Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Behavior of Armor Steel Gas Metal Arc Welding Joints Performed by Nickel-Chromium and Low-Alloy Steel Filler Metals

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this work is to improve the mechanical properties of armor steel welded joints by manufacturing dissimilar joints using a nickel-iron-chromium filler material. This work analyzes the hardness, tensile strength, impact resistance, and high-cycle fatigue behavior of an armor Cr-Mn steel, welded with the gas metal arc welding process. In the purpose of evaluating the advantage of dissimilar joints, the armor Cr-Mn steel was welded using two different filler materials: a commonly used filler material, ER70S-6, and a nickel-iron-chromium filler material, ERNiFeCr-2. The microstructural characteristics of the welded joints were analyzed and discussed. The ERNiFeCr-2 welds presented an increase in yield stress (20%), ultimate tensile stress (30%), and impact resistance (16%) in comparison with the ER70S-6 joints. However, an approximately 50% ductility decrease was also reported. It is argued that the superior strength and limited ductility of the ERNiFeCr-2 welds was attributed to the presence of carbides in the austenitic matrix of the weld metal. In terms of fatigue performance, both welded joints presented similar behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Magudeeswaran et al., Dynamic Fracture Toughness (JId) Behavior of Armor-Grade Q&T Steel weldments: Effect of Weld Metal Composition and Microstructure, Met. Mater. Int., 2009, 15, p 1017–1026.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. G. Madhusudhan Reddy and T. Mohandas, Ballistic Performance of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Weldments, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1996, 57, p 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Effect of Welding Consumables on Hydrogen Induced Cracking of Armour Grade Quenched and Tempered Steel Welds, Ironmak. Steelmak., 2008, 35, p 549–560.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian, T.S. Balasubramanian and G.M. Reddy, Effect of Welding Consumables on Tensile and Impact Properties of Shielded Metal Arc Welded High Strength, Quenched and Tempered Steel Joints, Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2008, 13, p 97–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Effect of Welding Consumables on Fatigue Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded High Strength, Q&T Steel Joints, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2009, 18, p 49–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Magudeeswaran, V. Balasubramanian and G. Madhusudhan Reddy, Effect of Welding Processes and Consumables on Fatigue Crack Growth Behaviour of Armour Grade Quenched and Tempered Steel Joints, Def. Technol., 2014, 10, p 47–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cabrilo, K. Geric, M. Jovanovic and L. Vukic, Weldability and Impact Energy Properties of High-Hardness Armor Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, 27, p 1281–1295.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Kuzmikova, H. Li, J. Norrish, Z. Pan and N. Larkin, Development of Safe Optimized Welding Procedures for High Strength Q&T Steel Welded with Austenitic Consumables, Soldag. Insp., 2013, 18, p 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Naveen Kumar, V. Balasubramanian, S. Malarvizhi, A. Hafeezur Rahman and V. Balaguru, Effect of Welding Consumables on the Ballistic Performance of Shielded Metal Arc Welded Dissimilar Armor Steel Joints, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2021 https://doi.org/10.1007/S11665-021-06219-9/FIGURES/18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Saxena, A. Kumaraswamy, G. Madhusudhan Reddy and V. Madhu, Influence of Welding Consumables on Tensile and Impact Properties of Multi-Pass SMAW Armox 500T Steel Joints vis-a-vis Base Metal, Def. Technol., 2018, 14, p 188–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N.K. Subramani, B. Visvalingam, M. Sudersanan, H.R. Abdur and B. Vadivel, Influence of Welding Consumables on Ballistic Performance of Gas Metal Arc Welded Ultra-High Hard Armor Steel Joints, Mater. Perform. Charact., 2021, 10, p 443–462.