Skip to main content
Log in

Correlation Between Gastrojejunal Anastomosis Diameter, Distensibility Index, and Weight Regain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Gastrojejunal anastomosis (GJA) dilation is an independent predictor of weight regain (WR) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, the role of planimetric measurements in this context remains unknown.

Methods

This is a retrospective cohort study including adult RYGB patients who underwent a diagnostic endoscopy with Endoflip assessment of the GJA. We excluded patients in the early postoperative period and those with abnormal endoscopic findings (marginal ulcers and gastro-gastric fistulas).

Results

Thirty-four patients were initially included. Endoscopic GJA diameter had a moderate positive correlation with WR (r=+0.438, p=0.011). However, after excluding the 7 patients with GJA> 30 mm, there was no significant correlation. There was a moderate agreement between the EndoFLIP-GJA diameter at 60mL and endoscopic diameter (ICC=0.576, p=0.049). The distensibility index (DI) showed a consistent moderate negative correlation with WR. Considering the maximum DI at 40 ml, we found a cutoff of DI = 7 mm2/mmHg that split the sample in two significantly different populations in terms of WR (67.4% vs. 43.2%, p=0.04).

Conclusion

Visual estimation of the GJA diameter correlates with EndoFLIP at 60mL. In the subset of patients with GJA ≤ 30 mm, more distensible GJAs are associated with lower rates of WR. Larger studies are needed to confirm this correlation and to validate its utility for clinical management.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Algorithm 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lopes EC et al. Is Bariatric Surgery effective in reducing comorbidities and drug costs? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1741–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Surgery, A.S.f.M.a.B. Estimate of bariatric surgery numbers, 2011-2021. 2022; Available from: https://asmbs.org/resources/estimate-of-bariatric-surgery-numbers.

  3. King WC, Hinerman AS, Courcoulas A. Weight regain after bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review and comparison across studies using a large reference sample. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020;16(8):1133–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sjöström L et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Abu Dayyeh BK, Lautz DB, Thompson CC. Gastrojejunal stoma diameter predicts weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(3):228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson CC et al. Endoscopic suturing for transoral outlet reduction increases weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. Gastroenterology. 2013;145(1):129–137.e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brunaldi VO et al. Long-term follow-up after transoral outlet reduction following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: back to stage 0? Endosc Int Open. 2023;11(5):E538–e545.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Desprez C et al. The use of impedance planimetry (Endoscopic Functional Lumen Imaging Probe, EndoFLIP(®) ) in the gastrointestinal tract: a systematic review. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2020;32(9):e13980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Haq Z et al. The utility of EndoFLIP for measuring gastrojejunal anastomosis diameter and distensibility in patients experiencing weight regain post Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2021;31(7):3353–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim EY. Definition, mechanisms and predictors of weight loss failure after bariatric surgery. J Metab Bariatr Surg. 2022;11(2):39–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thomas DD et al. Weight recidivism after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: an 11-year experience in a multiethnic medical center. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019;27(2):217–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Majid SF et al. Current state of the definition and terminology related to weight recurrence after metabolic surgery: review by the POWER Task Force of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(7):957–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heneghan HM et al. Influence of pouch and stoma size on weight loss after gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2012;8(4):408–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shariq OA et al. Impact of early gastrojejunal stenosis on weight loss in patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023;33(2):202–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jirapinyo P et al. Dose response for argon plasma coagulation in the treatment of weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;91(5):1078–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Tuma F et al. The inaccuracy of the endoscopic anastomotic measurement techniques. Ann Laparosc Endosc Surg. 2019;4:73.

  17. Yadlapati R et al. Inter- and intra-rater agreement of interpretation of functional lumen imaging probe in healthy subjects. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023;35(3):e14505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Snape WJ et al. Evaluation of the pylorus with concurrent intraluminal pressure and EndoFLIP in patients with nausea and vomiting. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;28(5):758–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Malik Z, Sankineni A, Parkman H. Assessing pyloric sphincter pathophysiology using EndoFLIP in patients with gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27(4):524–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gourcerol G et al. Impaired fasting pyloric compliance in gastroparesis and the therapeutic response to pyloric dilatation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41(4):360–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brunaldi VO et al. Argon plasma coagulation alone versus argon plasma coagulation plus full-thickness endoscopic suturing to treat weight regain after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a prospective randomized trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2020;92(1):97–107.e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riccioppo D et al. Small-volume, fast-emptying gastric pouch leads to better long-term weight loss and food tolerance after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2018;28(3):693–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sjöström L. Review of the key results from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) trial - a prospective controlled intervention study of bariatric surgery. J Intern Med. 2013;273(3):219–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Donna Maria Abboud and Dr. Karim Al Annan for their contributions to the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

BKA was involved in study design, conceptualization, study conduct, patient recruitment, data collection, data interpretation, statistical analysis, writing of manuscript, creation of figures, and drafting and critical review of the manuscript. FA, AK, VOB , RM, and TM were involved in study conduct, data collection, writing the manuscript, literature search, data interpretation, and critical review of the manuscript. FA and AK were responsible for statistical analysis and development of figures. KG, TM, EV, ACS, and OM were involved in data interpretation and critical review of the manuscript. BKA, FA, VOB, and RM fully accessed and verified the underlying data. All authors verify that this study was done per protocol and vouch for data accuracy and completeness.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barham Abu Dayyeh.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This study has been approved by the appropriate institutional research ethics committee.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all participants in the study.

Conflict of Interest

ACS reports institutional research grants from Boston Scientific, Enterasense, Endogenex; consulting fees from Olympus; consulting fees and research grants from Endo-TAGSS, and Apollo Endosurgery; Participation in Data Safety Monitoring Board with GI Dynamics, and ERBE. BKA reports consultant roles with Endogenex, Endo-TAGSS, Metamodix, and BFKW; consultant and grant/research support from USGI, Apollo Endosurgery, Spatz Medical, Cairn Diagnostics, Aspire Bariatrics, Boston Scientific; Speaker roles with Olympus, Johnson and Johnson; and speaker and grant/research support from Medtronic, Endogastric solutions. The remaining authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Likewise literature, we found positive correlation between endoscopic GJA diameter and WR.

• Correlation between endoscopic GJA and WR lost significance for patients with GJA < 30 mm.

• Endoscopic GJA diameter correlates with EndoFLIP GJA diameter at 60 ml BV.

• Distensibility index of the GJA and WR were found to have a negative correlation.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Razzak, F.A., Kerbage, A., Brunaldi, V.O. et al. Correlation Between Gastrojejunal Anastomosis Diameter, Distensibility Index, and Weight Regain After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. OBES SURG 33, 4042–4048 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06918-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06918-3

Keywords

Navigation