Abstract
On an agrosilvopastoral farm in central Italy where Maremmana cattle graze in Turkey oak forests, we evaluated the impact of different livestock densities on stand structure, tree diversity and natural regeneration in four types of grazed areas based on the grazing regime adopted: calf-grazed, high-intensity-grazed, low-intensity-grazed, ungrazed control. For each area, we set up three permanent circular plots (radius of 15 m) to survey the structural and dasometric characteristics of the overstorey, understorey, and regeneration layer. The results showed that grazing negatively affected the complexity of the forest structure and its potential to regenerate and maintain a high level of biodiversity. The differences in stand structure observed between the grazing areas were closely related to livestock density. The most sensitive components of the system were the understorey and the regeneration layers. Contrarily, the current grazing management did not affect the dominant tree structure or its composition. Our findings identified medium-term monitoring and regeneration management as the two significant aspects to consider when assessing sustainable livestock. New forests can be established by excluding grazing for about 20–25 years.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams S (1975) Sheep and cattle grazing in forests: a review. J Appl Ecol 12:143–152
Ali A (2019) Forest stand structure and functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Ecol Indic 98:665–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.017
Ali A, Mattsson E (2017) Individual tree size inequality enhances aboveground biomass in homegarden agroforestry systems in the dry zone of Sri Lanka. Sci Total Environ 575:6–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.022
Barbero M, Bonin G, Loisel R, Quézel P (1990) Changes and disturbances of forest ecosystems caused by human activities in the western part of the Mediterranean basin. Vegetatio 87(2):151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00042952
Barradas I, Cohen JE (1994) Disturbances allow coexistence of competing species. J Math Biol 32:663–676
Bernes C, Macura B, Jonsson BG, Junninen K, Müller J, Sandström J, Lõhmus A, Macdonald E (2018) Manipulating ungulate herbivory in temperate and boreal forests: effects on vegetation and invertebrates. A Systematic Review Environ Evid 7:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-018-0125-3
Bianchetto E, Argenti G, Ferretti F (2009) Proposta per una metodologia speditiva di stima del carico animale mantenibile da formazioni forestali nell’ambito della pianificazione territoriale. Forest 6:129–136. https://doi.org/10.3832/efor0575-006
Buongiorno J, Dahir S, Lu HC, Lin CR (1994) Tree size diversity and economic returns in uneven-aged forest stands. For Sci 40(1):83–103. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/40.1.83
Buttenschon J, Buttenschon RM (1978) The effect of browsing by cattle and sheep on trees and bushes. Nat Jutl 20:79–94
Caballero R, Fernández-González F, Pérez Badia R, Molle G, Roggero PP, Bagella S, D’Ottavio P, Papanastasis VP, Fotiadis G, Sidiropoulou A, Ispikoudis I (2009) Grazing systems and biodiversity in Mediterranean areas: Spain, Italy and Greece. Pastos 39(1):9–152
Cierjacks A, Hensen I (2004) Variation of stand structure and regeneration of Mediterranean holm oak along a grazing intensity gradient. Plant Ecol 173(2):215–223. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:VEGE.0000029322.75004.ad
Cotter M, Hauser I, Harich FK, He P, Sauerborn J, Treydte AC, Martin K, Cadisch G (2017) Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a case study for the assessment of multiple species and functional diversity levels in a cultural landscape. Ecol Indic 75:111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.11.038
Cox F (1971) Dichtebestimmung und Strukturanalyse von Pflanzenpopulationen mit Hilfe von Abstandsmessungen: Ein Beitr. z. method. Weiterentwicklung von Verfahren f. Verjüngungsinventuren. PhD thesis, Uni Göttingen
De Aranzabal I, Schmitz MF, Aguilera P, Pineda FD (2008) Modeling of landscape changes derived from the dynamics of socio-ecological systems. A case of study in a semiarid Mediterranean landscape. Ecol Indic 8(5):672–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2007.11.003
den Herder M, Moreno G, Mosquera-Losada RM, Palma JHN, Sidiropoulou A, Santiago Freijanes JJ, Crous-Duran J, Paulo JA, Tomé M, Pantera A, Papanastasis VP, Mantzanas K, Pachana P, Papadopoulos A, Plieninger T, Burgess PJ (2017) Current extent and stratification of agroforestry in the European union. Agric Ecosyst Environ 241:121–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.005
Dufour-Dror JM (2007) Influence of cattle grazing on the density of oak seedlings and saplings in a tabor oak forest in Israel. Acta Oecol 31(2):223–228
EIP-AGRI Focus Group Agroforestry (2017) Introducing woody vegetation into specialized crop and livestock systems. (December): 32. https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_fg_agroforestry_final_report_2017_en.pdf%0A, https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/focus-groups/agroforestry-introducing-woody-vegetation
