Skip to main content
Log in

Young-IFSO Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery Training and Education Survey

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

This international Young-IFSO survey aims to address variations, trends, and obstacles in bariatric/metabolic surgery (BMS) training globally, since expectations and resources differ among young surgeons.

Methods

The Young-IFSO scientific team designed an online confidential questionnaire with 50 questions analyzing the individual BMS training. The survey link was sent to all IFSO/ASMBS members and was shared in social media. All Young-IFSO members (age up to 45 years) were invited to participate between 16 December 2022 and 4 February 2023.

Results

A total of 240 respondents from 61 countries took the survey. Most respondents (70.24%) described their current position as a consultant surgeon with an average of 5.43 years’ experience working in BMS, and 55% are working in a bariatric center of excellence. More than 50% of the respondents performed none or less than 10 BMS during residency. Preparation of the stomach and stapling during sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were the first steps performed, and SG was the first BMS completed as a first operating surgeon by most of the respondents (74%). In total, 201 (84.45%) surgeons reported to perform scientific work. Most respondents (90.13%) reported that surgical mentorship had improved their surgical skills.

Conclusion

This international experts’ survey underlines the lack of a standardized global surgical curriculum of BMS during residency. It shows that SG is the single most performed procedure by young surgeons. These data might underline the importance of advancing surgical education in BMS, and accredited fellowship programs should be offered globally to maintain and raise quality of BMS.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Survey data is available by contacting the corresponding and co-corresponding author.

Abbreviations

IFSO:

International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity

BMS:

Bariatric/metabolic surgery

ASMBS:

American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery

SG:

Sleeve gastrectomy

RYGB:

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

OAGB:

One anastomosis gastric bypass

SADI-S:

Single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass + sleeve gastrectomy

OR:

Operating room

LAGB:

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding

CUSUM:

Cumulative sum

References

  1. Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29:782–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3593-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Poole M, Fasola L, Zevin B. Management of complications after bariatric surgery: a survey of comfort and educational needs of general surgeons in Ontario. Canada Obes Surg. 2022;32:2407–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06095-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. van Ramshorst GH, Kaijser MA, Pierie JEN, et al. Resident training in bariatric surgery-a national survey in the Netherlands. Obes Surg. 2017;27:2974–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-017-2729-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonrath EM, Weiner S, Birk D, et al. Training in bariatric surgery: a national survey of German bariatric surgeons. Obes Surg. 2020;30:56–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-019-04137-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gonzalez R, Martinez JM, Lo Menzo E, et al. Consumer-based technology for distribution of surgical videos for objective evaluation. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2179–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-2018-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Varban OA, Thumma JR, Carlin AM, et al. Evaluating the impact of surgeon self-awareness by comparing self versus peer ratings of surgical skill and outcomes for bariatric surgery. Ann Surg. 2022;276:128–32. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004450.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cullinan DR, Schill MR, DeClue A, et al. Fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery: not only for senior residents. J Surg Educ. 2017;74:e51–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.017.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Zevin B, Aggarwal R, Grantcharov TP. Volume-outcome association in bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg. 2012;256:60–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182554c62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stenberg E, Dos Reis Falcao LF, O’Kane M, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in bariatric surgery: Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations: A 2021 Update. World J Surg. 2022;46:729–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-021-06394-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Gero D, Raptis DA, Vleeschouwers W, et al. Defining global benchmarks in bariatric surgery: a retrospective multicenter analysis of minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy. Ann Surg. 2019;270:859–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO Worldwide Survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3783–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3450-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang W, Abbott S, Borg CM, et al. Global variations in preoperative practices concerning patients seeking primary bariatric and metabolic surgery (PACT Study): A survey of 634 bariatric healthcare professionals. Int J Obes (Lond). 2022;46:1341–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-022-01119-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mahawar KK, Omar I, Singhal R, et al. The first modified Delphi consensus statement on sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:7027–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08216-w.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fritz T, Stachel N, Braun BJ. Evidence in surgical training - a review. Innov Surg Sci. 2019;4:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1515/iss-2018-0026.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sebastian-Tomas JC, Navarro-Martinez S, Peris-Tomas N, et al. Surgical resident training program to perform laparoscopic bariatric procedures: are safety and postoperative outcomes compromised? Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2021;99:200–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ciresp.2020.05.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leeman M, Vijgen G, Apers JA, et al. The influence of surgical experience on postoperative recovery in fast-track bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020;30:1653–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04399-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Giudicelli G, Diana M, Chevallay M, et al. Global benchmark values for laparoscopic Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass: a potential new indicator of the surgical learning curve. Obes Surg. 2021;31:746–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05030-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Musella M, Berardi G, Velotti N, et al. Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence. Updates Surg. 2023;75:169–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gil PJ, Ruiz-Manzanera JJ, Ruiz de Angulo D, et al. Learning curve for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a cumulative summation (CUSUM) Analysis. Obes Surg. 2022;32:2598–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06145-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ozbalci GS, Mutlu V, Tarim IA. Assessing the learning process of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with different approaches. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2021;31:1331–6. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2021.11.1331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fantola G, Agus M, Runfola M, et al. Analysis of the learning process for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: CUSUM-curve of 110 consecutive patients with 1-year follow-up. J Visc Surg. 2021;158:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.05.001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Edgerton C, Heshmati K, Herman A, et al. Fellowship training influences learning curves for laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2022;36:1601–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08372-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Doumouras AG, Saleh F, Anvari S, et al. Mastery in bariatric surgery: the long-term surgeon learning curve of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2018;267:489–94. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002180.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Singhal R, Dickerson L, Sakran N, et al. Safe surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Obes Rep. 2022;11:203–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-021-00458-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore MD, Abelson JS, O’Mahoney P, et al. Using GoPro to give video-assisted operative feedback for surgery residents: a feasibility and utility assessment. J Surg Educ. 2018;75:497–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.07.024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Mao RQ, Lan L, Kay J, et al. Immersive virtual reality for surgical training: a systematic review. J Surg Res. 2021;268:40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bakshi SK, Lin SR, Ting DSW, et al. The era of artificial intelligence and virtual reality: transforming surgical education in ophthalmology. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021;105:1325–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316845.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. van de Graaf FW, Lange MM, Spakman JI, et al. Comparison of systematic video documentation with narrative operative report in colorectal cancer surgery. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:381–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.5246.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Halim J, Jelley J, Zhang N, et al. The effect of verbal feedback, video feedback, and self-assessment on laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing skills in novices: a randomized trial. Surg Endosc. 2021;35:3787–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07871-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Feenstra TM, Tejedor P, Popa DE, Francis N, Schijven MP: Surgical education in the post-COVID era: an EAES Delphi-study. Surg Endosc 2022; 1–10 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09762-1

