Abstract
Ecological interactions of species and thus their spatial patterns may differ between homogeneous and heterogeneous forests. To account for this, techniques of point pattern analysis were implemented on mapped locations of tree individuals from two 1-ha tropicalforest plots in Vietnam. We analyzed the effect of environmental heterogeneity on tree distributions; spatial distribution patterns of dominant species; inter-specific associations; and conspecific associations between life stages. Our analyses showed that: environmental conditions were homogeneous at plot 1 but heterogeneous at plot 2; in both plots, all six dominant species were aggregated at various scales up to 30 m, and tree species were aggregated at larger scales in the homogeneous site than in the heterogeneous site; attraction between pairs of species was remarkably higher at the homogeneous site while negative associations were more frequent in the heterogeneous site; some species, H. kurzii, T. ilicifolia (homogeneous plot) and D. sylvatica, S. wightianum (heterogeneous plot), showed a lack of early life-stage individuals near conspecific adults. Moreover, additional clustering of young individuals was independent from conspecific adults, except D. sylvatica in both sites. These findings are consistent with the Janzen-Connell hypothesis. Overall, habitat heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and inter-specific associations of the tree species and evidences of self-thinning are shown in most species.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Augspurger CK. 1984. Seedling survival of tropical tree species — Interactions of dispersal distance, Light-gaps, and Pathogens. Ecology, 65(6): 1705–1712.
Barot S. 2004. Mechanisms promoting plant coexistence: can all the proposed processes be reconciled? Oikos, 106(1): 185–192.
Boyden S, Binkley D, Shepperd W. 2005. Spatial and temporal patterns in structure, regeneration, and mortality of an old-growth ponderosa pine forest in the Colorado Front Range. Forest Ecology and Management 219(1): 43–55.
Bruno JF, Stachowicz JJ, Bertness MD. 2003. Inclusion of facilitation into ecological theory. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 18(3): 119–125.
Bunyavejchewin S, Lafrankie JV, Baker PJ, Kanzaki M, Ashton PS, Yamakura T. 2003. Spatial distribution patterns of the dominant canopy dipterocarp species in a seasonal dry evergreen forest in western Thailand. Forest Ecology and Management, 175(1–3): 87–101.
Callaway RM, Walker LR. 1997. Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology, 78(7): 1958–1965.
Condit R, Ashton PS, Baker P, Bunyavejchewin S, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N, Hubbell SP, Foster RB, Itoh A, LaFrankie JV, Lee HS, Losos E, Manokaran N, Sukumar R, Yamakura T. 2000. Spatial patterns in the distribution of tropical tree species. Science, 288(5470): 1414–1418.
Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 1992. Recruitment near conspecific adults and the maintenance of tree and shrub diversity in a neotropical forest. American Naturalist, 140(2): 261–286.
Connell JH. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and in rain forest trees. In: P. J. den Boer and G. Gradwell (eds), Dynamics of Populations. Pudoc, Wageningen, pp. 298–312.
Debski I, Burslem D, Palmiotto PA, Lafrankie JV, Lee HS, Manokaran N. 2002. Habitat preferences of Aporosa in two Malaysian forests: Implications for abundance and coexistence. Ecology, 83(7): 2005–2018.
Diggle PJ. 2003. Statistical Analysis of Spatial Point Patterns. London: Arnold (Hodder Headline Group).
Dixon PM. 2002. Ripley’s K function. In: Abdel H. El-Shaarawi and Walter W. Piegorsch (eds), Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp.1796–1803
FIPI. 1996. Vietnam forest trees. Hanoi, Vietnam: Agricultural Pub. House.
Getzin S, Wiegand T, Wiegand K, He F. 2008. Heterogeneity influences spatial patterns and demographics in forest stands. Journal Of Ecology, 96(4): 807–820.
Goreaud F, Pelissier R. 2003. Avoiding misinterpretation of biotic interactions with the intertype K-12-function: population independence vs. random labelling hypotheses. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14(5): 681–692.
Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatilleke IAUN, Esufali S, Harms KE, Ashton PMS, Burslem DFRP, Ashton PS. 2006. Species-habitat associations in a Sri Lankan dipterocarp forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology, 22: 371–384.
Harms KE, Condit R, Hubbell SP, Foster RB. 2001. Habitat associations of trees and shrubs in a 50-ha neotropical forest plot. Journal of Ecology 89(6): 947–959.
Harms KE, Wright SJ, Calderon O, Hernandez A, Herre EA. 2000. Pervasive density-dependent recruitment enhances seedling diversity in a tropical forest. Nature, 404(6777): 493–495.
He FL, Legendre P, LaFrankie JV. 1997. Distribution patterns of tree species in a Malaysian tropical rain forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8(1): 105–114.
Hood LA, Swaine MD, Mason PA. 2004. The influence of spatial patterns of damping-off disease and arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization on tree seedling establishment in Ghanaian tropical forest soil. Journal of Ecology, 92(5): 816–823.
Hubbell SP. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science, 203(4387): 1299–1309.
Hubbell SP, Ahumada JA, Condit R, Foster RB. 2001. Local neighborhood effects on long-term survival of individual trees in a neotropical forest. Ecological Research 16(5): 859–875.
Illian J, Stoyan D, Stoyan H, Penttinen A. 2008. Statistical Analysis and Modelling of Spatial Point Patterns. Sussex: Wiley.
Janzen DH. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forests. American Naturalist, 104(940): 501–528
Lan G, Getzin S, Wiegand T, Hu Y, Xie G, Zhu H, Cao M. 2012. Spatial Distribution and Interspecific Associations of Tree Species in a Tropical Seasonal Rain Forest of China. Plos One, 7(9).