Fabbio G, Merlo M, Tosi V (2003) Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe—the Mediterranean region. J Environ Manag 67(1):67–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00189-5
Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A, Rial-Lovera KE, Romero-Franco R, Mosquera-Losada MR (2016) Effect of grazing on carbon sequestration and tree growth that is developed in a silvopastoral system under wild cherry (Prunus avium L.). CATENA 142:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2016.02.002
Filazzola A, Lortie CJ (2014) A systematic review and conceptual framework for the mechanistic pathways of nurse plants. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 23:1335–1345
Fleischner TL (1994) Ecological costs of livestock grazing in western north America. Conserv Biol 8(3):629–644. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1994.08030629.x
Flores J, Jurado E (2003) Are nurse-protégé interactions more common among plants from arid environments? J Veg Sci 14:911–916
Garrett HE, Kerley MS, Ladyman KP, Walter WD, Godsey LD, Van Sambeek JW, Brauer DK (2004) Hardwood silvopasture management in north America. Agrofor Syst 61–62(1–3):21–33
Gasparini P, Di Cosmo L, Floris A, De Laurentis D (2023) Italian National Forest Inventory - Methods and Results of the Third Survey. Springer Tracts Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98678
Gómez-Aparicio L, Zamora R, Gómez JM, Hódar JA, Castro J, Baraza E (2004) Applying plant facilitation to forest restoration: a meta-analysis of the use of shrubs as nurse plants. Ecol Appl 14(4):1128–1138. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-5084
Goracci J, Uzielli MN, Giuliotti L, Benvenuti N (2007) Pascolo e bosco: un legame fondamentale per l’allevamento bovino brado in Toscana. Taurus 6(1):103–111
Graham RT, Jain TB, Kingery JL (2010) Ameliorating conflicts among deer, elk, cattle and/or other ungulates and other forest uses: a synthesis. Forestry 83(3):245–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpq003
Guerin G (2009) De la forêt pâturée au sylvopastoralisme. Forêt Méditerranéenne 4:491–496
Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) Past: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4(1):1–9
Hanish AL, Negrelle RRB, Monteiro ALG, Lacerda AEB, Pinotti LCA (2022) Combining silvopastoral systems with forest conservation: The caíva system in the Araucaria forest. Southern Brazil Agrofor Syst 96(4):759–771
Hester AJ, Edenius L, Buttenschøn RM, Kuiters AT (2000) Interactions between forests and herbivores: the role of controlled grazing experiments. Forestry 73(4):381–391. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/73.4.381
Holechek JL, De Souza GH, Molinar F, Galt D (1998) Grazing intensity: critique and approach. Rangelands 20(5):15–18
Hoosbeek MR, Remme RP, Rusch GM (2018) Trees enhance soil carbon sequestration and nutrient cycling in a silvopastoral system in south-western Nicaragua. Agrofor Syst 92(2):263–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-0049-2
Lionello P, Abrantes F, Gacic M, Planton S, Trico R, Ulbrich U (2014) The climate of the Mediterranean region: research progress and climate change impacts. Reg Environ Change 14:1679–1684
Longland AC (2013) Pastures and pasture management. In: Coenen M, Harris P, Geor RJ (eds) Equine applied and clinical nutrition. Elsiever, Philadelphia, pp 332–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-3422-0.00018-3
Mabry C (2002) Effects of cattle grazing on woodlands in central Iowa. J Iowa Acad Sci 109(3/4):53–60. https://doi.org/10.1300/J087v40n03_08
Manetti MC, Becagli C, Bertini G, Cantiani P, Marchi M, Pelleri F, Sansone D, Fabbio G (2020) The conversion into high forest of Turkey oak coppice stands: methods, silviculture and perspectives. iForest 13(4):309–317. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor3483-013
Mayerfeld D, Kruger E, Gildersleeve R, Rickenbach M (2022) Impacts of different grazing approaches on woodland ecosystem properties. Agrofor Syst 96:527–540
Mayerfeld D, Rickenbach M, Rissman A (2016) Overcoming history: attitudes of resource professionals and farmers toward silvopasture in southwest Wisconsin. Agrofor Syst 90(5):723–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-016-9954-7
Mondino GP, Bernetti G (1998) I tipi forestali [Forest types]. In: Boschi e macchie di Toscana [Woodlands and scrublands of Tuscany], part 2 of series. Edizioni Regione Toscana, Florence, Italy. p 358. (in Italian)
Montserrat P (1991) Forest evolution in the grazed mountains of the Pyrenees. Botan Chron 10:359–366
Mosquera-Losada MR, Fernández-Núñez E, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2006) Pasture, tree and soil evolution in silvopastoral systems of Atlantic Europe. For Ecol Manag 232(1–3):135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.057
Mosquera-Losada MR, Santiago-Freijanes JJ, Rois-Díaz M, Moreno G, den Herder M, Aldrey-Vázquez JA, Ferreiro-Domínguez N, Pantera A, Pisanelli A, Rigueiro-Rodríguez A (2018) Agroforestry in Europe: a land management policy tool to combat climate change. Land Use Policy 78:603–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.052
