Skip to main content
Log in

Differential Behavior of 25(OH)D and f25(OH)D3 in Patients with Morbid Obesity After Bariatric Surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Total 25-OH-vitamin D (25(OH)D) levels are decreased in patients with obesity, but few data exist regarding free-vitamin D3 (f25(OH)D3) concentrations. We aimed to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on 25(OH)D and f25(OH)D3 in a cohort of patients with morbid obesity.

Methods

Twenty-four patients submitted to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) (mean age 48 years, body mass index (BMI) 48.16±10.73k/m2) were evaluated before and 1 year after surgery. Anthropometric data, parathormone (PTH), calcium, alkaline phosphatase, 25(OH)D, and f25(OH)D3 were recorded.

Results

25(OH)D and f25(OH)D3 correlated well before and after SG. Baseline determinations did not correlate with BMI, but they inversely correlated with BMI 1 year after surgery (rs=−0.46, p=0.02 and rs=−0.60, p=0.002, respectively). Post-surgery % total body weight loss (%TBWL) was 27.4±13.8 %; f25(OH)D3 concentrations increased significantly (5.28±2.29 pg/mL vs 6.64±2.25 pg/mL; p=0.03), whereas 25(OH)D did not change. Patients who achieved a BMI <35 kg/m2 1 year after surgery had significantly higher concentrations of f25(OH)D3 (7.9±1 pg/mL vs 4.8±1.1, p<0.001) and 25(OH)D (30.9±9.4 ng/mL vs 22.3±13.4; p=0.03) compared to those who remained with BMI >35 kg/m2.

