Skip to main content
Log in

Combined Re-sleeve and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass as a Second Stage After Sleeve Gastrectomy (Video Report)

  • Multimedia Article
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In comparison with purely restrictive procedures, combined restrictive and malabsorptive procedures seem to produce better weight loss and comorbidity control in patients with morbid obesity. Two-stage bariatric surgery is popular and is a safe and efficient strategy for patients with super obesity (BMI > 50 kg/m2) and super-super obesity (BMI > 60 kg/m2).

Methods

The patient in this video was a 36-year-old man with an initial BMI of 53.2 kg/m2. Two-stage bariatric surgery was planned. The patient underwent the first stage, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, in 2018. Eighteen months after surgery, his lowest BMI was 38.8 kg/m2, and his excess weight loss was 50.9%. In 2021, he regained weight and reached a BMI of 42.4 kg/m2. Then, a second-stage bariatric surgery was performed.

Results

As shown in the video, combined re-sleeve and single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass constituted the second stage of bariatric surgery. During the operation, adhesiolysis was first performed, and the stomach was mobilized through a lateral-to-medial approach. Gastric transection was performed with a 36-Fr bougie. Then, the ileocecal junction was identified, and a location 250 cm from the cecum was selected as the anastomosis site. Gastro-ileal anastomosis (3 cm in diameter) was established with a stapler, and the two-layer suture method was used to close the defect. The postoperative period was uneventful, and the patient was discharged 5 days after surgery.

Conclusions

Combined re-sleeve and SASI bypass has a few surgical morbidities and is promising as an alternative to second-stage duodenal switch in patients with super obesity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schauer PR, Bhatt DL, Kirwan JP, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy for diabetes - 5-year outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):641–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8(3):267–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. IFSO worldwide survey 2016: primary, endoluminal, and revisional procedures. Obes Surg. 2018;28(12):3783–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lauti M, Kularatna M, Hill AG, et al. Weight regain following sleeve gastrectomy-a systematic review. Obes Surg. 2016;26(6):1326–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexandrou A, Felekouras E, Giannopoulos A, et al. What is the actual fate of super-morbid-obese patients who undergo laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy as the first step of a two-stage weight-reduction operative strategy? Obes Surg. 2012;22(10):1623–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Andalib A, Alamri H, Almuhanna Y, et al. Short-term outcomes of revisional surgery after sleeve gastrectomy: a comparative analysis of re-sleeve, Roux en-Y gastric bypass, duodenal switch (Roux en-Y and single-anastomosis). Surg Endosc. 2020.

  7. AlSabah S, Alsharqawi N, Almulla A, et al. Approach to poor weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: re-sleeve vs. gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2016;26(10):2302–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rayman S, Assaf D, Azran C, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy failure-revision to laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass or Roux-n-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter study. Obes Surg. 2021.

  9. Lee Y, Ellenbogen Y, Doumouras AG, et al. Single- or double-anastomosis duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass as a revisional procedure for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis : Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2019;15(4):556–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shimon O, Keidar A, Orgad R, et al. Long-term effectiveness of laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy to a biliopancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch or a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass due to weight loss failure. Obes Surg. 2018;28(6):1724–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anderson B, Gill RS, de Gara CJ, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion: the effectiveness of duodenal switch and its limitations. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:974762.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio M, Conde M, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass as a second step after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obes Relat Dis : Off J Am Soc Bariatric Surg. 2015;11(2):351–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hassan I. A337 single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass: an option for weight regain after sleeve gastrectomy. Surg Obesity Relat Dis. 2019;15(10):S138–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.08.281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahdy T, Al Wahedi A, Schou C. Efficacy of single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass for type-2 diabetic morbid obese patients: gastric bipartition, a novel metabolic surgery procedure: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2016;34:28–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kuo-Feng Hsu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

• Single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a novel bariatric procedure, containing restrictive and malabsorptive effects.

• Two-stage bariatric surgery has fewer surgical risks and is preferred in patients with BMI > 50 kg/m2.

• We present a practical approach of combined re-sleeve and SASI bypass as a 2nd-stage post laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (MP4 82451 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hsu, FC., Pan, HM., Wang, RT. et al. Combined Re-sleeve and Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass as a Second Stage After Sleeve Gastrectomy (Video Report). OBES SURG 31, 5514–5516 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05737-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05737-8

Keywords

Navigation