Skip to main content
Log in

A Study on Peripheral Grain Structure Evolution of an AA7050 Aluminum Alloy with a Laboratory-Scale Extrusion Setup

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A laboratory-scale hot extrusion setup was designed to investigate recrystallization and grain growth behavior of an AA7050 alloy during extrusion and subsequent heat treatments. Compared with industrial extrusion, the laboratory-scale process enabled rapid water quenching of extrudate with less delay so that the dynamic grain structure development was captured. After extrusion, static microstructure evolution in the extrudates was studied using salt bath annealing for 5 and 15 s at 490 °C and solutionization treatment for 1 h at 490 °C. The salt bath annealing was a simulation of the delay of press quenching in typical industrial extrusion practices. In the as-quenched extrudates, the peripheral region mainly exhibited continuous dynamic recrystallization and geometric dynamic recrystallization, whereas in the core region discontinuous dynamic recrystallization dominated. A <100> and <111> double fiber texture was identified in extrudates, and recrystallization behavior was found to be orientation dependent. The <100> oriented grains contained more sub-grain boundaries and better-defined sub-grains and had a higher tendency to fragment via continuous recrystallization, while the <111> oriented grains produced less sub-grain boundaries and did not recrystallize. Subsequent heat treatments resulted in static recrystallization and abnormal growth of the continuously recrystallized grains. Additionally, the effects of extrusion temperature (440, 480 and 520 °C) and punch speed (0.7, 1.4 and 2.1 mm/s) on grain structure were discussed. A revised grain structure evolution mechanism based on the observation of 7050 extrusion was proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N.U. Deshpande, A.M. Gokhale, D.K. Denzer, and J. Liu, Relationship Between Fracture Toughness, Fracture Path, and Microstructure of 7050 Aluminum Alloy: Part I. Quantitative Characterization, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 1998, 29(4), p 1191–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. Dumont, A. Deschamps, and Y. Brechet, A Model for Predicting Fracture Mode and Toughness in 7000 Series Aluminium Alloys, Acta Mater., 2004, 52(9), p 2529–2540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Minoda and H. Yoshida, Effect of Grain Boundary Characteristics on Intergranular Corrosion Resistance of 6061 Aluminum Alloy Extrusion, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2002, 33(9), p 2891–2898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. K. Chen, H. Fang, Z. Zhang, X. Chen, and G. Liu, Effect of Yb, Cr and Zr Additions on Recrystallization and Corrosion Resistance of Al–Zn–Mg–Cu Alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 497(1), p 426–431

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. W.H. Van Geertruyden, W.Z. Misiolek, and P.T. Wang, Grain Structure Evolution in a 6061 Aluminum Alloy During Hot Torsion, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 419(1–2), p 105–114

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Hu, L. Zhen, B. Zhang, L. Yang, and J. Chen, Microstructure Characterization of 7050 Aluminum Alloy During Dynamic Recrystallization and Dynamic Recovery, Mater. Charact., 2008, 59(9), p 1185–1189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.D. Robson, Microstructural Evolution in Aluminium Alloy 7050 During Processing, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2004, 382(1), p 112–121

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M.R. Rokni, A. Zarei-Hanzaki, A.A. Roostaei, and H.R. Abedi, An Investigation into the Hot Deformation Characteristics of 7075 Aluminum Alloy, Mater. Des., 2011, 32(4), p 2339–2344

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Jin, H. Zhang, Y. Han, W. Wu, and J. Chen, Hot Deformation Behavior of 7150 Aluminum Alloy During Compression at Elevated Temperature, Mater. Charact., 2009, 60(6), p 530–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R.D. Doherty, D.A. Hughes, F.J. Humphreys, J.J. Jonas, D. JuulJensen, M.E. Kassner, W.E. King, T.R. McNelley, H.J. McQueen, and A.D. Rollett, Current Issues in Recrystallization: A Review, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1997, 238(2), p 219–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Poletti, M. Rodriguez-Hortalá, M. Hauser, and C. Sommitsch, Microstructure Development in Hot Deformed AA6082, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2011, 528(6), p 2423–2430

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Güzel, A. Jäger, F. Parvizian, H.G. Lambers, A.E. Tekkaya, B. Svendsen, and H.J. Maier, A New Method for Determining Dynamic Grain Structure Evolution During Hot Aluminum Extrusion, J. Mater. Process. Techol., 2012, 212(1), p 323–330

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A.R. Eivani, J. Zhou, and J. Duszczyk, Numerical Modeling of Subgrain Growth of Hot Extruded Al–4.5 Zn–1 Mg Alloy in the Presence of Nanosized Dispersoids, Comput. Mater. Sci., 2014, 86, p 9–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. Libura and J. Zasadziński, The Influence of Strain Gradient on Material Structure During Extrusion of the AlCu4Mg Alloy, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1992, 34(1-4), p 517–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Kikuchi, H. Yamazaki, and T. Otsuka, Peripheral-Recrystallized Structures Formed in Al-Zn-Mg-Cu-Zr Alloy Materials During Extrusion and Their Quenching Sensitivity, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1993, 38(4), p 689–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. W.H. Van Geertruyden, H.M. Browne, W.Z. Misiolek, and P.T. Wang, Evolution of Surface Recrystallization During Indirect Extrusion of 6XXX Aluminum Alloys, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2005, 36(4), p 1049–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A.R. Eivani, J. Zhou, and J. Duszczyk, Mechanism of the Formation of Peripheral Coarse Grain Structure in Hot Extrusion of Al-4.5 Zn-1 Mg, Philos. Mag., 2016, 96(12), p 1188–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Schikorra, L. Donati, L. Tomesani, and A.E. Tekkaya, Microstructure Analysis of Aluminum Extrusion: Grain Size Distribution in AA6060, AA6082 and AA7075 Alloys, J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 2007, 21(10), p 1445–14551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. Sheppard, Press Quenching of Aluminium Alloys, Mater. Sci. Technol., 1988, 4(7), p 635–643

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. T. Sheppard, Chapter 3: Metallurgical Features Affecting the Extrusion of Aluminum Alloys, in: Extrusion of Aluminum Alloys (Springer , Berlin, 2013), pp. 81–86

  21. T. Sheppard and R.P. Vierod, Effect of Thermomechanical Process on As-Extruded and Solution Soaked Structures of Al–Cu–Mn Alloys, Mater. Sci. Technol., 1987, 3(4), p 285–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Furu, R. Østhus, N. Telioui, R. Aagård, M. Bru, O.R. Myhr, Modeling the Effect of Mn on Extrudability, Mechanical Properties and Grain Structure of AA6082 Alloys, in Eleventh International Aluminum Extrusion Technology Seminar & Exposition (2016), pp. 567–590.

  23. F.J. Humphreys, M. Hatherly, Chapter 9: Recrystallization of Two-Phase Alloys, in Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, (Elsevier, 2012), pp. 311-314

  24. Y. Sun, D.R. Johnson, and K.P. Trumble, Effect of Zr on Recrystallization in a Directionally Solidified AA7050, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, 700, p 358–365

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. F.J. Humphreys, M. Hatherly, Chapter 3: Deformation Textures, in Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena (Elsevier, 2012), pp. 78–79

  26. M. Somerday and F.J. Humphreys, Recrystallisation Behaviour of Supersaturated Al–Mn Alloys Part 2–Al–0.3 wt% Mn, Mater. Sci. Technol., 2003, 19(1), p 30–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. X. Huang and N. Hansen, Grain Orientation Dependence of Microstructure in Aluminium Deformed in Tension, Scripta Mater., 1997, 37(1), p 1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. G. Winther and X. Huang, Dislocation Structures Part II, Slip System Dependence, Philos. Mag., 2007, 87(33), p 5215–5235

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Q. Liu, D.J. Jensen, and N. Hansen, Effect of Grain Orientation on Deformation Structure in Cold-Rolled Polycrystalline Aluminium, Acta Mater., 1998, 46(16), p 5819–5838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. C. Merriman, D. Field, and P. Trivedi, Orientation Dependence of Dislocation Structure Evolution During Cold Rolling of Aluminum, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 494(1), p 28–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. S. Gourdet and F. Montheillet, A Model of Continuous Dynamic Recrystallization, Acta Mater., 2003, 51(9), p 2685–2699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Bauser, K. Siegert (eds.), Chapter 5: The Production of Extruded Semi-Finished Products from Metallic Materials, in Extrusion, (ASM International, 2006), p. 232

  33. O. Reiso, Extrusion of AlMgSi Alloys, Mater. Forum, 2004, 28, p 32–46

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. F.J. Humphreys, M. Hatherly, Chapter 7: Recrystallization of Single-Phase Alloys, in Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phenomena, (Elsevier, 2012), pp. 228–229

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support on this research from Shandong Nanshan Aluminum Co. and Beijing Nanshan Institute of Aeronautical Materials. Materials for the project donated by Arconic Lafayette Operations are also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yiwei Sun.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Shown in Fig. 8 is the optical micrograph of the water-quenched billet discard from the 480 °C, 1.4 mm/s extrusion run. A typical direct extrusion flow pattern and deformation zones can be seen, including the inflow zone (IFZ), shear intensive zone (SIZ) and dead metal zone (DMZ).

Fig. 8
figure 8

Water-quenched extrusion billet discard showing the flow pattern and deformation zones of inflow zone (IFZ), shear intensive zone (SIZ) and dead metal zone (DMZ)

Appendix 2

The preheating and extrusion finishing temperatures for all the extrusion runs conducted are listed in Table 2 as measured by the thermocouple in the extrusion container. The location of the thermocouple is indicated in Fig. 1(a). The temperature changes shown in Table 2 are much smaller than those in typical industrial extrusion (Ref 25). For the laboratory-scale setup, when extrusion started, the cold push rod came into contact with the punch, extracting heat from the hot parts (Fig. 1(a)). Also, the extrudate directly went into the water bath below the die exit during extrusion. Therefore, more heat loss was expected for the small-scale setup compared with industrial extrusion, and less heat was generated because of the smaller dimensions of the billet.

Table 2 Preheating temperature, punch speed and extrusion finishing temperature

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, Y., Bai, X., Klenosky, D. et al. A Study on Peripheral Grain Structure Evolution of an AA7050 Aluminum Alloy with a Laboratory-Scale Extrusion Setup. J. of Materi Eng and Perform 28, 5156–5164 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04208-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-019-04208-7

Keywords

Navigation