Skip to main content
Log in

Creep–Fatigue Interaction of P91 Steam Piping Subjected to Typical Start-up and Shutdown Cycles

  • Technical Article---Peer-Reviewed
  • Published:
Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The possibility of creep–fatigue interaction occurring in steam pipes of power generation plants during operation has been on the front burner for years. Often, failure of the pipes during operation is attributed to either creep alone or fatigue alone. Of recent, some failures are speculated to be due to simultaneously coupled interaction between creep and fatigue, especially when the failure occurs earlier than anticipated. The literature shows that such studies are very limited and indeed under-researched. Thus, there is a dire need to systematically investigate this coupled creep–fatigue phenomenon and provide clarity as the failure of high-pressure steam piping has consequential and very significant effects on the suppliers and end users. In this work, a special Fortran user subroutine script of a phenomenological modified hyperbolic sine creep model was developed and implemented in Abaqus CAE/2019 finite element code to initially determine the creep behavior of a P91 steam piping network subjected to a typical daily start-up and shutdown cycle. Subsequently, fe-safe/TURBOlife software was employed to investigate whether the failure induced by the start-up and shutdown cycles was due to fatigue alone, creep alone or due to creep–fatigue interaction. Interestingly, the study showed that the failure of the piping network under the specified operating conditions is specifically due to creep alone. Furthermore, the intrados of the elbow in the piping network was identified as the region most prone to failure, and the piping network will only survive a total of 7.1 and 7.7 years under these operating conditions for both machined and fine-machined surfaces, respectively. These results were thereafter analytically validated, and it showed a strong correlation with the numerically determined creep rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Jing et al., Finite element simulation of creep–fatigue crack growth behavior for P91 steel at 625°C considering creep–fatigue interaction. Int. J. Fatigue 98, 41–52 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. V. Shlyannikov, A. Tumanov, N.J.E.F.M. Boychenko, A creep stress intensity factor approach to creep–fatigue crack growth. Eng. Fract. Mech. 142, 201–219 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Zhang et al., Creep–fatigue endurance of 304 stainless steels. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech. 71, 51–66 (2014)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. R.J.F. Hales, A quantitative metallographic assessment of structural degradation of type 316 stainless steel during creep–fatigue. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 3(4), 339–356 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. Sadananda, P.J.M. Shahinian, Effect of environment on crack growth behavior in austenitic stainless steels under creep and fatigue conditions. Metall. Trans. A 11(2), 267–276 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J.-F. Wen et al., Simulations of creep crack growth in 316 stainless steel using a novel creep-damage model. Eng. Fract. Mech. 98, 169–184 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Fournier et al., Creep–fatigue–oxidation interactions in a 9Cr–1Mo martensitic steel. Part I: effect of tensile holding period on fatigue lifetime. Int. J. Fatigue 30(4), 649–662 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dassault Simulia Systemes, fe-safe/TURBOlife User Manual (Providence, RI, 2017), p. 122

  9. L. Zhao et al., Analysis of creep crack growth behavior of P92 steel welded joint by experiment and numerical simulation. Mater. Sci. Eng. 558, 119–128 (2012)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Hyde et al., Creep crack growth data and prediction for a P91 weld at 650°C. Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip. 87(12), 721–729 (2010)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. M. Saber, W. Sun, T.J.E.F.M. Hyde, Numerical study of the effects of crack location on creep crack growth in weldment. Eng. Fract. Mech. 154, 72–82 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Z. Ding et al., Modeling of fatigue crack growth in a pressure vessel steel Q345R. Eng. Fract. Mech. 135, 245–258 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Bolotin, I.J.P. Belousov, Early fatigue crack growth as the damage accumulation process. Probab. Eng. Mech. 16(4), 279–287 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Li, H. Yuan, X. Li, Assessment of low cycle fatigue crack growth under mixed-mode loading conditions by using a cohesive zone model. Int. J. Fatigue 75, 39–50 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R.M. Code, Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Components of FBR Nuclear Islands and High Temperature Applications, Appendix A16, Tome I, vol. Z (AFCEN, Paris, 2007)

  16. A. Boiler, Rules for Construction of Pressure Vessels (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. R.A. Ainsworth, R5: Assessment Procedure for the High Temperature Response of Structures (British Energy Generation Ltd, 2003)

  18. M.J. Chrzanowski, Use of the damage concept in describing creep–fatigue interaction under prescribed stress. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 18(2), 69–73 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Xu et al., A novel creep–fatigue interaction damage model with the stress effect to simulate the creep–fatigue crack growth behavior. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 130, 143–153 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. Annaratone, Cylinders under internal pressure. Press. Vessel Des. 47–125 (2007)

  21. B. Kanlıkama, A. Abuşoğlu, İ.H. Güzelbey, Coupled thermoelastic analysis of thick-walled pressurized cylinders. Int. J. Energy Power Eng. 2(2), 60–68 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Kandil, A. El-Kady, A. El-Kafrawy, Transient thermal stress analysis of thick-walled cylinders. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 37(7), 721–732 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Pesonen, Online Creep and Fatigue Monitoring in Power Plants (2014)

  24. F. Garofalo, An empirical relation defining the stress dependence of minimum creep rate in metals. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 227(2), 351–355 (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  25. J.M. Montes, F.G. Cuevas, J. Cintas, New creep law. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 3(28), 377–379 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. R. Skelton, D.J. Gandy, Creep–fatigue damage accumulation and interaction diagram based on metallographic interpretation of mechanisms. Mater. High Temp. 25(1), 27–54 (2008)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J.-F. Wen, S.-T. Tu, A multiaxial creep-damage model for creep crack growth considering cavity growth and microcrack interaction. Eng. Fract. Mech. 123, 197–210 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Lemaitre, A. Plumtree, Application of damage concepts to predict creep–fatigue failures. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 101(3), 284–292 (1979)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. W. Ramberg, W.R. Osgood, Description of stress–strain curves by three parameters. Nasa Scientific and Technical Facility Report (1943), pp. 1–32

  30. R. Lagneborg, R.J.M.T. Attermo, The effect of combined low-cycle fatigue and creep on the life of austenitic stainless steels. Metall. Trans. 2(7), 1821–1827 (1971)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dassault Simulia Systeme, ABAQUS 6.13 User’s Manual (Providence, RI, 2013)

  32. T. Rasiawan, The Influence of Prior Creep Damage on the Fracture Localisation in X20 CrMoV12-1 Cross-Weld Creep Tests (University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Pyrogel-XTE-Datasheet, High-Performance Aerogel Insulation for Industrial and Commercial Applications

  34. S. Salifu et al., Thermo-mechanical stress simulation of unconstrained region of straight X20 steam pipe. Proc. Manuf. 35, 1330–1336 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Gorash, D.J.O.E. MacKenzie, On cyclic yield strength in definition of limits for characterisation of fatigue and creep behaviour. Open Eng. 7(1), 126–140 (2017)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. M.E. Fine, Y.W. Chung, Fatigue Failure in Metals, vol. 19 (ASM International, 1996)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been profusely supported by Tshwane University of Technology and the University of Pretoria, South Africa. Also, the authors greatly appreciate the unending support of Eskom Power Plant Engineering Institute (Republic of South Africa).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Smith Salifu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salifu, S., Desai, D. & Kok, S. Creep–Fatigue Interaction of P91 Steam Piping Subjected to Typical Start-up and Shutdown Cycles. J Fail. Anal. and Preven. 20, 1055–1064 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00908-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-020-00908-8

Keywords

Navigation