Skip to main content
Log in

Bending Fatigue in Low-Pressure Carbonitriding of Steel Alloys with Boron and Niobium Additions

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the low-pressure carbonitriding (LPCN) response of four different steel alloys is investigated. The influence of unprotected boron is evaluated by comparing the microstructure and fatigue performance of 20MnCr5 with and without boron additions after LPCN. Similarly, the influence of Nb microalloying is assessed by comparing 8620 steel with and without Nb additions. Low-pressure carbonitriding heat treatments were developed to achieve case depths of 0.65-0.75 mm in each alloy, thus allowing the influence of alloying and microstructure to be explored independent of case depth. The hardness and case microstructure are correlated with bending fatigue response measured with Brugger fatigue specimens, which are designed to simulate the root of a gear tooth. The 20MnCr5 alloys had the highest fatigue strength, and the 8620 alloys had the lowest fatigue strength, despite having the same hardness profile and case depth. Reductions in prior austenite grain size and increased surface hardness appeared to have a positive effect on the endurance limit of the steel alloys. Retained austenite volume fraction on the surface of the steel alloys as well as non-martensitic transformation products subsurface in the case did not have an apparent direct contribution to fatigue performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Marray, P. Jacquet, M. Mansori, A. Fabre, and L. Barrallier, A Thermodynamic and Experimental Study of Low Alloy Steels After Carbonitriding in a Low-Pressure Atmosphere, Met. Sci. Heat Treat., 2014, 56, p 434–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Kanchanomai and W. Limtrakarn, Effect of Residual Stress on Fatigue Failure of Carbonitrided Low-Carbon Steel, J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2008, 17, p 879–887

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. J. Dossett, and G.E. Totten, Introduction to surface hardening of steels, in ASM Handbook, vol. 4A (ASM International. Materials Park, 2013), pp. 393–395

  4. T. Hoffmanm M. Steinbacher, B. Clausen, S. Bischoff, H. Klümper-Westkamp, and H. Zoch, New carbonitriding processes, in Proceedings of 26th ASM Heat Treating Society Conference (2011), pp. 115–121

  5. A. Goldsteinas, New vacuum processes achieve mechanical property improvement in gearbox components, Gear Technol., 2007, 24, p 34–39

    Google Scholar 

  6. D.J. Dixon and A.M. Mood, A Method for Obtaining and Analyzing Sensitivity Data, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 1948, 43(241), p 109–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Spice, D. Matlock, and G. Fett, Optimized Carburized Steel Fatigue Performance as Assessed with Gear and Modified Brugger Fatigue Tests, SAE Technical Publication, no. 2002-01-1003 (SAE, Warrendale, 2002)

  8. I. Yoshimoto, Fatigue Test by Staircase Method with Small Samples, Bull. JSME, 1962, 15(18), p 211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C.F. Jatczak, Retained Austenite and Its Measurements by x-Ray Diffraction, SAE Technical Paper 800426 (1980)

  10. W. Crafts and J. Lamont, Effect of some elements on hardenability, Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng., 1944, 1657, p 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. W. Leslie, Physical Metallurgy of Steels, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  12. G.F. Melloy, P.R. Summon, and P.P. Podgursky, Optimizing the Boron Effect, Metall. Mater. Trans., 1973, 4, p 2279–2289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Dossett, and G.E. Totten, Hardenability calculation of carbon and low-alloy steels with low or medium carbon, in ASM Handbook, vol. 4A (ASM International. Materials Park, 2013), pp. 64–71

  14. D.T. Llewellyn and W.T. Cook, Metallurgy of Boron-Treated Low-Alloy Steels, Met. Technol., 1975, 1, p 517–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. P. Yan and H.K.D.H. Bhadeshia, The Austenite-Ferrite Transformation in Enhanced-Niobium, Low-Carbon Steel. Mater. Sci. Technol., 2015, 31(9), p 1066–1076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. D.K. Matlock, K.A. Alogab, M.D. Richards, and J.G. Speer, Surface Processing to Improve the Fatigue Resistance of Advanced Bar Steels for Automotive Applications, Mater. Res., 2005, 8, p 453–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. R.E. Thompson, Microstructural Development and Fatigue Behavior of Niobium Modified Carburizing Steels, MS Thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering (2007)

  18. C.M. Enloe, K.O. Findley, J.G. Speer, A. Shibata, D. Terada, and N. Tsuji, The effects of Mo and initial precipitate distribution on (Nb,Ti)(C,N) precipitate size evolution in a high-temperature carburizing steel, in Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Steel Science (ISSS-2012) (ISIJ, Tokyo, 2012) pp. 163–166

  19. M.M.A. Bepari, Carburizing: A Method of Case Hardening of Steel, Mater. Sci. Mater. Eng., 2017, 2, p 71–106

    Google Scholar 

  20. ASTM Standard Practice, Standard Practice for x-Ray Determination of Retained Austenite in Steel with Neat random Crystallographic Orientation, ASTM E975-13 (2013)

  21. J.M. Prado and J.L. Arques, Influence of Retained Austenite on the Fatigue Endurance of Carbonitrided Steels, J. Mater. Sci., 1984, 19, p 2980–2988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. R. Tricot, M. Lacoude, and B. Champin, Étude Analytique des Processus Governant le Comportement en Service des Engrenages, Revue de Métallurgie, 1972, 69(7–8), p 497–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Wyszkowski, H. Priegnitz, E. Gozdzik, and A. Ratkiewicz, Influence de L’austénite Rédiduelle sur Qualques Propriétés de L’acier Cémenté, Revue de Métallurgie, 1971, 68(6), p 411–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Schmuck, Comparison of Surface Properties of Carburized and Carbonitrided Parts, Aciers Speciaux, 1976, 33, p 5–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. K.O. Findley, G. Krauss, R.J. Johnson, and D.K. Matlock, Deterministic Analysis of Crack Growth Rates in Carburized Steels, Procedia Eng., 2011, 10, p 370–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. R.S. Hyde, G. Krauss, and D.K. Matlock, The Effect of Reheat Treatments on Fatigue and Fracture of Carburized Steels, J. Mater. Manuf., 1994, 103(section 5), p 588–596

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.P. Wise, G. Krauss, and D.K. Matlock, Microstructure and fatigue resistance of carburized steels, in 20th ASM Heat Treating Society Conference Proceeding (ASM International, St. Louis, 2000), pp. 152–161

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Brazilian CNPq—Science without Boarders program and the sponsors of the Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center (ASPPRC) and CBMM North America. Additionally, the authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation CAREER Award No. 0955236.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larissa Vilela Costa.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vilela Costa, L., Corrêa de Oliveira, D., Wallace, D. et al. Bending Fatigue in Low-Pressure Carbonitriding of Steel Alloys with Boron and Niobium Additions. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 29, 3593–3602 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04757-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-020-04757-2

Keywords

Navigation