Skip to main content
Log in

High Asymptomatic Cases of Babesiosis in Dogs and Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Conventional PCR vs Blood Smears

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Parasitologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Babesiosis is one of the most important globally extended and quickly spreading tick-borne infections of dogs. Diagnosis of babesiosis in Sri Lanka is based on clinical signs followed by thin blood smears which could be error-prone due to undetected early infections, absence of clinical signs or low parasitemia. The present study investigated the prevalence of babesiosis in dogs presented to the Veterinary Teaching Hospital (VTH) at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, for treatments, vaccinations, and regular check-ups, and compared the diagnosis methods of microscopy and molecular analysis.

Methods

Blood samples from dogs were collected from January to June 2019. First, Giemsa stained blood smears were prepared, and then the blood samples were subjected to PCR using genus-specific primers to amplify a 411–450 bp region in the 18S rRNA gene. Twenty samples from PCR amplified products were sequenced for species identification and phylogenetic analysis. Clinical signs of the dogs were noted down, and ticks were also collected from dogs if any.

Results

Results show a very high prevalence of canine babesiosis (78.6%) among the dogs brought to the VTH. The parasite was identified microscopically and genetically as Babesia gibsoni. A large percentage (66.7%) of infections was asymptomatic. Out of 42 blood samples, 19 (45.2%) were microscopically positive for babesiosis while 33 (78.6%) were PCR positive, showing a significant difference in the two methods of diagnosis (chi-square test, χ2 = 9.462, p = 0.002). Three tick species: Rhipicephalus haemaphysaloides, Haemaphysalis bispinosa, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus were found attached to the dogs.

Conclusion

This study shows a very high prevalence of canine babesiosis among dogs in the Kandy area. Most of these infections might go undetected if only microscopy was used to diagnose. An improved, rapid diagnostic method such as the novel, PCR-based point-of-care diagnostic method that detects very low parasitemia within 30 min is needed. Moreover, as most infected dogs did not show clinical signs, they may act as reservoirs of infection. The ability of asymptomatic dogs to spread babesiosis should be investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Informed.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Kjemtrup AM, Kocan AA, Whitworth L, Meinkoth J, Birkenheuer AJ, Cummings J, Boudreaux MK, Stockham SL, Irizarry-Rovira A, Conrad PA (2000) There are at least three genetically distinct small piroplasms from dogs. Int J Parasitol 30:1501–1505. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00120-X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bilić P, Kuleš J, Barić Rafaj R, Mrljak V (2018) Canine babesiosis: where do we stand? Acta Vet Brno 68:127–160. https://doi.org/10.2478/acve-2018-0011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Matijatko V, Torti M, Schetters TP (2012) Canine babesiosis in Europe: how many diseases? Trends Parasitol 28:99–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2011.11.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karbowiak G, Biernat B, Stańczak J, Werszko J, Szewczyk T, Sytykiewicz H (2018) The role of particular ticks developmental stages in the circulation of tick-borne pathogens in Central Europe. 6. Babesia Ann Parasitol 64:265–284. https://doi.org/10.17420/ap6404.162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kelly P, Koster L, Lobetti R (2015) Canine babesiosis: a perspective on clinical complications, biomarkers, and treatment. Vet Med Res Rep. https://doi.org/10.2147/vmrr.s60431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Vannier E, Krause PJ (2009) Update on babesiosis. Interdiscip Perspect Infect Dis 2009:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2009/984568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Solano-Gallego L, Baneth G (2011) Babesiosis in dogs and cats-expanding parasitological and clinical spectra. Vet Parasitol 181:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.04.023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Solano-Gallego L, Sainz Á, Roura X, Estrada-Peña A, Miró G (2016) A review of canine babesiosis: the European perspective. Parasit Vectors 9:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1596-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Irwin PJ (2010) Canine babesiosis. Vet Clin North Am—Small Anim Pract 40:1141–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2010.08.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mahalingaiah MKC, Asoor M, Thimmaiah RP, Narayanaswamy HD, Mukartal SY, Elattuvalappil AM, Chikkahonnaiah N, Gupta S, Singh S (2017) Prevalence of canine babesiosis in different breeds of dogs in and around Bengaluru. Adv Anim Vet Sci 5:140–144. https://doi.org/10.14737/journal.aavs/2017/5.3.140.144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Böse R, Jorgensen WK, Dalgliesh RJ, Friedhoff KT, de Vos AJ (1995) Current state and future trends in the diagnosis of babesiosis. Vet Parasitol 57:61–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4017(94)03111-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Homer MJ, Aguilar-delfin I, Telford SR, Krause PJ, Persing DH (2000) Babesiosis. Clin Microb Rev 13:451–469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Aktaş M, Altay K, Dumanli N (2005) Development of a polymerase chain reaction method for diagnosis of Babesia ovis infection in sheep and goats. Vet Parasitol 133:277–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2005.05.057

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu HH, Cushinotto L, Giger O, Daum G, McBride P, Negron EA, Vandegrift K, Kapelusznik L (2019) Increasing babesiosis in Southeastern Pennsylvania, 2008–2017. Open Forum Infect Dis 6:2008–2010. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofz066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartelt K, Rieker T, Oehme RM, Brockmann SO, Müller W, Dorn N (2007) First evidence of Babesia gibsoni (Asian genotype) in dogs in Western Europe. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis 7:163–166. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2006.0580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weilgama DJ, Jorgensen WK, Dalgliesh RJ, Navaratne M, Weerasinghe C (1989) Comparison between Sri Lankan and Australian strains of Babesia bovis in the vaccination of imported cattle in Sri Lanka. Trop Anim Health Prod 21:141–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02236195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Neelawala D, Dissanayake DRA, Prasada DVP, Silva ID (2021) Analysis of risk factors associated with recurrence of canine babesiosis caused by Babesia gibsoni. Comp Immunol Microb Infect Dis 74:101572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seneviratna P (1953) Piroplasmosis of dogs in Ceylon. Ceylon Veterinary J 1:95–98

