Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Modelling stemflow production by juvenile lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) trees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Forestry Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stemflow is a focused point source input of precipitation and nutrients at the base of a tree or plant and can have a significant impact on site hydrology. To date, no known studies have modelled stemflow production for juvenile lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia). Meteorological conditions, tree characteristics, and stemflow were sampled for two juvenile lodgepole pine stands over the course of the 2009 growing season. Step-wise multiple regression was used to assess which meteorological and tree architecture variables influenced stemflow production for each research plot. Once predictor variables were identified, models were produced for each stand and a generic model was produced that applied to both plots. A model employing precipitation depth and crown projection area successfully explained 71.3% of the variation in stemflow production from sampled trees. Stemflow was found to represent 1.8% of the study period rainfall and, although not a large component of the plot-scale canopy water balance, it is an order of magnitude greater than the fractioning of stemflow from mature lodgepole and lodgepole pine dominated forest. Additionally, stemflow funnelling ratios were found to average 22.2 and 24.3 from the two sample plots over the study period with a single tree, single event maximum of 111.7 recorded for a tree with a 3.3 cm bole diameter and a rain depth of 17.4 mm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aboal JR, Morales D, Hernández JM, Jiménez MS (1999) The measurement and modelling of the variation of stemflow in a laurel forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands. J Hydrol 221(3):161–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bialkowski R, Buttle JM (2015) Stemflow and throughfall contributions to soil water recharge under trees with differing branch architectures. Hydrol Process 29(18):4068–4082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinson MM, Bradshaw HD, Holmes RN, Elkins JB Jr (1980) Litterfall, stemflow, and throughfall nutrient fluxes in an alluvial swamp forest. Ecology 61(4):827–835

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • British Columbia Ministry of Forests, Lands, and Natural Resource Operations (2015) Mountain Pine Beetle. Infestation Information. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/mountain_pine_beetle/. Accessed May 2015

  • British Columbia Ministry of Water, Land and Air Protection (2004) Weather, Climate and the Future: BC’s Plan. http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/air/climate/index.html#1

  • Brown JH Jr, Barker AC Jr (1970) An analysis of throughfall and stemflow in mixed oak stands. Water Resour Res 6(1):316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttle JM, Toye HJ, Greenwood WJ, Bialkowski R (2014) Stemflow and soil water recharge during rainfall in a red pine chronosequence on the Oak Ridges Moraine, southern Ontario, Canada. J Hydrol 517:777–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cape JN, Brown AHF, Robertson SMC, Howson G, Paterson IS (1991) Interspecies comparisons of throughfall and stemflow at three sites in northern Britain. For Ecol Manag 46(3–4):165–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses DE (2004) A Reply to R. Keim’s Comment on ‘Measurement and modelling of growing-season canopy water fluxes in a mature mixed deciduous forest stand, southern Ontario, Canada. Agric For Meteorol 124(3–4):281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses DE, Lishman CE (2015) Throughfall heterogeneity and temporal persistence below and between the canopies of juvenile lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta). Hydrol Process 29(18):4051–4067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses DE, Schooling JT (2015) Tree traits and meteorological factors influencing the initiation and rate of stemflow from isolated deciduous trees. Hydrol Process 29(18):4083–4099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle-Moses DE, Lishman CE, McKee AJ (2014) A preliminary evaluation of throughfall sampling techniques in a mature coniferous forest. J For Res 25(2):407–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chang S, Matzner E (2000) The effect of beech stemflow on spatial patterns of soil solution chemistry and seepage fluxes in a mixed beech/oak stand. Hydrol Process 14(1):135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davie TJA, Durocher MG (1997) A model to consider the spatial variability of rainfall partitioning within deciduous canopy. II. Model parameterization and testing. Hydrol Process 11(11):1525–1540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombois MD, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and Methods of Vegetation Ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 67–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunford EG, Neiderhof CH (1944) Influence of aspen, young lodgepole pine, and open grassland types upon factors affecting water yield. J For 42(9):673–677

    Google Scholar 

  • Eaton B, Moore RD (2010) Regional Hydrology. In: Pike RG, Redding TE, Moore Rd, Winkler RD, Bladon KD (eds) Compendium of forest hydrology and geomorphology in British Columbia. Kamloops: Land management Handbook 66, BC Ministry of Forest and Range and FORREX Forum for Research and Extension in Natural Resources, p. 85–110

  • Ford ED, Deans JD (1978) The effects of canopy structure on stemflow, throughfall and interception loss in a young sitka spruce plantation. J Appl Ecol 15(3):905–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanchi A, Rapp M (1997) Stemflow determination in forest stands. For Ecol Manag 97(3):231–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz SR (1986) Infiltration-excess caused by stemflow in a cyclone-prone tropical rainforest. Earth Surf Proc Land 11(4):401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herwitz SR (1987) Raindrop impact and water flow on the vegetative surfaces of trees and the effects on stemflow and throughfall generation. Earth Surf Proc Land 12(4):425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MS, Lehmann J (2006) Double-funnelling of trees: stemflow and root-induced preferential flow. Ecoscience 13(3):324–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia DF (2004) Differential winter stemflow generation under contrasting storm conditions in a southern New England broad-leaved deciduous forest. Hydrol Process 18(6):1105–1112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia DF, Frost EE (2003) A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forest and agricultural ecosystems. J Hydrol 274(1–4):1–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Levia DF, Germer S (2015) A review of stemflow generation dynamics and stemflow-environment interactions in forests and shrublands. Rev Geophys 53(3):673–714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levia DF, Keim RF, DE Carlyle-Moses, Frost EE (2011) Throughfall and stemflow in wooded ecosystems. In: Levia DF, DE Carlyle-Moses, Tanaka T (eds) Forest hydrology and biogeochemistry: synthesis of past research and future directions, 216th edn., Ecological SeriesSpringer, Germany, pp 425–444

