Skip to main content
Log in

Development and Evaluation of Dissimilar Gas Tungsten Arc-Welded Joint of P92 Steel/Inconel 617 Alloy for Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Boiler Applications

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the present research work, an effort has been made to examine the effect of the ERNiCrCoMo-1 filler on solidification mechanism, microstructural characterization, welded joint integrity, and residual stresses of the dissimilar welded joint (DWJ) of martensitic grade P92 steel and Ni-based superalloy Inconel 617 for advanced ultra-supercritical (A-USC) power plant application. Weld joints have been fabricated for V groove geometry by using the multipass gas tungsten arc welding (GTAW) process. The multiple aspects of the welded joint structural integrity have been tested by performing the tensile test, microhardness tests and Charpy impact test. The ERNiCrCoMo-1 weld solidified in austenitic mode with columnar and cellular dendrites in the interior region, while columnar dendrites were observed near the interface region. The unmixed zone (UZ) formation was noticed at the ERNiCrCoMo-1 filler weld and P92 steel interface, while the UZ gets eliminated at Inconel 617 interface. The microstructural observation near the interface showed that migrated grain boundaries were observed frequently near the lower region of the weld metal (WM), while at the interface of the P92 steel and ERNiCrCoMo-1 filler welds, higher density of soft δ ferrite patches for the capping and backing passes were observed. The energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) results confirmed the presence of the Cr- and Mo-enriched M23C6 precipitates, Mo-enriched M6C and Ti-enriched Ti(C, N) precipitates in the WM. Acceptable mechanical properties were obtained at room temperature. The Charpy impact toughness (CIT) was observed 98 ± 5 J and 108 ± 3 J for WM with V notch at the top and root region, respectively. The dramatic reduction in CIT was after the postweld heat treatment (PWHT) was attributed to the evolution of the carbide particles in interdendritic areas. Tensile strength results of the cross-weld specimen showed the tensile strength value marginally lower than the P92 steel but significantly lower than the Inconel 617 base metal in both as-welded (AW) and PWHT condition along with fracture in the week region of P92 steel. The failure from the region of P92 steel instead of the ERNiCrCoMo-1 filler WM confirmed that the welded joint was safe for A-USC power plants boiler application. A significant heterogeneity in microhardness was seen along the weldments with a peak hardness of 445 ± 8 in P92 CGHAZ and a lower hardness of 181 HV in the peninsula. The increase in microhardness of the WM as a result of PWHT was attributed to the evolution of the carbide particles in the WM. Through thickness residual stresses variation was also measured for both WM and HAZ region and the effect of the PWHT on the magnitude and nature of the residual stresses were also performed. Hence the work provides insight into welding procedure development, microstructural evolution in the WM and HAZ, variation in mechanical properties, and residual stresses variation for the welded joint of P92 steel and Inconel 617 alloy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K.Y. Shin, J.W. Lee, J.M. Han, K.W. Lee, B.O. Kong, and H.U. Hong: Mater. Charact., 2018, vol. 139, pp. 144–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Viswanathan, J.F. Henry, J. Tanzosh, G. Stanko, J. Shingledecker, B. Vitalis, and R. Purgert: J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2005, vol. 14, pp. 281–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Chong, Z.D. Liu, A. Godfrey, L. Wang, W. Liu, and Y.Q. Weng: J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 2015, vol. 22, pp. 150–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. H.N. Moosavy, M.R. Aboutalebi, S.H. Seyedein, and C. Mapelli: Mater. Charact., 2013, vol. 82, pp. 41–49.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Taheri, H. Naffakh-Moosavy, and F.M. Ghaini: Opt. Laser Technol., 2017, vol. 91, pp. 71–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H.S. Hosseini, M. Shamanian, and A. Kermanpur: Mater. Charact., 2011, vol. 62, pp. 425–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Y. Zhang, M. Fan, K. Ding, B. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Y. He, Y. Wang, G. Wu, T. Wei, and Y. Gao: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13621718.2020.1719622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Sirohi, P.K. Taraphdar, G. Dak, C. Pandey, S.K. Sharma, and A. Goyal: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2021, vol. 194, 104557.