Skip to main content
Log in

Patient satisfaction analysis of robot-assisted minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a single-center retrospective study

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the satisfaction of patients undergoing robot-assisted retroperitoneal laparoscopy adrenalectomy under the ambulatory mode and conventional mode. Basic information and clinical data of patients who underwent robotic-assisted posterior laparoscopic adrenalectomy between June 2020 and June 2023 were queried from our case system. The Outpatient and Ambulatory Surgery Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Survey (OAS CAHPS®) was used to investigate patient satisfaction with preoperative preparation, discharge counseling, postoperative instructions, postoperative pain, and satisfaction with nursing work. The stats R package was used to select the appropriate statistic for the statistics based on the characteristics of the data. A total of 311 patients who underwent robot-assisted posterior laparoscopic adrenalectomy were enrolled in our case system. There were no statistical differences between the two groups in gender, age, body mass index, ASA classification, laterality, maximum tumor diameter, type of resection, hormonal activity, disease type, pathological classification, duration of surgery, estimated intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications and follow-up period that were compared between the two groups of patients. There were no significant differences in preoperative preparation score, discharge counseling score, postoperative guidance score and nursing care satisfaction score (P > 0.05). Postoperative hospitalization, peristalsis time, defecation time, time to first postoperative mobilization, duration of indwelling drain and hospitalization costs in patients in the ambulatory model group were significantly less than patients in the conventional model group (P < 0.001). Patients in the ambulatory model group had significantly higher postoperative pain relief scores than patients in the conventional model group. In conclusion, our data suggest that patient satisfaction is equal between the conventional and ambulatory mode of performing robotic-assisted adrenalectomy. Patient satisfaction was probably associated with shorter hospitalization days, adequate preoperative preparation and standardized, high-quality post-discharge information and guidance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Suhonen RA, Iivonen MK, Valimaki MA (2007) Day-case surgery patients’ health-related quality of life. Int J Nurs Pract 13(2):121–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uludag M, Aygun N, Isgor A (2020) Surgical Indications and Techniques for Adrenalectomy. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 54(1):8–22

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bancos I, Prete A (2021) Approach to the Patient with Adrenal Incidentaloma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106(11):3331–3353

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ren X, Shang JW, Ren RM et al (2020) Analysis of the influencing factors for postoperative chronic kidney insufficiency in patients with primary aldosteronism. Chin J Urol 41(10):731–735

    Google Scholar 

  5. Piazza L, Caragliano P, Scardilli M et al (1999) Laparoscopic robot-assisted right adrenalectomy and left ovariectomy (case reports). Chir Ital 51(6):465–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giron F, Rey CC, Rodriguez L et al (2022) Postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive adrenalectomy: do body mass index and tumor size matter? A single-center experience. BMC Surg 22(1):280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sada A, Mckenzie TJ (2023) Surgical approaches to the adrenal gland. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 30(3):161–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vatansever S, Nordenstrom E, Raffaelli M et al (2022) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy: Results from the EUROCRINE Surgical Registry. Surgery 171(5):1224–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gan L, Peng L, Li J et al (2022) Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic in adrenalectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 105:106853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moughnyeh M, Lindeman B, Porterfield JR et al (2020) Outpatient robot-assisted adrenalectomy: Is it safe? Am J Surg 220(2):296–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gartland RM, Fuentes E, Fazendin J et al (2021) Safety of outpatient adrenalectomy across 3 minimally invasive approaches at 2 academic medical centers. Surgery 169(1):145–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yao X, Luo XY, Xie YY et al (2021) Application effect of continuous nursing in patients with adrenal aldosterone tumor after day operation. Chin Nurs Res 35(21):3924–3927

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tanner D, Morgan H (2022) An Evaluation of Timing of Discharge Instruction and the Impact on Patient Satisfaction. J Perianesth Nurs 37(1):29–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shariq OA, Bews KA, Mckenna NP et al (2021) Is same-day discharge associated with increased 30-day postoperative complications and readmissions in patients undergoing laparoscopic adrenalectomy? Surgery 169(2):289–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ragavan N, Bafna S, Thangarasu M et al (2021) Day-case robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: Feasibility and safety. Turk J Urol 47(1):30–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Graves CE (2022) Clinical Judgment and Experience Remain Critical Factors in the Safety of Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: Commentary on "Outpatient Adrenalectomy: A Framework for Assessment and Institutional Protocol. Ann Surg 275(2):e543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Su D, Zhang Z, Xia F et al (2023) The safety, benefits and future development of overnight and outpatient thyroidectomy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 14:1110038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang K, Yao X, Liu P et al (2021) Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy in day surgery mode. J Clin Urol 36(10):802–805

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kang E, Gillespie BM, Tobiano G et al (2018) Discharge education delivered to general surgical patients in their management of recovery post discharge: A systematic mixed studies review. Int J Nurs Stud 87:1–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pigg RA, Fazendin JM, Porterfield JR et al (2022) Patient Satisfaction is Equivalent for Inpatient and Outpatient Minimally-Invasive Adrenalectomy. J Surg Res 269:207–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly MP, Calkins TE, Culvern C et al (2018) Inpatient Versus Outpatient Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Which Has Higher Patient Satisfaction? J Arthroplasty 33(11):3402–3406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Asamrew N, Endris AA, Tadesse M (2020) Level of Patient Satisfaction with Inpatient Services and Its Determinants: A Study of a Specialized Hospital in Ethiopia. J Environ Public Health 2020:2473469

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research is financially supported by project from Natural Science Research in Shanxi Province (202203021211072).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.Y. completed the conception and design of the study. X.Y.L completed the acquisition of clinical data. Y.H.T and K.W. completed the data analysis and interpretation. Y.H.T completed the drafting of manuscript and critical revision. J.W.S completed the approval of final version of manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shang Jiwen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Yao Xue, Luo Xiaoyan, Tai Yanghao, Wang Kang, and Shang Jiwen have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 26 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xue, Y., Xiaoyan, L., Yanghao, T. et al. Patient satisfaction analysis of robot-assisted minimally invasive adrenalectomy: a single-center retrospective study. J Robotic Surg 18, 39 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01755-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-023-01755-z

Keywords

Navigation