Abstract
Flue gas desulfurization (FGD) technologies are applied to minimize SO2 emission to the atmosphere and prevention of acid rains. Magnesium oxide (MgO) is one of the common sorbents to capture sulfur dioxide in FGD. Pore blockage and incomplete conversion are the main problems of sorbents such as CaO and MgO. In this study, acid-washed technique as a modification method was applied to enhance SO2 adsorption capacity of MgO. The tests were carried out in thermogravimeter (TG) and packed bed reactor to compare the performance of the acid-washed sorbents with the initial natural samples. The results showed that the acid-washed sorbents has more adsorption capacity than the natural samples. Finally, the single pellet conversion–time profiles and packed bed reactor breakthrough curves for both sorbents were predicted by random pore model (RPM) with fairly good agreements.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- a = CA/CAb :
-
Dimensionless gas concentration in the pellet
- b = CB/CB0 :
-
Dimensionless solid concentration
- C A :
-
Gas concentration in the pellet, kmol m–3
- C Ab :
-
Bulk gas concentration, kmol m–3
- C Ab0 :
-
Inlet bulk gas concentration to the bed, kmol m–3
- C B :
-
Solid reactant concentration, kmol m–3
- C B 0 :
-
Initial solid reactant concentration, kmol m–3
- D AK :
-
Knudsen diffusivity, m2 s–1
- D AM :
-
Molecular diffusivity of gas A in the pellet, m2 s–1
- D e :
-
Effective diffusivity of gas A in the pellet, m2 s–1
- D e0 :
-
Initial effective diffusivity of gas A in pores, m2 s–1
- D p :
-
Diffusivity of gas A in product layer, m2 s–1
- D L :
-
Axial dispersion coefficient in bed, m2 s−1
- k m :
-
External mass-transfer coefficient, m s–1
- k s :
-
Surface rate constant, m s–1
- L :
-
Packed bed length, m
- L 0 :
-
Pore length per unit volume, m–2
- M B :
-
Molecular weight of solid reactant, kg kmol–1
- M D :
-
Molecular weight of solid product, kg kmol–1
- n :
-
Reaction order
- r :
-
Pore radius, m
- r p :
-
Each point position in the spherical pellet, m
- \(\overline{r}\) :
-
Average pore radius of the pellet, m
- R :
-
Spherical pellet radius, m
- S 0 :
-
Reaction surface area per unit volume, m–1
- \({\text{Sh}} = \frac{{k_{{\text{m}}} L}}{{2D_{{{\text{AM}}}} }}\) :
-
Sherwood number for external mass transfer
- t :
-
Time, s
- T :
-
Temperature, K
- \(\upsilon_{0} (r)\) :
-
Pore volume distribution function, m2 kg–1
- V p :
-
Total pore volume, m3 kg−1
- \(w = C_{{\text{A}}} /C_{{{\text{Ab0}}}}\) :
-
Dimensionless gas concentration in the bed
- x :
-
Axial distance from beginning of bed, m
- \(X\) :
-
Solid local conversion in the bed at each time
- \(\overline{X}(\theta )\) :
-
Solid average conversion at each time
- \(y = r_{{\text{p}}} /R\) :
-
Dimensionless position in the spherical pellet
- Z :
-
Molar volume ratio of solid product to solid reactant
- \(\beta = 2k_{{\text{s}}} (1 - \varepsilon_{0} )/(\upsilon_{{\text{B}}} D_{{\text{p}}} S_{0} )\) :
-
Product layer resistance
- \(\varepsilon\) :
-
Pellet porosity
- \(\varepsilon_{0}\) :
-
Initial pellet porosity
- \(\delta = \frac{{D_{{\text{e}}} }}{{D_{{{\text{e0}}}} }}\) :
-
Variation ratio of the pore diffusion
- \(\beta = 2k_{{\text{s}}} (1 - \varepsilon_{0} )/(\nu_{{\text{B}}} D_{{\text{p}}} S_{0} )\) :
-
Product layer resistance
- \(\varepsilon\) :
-
Pellet porosity
- \(\varepsilon_{0}\) :
-
Initial pellet porosity
- \(\delta = \frac{{D_{e} }}{{D_{e0} }}\) :
-
Variation ratio of the pore diffusion
- \(\theta = k_{{\text{s}}} S_{0} C_{{{\text{Ab}}}}^{{}} t/[C_{{{\text{B0}}}} (1 - \varepsilon_{0} ] = t/\tau\) :
-
Dimensionless time
- \(\nu_{{\text{B}}}\) :
-
Stoichiometric coefficient of the solid reactant
- \(\nu_{{\text{D}}}\) :
-
Stoichiometric coefficient of the solid product
- \(\rho_{{\text{B}}}\) :
-
True density of the solid reactant, kg m–3
- \(\rho_{{\text{D}}}\) :
-
True density of the solid product, kg m–3
- \(\phi = (L/2)(k_{{\text{s}}} S_{0} C_{{{\text{Ab}}}}^{n - 1} /\upsilon_{{\text{B}}} D_{{{\text{e0}}}} )^{1/2}\) :
-
Thiele modulus for the pellet
- \(\psi\) :
-
Random pore model main parameter
- \(\zeta = x/R\) :
-
Dimensionless reactor length
References
Ale Ebrahim H (2010) Application of random-pore model to SO2 capture by lime. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:117–122. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie901077b
Afshar A, Ale Ebrahim H, Hatam M, Jamshidi E (2008) Finite element solution for gas–solid reactions: application to the moving boundary problems. Chem Eng J 144:110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.05.016
Afshar A, Ale Ebrahim H, Hatam M, Jamshidi E (2009) Finite element solution of the fluid-solid reaction equations with structural changes. Chem Eng J 148:533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2009.01.009
Bahrami R, Ale Ebrahim H, Halladj R (2014a) Application of random pore model for SO2 removal reaction by CuO. Process Saf Environ Protect 92:938–947. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2013.11.002