Nicodemo MLF, Porfírio-da-Silva V (2019) Bark stripping by cattle in silvopastoral systems. Agrofor Syst 93(1):305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0185-y
Niu YJ, Yang SW, Wang GZ, Liu L, Hua LM (2017) Evaluation and selection of species diversity index under grazing disturbance in alpine mea-dow. Chin J Appl Ecol 28(6):1824–1832. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.201706.026
Ollerer K, Varga A, Kirby K, Demeter L, Birò M, Boloni J, Molnar Z (2019) Beyond the obvious impact of domestic livestock grazing on temperate forest vegetation—a global review. Biol Conser 237:209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.07.007
Papadopoulos A, Pantera Α, Fotiadis G, Papaspyropoulos K, Mantzanas K, Papanastasis VP (2017) Effects of grazing and understorey clearing on regeneration of a valonia oak silvopastoral system in western Greece. CEST 15:1–4
Papanastasis VP, Yiakoulaki MD, Decandia M, Dini-Papanastasi O (2008) Integrating woody species into livestock feeding in the Mediterranean areas of Europe. Anim Feed Sci Techn 140:1–17
Paris P, Camilli F, Rosati A, Mantino A, Mezzalira G, Dalla Valle C, Franca A, Seddaiu G, Pisanelli A, Lauteri M, Brunori A, Re GA, Sanna F, Ragaglini G, Mele M, Ferrario V, Burgess PJ (2019) What is the future for agroforestry in Italy? Agrofor Syst 93(6):2243–2256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00346-y
Piussi P, Alberti G (2015) Selvicoltura generale. Boschi, società e tecniche colturali. Collana Scienze Forestali e Ambientali, Compagnia delle Foreste S.r.l., Arezzo. p 432
Plieninger T (2007) Compatibility of livestock grazing with stand regeneration in Mediterranean holm oak parklands. J Nat Conserv 15(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2005.09.002
Plieninger T, Pulid FJ, Schaich H (2004) Effects of land-use and landscape structure on holm oak recruitment and regeneration at farm level in Quercus ilex L. dehesas. J Arid Environ 57(3):345–364
Plieninger T, Schaich H, Kizos T (2011) Land-use legacies in the forest structure of silvopastoral oak woodlands in the eastern Mediterranean. Reg Environ Change 11(3):603–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0192-7
Pozner E, Bar-On P, Livne-Luzon S, Moran U, Tsamir-Rimon M, Dener E, Klein T (2022) A hidden mechanism of forest loss under climate change: the role of drought in eliminating forest regeneration at the edge of its distribution. For Ecol Manag 506:119966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119966
Röder A, Udelhoven T, Hill J, del Barrio G, Tsiourlis G (2008) Trend analysis of Landsat-TM and -ETM+ imagery to monitor grazing impact in a rangeland ecosystem in northern Greece. Remote Sens Environ 112(6):2863–2875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.01.018
Rousset O, Lepart J (1999) Shrub facilitation of Quercus humilis regeneration in succession on calcareous grasslands. J Veg Sci 10(4):493–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237184
Shannon CE (1948) A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
Smit C, Den Ouden J, Müller-Schärer H (2006) Unpalatable plants facilitate tree sapling survival in wooded pastures. J Appl Ecol 43:305–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01147.x
Suryanto P, Sadono R, Yohanifa A, Widyawan MH, Alam T (2021) Semi-natural regeneration and conservation in agroforestry system models on small-scale farmers. Biodiversitas 22(2):858–865. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d220240
Tabacchi G, Cosmo L, Gasparini P (2011) Stima del volume e della fitomassa delle principali specie forestali italiane. Equazioni di previsione, tavole del volume e tavole della fitomassa arborea epigea. Consiglio per la Ricerca e la sperimentazione, Unità di Ricerca per il Monitoraggio e la Pianificazione Forestale. Trento. p 412. (in Italian)
Valipour A, Plieninger T, Shakeri Z, Ghazanfari H, Namiranian M, Lexer MJ (2014) Traditional silvopastoral management and its effects on forest stand structure in northern Zagros. Iran For Ecol Manag 327:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.004
Varela E, Górriz-Mifsud E, Ruiz-Mirazo J, López-i-Gelats F (2018) Payment for targeted grazing: Integrating local shepherds into wildfire prevention. Forests 9(8):464. https://doi.org/10.3390/f9080464
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Project funding: This research is related to the project GO NEWTON “Agroforestry Network in Tuscany”, financed by the Tuscany Region through the Measure 16.2 of Rural Development Plan 2014–2020 to promote agroforestry systems by spreading knowledge to farmers and promoting innovation in the Tuscan territory.
The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com
Corresponding editor: Yanbo Hu.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Pacini, A., Pelleri, F., Marini, F. et al. Impact of cattle density on the structure and natural regeneration of a turkey oak stand on an agrosilvopastoral farm in central Italy. J. For. Res. 35, 22 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01680-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-023-01680-9