Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Different Metals as Ohmic Contacts to β-Ga2O3: Comparison and Analysis of Electrical Behavior, Morphology, and Other Physical Properties

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Materials Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nine metals (Ti, In, Ag, Sn, W, Mo, Sc, Zn, and Zr) have been investigated as electrical contacts to n-type single-crystal β-Ga2O3 substrates as a function of annealing temperature up to 800°C (in flowing Ar). For each contact metal, we investigated its electrical behavior and morphology at each annealing temperature, as well as the effects of adding a Au capping layer. Select metals displayed either ohmic (Ti and In) or pseudo-ohmic (Ag, Sn, and Zr) behavior under certain conditions; however, the morphology was often a problem. It was concluded that metal work function is not a dominant factor in forming an ohmic contact to β-Ga2O3 and that limited interfacial reactions play an important role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Matsuzaki, H. Hiramatsu, K. Nomura, H. Yanagi, T. Kamiya, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Thin Solid Films 496, 37 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 013504 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Sasaki, M. Higashiwaki, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, J. Cryst. Growth 378, 591 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, M.H. Wong, T. Kamimura, D. Krishnamurthy, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, in 2013 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (2013).

  5. M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, T. Kamimura, M.H. Wong, D. Krishnamurthy, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 123511 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M.H. Wong, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, S. Yamakoshi, and M. Higashiwaki, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 37, 212 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Kokubun, K. Miura, F. Endo, and S. Nakagomi, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 031912 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. T. Oshima, T. Okuno, N. Arai, N. Suzuki, S. Ohira, and S. Fujita, Appl. Phys. Express 1, 011202 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. T. Oshima, T. Okuno, and S. Fujita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46, 7217 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R. Suzuki, S. Nakagomi, and Y. Kokubun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 131114 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. R. Suzuki, S. Nakagomi, Y. Kokubun, N. Arai, and S. Ohira, Appl. Phys. Lett. 94, 222102 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Janowitz, V. Scherer, M. Mohamed, A. Krapf, H. Dwelk, R. Manzke, Z. Galazka, R. Uecker, K. Irmscher, R. Fornari, et al., New J. Phys. 13, 085014 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Orita, H. Ohta, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4166 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. Peelaers and C.G. Van de Walle, Phys. Status Solidi B 254, 828 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Tippins, Phys. Rev. 140, A316 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Varley, J. Weber, A. Janotti, and C. Van de Walle, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 142106 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tamura Corporation, Single-Crystal Gallium Oxide Sub-strates. http://www.tamura-ss.co.jp/en/gao/pdf/Specifications.pdf. Accessed 06 August 2016.

  18. B. Baliga, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1759 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M. Higashiwaki, K. Sasaki, A. Kuramata, T. Masui, and S. Yamakoshi, Phys. Status Solidi A 211, 21 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S.M. Sze and K.K. Ng, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd ed. (New Jersey: Wiley, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Grodzicki, P. Mazur, S. Zuber, J. Brona, and A. Ciszewski, Appl. Surf. Sci. 304, 20 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. T. Oshima, T. Okuno, N. Arai, N. Suzuki, H. Hino, and S. Fujita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 48, 011605 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. N. Ueda, H. Hosono, R. Waseda, and H. Kawazoe, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3561 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D.R. Lide ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics Student Edition, 85th ed. (New York: CRC Press, 2004), p. 130.

  25. T.B. Massalski, H. Okamoto, P.R. Subramanian, and Linda Kacprzak, eds., Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, 2nd ed. (Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 1990).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yao Yao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yao, Y., Davis, R.F. & Porter, L.M. Investigation of Different Metals as Ohmic Contacts to β-Ga2O3: Comparison and Analysis of Electrical Behavior, Morphology, and Other Physical Properties. J. Electron. Mater. 46, 2053–2060 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-016-5121-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-016-5121-1

Keywords

Navigation