Abstract
Health care costs are an important consideration in the decision of hysterectomy routes and robotic surgery is often critiqued for its high cost. We sought to compare the cost of robotic-assisted hysterectomies performed after initial acquisition of the robotic surgical system to cases performed after 5 years of experience. The first 20 patients at a community teaching hospital who underwent robotic-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial cancer by a single gynecologic oncology surgeon were designated Group 1 and 20 patients undergoing robotic hysterectomies 5 years later for the same indication were designated Group 2. Direct hospital costs were divided into operative and non-operative costs. Mean operating room cost and cost of anesthesia per minute for Group 1 were adjusted to Group 2 mean costs. Supply costs were adjusted using the 2015 Consumer Price Index. Baseline characteristics of the groups were comparable. After 5 years of experience, there was a 15.5% [95% CI (−$2865, −$407), p = 0.01] reduction in mean total costs (Group 1 = $10,543, Group 2 = $8907) and a 14.3% [95% CI (−$2378, −$390), p ≤ 0.01] reduction in mean operative costs (Group 1 = $9688, Group 2 = $8304). Significant reductions in procedure time, operating room time, operating room cost, and cost of anesthesia were seen from Group 1 to Group 2. There were no differences in mean non-operative costs, estimated blood loss, cost of supplies or surgeon cost. Experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomies is associated with reduction in costs, which is primarily a result of reduced operative times. This is an important factor when considering costs related to robotic surgery.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yu HY, Friedlander DF, Patel S, Hu JC (2013) The current status of robotic oncologic surgery. CA Cancer J Clin 63:45–56
Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Tsui J et al (2013) Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 122:233–241
Desille-Gbaguidi H, Hebert T, Paternotte-Villemagne J, Gaborit C, Rush E, Body G (2013) Overall care cost comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for endometrial and cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 17:348–352
Woelk J, Borah BJ, Trabuco EC, Heien HC, Gebhart JB (2014) Cost differences among robotic, vaginal, and abdominal hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 123:255–262
Sarlos D, Kots L, Stevanovi CN, Schaer G (2010) Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcomes and cost analysis of a matched case–control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 150:92–96
Wright K, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI (2012) Costs and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS 16:519–524
Eltabbakh GH (2000) Effect of surgeon’s experience on the surgical outcome of laparoscopic surgery for women with endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 78:58–61
Holtz DO, Miroshnichenko G, Finnegan MO, Chernick M, Dunton CJ (2010) Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:500–503
The Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission [Internet]. Hospital rates, charge targets and compliance. http://www.hscrc.state.md.us/. (Cited 2015, Sept 15)
Bureau of Labor Statistics [Internet]. Consumer Price Index (CPI). http://www.bls.gov/cpi/. (Cited April 15, 2015)
Iavazzo C, Papadopoulou EK, Gkegkes ID (2014) Cost assessment of robotics in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 40:2125–2134
Zeybek B, Oge T, Kılıç CH, Borahay MA, Kılıç GS (2014) A financial analysis of operating room charges for robot-assisted gynaecologic surgery: efficiency strategies in the operating room for reducing costs. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 15:25–29
Lenihan JP, Kovanda C, Seshadri-Kreaden U (2008) What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 15(5):589–594
Seamon LG, Fowler JM, Richardson DL et al (2009) A detailed analysis of the learning curve: robotic hysterectomy and pelvic-aortic lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 114(2):162–167
Woelk JL, Casiano ER, Weaver AL, Gostout BS, Trabuco EC, Gebhart JB (2013) The learning curve of robotic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol 121(1):87–95
Acknowledgements
We have no further acknowledgements. No financial compensation was received for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This study received no funding.
Conflict of interest
Andrea M. Avondstondt, M.D. declares that she has no conflict of interest. Michelle Wallenstein, M.D. declares that she has no conflict of interest. Christopher R. D’Adamo, PhD. declares that he has no conflict of interest. Robert M. Ehsanipoor, M.D. declares that he has no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Avondstondt, A.M., Wallenstein, M., D’Adamo, C.R. et al. Change in cost after 5 years of experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer. J Robotic Surg 12, 93–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0700-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-017-0700-6