  31. Brown WA, Johari Halim Shah Y, Balalis G, et al. IFSO position statement on the role of esophago-gastro-duodenal endoscopy prior to and after bariatric and metabolic surgery procedures. Obes Surg. 2020;30:3135–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04720-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nedelcu M, Manos T, Noel P, Danan M, Zulian V, Vilallonga R, et al.: Is the surgical drainage mandatory for leak after sleeve gastrectomy? J Clin Med 2023;12 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12041376

  33. Abu Dayyeh BK, Bazerbachi F, Vargas EJ, et al. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty for treatment of class 1 and 2 obesity (MERIT): a prospective, multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2022;400:441–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01280-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Chief Operating Officer of IFSO Manuela Mazzarella and IFSO Membership manager Stefanie D´Arco for the help with creating the survey and this article

Young-IFSO Collaborative Group

Daniel Fonseca Rohrs

Haval Sabir

Silvana Leanza

Miljana Vladimirov

Muhammad Umar Younis

Ng Ka Kei Stephen

Michael Gale

Saif Mundher Ismael

Adelina E Coturel

Rocío González López

Costantino Voglino

Usman Mohammed Bello

Evert-Jan G. Boerma

Abdullah Almunifi

Ali Ediz Kivanc

Seymur Abdullayev

George Balalis

Seren A Yaseen

Gabriel Alejandro Molina

Jakob Eichelter

Magdalena Mairinger

Nicoletta Basile

Suleiman Aldibaybi

Piotr Kalinowski

Mostafa Refaie Elkeleny

Kotaro Wakamatsu

Tarig A Samarkandy

Marleen Romeijn

Aaron L Sabbota

Luis F Zorrilla-Nuñez

Morgan Pomeranz

Abdullah Al Jabri

Kathriena Greenwell

Loic Tchokouani

Derek Rogalsky

Gerardo Davila

Huzifa Haj Ibrahim

Sebastian Arana

Tina Thomas

Juan Ortega Puy

Gabriel Carrizo

Rodolfo Oviedo

Emmanouil Onoufrios Sgouromallis

Ala Wafa

Napolitano errichetta

Felipe Martin Bianco Rossi

Cem Emir Guldogan

Hosam Elghadban

Tiago Ferreira Paula

Masoud Rezvani

Omar Quiroz

Midhat Abu Sneineh

Nadia De Falco

Abdullahi Ibrahim

Paul Cromwell

Raghav Garg

El bouyousfi

Fatih can Karaca

Zhou Fuqing

Gustavo Adolfo Us De Paz

Elena Ruiz-Úcar

Ahmed Borhamy

Tamer Abdelbaki

Farooq Khan

Shiliang Dong

Arpád Panyko

Sjaak Pouwels

Alaaddin

Cihan Şahan

Ahmet Türkoğlu

Muhammed Rasid Aykota

Sercan Yuksel

Suleyman Caglar Ertekin

Mehmet Celal Kizilkaya

Jerry Dang

Muhammad Umar

Mohammed Abdullah Alawad

Odd Bjørn Kjeldaas Salte

Eleftherios Spartalis

Michael Spartalis

Saeed Safari

Oguzhan Fatih Ay

Francesca Abbatini

Zatir Soufiane

Arshad Ali

Shan Xiaodong

Gianluca Vanni

Marco Materazzo

Guccione Fabio

Shlomi Rayman

Anna Carolina Hoff

Dimitri J Pournaras

Farbod Emami Yeganeh

Hamed Atarodi

Giuseppe Marincola

Hany Takla

Amir H Davarpanah Jazi

Jose Gilberto Romero Lozano

Taryel Omarov

Yentl Lodewijks

Anne Freund

Ambar Banerjee

Christopher Dawoud

Giorgi Zurabashvili

Yingxu Li

Marko Kraljevic

Erick Rodrigo Conde Cadena

Mahir Gachabayov

Michael de Cillia

Abdulellah Niyaz

Antonio Vitiello

Abdulrahman Rudwan

Adrian Marius Nedelcu

Julian Süsstrunk

Ivan Kristo

Ioannis I. Lazaridis

José Antonio Soria

Julia Jedamzik

