Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic Crack Tip Meshing Approach for Constraint-Based Fracture Mechanics Application

  • Tools and Techniques
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Finite element analysis is a popular method used to characterize crack tip stress and strain fields in fracture mechanics problems. In a constraint-based elastic-plastic fracture mechanics, the crack tip stress and strains are essentially dependent on the accurate crack tip finite element configuration. Typical finite element software does not provide control of node and elemental numbering order and sequence which caused difficulty to examine different crack configuration state of stress–strain using automated post-processing codes. A method to automate the creation of finite element mesh of arbitrary lengths and shapes of standard and nonstandard fracture mechanics geometries using a geometric progression technique is described. A list of equations was proposed to develop nodal and elemental model data that represented a defined region of a cracked geometry. Assembly of the regions produced a finite element mesh representing a fracture mechanics cracked geometry which can be incorporated into a typical finite element program. The approach can eliminate the modeling processes of finite element of cracked specimens and offers the ability to control the nodal and elemental numbering system to allow systematic stress and strain elucidation for large degrees of freedom mesh and history-dependent incremental plasticity crack tip analysis. The approach used to develop the finite element mesh was discussed, and examples of the finite element mesh generated by the approach were compared to established two-parameter elastic-plastic fracture mechanics results. Finally, the algorithm codes used to develop the cracked models are supplied as supplementary files to interested users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Kuna, Finite Elements in Fracture Mechanics: Theory-Numerics-Applications, in Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 201, ed. by G.M.L. Gladwell (Springer, Wiesbaden, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. S.H. Lo, Finite Element Mesh Generation. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.C. Caendish, D.A. Field, W.H. Frey, An approach to automatic three-dimensional finite element mesh generation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 21(2), 329–347 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M.S. Shephard, Approaches to the automatic generation and control of finite element meshes. Appl. Mech. Rev. 41(4), 169–185 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Schneiders, R. Bünten, Automatic generation of hexahedral finite element meshes. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 12(7), 693–707 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Geuzaine, J.F. Remacle, Gmsh: a 3-D finite element mesh generator with built-in pre-and post-processing facilities. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 79(11), 1309–1331 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. L.S. de Schiara, G.O. de Ribeiro, Finite element mesh generation for fracture mechanics in 3D coupled with Ansys: elliptical cracks and lack of fusion in nozzle welds. J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38(1), 253–263 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.C. Neto, P.A. Wawrzynek, M.T. Carvalho, L.F. Martha, A.R. Ingraffea, An algorithm for three-dimensional mesh generation for arbitrary regions with cracks. Eng. Comput. 17(1), 75–91 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Betegon, J.W. Hancock, Two-parameter characterization of elastic-plastic crack-tip fields. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME. 58(1), 104–110 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N.P. O’Dowd, C.F. Shih, Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—I. Structure of fields. J. Mech. Phys. Solids. 39(8), 989–1015 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Yang, Y.J. Chao, M.A. Sutton, Higher order asymptotic crack tip fields in a power law hardening material. Eng. Fract. Mech. 45(1), 1–20 (1993)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. W.L. Guo, Elastoplastic three dimensional crack border field—I. Singular structure of the field. Eng. Fract. Mech. 46(1), 93–104 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. F. Yusof, Three-dimensional assessments of crack tip constraint. Theoret. Appl. Fract. Mech. 101, 1–16 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Tada, P.C. Paris, G.R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook (3rd Edition). (Det Research Corporation, Pennsylvania, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. D.P. Rooke and D.J. Cartwright, Compendium of Stress Intensity Factors. (Procurement Executive, Ministry of Defence. H. M. S. O, 1976)

  17. N.P. O’Dowd, Application of two parameter approaches in elastic plastic fracture mechanics. Eng. Fract. Mech. 52, 445–465 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W.L. Guo, C. She, J.H. Zhao, and B. Zhang. Advances in three-dimensional fracture mechanics. in Key Engineering Materials. (Trans Tech Publ, 2006)

  19. ABAQUS, ABAQUS ver 6.12 User's Manual. 2012, Dassault Systemes, K. K.: Kaigan Minato-ku Tokyo, Japan

  20. ANSYS, Academic Research Mechanical 18.1. 2019

  21. ASTM-E1820, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness. (ASTM, West Conshohocken, 2009)

  22. MATLAB, 8.5.0.197613 (R2015a). (The MathWorks, Inc.: Natick, Massachusetts, United States, 2015)

  23. R. Hill, The Mathematical Theory of Plasticity. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1950)

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Sherry, C. France, M. Goldthorpe, Compendium of T-stress solutions for two and three dimensional cracked geometries. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 18(1), 141–155 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W.L. Guo, Elastoplastic three dimensional crack border field—III. Fracture parameters. Eng. Fract. Mech. 51(1), 51–71 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B. Zhang, W. Guo, Tz constraints of semi-elliptical surface cracks in elastic plates subjected to uniform tension loading. Int. J. Fract. 131(2), 173–187 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia (MOHE) grant (FRGS/1/2014/TK01/USM/02/5) which funded this research project. The ABAQUS finite element code that was used to perform the analysis was made available under an academic license from Dassault Systemes, K.K. Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Yusof.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Appendices

Appendix A: A flowchart for mesh creation implementable in a typical programming code

figure a

Appendix B: A crack tip mesh graphical user interface (GUI) program using Matlab supplementary file “gui_automate.m”

figure b

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leong, K.H., Yusof, F. & Latiff, R.H.A. Automatic Crack Tip Meshing Approach for Constraint-Based Fracture Mechanics Application. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 21, 806–821 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-021-01119-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-021-01119-5

Keywords

Navigation