’s manual. Minneapolis, MN, USA: Itasca Consulting Group, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  32. Christian J T, Ladd C C, Baecher G B. Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 1994, 120 (12): 2180–2207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rieben E H. Geological observation on alluvial deposits in northern Iran. Geological Organization of Iran, Report 9, 1966 (in French)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Duncan J M, Byrne P M, Wong K S, Marby P. Strength, stress-strain and bulk modulus parameters for finite element analysis of stresses and movements in soil mass. Rep. No. UCB/GT/80-01, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seed R B, Duncan J M. SSCOMP: a finite element analysis program for evaluation of soil structure interaction and compaction effects. Report No. UCB/GT/84-02, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  36. Briaud J L, Lim Y. Tieback walls in sand: numerical simulations and design implications. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1999, 125(2): 101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lim Y, Briaud J L. Three dimensional nonlinear finite element analysis of tieback walls and of soil nailed walls under piled bridge abutment. Report to the Federal Highway Administration and the Texas Department of Transportation, Department of Civil Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dunlop P, Duncan J M. Development of failure around excavated slopes. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, 1970, 96: 471–493

    Google Scholar 

  39. Finno R J, Blackburn J T, Roboski J F. Three dimensional effects for supported excavations in clay. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(1): 30–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. U.S. EPA. TRIM FaTE Technical Support Document Volume I: Description of Module. EPA/43/D-99/002A, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vu-Bac N, Rafiee R, Zhuang X, Lahmer T, Rabczuk T. Uncertainty quantification for multiscale modeling of polymer nanocomposites with correlated parameters. Composites. Part B, Engineering, 2015, 68: 446–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vu-Bac N, Lahmer T, Zhuang X, Nguyen-Thoi T, Rabczuk T. A software framework for probabilistic sensitivity analysis for computationally expensive models. Advances in Engineering Software, 2016, 100: 19–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Baecher G B. Geotechnical Error Analysis. Special Summer Course 1.60s. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kulhawy F H, Birgisson B, Grigoriu M D. Reliability based foundation design for transmission line structures: transformation models for in situ tests. Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California: Report EL-5507(4), 1992

    Google Scholar 

  45. Li K S, White W. Reliability index of slopes. In: Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability in Soil and Structural Engineering, 1987, (2): 755–762

    Google Scholar 

  46. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Soil nail walls reference manual. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  47. US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Introduction to probability and reliability methods for use in geotechnical engineering. Engineering Technical Letter No. 1110–2-547, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  48. Long M. Database for retaining wall and ground movements due to deep excavations. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2001, 127(3): 203–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Babol Noshirvani University of Technology, Babol, Iran

    Arash Sekhavatian & Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti

Authors
  1. Arash Sekhavatian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Asskar Janalizadeh Choobbasti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sekhavatian, A., Choobbasti, A.J. Application of random set method in a deep excavation: based on a case study in Tehran cemented alluvium. Front. Struct. Civ. Eng. 13, 66–80 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0461-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-018-0461-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation