Abstract
Previous studies have investigated the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying insight problem solving (INPS). However, it is still unclear which mechanisms are common to both INPS and ordinary problem solving (ORPS), and which are distinctly involved in only one of these processes. In this study, we selected two types of Chinese character chunk decompositions, ordinary Chinese character chunk decomposition (OCD) and creative Chinese character chunk decomposition (CCD), as representatives of ORPS and INPS, respectively. By using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to record brain activations when subjects executed OCD or CCD operations, we found that both ORPS and INPS resulted in significant activations in the widespread frontoparietal cognitive control network, including the middle frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobe. Furthermore, compared with ORPS, INPS led to greater activations in higher-level brain regions related to symbolic processing in the default mode network, including the anterior cingulate cortex, superior temporal gyrus, angular gyrus, and precuneus. Conversely, ORPS induced greater activations than INPS in more posterior brain regions related to visuospatial attention and visual perception, such as the inferior temporal gyrus, hippocampus, and middle occipital gyrus/superior parietal gyrus/fusiform gyrus. In addition, an ROI analysis corroborated the neural commonalities and differences between ORPS and INPS. These findings provide new evidence that ORPS and INPS rely on common as well as distinct cognitive processes and cortical mechanisms.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ORPS:
-
Ordinary problem solving
- INPS:
-
Insight problem solving
- OCD:
-
Ordinary Chinese character chunk decomposition
- CCD:
-
Creative Chinese character chunk decomposition
- OCDL:
-
Ordinary chunk decomposition-low difficult level
- OCDH:
-
Ordinary chunk decomposition-high difficult level
- CCDL:
-
Creative chunk decomposition-low creative level
- CCDH:
-
Creative chunk decomposition-high creative level
- MFG:
-
Middle frontal gyrus
- IFG:
-
Inferior frontal gyrus
- SMG:
-
Supramarginal gyrus
- MPFC:
-
Medial prefrontal cortex
- IPL:
-
Inferior parietal lobe
- PCUN:
-
Precuneus
- SFG:
-
Superior frontal gyrus
- AG:
-
Angular gyrus
- ACC:
-
Anterior cingulate cortex
- STG:
-
Superior temporal gyrus
- MTG:
-
Middle temporal gyrus
- HIP:
-
Hippocampus
- ITG:
-
Inferior temporal gyrus
- MOG:
-
Middle occipital gyrus
- MCC:
-
Middle cingulate cortex
- SMA:
-
Sensorimotor areas
- SPL:
-
Superior parietal lobe
- FG:
-
Fusiform gyrus
- MNI:
-
Montreal Neurological Institute
- FWHM:
-
Full width at half maximum
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- RTs:
-
Response times
- ROI:
-
Region of interest
- CRs:
-
Correct rates
- DMN:
-
Default mode network
References
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
Anderson, J. R., Qin, Y., Sohn, M.-H., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2003). An information-processing model of the BOLD response in symbol manipulation tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(2), 241–261.
Aron, A. R., Fletcher, P. C., Bullmore, E. T., Sahakian, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 6(2), 115–116.
Ash, I. K., Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2009). Obstacles in investigating the role of restructuring in insightful problem solving. The Journal of Problem Solving, 2(2), 3.
Astafiev, S. V., Shulman, G. L., Stanley, C. M., Snyder, A. Z., Van Essen, D. C., & Corbetta, M. (2003). Functional organization of human intraparietal and frontal cortex for attending, looking, and pointing. Journal of Neuroscience, 23(11), 4689–4699.
Bechtereva, N., Korotkov, A., Pakhomov, S., Roudas, M., Starchenko, M., & Medvedev, S. (2004). PET study of brain maintenance of verbal creative activity. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 53(1), 11–20.
Boccia, M., Piccardi, L., Palermo, L., Nori, R., & Palmiero, M. (2015). Where do bright ideas occur in our brain? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies of domain-specific creativity. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1195.
Bowden, E. M. (1997). The effect of reportable and unreportable hints on anagram solution and the aha! Experience. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(4), 545–573.
Bowden, E. M., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2007). Methods for investigating the neural components of insight. Methods, 42(1), 87–99.
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain's default network. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124(1), 1–38.
Cavanna, A. E., & Trimble, M. R. (2006). The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain, 129(3), 564–583.
Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory. Neuroimage, 23(2), 604–612.
Derrfuss, J., Brass, M., Neumann, J., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Involvement of the inferior frontal junction in cognitive control: meta-analyses of switching and Stroop studies. Human Brain Mapping, 25(1), 22–34.
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822–848.
Dreu, C. K. D., Nijstad, B. A., & Baas, M. (2011). Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(1), 72–80.
Duncker, K., & Lees, L.S. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological monographs 58 (5):i.
D'zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107–126.
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012). Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process. Neuroimage, 59(2), 1783–1794.
Elliott ML, Knodt AR, Ireland D, Morris ML, Poulton R, Ramrakha S, Sison ML, Moffitt TE, Caspi, A., & Hariri, A.R. (2019). Poor test-retest reliability of task-fMRI: new empirical evidence and a meta-analysis. BioRxiv:681700.
Ellison, A., Schindler, I., Pattison, L. L., & Milner, A. D. (2004). An exploration of the role of the superior temporal gyrus in visual search and spatial perception using TMS. Brain, 127(10), 2307–2315.
Fan, J., Hof, P. R., Guise, K. G., Fossella, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2007). The functional integration of the anterior cingulate cortex during conflict processing. Cerebral Cortex, 18(4), 796–805.
Fincham, J. M., Carter, C. S., Van Veen, V., Stenger, V. A., & Anderson, J. R. (2002). Neural mechanisms of planning: a computational analysis using event-related fMRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(5), 3346–3351.
Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1–2), 99–120.
Hebscher, M., Levine, B., & Gilboa, A. (2018). The precuneus and hippocampus contribute to individual differences in the unfolding of spatial representations during episodic autobiographical memory. Neuropsychologia, 110, 123–133.
Heim, S., Eickhoff, S. B., Ischebeck, A. K., Friederici, A. D., Stephan, K. E., & Amunts, K. (2009). Effective connectivity of the left BA 44, BA 45, and inferior temporal gyrus during lexical and phonological decisions identified with DCM. Human Brain Mapping, 30(2), 392–402.
Hermes, D., Rangarajan, V., Foster, B. L., King, J.-R., Kasikci, I., Miller, K. J., & Parvizi, J. (2015). Electrophysiological responses in the ventral temporal cortex during reading of numerals and calculation. Cerebral Cortex, 27(1), 567–575.
Hopfinger, J. B., Buonocore, M. H., & Mangun, G. R. (2000). The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control. Nature Neuroscience, 3(3), 284–291.
Howard-Jones, P. A., Blakemore, S.-J., Samuel, E. A., Summers, I. R., & Claxton, G. (2005). Semantic divergence and creative story generation: An fMRI investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 25(1), 240–250.
Huang, F., Fan, J., & Luo, J. (2015). The neural basis of novelty and appropriateness in processing of creative chunk decomposition. Neuroimage, 113, 122–132.
Huang, F., Tang, S., Sun, P., & Luo, J. (2018). Neural correlates of novelty and appropriateness processing in externally induced constraint relaxation. NeuroImage, 172, 381–389.
Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63–85.
Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Marshuetz, C., Koeppe, R. A., & Reuter-Lorenz, P. A. (1998). Inhibition in verbal working memory revealed by brain activation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(14), 8410–8413.
Jung-Beeman, M., Bowden, E. M., Haberman, J., Frymiare, J. L., Arambel-Liu, S., Greenblatt, R., Reber, P. J., & Kounios, J. (2004). Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight. PLoS Biology, 2(4), e97.
Karnath, H.-O. (2001). New insights into the functions of the superior temporal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8), 568–576.
Keller, C. J., Davidesco, I., Megevand, P., Lado, F. A., Malach, R., & Mehta, A. D. (2017). Tuning face perception with electrical stimulation of the fusiform gyrus. Human Brain Mapping, 38(6), 2830–2842.
Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: the case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(1), 3.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(6), 1534.
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000–1009.
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The Aha! moment: the cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210–216.
Kounios, J., Frymiare, J. L., Bowden, E. M., Fleck, J. I., Subramaniam, K., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2006). The prepared mind: neural activity prior to problem presentation predicts subsequent solution by sudden insight. Psychological Science, 17(10), 882–890.
Lin, J., Cui, X., Dai, X., & Mo, L. (2018). Regional homogeneity predicts creative insight: a resting-state fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 210.
Luo, J., & Knoblich, G. (2007). Studying insight problem solving with neuroscientific methods. Methods, 42(1), 77–86.
Luo, J., & Niki, K. (2003). Function of hippocampus in “insight” of problem solving. Hippocampus, 13(3), 316–323.
Luo, J., Niki, K., & Phillips, S. (2004). Neural correlates of the ‘Aha! Reaction’. Neuroreport, 15(13), 2013–2017.
Luo, J., Niki, K., & Knoblich, G. (2006). Perceptual contributions to problem solving: chunk decomposition of Chinese characters. Brain Research Bulletin, 70(4), 430–443.
MacKay, D. G., Stewart, R., & Burke, D. M. (1998). HM revisited: relations between language comprehension, memory, and the hippocampal system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(3), 377–394.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving, Vol. 104. No. 9. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Newman, S. D., Carpenter, P. A., Varma, S., & Just, M. A. (2003). Frontal and parietal participation in problem solving in the tower of London: fMRI and computational modeling of planning and high-level perception. Neuropsychologia, 41(12), 1668–1682.
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77.
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. Advances in the Psychology of Thinking, 1, 1–44.
Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2008). Investigating the effect of mental set on insight problem solving. Experimental Psychology, 55(4), 269–282.
Perkins, D. N., Hancock, C., Hobbs, R., Martin, F., & Simmons, R. (1986). Conditions of learning in novice programmers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2(1), 37–55.
Qin, Y., Carter, C. S., Silk, E. M., Stenger, V. A., Fissell, K., Goode, A., & Anderson, J. R. (2004). The change of the brain activation patterns as children learn algebra equation solving. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(15), 5686–5691.
Qiu, J., Li, H., Yang, D., Luo, Y., Li, Y., Wu, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2008). The neural basis of insight problem solving: an event-related potential study. Brain and Cognition, 68(1), 100–106.
Qiu, J., Li, H., Jou, J., Liu, J., Luo, Y., Feng, T., Wu, Z., & Zhang, Q. (2010). Neural correlates of the “Aha” experiences: evidence from an fMRI study of insight problem solving. Cortex, 46(3), 397–403.
Radua, J., Borgwardt, S., Crescini, A., Mataix-Cols, D., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., McGuire, P., & Fusar-Poli, P. (2012). Multimodal meta-analysis of structural and functional brain changes in first episode psychosis and the effects of antipsychotic medication. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(10), 2325–2333.
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(2), 676–682.
Renier, L. A., Anurova, I., De Volder, A. G., Carlson, S., VanMeter, J., & Rauschecker, J. P. (2010). Preserved functional specialization for spatial processing in the middle occipital gyrus of the early blind. Neuron, 68(1), 138–148.
Ruge, H., Brass, M., Koch, I., Rubin, O., Meiran, N., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Advance preparation and stimulus-induced interference in cued task switching: further insights from BOLD fMRI. Neuropsychologia, 43(3), 340–355.
Scott, W. A. (1962). Cognitive complexity and cognitive flexibility. Sociometry, 25, 405–414.
Seghier, M. L. (2013). The angular gyrus: multiple functions and multiple subdivisions. The Neuroscientist, 19(1), 43–61.
Seghier, M. L., Fagan, E., & Price, C. J. (2010). Functional subdivisions in the left angular gyrus where the semantic system meets and diverges from the default network. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(50), 16809–16817.
Sohn, M.-H., Goode, A., Stenger, V. A., Jung, K.-J., Carter, C. S., & Anderson, J. R. (2005). An information-processing model of three cortical regions: evidence in episodic memory retrieval. Neuroimage, 25(1), 21–33.
Stern, C. E., Corkin, S., González, R. G., Guimaraes, A. R., Baker, J. R., Jennings, P. J., Carr, C. A., Sugiura, R. M., Vedantham, V., & Rosen, B. R. (1996). The hippocampal formation participates in novel picture encoding: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(16), 8660–8665.
Subramaniam, K., Kounios, J., Parrish, T. B., & Jung-Beeman, M. (2009). A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(3), 415–432.
Tan, L. H., Liu, H.-L., Perfetti, C. A., Spinks, J. A., Fox, P. T., & Gao, J.-H. (2001). The neural system underlying Chinese logograph reading. Neuroimage, 13(5), 836–846.
Tang, X., Pang, J., Nie, Q.-Y., Conci, M., Luo, J., & Luo, J. (2015). Probing the cognitive mechanism of mental representational change during chunk decomposition: a parametric fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, 26(7), 2991–2999.
Weiner, K. S., & Zilles, K. (2016). The anatomical and functional specialization of the fusiform gyrus. Neuropsychologia, 83, 48–62.
Wen, X., Xiang, Y., Cant, J. S., Wang, T., Cupchik, G., Huang, R., & Mo, L. (2017). The neural correlates of internal and external comparisons: an fMRI study. Brain Structure and Function, 222(1), 563–575.
Wu, L., Knoblich, G., Wei, G., & Luo, J. (2009). How perceptual processes help to generate new meaning: an EEG study of chunk decomposition in Chinese characters. Brain Research, 1296, 104–112.
Wu, L., Knoblich, G., & Luo, J. (2013). The role of chunk tightness and chunk familiarity in problem solving: evidence from ERPs and fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 34(5), 1173–1186.
Xing, X.-X., & Zuo, X.-N. (2018). The anatomy of reliability: a must read for future human brain mapping. Science Bulletin, 63, 1606–1607.
Yang, W., Dietrich, A., Liu, P., Ming, D., Jin, Y., Nusbaum, H. C., Qiu, J., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Prototypes are key heuristic information in insight problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 28(1), 67–77.
Zhang, M., Tian, F., Wu, X., Liao, S., & Qiu, J. (2011). The neural correlates of insight in Chinese verbal problems: an event related-potential study. Brain Research Bulletin, 84(3), 210–214.
Zhao, Q., Zhou, Z., Xu, H., Chen, S., Xu, F., Fan, W., & Han, L. (2013). Dynamic neural network of insight: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study on solving Chinese ‘chengyu’riddles. PLoS One, 8(3), e59351.
Zuo, X.-N., & Xing, X.-X. (2014). Test-retest reliabilities of resting-state FMRI measurements in human brain functional connectomics: a systems neuroscience perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 100–118.
Zuo, X.-N., Xu, T., & Milham, M. P. (2019). Harnessing reliability for neuroscience research. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 768–771.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by funding from the Project of Guangzhou Philosophies and Social Sciences (Grant Number: 2020GZQN43), the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant Number: 14ZDB159) and the Project of Key Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, MOE (16JJD880025).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Research Ethics Review Board of South China Normal University has approved the experiment protocol.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 23 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lin, J., Wen, X., Cui, X. et al. Common and specific neural correlates underlying insight and ordinary problem solving. Brain Imaging and Behavior 15, 1374–1387 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-020-00337-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-020-00337-z