Abstract
Casting that comprises multiple parts with different thicknesses is prone to experience warpage deformation due to the non-uniform temperature distribution from the beginning of solidification to room temperature. This study is the first to investigate the effect of sand mold shake-out timing on the warpage deformation of a lamellar graphite gray cast iron casting with thick and thin geometries by both experiment and finite element analysis. It was found that warpage deformation was suppressed by 81.6% when the shakeout was performed just after A1 (austenite to ferrite) phase transformation temperature rather than after eutectic solidification temperature. The elastoplastic-creep analysis was proven to predict the warpage amount better than elastoplastic analysis, in which prediction error was reduced by 116%. The introduction of creep term that should not contribute to the work-hardening of the casting was assumed to relax the stress and suppress the warpage deformation; however, poor estimation of the creep properties at about 1000 °C to the A1 transformation temperature reduced the prediction accuracy. A sudden increase of warpage was observed and predicted during shakeout due to the release of the elastic strain that was accumulated as a result of sand mold constraint.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
T. Nakano, Warp on the Bed Casting of Machine Tool and Its Counter Measure, Imono J. Jpn. Foundrym. Eng. Soc., 1991, 63, p 976–982. (in Japanese)
M. Tanaka, Warpage of Bed Castings for Large Machine Tools and Countermeasures, Imono J. Jpn. Foundrym. Eng. Soc., 1991, p 483–485. (in Japanese)
L. Sung-Mo and L. Won-Jae, Finite-Element Analysis on Thermomechanical Behavior of A Marine Propeller Casting in the Sand-Casting Process, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2004, 14, p 388–394.
Y. Motoyama, S. Sekiguchi, T. Okane, and M. Yoshida, Thermo-Elasto-Plastic Finite Element Analysis of Warping Deformation during Casting of Gray Cast Iron, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2020, 277, p 116454.
C. Marscre, Klassifikation, Fehler Allgemeiner Art Und Graugußfehler. Düsseldorf Gußfehler-Atlas Band 1, Gießerei-Verlag GmbH, Kansas, 1995. ((in Germany))
R.A. Harding and N.J. Saunders, Theory and Practice of Computer Modelling of Phase Diagrams for Cast Irons, AFS Trans., 1998, 97–49, p 451–458.
Y. Motoyama, H. Takahashi, T. Okane, Y. Fukuda, and M. Yoshida, Numerical and Experimental Study on Residual Stress in Gray Cast Iron Stress Lattice Shape Casting, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2013, 44, p 3261–3270.
Y. Motoyama, H. Shiga, T. Sato, H. Kambe, and M. Yoshida, Elasto-Plastic-Creep Constitutive Equation of an Al-Si-Cu High-Pressure Die Casting Alloy for Thermal Stress Analysis, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, 47, p 5598–5608.
Y. Motoyama, D. Inukai, T. Okane, and M. Yoshida, Verification of the Simulated Residual Stress in the Cross Section of Gray Cast Iron Stress Lattice Shape Casting via Thermal Stress Analysis, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2014, 45A, p 2315–2325.
K. Chijiiwa and M. Hayashi, Mechanical Properties of Ductile Cast Iron at Temperatures in the Region of Room Temperature to Liquidus, Imono J. Jpn. Foundrym. Soc., 1979, 51, p 395–400. ((in Japanese))
J.C. Margerie, The Metallurgy of Cast Iron, B, Lux. I. Minkoff, F. Mollard Ed., Georgi Publishing, Switzerland, 1975, p 723–739
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express gratitude to Mr. Akihiro Yano for the assistance during experiment. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khairi Faiz, M., Uehara, K., Nakajima, T. et al. Effect of Sand Mold Constraint on Warpage Deformation of Lamellar Graphite Gray Cast Iron and Prediction by Elastoplastic-Creep Finite Element Analysis. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 30, 4669–4680 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05716-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05716-1