Skip to main content
Log in

Residual Stress Distribution and Dynamic Stress Variation in Aluminum Alloy Round Rods after Laser Shock Peening

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Laser shock peening is an advanced surface treatment technology that can significantly improve the performance of metallic components. To study the residual stress distribution and the propagation law of the dynamic stress in a round rod structure after laser shock peening, a laser shock peening finite element model was established for aluminum alloy round rod fatigue test samples. The residual stress distribution of the sample after laser shock peening with different spot sizes was analyzed in three directions. The propagation law of the dynamic stress was analyzed by a simulation of the dynamic stress change process. The accuracy of the model was experimentally verified. The results showed that as the spot size increased, the range of surface residual stress gradually increased in the axial direction. The degree of residual stress range increase in the circumference direction was smaller than the increase in the axial direction. The convergence of the unloaded tensile stress wave and the reflected tensile stress wave led to the formation of tensile residual stress in the round rod center. The compressive stress generated at the impact edge increased the final compressive residual stress. As the spot size decreased, the fatigue life of the samples increased. These conclusions can not only guide the selection of process parameters for a curved surface structure but also provide a reference for the analysis of the laser-induced shock wave propagation mechanism for specific structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Cao, A. Feng and G. Hua, Influence of Interaction Parameters on Laser Shock Wave Induced Dynamic Strain on 7050 Aluminum Alloy Surface, J. Appl. Phys., 2014, 116(15), p 153105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Rozmus-Górnikowska, J. Kusiński and Ł Cieniek, Effect of Laser Shock Peening on the Microstructure and Properties of the Inconel 625 Surface Layer, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2020, 29(3), p 1544–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Ganesh, A.K. Rai, P.K. Dwivedi et al., Study on Enhancing Fatigue Life of SAE 9260 Spring Steel with Surface Defect Through Laser Shock Peening, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28(4), p 2029–2035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. A.S. Gill, A. Telang and V.K. Vasudevan, Characteristics of Surface Layers Formed on Inconel 718 by Laser Shock Peening with and Without a Protective Coating, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 225, p 463–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Pan, X. Li, L. Zhou et al., Effect of Residual Stress on S-N Curves and Fracture Morphology of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy after Laser Shock Peening without Protective Coating, Materials, 2019, 12(22), p 3799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Glaser and C. Polese, Cavitation Bubble Oscillation Period as a Process Diagnostic During the Laser Shock Peening Process, Appl. Phys. A, 2017, 123(9), p 603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Hua, Z. Rong, Y. Ye et al., Laser Shock Processing Effects on Isothermal Oxidation Resistance of GH586 Superalloy, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 330(6), p 439–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. X. Shen, P. Shukla, P. Swanson et al., Altering the Wetting Properties of Orthopaedic Titanium Alloy (Ti–6Al–7Nb) Using Laser Shock Peening, J. Alloy. Compd., 2019, 801, p 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Keller, M. Horstmann, N. Kashaev et al., Experimentally Validated Multi-step Simulation Strategy to Predict the Fatigue Crack Propagation Rate in Residual Stress Fields After Laser Shock Peening, Int. J. Fatigue, 2019, 124, p 265–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J.L. Ocaña, C. Correa, A. García-Beltrán et al., Laser Shock Processing of Thin Al2024-T351 Plates for Induction of Through-Thickness Compressive Residual Stresses Fields, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 223, p 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Keller, M. Horstmann, N. Kashaev et al., Crack closure Mechanisms in Residual Stress Fields Generated by Laser Shock Peening: A Combined Experimental-Numerical Approach, Eng. Fracture Mech., 2019, 221, p 106630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. N. Hfaiedh, P. Peyre, H. Song et al., Finite Element Analysis of Laser Shock Peening of 2050–T8 Aluminum Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2015, 70, p 480–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. Li, S. Huang, H. Xu et al., Numerical Simulation and Experiments of Titanium Alloy Engine Blades Based on Laser Shock Processing, Aerosp. Sci. Technol., 2015, 40, p 164–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Sun, S. Keller, Y. Zhu et al., Experimental-Numerical Study of Laser-Shock-Peening-Induced Retardation of Fatigue Crack Propagation in Ti-17 Titanium Alloy, Int. J. Fatigue, 2020, 145, p 106081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. T. Kim, S. Hwang, K.H. Hong et al., Numerical Analysis of Working Distance of Square-shaped Beam Homogenizer for Laser Shock Peening, Current Optics Photonics, 2017, 1(3), p 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  16. H.C. Qiao, B.Y. Sun, J.B. Zhao et al., Numerical Modeling of Residual Stress Field for Linear Polarized Laser Oblique Shock Peening, Optik, 2019, 186, p 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H.C. Qiao, Experimental Investigation of Laser Peening on Ti17 Titanium Alloy for Rotor Blade Applications, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2015, 351, p 524–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Fang, Y. Li, W. He et al., Numerical Simulation of Residual Stresses Fields of DD6 Blade During Laser Shock Processing, Mater. Des., 2013, 43, p 170–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. G. Xu, K.Y. Luo, F.Z. Dai et al., Effects of Scanning Path and Overlapping Rate on Residual Stress of 316L Stainless Steel Blade Subjected to Massive Laser Shock Peening Treatment with Square Spots, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2019, 481(JUL.1), p 1053–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K.D. Ramkumar, A. Narenthiran, A. Konjenti et al., Effect of Low Energy Laser Shock Peening on the Mechanical Integrity of Hastelloy C-276 Welds, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2019, 274, p 116296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Li, X. Qi and D. Xiang, Finite Element Modeling of Crack Generation in Laser Shock Peening Processed Airfoils, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2014, 2014, p 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Yang, P.D. Hodgson, Q. Liu et al., Geometrical Effects on Residual Stresses in 7050–T7451 Aluminum Alloy Rods Subject to Laser Shock Peening, J. Mater. Process. Tech., 2008, 201(1), p 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Zhao, Y. Dong and C. Ye, Laser Shock Peening Induced Residual Stresses and the Effect on Crack Propagation Behavior, Int. J. Fatigue, 2017, 100, p 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. C. Correa, L.L. d Ruiz, M. Díaz et al., Influence of Pulse Sequence and Edge Material Effect on Fatigue Life of Al2024-T351 Specimens Treated by Laser Shock Processing[J], Int. J. Fatigue, 2015, 70, p 196–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. W. Xian-Qian, D. Zhu-Ping, H. Chen-Guang et al., A Coupling Model for Computing Plasma Pressure Induced by Laser Shock Peening, Explosion Shock Waves, 2012, 32(1), p 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  26. R. Fabbro, J. Fournier, P. Ballard et al., Physical Study of Laser-Produced Plasma in Confined Geometry, J. Appl. Phys., 1990, 68(2), p 775–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. X. Zhang, J. She, S. Li et al., Simulation on Deforming Progress and Stress Evolution During Laser Shock Forming with Finite Element Method, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, 220, p 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J.S. Kim, H.S. Nam, Y.J. Kim, et al., Numerical Study of Laser Shock Peening Effects on Alloy 600 Nozzles with Initial Residual Stresses. J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 2017, 139(4).