Conclusion

There is a significant inverse relationship between BMI and both f25(OH)D3 and 25(OH)D 1 year after surgery. Only f25(OH)D3 concentrations increased 1 year after surgery, which could be explained by a greater f25(OH)D3 sequestration before SG in the adipose tissue, potentially due to the more liposoluble nature of f25(OH)D3 than the protein-bound form 25(OH)D.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pereira-Santos M, Costa PR, Assis AM, et al. Obesity and vitamin D deficiency: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16(4):341–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Basterra-Gortari FJ, Bes-Rastrollo M, Ruiz-Canela M, et al. Prevalence of obesity and diabetes in Spanish adults 1987-2012. Med Clin (Barc). 2017;148:250–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aranceta-Bartrina J, Gianzo-Citores M, Pérez-Rodrigo C. Prevalence of overweight, obesity and abdominal obesity in the Spanish population aged 3 to 24 years. The ENPE study. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2020;73(4):290–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pellitero S, Martínez E, Puig R, et al. Evaluation of vitamin and trace element requirements after sleeve gastrectomy at long term. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1674–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Damms-Machado A, Friedrich A, Kramer K, et al. Pre- and postoperative nutritional deficiencies in obese patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2012;22(6):881–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. McKinney K, Breitkopf CR, Berenson AB. Association of race, body fat and season with vitamin D status among young women: a crosssectional study. Clin Endocrinol. 2008;69:535–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lagunova Z, Porojnicu AC, Lindberg F, et al. The dependency of vitamin D status on body mass index, gender, age and season. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3713–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Samuel L, Borrell LN. The effect of body mass index on optimal vitamin D status in U.S. adults: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2006. Ann Epidemiol. 2013;23:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Walsh JS, Evans AL, Bowles S, et al. Free 25-hydroxyvitamin D is low in obesity, but there are no adverse associations with bone health. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016;103:1465–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shea MK, Houston DK, Tooze JA, et al. Correlates and prevalence of insufficient 25-hydroxyvitamin D status in black and white older adults: the health, aging and body composition study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59:1165–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Martinaityte I, Kamycheva E, Didriksen A, et al. Vitamin D stored in fat tissue during a 5-year intervention affects serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels the following year. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(10):3731–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(7):1911–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Salazar DA, Ferreira MJS, Neves JS, et al. Variable thresholds of vitamin D plasma levels to suppress PTH: the effect of weight and bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2020;30(4):1551–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shapses SA, Lee EJ, Sukumar D, et al. The effect of obesity on the relationship between serum parathyroid hormone and 25- hydroxivitamin D in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):E886–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bikle D. Nonclassic actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(1):26–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicolas H, Lindhout E, Swinkels L. A direct assay for measuring free 25-hydroxyvitamin D. J AOAC Int. 2017;100(5):1318–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jassil NK, Sharma A, Bikle D, et al. Vitamin D binding protein and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels: emerging clinical applications. Endocr Pract. 2017;23(5):605–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lopez-Molina M, Santillan C, Murillo M, et al. Measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D in healthy children and relationship to total 25-hydroxyvitamin D, calculated free 25-hydroxyvitamin D and vitamin D binding protein. Clin Biochem. 2018;61:23–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsuprykov O, Chen X, Hocher CF, et al. Lianghong Yin, Hocher B.Why should we measure free 25(OH) vitamin D? J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;180:87–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Holmlund-Suila E, Pekkinen M, Ivaska KK, et al. Obese young adults exhibit lower total and lower free serum 25-hydroxycholecalciferol in a randomized vitamin D intervention. Clin Endocrinol. 2016;85(3):378–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Karlsson T, Osmancevic A, Jansson N, et al. Increased vitamin D-binding protein and decreased free 25(OH)D in obese women of reproductive age. Eur J Nutr. 2013;53(1):259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pelczyńska M, Grzelak T, Sperling M, et al. Impact of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, free and bioavailable fractions of vitamin D, and vitamin D binding protein levels on metabolic syndrome components. Arch Med Sci. 2017;13(4):745–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rubio MA, Monereo S, Lecube A, et al. Joint position statement of the SEEN-SECO-SEEDO-SED societies on metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Endocrinol Nutr. 2013;60(10):547–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Oleröd G, Hultén LM, Hammarsten O, et al. The variation in free 25-hydroxy vitamin D and vitamin D-binding protein with season and vitamin D status. Endocr Connect. 2017;6(2):111–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, et al. Clinton, et al.The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(1):53–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Dix CF, Bauer JD, Wright ORL. A systematic review: vitamin D status and sleeve gastrectomy. Obes Surg. 2017;27:215–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mihmanli M, Isil RG, Isil CT, et al. Effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on parathyroid hormone, vitamin D, calcium, phosphorus, and albumin levels. Obes Surg. 2017;27(12):3149–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient—2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The Obesity Society, and American Society for Metabolic & Bariatric Surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;(9):159–91.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to particularly acknowledge the patients and the IGTP-HUGTIP Biobank integrated in the Spanish National Biobanks Network of Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PT13/0010/0009) and Tumour Bank Network of Catalonia for its collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Montserrat Marques-Pamies or Manel Puig-Domingo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards (Ref: PI-17-070; approved on April 28th, 2017).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study prior to the analysis of clinical data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Limitations

This study has some limitations due to its retrospective design. It includes a relatively small number of cases, and we have no information about the percentage of body fat or data of bone densitometry changes that could be related to vitamin D determinations.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Key Points

1. Serum 25(OH)D and F25(OH)D3 concentrations significantly correlated before and after bariatric surgery.

2. 25(OH)D and F25(OH)D3 showed an inverse correlation with BMI one year after bariatric surgery, but not before surgery.

3. Only F25(OH)D3 increased 1 year after bariatric surgery, which could be explained by a greater f25(OH)D3 sequestration before SG in the adipose tissue, potentially due to the more liposoluble nature of f25(OH)D3 than the protein-bound form 25(OH)D.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marques-Pamies, M., López-Molina, M., Pellitero, S. et al. Differential Behavior of 25(OH)D and f25(OH)D3 in Patients with Morbid Obesity After Bariatric Surgery. OBES SURG 31, 3990–3995 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05442-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05442-6

Keywords

Navigation