Bahrami R, Ale Ebrahim H, Halladj R, Ale Ebrahim MA (2014b) Applying the random pore model in a packed bed reactor for the regenerative SO2 removal reaction by CuO. Ind Eng Chem Res 53:16285–16292. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie502581n
Bahrami R, Ale Ebrahim H, Halladj R, Afshar A (2016) A comprehensive kinetic study of the SO2 removal reaction by pure CuO with the random pore model. Progress React Kinet Mech 41:385–397. https://doi.org/10.3184/146867816X14716171449503
Bhatia S, Perlmutter D (1981) A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: II. Diffusion and transport effects. AICHE J 27:247–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690270211
Chen C, Zhuang Y, Wang C (2009) Enhancement of direct sulfation of limestone by Na2CO3 addition. Fuel Process Technol 90:889–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2009.04.008
DelValleZermeno R, Montiano Redondo J, Formosa J (2014) Reutilization of low-grade magnesium oxides for flue gas desulfurization during calcination of natural magnesite: a closed-loop process. Chem Eng J 254:63–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.089
Department of the environment and heritage, Australian government (2008) In :National standards for criteria air pollutants in Australia
Gupta H, Fan LS (2002) Carbonation-calcination cycle using high reactivity calcium oxide for carbon dioxide separation from flue gas. Ind Eng Chem Res 41:4035–4042. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie010867l
Jae LS, Jun HK, Jung SY, Lee TJ, Ryu CK, Kim JC (2005) Regenerable MgO-based SOx removal sorbents promoted with cerium and iron oxide in RFCC. Ind Eng Chem Res 44:9973–9978. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie050607u
Kirk-Othmer (1991) Encyclopedia of chemical technology, 12. Wiley, New York
Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2007) Steam reactivation of spent CaO-based sorbent for multiple CO2 capture cycles. Environ Sci Technol 41:1420–1425. https://doi.org/10.1021/es0621344
Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2008) Sequential SO2/CO2 capture enhanced by steam reactivation of a CaO-based sorbent. Fuel 87:1564–1573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2007.08.022
Manovic V, Anthony EJ (2010) Lime-based sorbents for high-temperature CO2 capture: a review of sorbent modification methods. Int J Environ Res Public Health 7:3129–3140. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph7083129
Moshiri H, Ebrahim HA, Nasernejad B (2015a) Various methods to prepare high efficiency CaO sorbents for improved SO2 capture capacity. Int J Coal Prepar Utiliz 36:231–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392699.2015.1111877
Moshiri H, Ebrahim HA, Nasernejad B (2015b) Enhancing SO2 capture capacity by preparation of a nano-CaO sorbent with modified structural parameters. Micro Nano Lett 10:577–579. https://doi.org/10.1049/mnl.2015.0132
Nouri SMM, Ebrahim HA, Nasernejad B, Afsharebrahimi A (2016) Investigation of CO2 reaction with CaO and an acid washed lime in a packed-bed reactor. Chem Eng Commun 203:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2014.938805
Petheram L (2003) Acid rain. Bridgestone Books, Minnesota
Przepiorski J, Czyzewski A, Moszynski D, Grzmil B, Tryba B, Mozia S, Morawski AW (2012) Low temperature removal of SO2 traces from air by MgO-loaded porous carbons. Chem Eng J 191:147–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.02.087
Stanislaus A, Marafi A, Rana MS (2010) Recent advances in the science and technology of ultra low sulfur diesel (ULSD) production. Catal Today 153:1–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2010.05.011
Wondyfraw M (2014) Mechanisms and effects of acid rain on environment. J Earth Sci Clim Change 5:1–3. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000204
Wu S, Azhar UM, Su C, Nagamine S, Sasaoka E (2002) Effect of pore size distribution of lime on the reactivity for the removal of SO2 in the presence of high concentration CO2 at high temperature. Ind Eng Chem Res 254:5455–5458. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020362a
Yang J-H, Shih S-M (2010) Preparation of high surface area CaCO3 by bubbling CO2 in aqueous suspensions of Ca(OH)2: Effects of (NaPO3)6, Na5P3O10, and Na3PO4 additives. Powder Technol 197:230–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2009.09.020
Zhang Q, Tao Q, He H, Liu H, Komarneni S (2017) An efficient SO2 adsorbent from calcination of natural magnesite. Ceramics Int 43:12557–12562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.06.130
Zhou Y, Zhu X, Peng J, Liu Y, Zhang D, Zhang M (2009) The effect of hydrogen peroxide solution on SO2 removal in the semidry flue gas desulfurization process. J Hazard Mater 170:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.04.075
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ani, A.B., Ebrahim, H.A. Theoretical and experimental investigation on improvement of magnesium oxide sorbent by acetic acid washing for enhancing flue gas desulfurization performance. Chem. Pap. 74, 2471–2479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01093-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-020-01093-6