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levia DF, Michalzik B, Näthe K, Bischoff S, Richter S, Legates DR (2015) Differential stemflow yield from European beech saplings: the role of individual canopy structure metrics. Hydrol Process 29:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfroi OJ, Koichiro K, Nobuaki T, Masakazu S, Nakagawa M, Nakashizuka T, Chong L (2004) The stemflow of trees in a Bornean lowland tropical forest. Hydrol Process 18(13):2455–2474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Meza E, Whitford WG (1996) Stemflow, throughfall and channelization of stemflow by roots in three Chihuahuan desert shrubs. J Arid Environ 32(3):271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee AJ, Carlyle-Moses DE (2010) Stemflow: a potentially important point source of water for growth. Link Innov Netw Knowl 11(2):11–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore RD, Winkler R, Carlyle-Moses D, Spittlehouse D, Giles T, Phillips J, Leach J, Eaton B, Owens P, Petticrew E, Blake W, Heise B, Redding T (2008) Watershed response to the McLure forest fire: presentation summaries from the Fishtrap Creek workshop. Streamline Watershed Manag Bull 12(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Murakami S (2009) Abrupt change in annual stemflow with growth in a young stand of Japanese cypress. Hydrol Res Lett 3:32–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J (1993) The causes of stemflow variation in three semi-arid growing species of northeastern Mexico. J Hydrol 145(1–2):175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Návar J (2011) Stemflow variation in Mexico’s northeastern forest communities: its contribution to soil moisture content and aquifer recharge. J Hydrol 408(1–2):35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park H, Hattori S (2002) Applicability of stand structural characteristics to stemflow modelling. J For Res 7(2):91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piñeiro G, Perelman S, Guerschman JP, Paruelo JM (2008) How to evaluated models: observed vs. predicted or predicted vs. observed? Ecol Model 216(3–4):316–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schooling JT, Carlyle-Moses DE (2015) The influence of rainfall depth class and deciduous tree traits on stemflow production in an urban park. Urban Ecosyst 18(4):1261–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Elias MEA, Uguen K, Seixas R, Zech W (2001) Nutrient fluxes in rainfall, throughfall and stemflow in tree-based land use systems and spontaneous tree vegetation of central Amazonia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 87(1):37–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spittlehouse D (1998) Rainfall interception in young and mature conifer forests in British Columbia. Proceedings 23rd conference on agricultural and forest meteorology, boston: american meteorological society, p.40–44

  • Tanaka T, Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M (1996) Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge. 2: a cylindrical infiltration model for evaluating the stemflow contribution to groundwater recharge. Hydrol Process 10(1):81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi M, Tsujimura M, Tanaka T (1996) Significance of stemflow in groundwater recharge. 1: evaluation of this stemflow contribution to recharge using a mass balance approach. Hydrol Process 10(1):71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Meteorological monitoring guidance for regulatory modeling applications. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research, Triangle Park, pp 1–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stan JT II, Levia DF (2010) Inter- and intraspecific variation of stemflow production from Fagus grandifolia Ehrh. (American beech) and Liriodendron tulipifera L. (yellow poplar) in relation to bark microrelief in the eastern United States. Ecohydrology 3(1):11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Stan JT II, Van Stan JH, Levia DF (2014) Meteorological influences on stemflow generation across diameter size classes of two morphologically distinct deciduous species. Biometeorology 58(10):2059–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voigt GK (1960) Distribution of rainfall under forest stands. For Sci 6(1):2–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang XP, Wang ZN, Berndtsson R, Zhang YF, Pan YX (2011) Desert shrub stemflow and its significance in soil moisture replenishment. Hydrol Earth Syst Process 15:561–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitford WH, Anderson J, Rice PM (1997) Stemflow contribution to the ‘fertile island’ effect in creosotebush, Larrea tridentate. J Arid Environ 35(3):451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler RD, Spittlehouse DL, Golding DL (2005) Measured differences in snow accumulation and melt among clearcut, juvenile, and mature forests in southern British Columbia. Hydrol Process 19(1):51–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to C. Lishman, A. Pillar, P. Sanders, J. Golden and everyone else who provided assistance in the field.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate Program in Environmental Science, Thompson Rivers University, 900 McGill Road, Kamloops, BC, V2C 0C8, Canada

    Adam J. McKee

  2. Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, Thompson Rivers University, 900 McGill Road, Kamloops, BC, V2C 0C8, Canada

    Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses

Authors
  1. Adam J. McKee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darryl E. Carlyle-Moses.

Additional information

Project funding: This research was funded by a British Columbia Forest Investment Account - Forest Science Program (Project # Y091045) grant and a National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant awarded to DC-M.

The online version is available at http://www.springerlink.com

Corresponding editor: Zhu Hong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McKee, A.J., Carlyle-Moses, D.E. Modelling stemflow production by juvenile lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) trees. J. For. Res. 28, 565–576 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0336-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-016-0336-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation