Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Open-Cell Nickel Alloy Foam–Natural Rubber Hybrid: Compression Energy Absorption Behavior Analysis and Experiment

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work deals with the compression energy absorption aspects of an open-cell nickel foam–natural rubber hybrid material. A comprehensive numerical analysis and elaborate experiments were the main tools used in this investigation. Open-cell nickel foam was analyzed as tetrakaidecahedron geometry. Inputs to the geometric dimensions were obtained by subjecting the nickel foam samples to x-ray micro-computed tomography (µCT) technique. A Mooney–Rivlin 2 parameter-based material model was implemented for the rubber part. Analysis was carried out using finite element-based commercial software ANSYS® with explicit dynamics as the chosen analysis scheme. During analysis, symmetry boundary conditions were applied considering each unit cell to be a mirror image of the adjacent cells. Static compression experiments were conducted on fabricated samples for validation of analysis with regard to energy absorption behavior. Scanning electron microscopy examination was carried out on hybrid samples both pre- and post-compression test for better understanding of compression mechanism. The compression energy absorption value of hybrid sample is significantly better than open-cell nickel foam and natural rubber values. The study clearly demonstrates interfacial bonds failure coupled with progressive deformation of foam cell ligaments as the main reasons for enhanced energy absorption during compression loading and presents the results quantitatively as a novel feature. In the end, the paper thoroughly compares the analysis and results in a critical way.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J.C. Viana, Polymeric Materials for Impact and Energy Dissipation, Plast., Rubber Compos., 2006, 35, p 260–267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L.J. Gibson and M.F. Ashby, Cellular Solids: Structures and Properties, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. T.I. Duarte, M. Vesenjak, L. Krstulović-Opara, and Z. Ren, Crush Performance of Multifunctional Hybrid Foams Based on an Aluminium Alloy Open-Cell Foam Skeleton, Polym. Test., 2018, 67, p 246–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. Raju, R. Johnson, and A.K. Khanra, Preparation and Comparative Evolution of Mechanical Behavior of Fe and Fe2O3 Foams and Their Polymer Composites, J. Alloys Compd., 2018, 750, p 71–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Kishimoto and N. Shinya, Development of Metallic Closed Cellular Materials Containing Polymers, Mater. Des., 2000, 21, p 575–578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Reinfried, G. Stephani, F. Luthardt, J. Adler, M. John, and A. Krombholz, Hybrid Foams—A New Approach for Multifunctional Applications, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2011, 13(11), p 1031–1036

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Kunmutta and A. Seksak, Structure and Mechanical Properties of ADC 12 Al Foam-Polymer Interpenetrating Phase Composites with Epoxy Resin or Silicone, Mater. Test., 2018, 60(11), p 1061–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Yin and N. Rayess, Characterization of Polymer-Metal Foam Hybrids for Use in Vibration Dampening and Isolation, in 8th International Conference on Porous Metals and Metallic Foams, 2014, in Procedia Materials Science, vol 4, p 295–300

  9. N. Dukhan, N. Rayess, and J. Hadley, Characterization of Aluminum Foam–Polypropylene Interpenetrating Phase Composites: Flexural Test Results, Mech. Mater., 2010, 42(2), p 134–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X.G. Yang, D.L. Duan, X. Zhang, S.L. Jiang, S. Li, and H.C. Zhang, Impact Behavior of Polyetheretherketone/Nickel Foam Co-continuous Composites, 2019, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2019, 28, p 6380–6390

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Chaturvedi, Recent Developments in the Field of Metal Foam-Polymer Hybrid Materials: A Brief Overview, J. Met. Mater. Miner., 2018, 28(1), p 136–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J.L. Yu, J.R. Li, and S.S. Hu, Strain-Rate Effect and Micro-structural Optimization of Cellular Metals, Mech. Mater., 2006, 38, p 160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H.F. Cheng and F.S. Han, Compressive Behavior and Energy Absorbing Characteristic of Open Cell Aluminum Foam Filled with Silicate Rubber, Scr. Mater., 2003, 49, p 583–586

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. M. Vesenjak, L. Krstulovic-Opara, Z. Ren, A. Ochsner, and Z. Domazet, Experimental Study of Open-Cell Cellular Structures with Elastic Filler Material, Exp. Mech., 2009, 49, p 501–509