  29. Y. Hu and Z. Yao, Overlapping Rate Effect On Laser Shock Processing of 1045 Steel by Small Spots with Nd:YAG Pulsed Laser, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 202(8), p 1517–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Wang, X. Wang, Y. Xu et al., Numerical Modeling of the Confined Laser Shock Peening of the OFHC Copper, Int. J. Mech. Sci., 2016, 108, p 104–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. T. Nam, Finite element analysis of residual stress field induced by laser shock peening. The Ohio State University, 2002.

  32. R.A. Brockman, W.R. Braisted, S.E. Olson et al., Prediction and Characterization of Residual Stresses from Laser Shock Peening, Int. J. Fatigue, 2012, 36(1), p 96–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. C. Hu, H.J. Qi, X.H. Zhang et al., FEM Study and Characterization on Laser Shock Peening of TC4 Titanium Alloy Structure, Appl. Mech. Mater., 2014, 651–653, p 34–37.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Y.F. Jiang, B. Ji, X.D. Gan et al., Study on the Effect of Laser Peening with Different Power Densities on Fatigue Life of Fastener Hole, Opt. Laser Technol., 2018, 106, p 311–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. W. Zhou, X. Ren, Y. Yang et al., Finite Element Analysis of Laser Shock Peening Induced Near-Surface Deformation in Engineering Metals, Opt. Laser Technol., 2019, 119, p 105608–105608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. W.Y. Lv, Z.Q. Liu, Y. Hua et al., Effects of Overlap Rate and Energy Density on Mechanical Properties of Inconel 718 by Multiple Small-Spot-LSP Impacts, Mater. Res. Express, 2019, 6(6), p 066576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Y. Pei and C. Duan, Study on Stress-Wave Propagation and Residual Stress Distribution of Ti-17 Titanium Alloy by Laser Shock Peening, J. Appl. Phys., 2017, 122(19), p 193102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. S. Huang, Y. Zhu, W. Guo et al., Impact Toughness and Microstructural Response of Ti-17 Titanium Alloy Subjected to Laser Shock Peening, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2017, 327, p 32–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. G.X. Lu, J.D. Liu, H.C. Qiao et al., Effect of Laser Shock on Tensile Deformation Behavior of a Single Crystal Nickel-Base Superalloy, Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2017, 686, p 46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51875558).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Boyu Sun or Jibin Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, B., Zhao, J., Qiao, H. et al. Residual Stress Distribution and Dynamic Stress Variation in Aluminum Alloy Round Rods after Laser Shock Peening. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 31, 9073–9082 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06885-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06885-3

Keywords

Navigation