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Madhusudhan Reddy, T. Mohandas and K.K. Papukutty, Effect of Welding Process on the Ballistic Performance of High-Strength Low-Alloy Steel Weldments, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1988, 74, p 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. V. Sharma and A.S. Shahi, Quenched and Tempered Steel Welded with Micro-Alloyed Based Ferritic Fillers, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2018, 253, p 2–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. E.R.S. Souza, R.P. Weber, S.N. Monteiro and S.D.S.A. Oliveira, Microstructure Effect of Heat Input on Ballistic Performance of Welded High Strength Armor Steel, Materials, 2021, 14, p 5789.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Cortés, E.R. Barragán, V.H. López, R.R. Ambriz and D. Jaramillo, Mechanical properties of Inconel 718 welds performed by gas tungsten arc welding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2018, 94, p 3949–3961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Cortés et al., Fatigue and Crack Growth Behavior of Inconel 718–AL6XN Dissimilar Welds, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, 745, p 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. G. Dak and C. Pandey, A Critical Review on Dissimilar Welds Joint Between Martensitic and Austenitic Steel for Power Plant Application, J. Manuf. Process., 2020, 58, p 377–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. K.G. Kumar, K.D. Ramkumar and N. Arivazhagan, Characterization of Metallurgical and Mechanical Properties on the Multi-Pass Welding of Inconel 625 and AISI 316L, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2015, 29, p 1039–1047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A.A. Sadek, M. Abass, B. Zaghloul, A. Elrefaey and M. Ushio, Investigation of Dissimilar Joints Between Low Carbon Steel and Monel 400 (Materials, Metallurgy and Weldability), Trans. JWRI, 2000, 29, p 21–28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. H.T. Lee, S.L. Jeng, C.H. Yen and T.Y. Kuo, Dissimilar Welding of Nickel-Based Alloy 690 to SUS 304L with Ti Addition, J. Nucl. Mater., 2004, 335, p 59–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Y.H. Kim, G.S. Frankel, J.C. Lippold and G. Guaytima, Development of a Chromium-Free Consumable for Austenitic Stainless Steels Part 1: Monel (Alloy 400) Filler Metal, Corrosion, 2006 https://doi.org/10.5006/1.3278251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A. Hinojos et al., Joining of Inconel 718 and 316 Stainless Steel Using Electron Beam Melting Additive Manufacturing Technology, Mater. Des., 2016, 94, p 17–27.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Mortezaie and M. Shamanian, An Assessment of Microstructure, Mechanical Properties and Corrosion Resistance of Dissimilar Welds Between Inconel 718 and 310S Austenitic Stainless Steel, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 2014, 116, p 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H.-C. Chen, A.J. Pinkerton and L. Li, Fibre Laser Welding of Dissimilar Alloys of Ti-6Al-4V and Inconel 718 for Aerospace Applications, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, 52, p 977–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Z. Sun and J.C. Ion, Laser Welding of Dissimilar Metal Combinations, J. Mater. Sci., 1995, 30, p 4205–4214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Dev, K.D. Ramkumar, N. Arivazhagan and R. Rajendran, Investigations on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Dissimilar Welds of Inconel 718 and Sulphur Rich Martensitic Stainless Steel, AISI 416, J. Manuf. Process., 2018, 32, p 685–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Paddea, F. Masuyama & A. Shibli, T23 and T24 – new generation low alloyed steels. in Coal Power Plant Materials and Life Assessment: Developments and Applications 87–106 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1533/9780857097323.1.87

  28. M. Shakil et al., Microstructure and Hardness Studies of electron Beam Welded INCONEL 625 and Stainless Steel 304L, Vacuum, 2014, 110, p 121–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. C. Pandey, Mechanical and Metallurgical Characterization of Dissimilar P92/SS304 L Welded Joints Under Varying Heat Treatment Regimes, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2020, 51, p 2126–2142.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Locq, M. Marty, A. Walder and P. Caron, Development of New PM Superalloys for High Temperature Applications, Intermetallics and Superalloys. D.G. Morris, S. Naka, P. Caron Ed., Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  31. E. Akca and A. Gursel, A Review on Superalloys and IN718 Nickel-Based INCONEL Superalloy, Period. Eng. Natl. Sci., 2015 https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v3i1.43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. C. Lippold, S. D. Kiser, J. N DuPont. Welding metallurgy and weldability of nickel-base alloys. (Wiley, 2013)

  33. S. Auvinen et al. Microstructural evolution and precipitation behavior in heat affected zone of Inconel 625 and AISI 904L dissimilar welds. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 263, 062073 (2017).

  34. M. Sireesha, V. Shankar, S.K. Albert and S. Sundaresan, Microstructural Features of Dissimilar Welds Between 316LN Austenitic Stainless Steel and Alloy 800, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2000, 292, p 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P.E. Fritz Saenger, Jr, I. Guide to Weldability Carbon and Low Alloy Steels. (2005). http://www.copyright.com.

  36. J. Carrier et al., Influence of the Heat Affected Zone on the Dynamic Behavior of a Welded Joint of Armoured Steel, Int. J. Impact Eng., 2017, 104, p 154–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. ASTM International - Standard References for ASTM E3 - 11(2017). https://www.astm.org/DATABASE.CART/STD_REFERENCE/E3.htm.

  38. ASTM E92 - 17 Standard Test Methods for Vickers Hardness and Knoop Hardness of Metallic Materials. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E92.htm.

  39. ASTM E8 / E8M - 21 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E8.

  40. ASTM E23 - 18 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E23.htm.

  41. E2298-13a. ASTM E2298 - Standard Test Method for Instrumented Impact Testing of Metallic Materials. ASTM Book of Standards (2013) https://doi.org/10.1520/E2298-13A.2.

  42. ASTM E466 - 21 Standard Practice for Conducting Force Controlled Constant Amplitude Axial Fatigue Tests of Metallic Materials. https://www.astm.org/Standards/E466.htm.

  43. Recommended Values of Thermophysical Properties for Selected Commercial Alloys | ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9781855735699/recommended-values-of-thermophysical-properties-for-selected-commercial-alloys.

  44. O. Grong, Institute of Materials (London, E. Metallurgical modelling of welding. (London : Institute of Materials, 1997).

  45. S. Kumar, C. Pandey and A. Goyal, Role of Dissimilar IN617 Nickel Alloy Consumable on Microstructural and Mechanical Behavior of P91 Welds Joint, Arch. Civil Mech. Eng., 2020, 20, p 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. M.K. Singh et al. Effect of filler metals on the mechanical properties of Inconel 625 and AISI 904L dissimilar weldments using gas tungsten arc welding. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 263, 062072 (2017).

  47. G. Rogalski, A. Świerczyńska, M. Landowski and D. Fydrych, Mechanical and Microstructural Characterization of TIG Welded Dissimilar Joints Between 304L Austenitic Stainless Steel and Incoloy 800HT Nickel Alloy, Metals, 2020, 10, p 559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Y. Zhao, J. Gong, X. Wang, W. Gao and Q. Li, Carbon Diffusion in Dissimilar Joints Between P91 and 12Cr1MoV Steels Welded by Different Consumables at High Temperature, Mater. High Temp., 2015, 32, p 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1179/1878641315Y.0000000002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. A. Hirose, D. Nakamura, H. Yanagawa and K.F. Kobayashi, Microstructure and mechanical property of laser welds of single crystal nickel base superalloy CMSX-4, Mater. Sci. Forum, 2003, 426–432, p 4007–4012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. L.A. James, Fatigue Crack Growth in Inconel 718 Weldments at Elevated Temperatures, Weld. J. Res. Supl., 1978, 57(1), p 17s–23s.

    Google Scholar 

  51. S. Sui et al., The Influence of Laves Phases on the Room Temperature Tensile Properties of Inconel 718 Fabricated by Powder Feeding Laser Additive Manufacturing, Acta Mater., 2019, 164, p 413–427.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. K. Sivaprasad, C.G.S. Raman, P. Mastanaiah and G.M. Reddy, Influence of Magnetic Arc Oscillation and Current Pulsing on Microstructure and High Temperature Tensile Strength of Alloy 718 TIG Weldments, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 428, p 327–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate the support of CONACYT-México (Project A1-S-27474) and SIP-IPN to conduct this research. René Serrano is thankful to CONACYT for the scholarship provided for his doctorate studies. The technical and academic support given by Centro de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica of the IPN is also gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. R. Ambriz.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Serrano, R., Ambriz, R.R., Ayoub, G. et al. Mechanical Behavior of Armor Steel Gas Metal Arc Welding Joints Performed by Nickel-Chromium and Low-Alloy Steel Filler Metals. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 31, 3930–3942 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06517-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-06517-2

Keywords

Navigation