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. G. Dak and C. Pandey: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2021, vol. 194, 104536.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Wang, H. Cui, M. Fan, Y. Chen, and F. Lu: Mater. Charact., 2019, vol. 151, pp. 227–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y. Zhang, K. Li, Z. Cai, and J. Pan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2019, vol. 764, 138185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Ahmad, J. Hwang, J. Lee, and D. Bae: Metals (Basel), 2016, vol. 6, p. 242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Kumar and C. Pandey: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2022, vol. 198, 104678.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Kannan, V. Sankar, R. Sandhya, and M.D. Mathew: Proc. Eng., 2013, vol. 55, pp. 149–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Saini, C. Pandey, and M.M. Mahapatra: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 688, pp. 250–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Shanmugarajan, P. Sathiya, and G. Buvanashekaran: J. Manuf. Process., 2016, vol. 24, pp. 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E.I. Samuel, B.K. Choudhary, D.P.R. Palaparti, and M.D. Mathew: Proc. Eng., 2013, vol. 55, pp. 64–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. M.I. Isik, A. Kostka, and G. Eggeler: Acta Mater., 2014, vol. 81, pp. 230–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Maddi, G.S. Deshmukh, A.R. Ballal, D.R. Peshwe, R.K. Paretkar, K. Laha, and M.D. Mathew: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2016, vol. 668, pp. 215–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. C. Kocer, T. Abe, and A. Soon: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2009, vol. 505, pp. 1–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. H.K. Danielsen, P. Emilio, D.I. Nunzio, and J. Hald: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2013, vol. 44A, pp. 2445–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. Akram, P.R. Kalvala, M. Misra, and I. Charit: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2017, vol. 688, pp. 396–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. G. Wu, K. Ding, T. Wei, S. Qiao, X. Liu, and Y. Gao: Eng. Fail. Anal., 2021, vol. 125, 105412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. H. Naffakh, M. Shamanian, and F. Ashrafizadeh: J. Mater. Sci., 2010, vol. 45, pp. 2564–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. H.S. Hosseini, M. Shamanian, and A. Kermanpur: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2016, vol. 144, pp. 18–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. K. Ranjbar, R. Dehmolaei, M. Amra, and I. Keivanrad: Weld. World, 2018, vol. 62, pp. 1121–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Sirohi, C. Pandey, and A. Goyal: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2020, vol. 188, 104179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. T.W. Nelson, J.C. Lippold, and M.J. Mills: Weld. J., 2000, vol. 79, pp. 267–77.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. Sayiram and N. Arivazhagan: Mater. Charact., 2015, vol. 102, pp. 180–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Kumar, C. Pandey, and A. Goyal: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2021, vol. 190, 104290.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Jula, R. Dehmolaei, and S.R.A. Zaree: J. Manuf. Process., 2018, vol. 36, pp. 272–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. V. Bhanu, D. Fydrych, A. Gupta, and C. Pandey: Materials (Basel), 2021, vol. 14, pp. 1–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. A.H. Yaghi, T.H. Hyde, A.A. Becker, and W. Sun: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2013, vol. 111–112, pp. 173–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Kumar, V. Yadav, S. Sharma, C. Pandey, A. Goyal, and P. Kumar: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2021, vol. 193, 104443.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Y. Javadi, M.C. Smith, K.A. Venkata, N. Naveed, A.N. Forsey, J.A. Francis, R.A. Ainsworth, C.E. Truman, D.J. Smith, F. Hosseinzadeh, S. Gungor, P.J. Bouchard, H.C. Dey, A.K. Bhaduri, and S. Mahadevan: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2017, vol. 154, pp. 41–57.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. M.D. Rowe, T.W. Nelson, and J.C. Lippold: Weld. Res. Suppl., 1999, vol. 78, pp. 31–37.