Samuel Wanjara

Zaher Toumi

Anna Carolina Batista Dantas

Guanhua Lu

Lukas Altmann

Mayte Wimber Arellano

Salvatore Tolone

Zhouqi Wei

Omar Ghazouani

Ricardo Lopez Osorio

Abd-Elfattah Kalmoush

Marco Pellicciaro

Andrei Sarmiento

Carlo Gazia

William Peña

Alfonso Bosco

Abdullah AlMunifi

Sirvjo Dhimolea

Piotr Major

Lorenza Beomonte Zobel

Maxim Madalina

Zhengrong Wen

Xavier de Sousa

Bruno sensi

Gancho Kostov

Fakuan Zhao

Huiqi Li

Tay Kon Voi

Usman Mohammed Bello

Mohammed Abd Al-fattah

Andrew G Robertson

Snoekx Rob

Elia Carolina Centeno Ríos

Kurt Devroe

José Fernando Escoto González

Gennaro Martines

Serhii Sorochan

Cosimo Saviello

Laurentiu Stefan Grecu

Ahmed Abdelsalam

Damiano Pennisi

Nawaf mahmood dagher

Mohammadtaghi Rezaei

André Costa Pinho

Carlo Nagliati

Ismail Calikoglu

Katrina Lolas Tornquist

Matteo Uccelli

Attaullah Mahar

Silvana Alexandra Valencia Valverde

Bassem Amr

Youssef Sleiman

Bakhtiyar Yelembayev

Jonathan Sivakumar

Dirceu Felipe Valentini Junior

Claudia Mulas

Khalid M. Alzahrani

Soroceanu Radu-Petru

Artur Silva

Michael Joseph Baluda

Barbara Jacobi

Maria Lapeña-Rodriguez

Antonio Buondonno

Maria Spagnuolo

Adisa Poljo

Federica Alicata

Claudio Arcudi

Mohammad Kermansaravi

Pier Paolo Cutolo

Natalie Vock

Paula Richwien

Rahmatullah Athar

Giovanni Fantola

Lorenzo Petagna

Sara Ingallinella

Bekkhan Khatsiev

Leandro Siragusa

Adam Abu-Abeid

Domenico Di Nardo

Kira Keller

Angelo Iossa

Panagiotis Lainas

Giovanni Merola

Vincenzo Schiavone

Koshish Nandan Pokharel

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

All authors performed substantial contributions to conception and design of the article and to acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data. All authors reviewed the manuscript for important intellectual content and approved the final version for publication. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel M. Felsenreich or Sonja Chiappetta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent does not apply.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• BMS education globally varies among different geographic locations.

• More than 50% of the respondents performed less than 10 bariatric surgeries during residency.

• Preparation of the stomach during SG is the most performed surgical step, and SG is the most performed BMS during residency.

• All types of gastric bypass are rarely performed during residency.

• More than half of the residents are trained in BMS centers of excellence.

• Laparoscopic training courses, cadaver courses, and wet lab training are the most preferred surgical training options.

Daniel M. Felsenreich, Wah Yang, Halit E. Taskin, Tamer Abdelbaki, Shahab Shahabi, Roxanna Zakeri, Toghrul Talishinskiy, Daniel Gero, Alexandr Neimark, and Sonja Chiappetta are members of the Young IFSO Collaborative Group.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Felsenreich, D.M., Yang, W., Taskin, H.E. et al. Young-IFSO Bariatric/Metabolic Surgery Training and Education Survey. OBES SURG 33, 2816–2830 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06751-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06751-8

Keywords

Navigation