Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Practising transoral robotic surgery in a middle-income country: surgical outcomes and early challenges

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Robotic Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transoral robotic surgery is a minimally invasive surgical technique that recently debuted in Malaysia. However, there are concerns over its cost, practicality, and feasibility in local settings. Our study aims to evaluate the surgical outcomes of transoral robotic surgery and discuss its learning curves. The clinical records of all patients who underwent transoral robotic surgery in a university hospital were reviewed. 25 patients were identified with a mean age of 43.9 years. The commonest indication was obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) (76%), followed by base of tongue carcinoma (16%), recurrent tonsilitis and Wharton's duct cyst (4% each). For excision of tongue base in obstructive sleep apnoea without epiglottectomy, the mean operating time was 2.3(±0.9) hours with an average of 2.8(±0.4) days of hospital stay. The success rate for OSA surgery was seen in 78.9% of cases. The mean operating time for transoral excision of tongue base carcinoma was 4.3(±2.5) hours, whereas the mean hospital stay was 9(±3.6) days. All surgical margins were cleared with no recurrence except for one patient. The recurrent tumour was successfully excised via transoral robotic surgery, and he remained disease free after one year. The most frequent post-operative complaints were dysphagia, post-nasal drip, and hypogeusia. Transoral robotic surgery in Malaysia is in the commencement phase, where some pitfalls are expected. Opportunities should be given for more surgeons to acquire this technique so that minimally invasive surgery for head and neck diseases is readily available for patients in middle-income countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah J, Vyas A, Vyas D (2014) The history of robotics in surgical specialties. Am J Robot Surg 1:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1166/ajrs.2014.1006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Malley BW, Weinstein GS, Snyder W et al (2006) Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) for base of tongue neoplasms. Laryngoscope 116:1465–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000227184.90514.1a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Vicini C, Montevecchi F, Gobbi R et al (2017) Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: Principles and technique. World J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 3:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.05.003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Justin GA, Chang ET, Camacho M et al (2016) Transoral robotic surgery for obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 154:835–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816630962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li KK, Kushida C, Powell NB et al (2000) Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a comparison between Far-East Asian and white men. Laryngoscope 110:1689–1693. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200010000-00022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chia SH, Gross ND, Richmon JD (2013) Surgeon experience and complications with transoral robotic surgery (TORS). Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 149:885–892. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813503446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wong YF, Yusof MM, Wan Ishak WZ et al (2015) Treatment outcome for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in a developing country: University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia from 2003–2010. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2015.16.7.2903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abdullah K, Raja Lope Ahmad RA, Asha’ari ZA et al (2014) An outcome of surgically treated head and neck cancer in one of the tertiary referral centers in the East Coast of Malaysia: A 6-year retrospective analysis. Malays J Med Sci 21:28–36

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Paleri V, Fox H, Coward S et al (2018) Transoral robotic surgery for residual and recurrent oropharyngeal cancers: exploratory study of surgical innovation using the IDEAL framework for early-phase surgical studies. Head Neck. 40:512–525. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.25032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richmon JD, Quon H, Gourin CG (2014) The effect of transoral robotic surgery on short-term outcomes and cost of care after oropharyngeal cancer surgery. Laryngoscope 124:165–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.24358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Meccariello G, Cammaroto G, Montevecchi F et al (2017) Transoral robotic surgery for the management of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274:647–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-016-4113-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Park J, Lee J, Azham Hakim N et al (2014) Robotic thyroidectomy learning curve for beginning surgeons with little or no experience of endoscopic surgery. Head Neck 37:1705–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dombrée M, Crott R, Lawson G et al (2014) Cost comparison of open approach, transoral laser microsurgery and transoral robotic surgery for partial and total laryngectomies. Eur Archiv Oto-Rhino-Laryngol 271:2825–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-3056-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Almeida J, Moskowitz A, Miles B et al (2016) (2016) Transoral robotic surgery is cost-effective compared to (Chemo)radiotherapy for early t-classification oropharyngeal carcinoma: a cost-utility analysis. Head Neck. 38:589–600. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.23930

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Weinstein GS, O’Malley BW, Desai SC et al (2009) Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 17:126–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/moo.0b013e32832924f5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al (2001) Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature 413:379–80. https://doi.org/10.1038/35096636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Data collections were performed by Ahmad Kusyairi Khalid and research assistants. The data analysis and the first draft of the manuscript were written by Khairil Afif Mahmud. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmad Kusyairi Khalid.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethics approval

This is a retrospective study and approval was obtained from relevant authorities.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

No identifiable images of the participants were included in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmud, K.A., Ghazali, F.N.F., Zahari, M.N.I. et al. Practising transoral robotic surgery in a middle-income country: surgical outcomes and early challenges. J Robotic Surg 17, 613–618 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01456-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-022-01456-z

Keywords

Navigation