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seneviratna P (1965) Studies of Babesia gibsoni infections of dogs in Ceylon. Ceylon Vet J 13:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seneviratna P (1965) Studies of Babesia gibsoni (patton, 1910) infections in the Dog. Br Vet J 121:263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1935(17)41153-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Seneviratna P, Jayawwickrama SD (1961) Treatment of Babesia gibsoni infections in dogs with spirotrypan hoeschst. Indian Vet J 38:465–474

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jayathilake PS, Rajakaruna RS, Fernando ADS, Wijerathna HSU, Ginarathne KMH, Naullage NGRK, Silva SNS, Thananjayan K, Amarasiri LKHRT, Jayasundara NPK, Mallawa MCK, Dangolla A (2020) Canine vector-borne diseases of working military dogs of Sri Lanka air force, free-roaming and owned dogs. 10th Research Congress of the Postgraduate Institute of Science, RESCON. University of Peradeniya, p 140

  23. Weerathunga D, Iddawela D (2019) Prevalence of canine tick-borne haemoparasites in three divisional secretariat divisions (Rambewa, Tirappane, and Galenbidunuwewa) in the Anuradhapura district, Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka J Infect Dis 9:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Aragão H, Fonseca D (1961) Ixodological notesVII list and key to the representatives of the Brazilian ixodological fauna [In Portuguese]. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 59:115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Labruna MB, Pereira MC (2001) Carrapato em cães no Brasil [In Portuguese]. Clínica Veterinária 30:24–32

    Google Scholar 

  26. Dantas-Torres F, Figueredo LA, Faustino MDG (2004) Ectoparasitos de cães provenientes de alguns municípios da região metropolitana do Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil [In Portuguese]. Rev Bras Parasitol Vet 13:151–154

    Google Scholar 

  27. Walker AR, Bouattour A, Camicas JL, Estrada- Peña A, Horak IG, Latif AA (2007) Ticks of domestic animals in Africa : a guide to identification of species. Bioscience Reports, Edinburgh Scotland, UK, pp 153–161

  28. Casati S, Sager H, Gern L, Piffaretti JC (2006) Presence of potentially pathogenic Babesia sp. for human in Ixodes ricinus in Switzerland. Ann Agric Env Med 13:65–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jain KJ, Lakshmanan B, Syamala K, Praveena JE, Aravindakshan T (2017) High prevalence of small Babesia species in canines of Kerala, South India. Vet World 10:1319–1323. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2017.1319-1323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Bhattacharjee K, Sarmah PC (2013) Prevalence of haemoparasites in pet, working and stray dogs of Assam and North-East India: a hospital based study. Vet World 6:874–878. https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2013.874-878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Razi Jalali MH, Mosallanejad B, Avizeh R, Alborzil AR et al (2013) Babesia infection in urban and rural dogs in Ahvaz district, Southwest of Iran. Archiv Razi Inst 68:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  33. Dantas-Torres F, Otranto D (2014) Dogs, cats, parasites, and humans in Brazil: opening the black box. Parasit Vectors 7:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Harrus S, Waner T, Bark H, Jongejan F, Cornelissen AWCA (1999) Recent advances in determining the pathogenesis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis. J Clin Microb 37:2745–2749. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.9.2745-2749.1999

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Zahler M, Rinder H, Schein E, Gothe R (2000) Detection of a new pathogenic Babesia microti-like species in dogs. Vet Parasitol 89:241–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(00)00202-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Macintire DK, Boudreaux MK, West GD, Bourne C, Wright JC, Conrad PA (2002) Babesia gibsoni infection among dogs in the South Eastern United States. J Am Vet Med Assoc 220:325–329. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2002.220.325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Silva I (2017) Complex clinical presentations of tick-borne diseases in dogs in Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Vet J 63:1. https://doi.org/10.4038/slvj.v63i2.9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bell AS, Ranford-Cartwright LC (2002) Real-time quantitative PCR in parasitology. Trends Parasitol 18:337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1471-4922(02)02331-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sasaki M, Omobowale O, Tozuka M, Ohta K, Matsuu A, Nottidge HO, Hirata H, Ikadai H, Oyamada T (2007) Molecular survey of Babesia canis in dogs in Nigeria. J Vet Med Sci 69:1191–1193. https://doi.org/10.1292/jvms.69.1191

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to acknowledge the academic and non-academic staff at the VTH, at the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [grant number. RG/2019/BT/01] and the National Research Council [Grant no. 20-083], Sri Lanka.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RASR: Sample collection and analysis, data analysis and writing of the manuscript. AD: sample collection, editing the manuscript; SDDSS: supervision of lab work and editing the manuscript; RSR: study conception and design, supervision, editing the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. S. Rajakaruna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interests.

Ethical approval

The study protocols received ethical approval from the Ethical Review Committee of the Postgraduate Institute of Science (PGIS), University of Peradeniya, Sri Lanka.

Consent to participate

Verbal informed consent was obtained from the dog owners.

Consent for publication

Verbal informed consent was obtained from the dog owners.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 167 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ranatunga, R.A.S., Dangolla, A., Sooriyapathirana, S.D.S.S. et al. High Asymptomatic Cases of Babesiosis in Dogs and Comparison of Diagnostic Performance of Conventional PCR vs Blood Smears. Acta Parasit. 67, 1217–1223 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-022-00549-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-022-00549-x

Keywords

Navigation