Li H, Reynolds JF. 1995. On definition and quantification of heterogeneity. Oikos, 73(2): 280–284.
Luo ZR, Mi XC, Chen XR, Ye ZL, Ding BY. 2011. Density dependence is not very prevalent in a heterogeneous subtropical forest. Oikos, 121(8): 1239–1250.
Martinez I, Wiegand T, Gonzalez-Taboada F, Ramon Obeso J. 2010. Spatial associations among tree species in a temperate forest community in North-western Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 260(4): 456–465.
McDonald RI, Peet RK, Urban DL. 2003. Spatial pattern of Quercus regeneration limitation and Acer rubrum invasion in a Piedmont forest. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14(3): 441–450.
North M, Chen JQ, Oakley B, Song B, Rudnicki M, Gray A, Innes J. 2004. Forest stand structure and pattern of old-growth western hemlock/Douglas-fir and mixed-conifer forests. Forest Science, 50(3): 299–311.
Peters HA. 2003. Neighbour-regulated mortality: the influence of positive and negative density dependence on tree populations in species-rich tropical forests. Ecology Letters, 6(8): 757–765.
Pizano C, Mangan SA, Herre EA, Eom A-H, Dalling JW. 2011. Above- and belowground interactions drive habitat segregation between two cryptic species of tropical trees. Ecology, 92(1): 47–56.
Rcfee. 2011. Forest ecological stratification in Vietnam. Hanoi.
Ripley BD. 1976. The Second-Order Analysis of Stationary Point Processes Journal of Applied Probability, 13(2): 255–266
Seidler TG, Plotkin JB. 2006. Seed dispersal and spatial pattern in tropical trees. Plos Biology, 4(11): 2132–2137.
Somanathan H, Borges RM. 2000. Influence of exploitation on population structure, spatial distribution and reproductive success of dioecious species in a fragmented cloud forest in India. Biological Conservation, 94(2): 243–256.
Stoyan D, Stoyan H. 1994. Fractals, random shapes, and point fields: Methods of geometrical statistics. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Team RDC. 2010. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Tilman D. 2004. Niche tradeoffs, neutrality, and community structure: A stochastic theory of resource competition, invasion, and community assembly. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(30): 10854–10861.
Uriarte M, Canham CD, Thompson J, Zimmerman JK. 2004a. A neighborhood analysis of tree growth and survival in a hurricane-driven tropical forest. Ecological Monographs, 74(4): 591–614.
Uriarte M, Condit R, Canham CD, Hubbell SP. 2004b. A spatially explicit model of sapling growth in a tropical forest: does the identity of neighbours matter? Journal of Ecology, 92(2): 348–360.
Wagner HH, Fortin MJ. 2005. Spatial analysis of landscapes: Concepts and statistics. Ecology, 86(8): 1975–1987.
Wang XP, Jin XB, Sun CY. 1986. Burretiodendron hsienmu Chun & How: Its Ecology and Its Protection. Arnoldia, 45(4): 46–51.
Wang XG, Wiegand T, Hao ZQ, Li BH, Ye J, Lin F. 2010. Species associations in an old-growth temperate forest in north-eastern China. Journal of Ecology, 98(3): 674–686.
Webb CO, Peart DR. 2000. Habitat associations of trees and seedlings in a Bornean rain forest. Journal of Ecology, 88(3): 464–478.
Wiegand T, Gunatilleke S, Gunatilleke N. 2007. Species associations in a heterogeneous Sri lankan dipterocarp forest. American Naturalist, 170(4): E77–E95.
Wiegand T, Huth A, Getzin S, Wang X, Hao Z, Gunatilleke CVS, Gunatilleke IAUN. 2012. Testing the independent species’ arrangement assertion made by theories of stochastic geometry of biodiversity. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 279(1741): 3312–3320.
Wiegand T, Moloney KA. 2004. Rings, circles, and null-models for point pattern analysis in ecology. Oikos, 104(2): 209–229.
Wiens JA. 2000. Ecological heterogeneity: an ontogeny of concepts and approaches. In: M. J. Hutchings, E. A. John and A. J. A. Stewart (eds), The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. Oxford Blackwell Science, pp.9–32.
Wright SJ. 2002. Plant diversity in tropical forests: a review of mechanisms of species coexistence. Oecologia, 130(1): 1–14.
Yamada T, Tomita A, Itoh A, Yamakura T, Ohkubo T, Kanzaki M, Tan S, Ashton PS. 2006. Habitat associations of Sterculiaceae trees in a Bornean rain forest plot. Journal of Vegetation Science, 17(5): 559–566.
Zhang Z-H, Hu G, Zhu J-D, Luo D-H, Ni J. 2010. Spatial patterns and interspecific associations of dominant tree species in two old-growth karst forests, SW China. Ecological Research, 25(6): 1151–1160.
Zhang ZH, Hu G, Zhu JD, Ni J. 2013. Aggregated spatial distributions of species in a subtropical karst forest, southwestern China. Journal of Plant Ecology, 6(2): 131–140.
Zhu Y, Mi XC, Ren HB, Ma KP. 2009. Density dependence is prevalent in a heterogeneous subtropical forest. Oikos, 119(1): 109–119.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Project funding: This study was supported with funds from the Ministry of Education and Training of Vietnam.
Corresponding editor: Chai Ruihai
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hai, N.H., Wiegand, K. & Getzin, S. Spatial distributions of tropical tree species in northern Vietnam under environmentally variable site conditions. Journal of Forestry Research 25, 257–268 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0457-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-014-0457-y