Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the alterations in bone turnover markers between SG and RYGB. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases to find the studies. There was significant less increment in osteocalcin [WMD = − 5.98, 95% CI (− 9.30, − 2.47) P < 0.01] and parathyroid hormone (PTH) [WMD = − 9.59, 95% CI (− 15.02, − 4.16) P < 0.01] in the SG group compared to the RYGB group. No significant differences were seen in change of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), Ca, and 25(OH)-D between SG and RYGB groups. According to our meta-analysis, bone formation markers appear to have more increment following RYGB than SG. This observation is accompanied by a larger increase in PTH after RYGB patients compared to SG patients. PROSPERO: CRD42022308985.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Welbourn R, Hollyman M, Kinsman R, et al. Bariatric Surgery worldwide: baseline demographic description and one-year outcomes from the Fourth IFSO Global Registry Report 2018. Obes Surg. 2019;29(3):782–95.
O’Brien PE, Hindle A, Brennan L, et al. Long-term outcomes after bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of weight loss at 10 or more years for all bariatric procedures and a single-centre review of 20-year outcomes after adjustable gastric banding. Obes Surg. 2019;29(1):3–14.
Wiggins T, Guidozzi N, Welbourn R, et al. Association of bariatric surgery with all-cause mortality and incidence of obesity-related disease at a population level: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(7):e1003206.
Pereira Chaves, de Holanda N, de Lima Carlos I, et al. Fracture Risk after bariatric surgery: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Endocr Pract : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2022;28(1):58–69.
Jaruvongvanich V, Vantanasiri K, Upala S, et al. Changes in bone mineral density and bone metabolism after sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2019;15(8):1252–60.
Stein EM, Silverberg SJ. Bone loss after bariatric surgery: causes, consequences, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014;2(2):165–74.
Liu C, Wu D, Zhang JF, et al. Changes in bone metabolism in morbidly obese patients after bariatric surgery: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):91–7.
Martin TJ, Seeman E. Bone remodelling: its local regulation and the emergence of bone fragility. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;22(5):701–22.
Vasikaran S, Cooper C, Eastell R, et al. International Osteoporosis Foundation and International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine position on bone marker standards in osteoporosis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2011;49(8):1271–4.
Tian Z, Fan XT, Li SZ, et al. Changes in bone metabolism after sleeve gastrectomy versus gastric bypass: a meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2020;30(1):77–86.
Gu L, Lin K, Du N, et al. Differences in the effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gut hormones: systematic and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2021;17(2):444–55.
Saad RK, Ghezzawi M, Habli D, et al. Fracture risk following bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporo Int : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2022;33(3):511–26.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2021;372:n71.
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2017;358:j4008.
Paccou J, Thuillier D, Courtalin M, et al. A comparison of changes in bone turnover markers after gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, and their association with markers of interest. Surg Obes Relat Dis : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2022;18(3):373–83.
Hofsø D, Hillestad TOW, Halvorsen E, et al. Bone mineral density and turnover after sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass: a randomized controlled trial (Oseberg). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021;106(2):501–11.
Guerrero-Pérez F, Casajoana A, Gómez-Vaquero C, et al. Changes in bone mineral density in patients with type 2 diabetes after different bariatric surgery procedures and the role of gastrointestinal hormones. Obes Surg. 2020;30(1):180–8.
Crawford MR, Pham N, Khan L, et al. Increased bone turnover in type 2 diabetes patients randomized to bariatric surgery versus medical therapy at 5 years. Endocr Pract : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. 2018;24(3):256–64.
Ivaska KK, Huovinen V, Soinio M, et al. Changes in bone metabolism after bariatric surgery by gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy. Bone. 2017;95:47–54.
Bredella MA, Greenblatt LB, Eajazi A. Effects of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on bone mineral density and marrow adipose tissue. Bone. 2017;95:85–90.
Lancha A, Moncada R, Valentí V, et al. Comparative effects of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on plasma osteopontin concentrations in humans. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(8):2412–20.
Muschitz C, Kocijan R, Marterer C, et al. Sclerostin levels and changes in bone metabolism after bariatric surgery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(3):891–901.
Morgan EF, Gerstenfeld LC. Chapter 2 - The bone organ system: form and function. In: Dempster DW, Cauley JA, Bouxsein ML, Cosman F, editors. Marcus and Feldman's Osteoporosis (Fifth Edition): Academic Press 2021; 15–35.
Paccou J, Caiazzo R, Lespessailles E, et al. Bariatric surgery and osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2022;110(5):576–91.
Mele C, Caputo M, Ferrero A, et al. Bone response to weight loss following bariatric surgery. Front Endocrinol. 2022;13:921353.
Lee CG, Carr MC, Murdoch SJ, et al. Adipokines, inflammation, and visceral adiposity across the menopausal transition: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(4):1104–10.
Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(3):266–81.
Marzullo P, Minocci A, Tagliaferri MA, et al. Investigations of thyroid hormones and antibodies in obesity: leptin levels are associated with thyroid autoimmunity independent of bioanthropometric, hormonal, and weight-related determinants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95(8):3965–72.
Ishii S, Cauley JA, Crandall CJ, et al. Diabetes and femoral neck strength: findings from the Hip Strength Across the Menopausal Transition study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97(1):190–7.
Barzin M, Ebadinejad A, Vahidi F, et al. The mediating role of bariatric surgery in the metabolic relationship between parathyroid hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Osteoporos Int. 2022;33(12):2585–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-022-06533-5.
Greenblatt MB, Tsai JN, Wein MN. Bone turnover markers in the diagnosis and monitoring of metabolic bone disease. Clin Chem. 2017;63(2):464–74.
Hindi SM, Vittinghoff E, Schafer AL, et al. Commercial Laboratory Reproducibility of Serum CTX in Clinical Practice. JBMR plus. 2019;3(10):e10225.
Yu EW, Wewalka M, Ding SA, et al. Effects of gastric bypass and gastric banding on bone remodeling in obese patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(2):714–22.
Yu EW. Bone metabolism after bariatric surgery. J Bone Miner Res : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2014;29(7):1507–18.
Abegg K, Gehring N, Wagner CA, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery reduces bone mineral density and induces metabolic acidosis in rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2013;305(9):R999-r1009.
Khundmiri SJ, Murray RD, Lederer E. PTH and vitamin D. Compr Physiol. 2016;6(2):561–601.
Salman MA, Aradaib M, Salman A, et al. Effects of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg. 2022;46(4):865–75.
Khalid SI, Omotosho PA, Spagnoli A, et al. Association of bariatric surgery with risk of fracture in patients with severe obesity. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(6):e207419.
Gagnon C, Schafer AL. Bone health after bariatric surgery. JBMR plus. 2018;2(3):121–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Consent to Participate
Informed consent does not apply.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key Points
• According to the evidence, bone formation markers appear to have more increment following RYGB than SG.
• No significant differences were seen in change of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX), N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen (PINP), Ca and 25(OH)-D between SG and RYGB groups.
• Patients who undergo metabolic surgery are at risk for accelerated bone loss and may develop bone fragility if not effectively controlled.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ebadinejad, A., Ahmadi, A.R., Ghazy, F. et al. Changes in Bone Turnover Markers after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. OBES SURG 33, 1259–1269 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06503-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-023-06503-8