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Yuan, N. Rayess, and N. Dukhan, Modelling of the Mechanical Properties of a Polymer-Metal Foam Hybrid, Proc. Mater. Sci., 2014, 4, p 215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Xie, L. Zixing, and Z. Yuan, Numerical Analysis of Elastic and Elastoplastic Behavior of Interpenetrating Phase Composites, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2015, 97, p 94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Su, Z. Li, X. Gong, Q. Ouyang, Q. Guo, C. Guo, and J. Zhang, Structural Modeling and Mechanical Behavior of Metal-Porous-Polymer-Composites (MPPCs) with Different Polymer Volume Fractions, Compos. Struct., 2016, 153, p 673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Khodadadi, G. Liaghat, H. Ahmadi, A. Bahramian, Y. Anani, O. Razmkhah, and S. Asemeni, Numerical and Experimental Study of Impact on Hyperelastic Rubber Panels, Iran. Polym. J., 2019, 28, p 113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Angamnuaysiri and S. Asavavisithchai, Mechanical Properties of Interpenetrating Phase Composites Using Open-Cell Al Foams with Natural Rubber and Polyethylene, J. Met. Mater. Miner., 2015, 25(2), p 31–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Tobajas, E. Ibartz, and L. Gracia, A Comparative Study of Hyperelastic Constitutive Models to Characterize the Behavior of a Polymer Used in Automotive Engines, in Proceedings of 2nd International Electronic Conference on Materials, MDPI, 2016, p A002

  21. M. Shahzad, A. Kamran, M.Z. Siddiqui, and M. Farhan, Mechanical Characterization and FE Modelling of a Hyperelastic Material, Mater. Res., 2015, 18, p 918–924

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. W.-Y. Jang and S. Kyriakides, On the Crushing of Aluminum Open-Cell Foams: Part II, Analysis, Int. J. Solids Struct., 2009, 46, p 635–650

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Perrot, R. Panneton, and X. Olny, Periodic Unit Cell Reconstruction of Porous Media: Application to Open-Cell Aluminum Foams, J. Appl. Phys. Am. Inst. Phys., 2007, 101(11), p 11–113538

    Google Scholar 

  24. J. Gao and N. Rayees, Modeling of the Mechanical Properties of a Polymer-Metal Foam Interpenetrating Phase Composite, in Proceedings of the ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Montreal, Canada, 2014

  25. R. Jhaver and H. Tippur, Processing Compression Response and Finite Element Modeling of Syntactic Foam Based Interpenetrating Phase Composite (IPC), Mater. Sci. Eng., A, 2009, 499, p 507–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S.J. Jerrams and J. Bowen, Modelling the Behaviour of Rubber-Like Materials to Obtain Correlation with Rigidity Modulus Tests, Trans. Model. Simul., 1995, 10, p 511–518

    Google Scholar 

  27. L.A. Wood, Stress–Strain Relation of Pure-Gum Rubber Vulcanizates in Compression and Tension, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand., 1958, 60(3), p 193–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. R.P. Merrett, G.S. Langdon, and M.D. Theobald, The Blast and Impact Loading of Aluminum Foam, Mats Des., 2013, 44, p 311–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. A.P.S. Selvadurai and M. Shi, Fluid Pressure Loading of a Hyperelastic Membrane, Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 2012, 47(2), p 228–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. A. Eriksson and A. Nordmark, Non-unique Response of Mooney–Rivlin Model in Bi-axial Membrane Stress, Comput. Struct., 2014, 144, p 12–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. N. Kumar and V.V. Rao, Hyperelastic Mooney–Rivlin Model: Determination and Physical Interpretation of Material Constants, MIT Int J. Mech. Eng., 2016, 6(1), p 43–46

    Google Scholar 

  32. M.N. Hamza and H.M. Alwan, Hyperelastic Constitutive Modeling of Rubber and Rubber like Materials under Finite Strain, Eng. Technol. J., 2010, 28(13), p 2560–2575

    Google Scholar 

  33. C. Liu, C.M. Cady, M.L. Lovato, and E.B. Orler, Uniaxial Tension of Thin Rubber Liner Sheets and Hyperelastic Model Investigation, J. Mater. Sci., 2015, 50, p 1401–1411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Dr. Prabhat Ranjan is acknowledged for contributing toward thought-building process. Mr. Tarun Dewangan, Dr. P. S. Sarkar and Mr. Ashutosh Anand have provided crucial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhay Chaturvedi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chaturvedi, A., Gupta, M.K. & Chaturvedi, S. Open-Cell Nickel Alloy Foam–Natural Rubber Hybrid: Compression Energy Absorption Behavior Analysis and Experiment. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 30, 885–893 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05435-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-05435-z

Keywords

Navigation