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Chen, J. Huang, J. Xia, X. Zhao, and S. Lin: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2015, vol. 222, pp. 43–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. H. Naffakh, M. Shamanian, and F. Ashrafizadeh: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, vol. 209, pp. 3628–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. T.W. Nelson, J.C. Lippold, and M.J. Mills: Weld. J., 1999, vol. 78, pp. 329–30.

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.N. DuPont: Int. Mater. Rev., 2012, vol. 57, pp. 208–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. B. Brickstad and B.L. Josefson: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 1998, vol. 75, pp. 11–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. S. Fujiyama, M. Shigeta, and M. Tanaka: Sci. Technol. Weld. Join., 2021, vol. 26, pp. 371–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. P.K. Taraphdar, M.M. Mahapatra, A.K. Pradhan, P.K. Singh, K. Sharma, and S. Kumar: 2021, pp. 119–25.

  44. C.G. Panait, W. Bendick, A. Fuchsmann, A.F. Gourgues-Lorenzon, and J. Besson: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2010, vol. 87, pp. 326–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. A.H.V. Pavan, K.S.N. Vikrant, R. Ravibharath, and K. Singh: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2015, vol. 642, pp. 32–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. K. Rajasekhar, C.S. Harendranath, R. Raman, and S.D. Kulkarni: Mater. Charact., 1997, vol. 38, pp. 53–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. S. Kumar, S. Kumar, C. Pandey, and A. Goyal: Int. J. Press. Vess. Pip., 2021, vol. 191, 104373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. B.T. Alexandrov, J.C. Lippold, J.W. Sowards, A.T. Hope, and D.R. Saltzmann: Weld. World, 2013, vol. 57, pp. 39–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. R. Buntain, B. Alexandrov, and G. Viswanathan: Mater. Charact., 2020, vol. 170, 110638.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. S. Kou and Y.K. Yang: Weld. J. (Miami), 2007, vol. 86, pp. 303–12.

    Google Scholar 

  51. H. Xu, M.J. Xu, C. Yu, H. Lu, X. Wei, J.M. Chen, and J.J. Xu: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2017, vol. 240, pp. 162–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. C. Barr, S. Da Sun, M. Easton, N. Orchowski, N. Matthews, and M. Brandt: Surf. Coat. Technol., 2018, vol. 340, pp. 126–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. W.F. Savage, E.F. Nippes, and E.S. Szekeres: Weld. J., 1976, vol. 55, pp. 276–83.

    Google Scholar 

  54. W. Ren and R. Swindeman: J. Press. Vessel Technol. Trans. ASME, 2009, vol. 131, pp. 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  55. S.S. Prabu, K.D. Ramkumar, and N. Arivazhagan: IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2017, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/263/6/062073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. S. Rahman, G. Priyadarshan, K.S. Raja, C. Nesbitt, and M. Misra: Mater. Lett., 2008, vol. 62, pp. 2263–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Y. Zhang, H. Jing, L. Xu, Y. Han, L. Zhao, and B. Xiao: Mater. Charact., 2018, vol. 139, pp. 279–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. K. Shinozaki: Weld. Int., 2001, vol. 15, pp. 593–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. S. Kumar, C. Pandey, and A. Goyal: Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng., 2020, vol. 20, p. 99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. C. Sudha, V.T. Paul, A.L.E. Terrance, S. Saroja, and M. Vijayalakshmi: Weld. J. (Miami).

  61. S. Sirohi, A. Gupta, C. Pandey, R.S. Vidyarthy, K. Guguloth, and H. Natu: Opt. Laser Technol., 2022, vol. 147, 107610.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. J.K. Kim, H.J. Park, and D.N. Shim: Acta Metall. Sin. (Engl. Lett.), 2016, vol. 29, pp. 1107–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. G. Chandrasekar, C. Kailasanathan, and M. Vasundara: J. Manuf. Process., 2018, vol. 35, pp. 466–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. S. Standard: Com. Eur. Norm.

  65. K. Ding, P. Wang, X. Liu, X. Li, B. Zhao, and Y. Gao: J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2018, vol. 27, pp. 6027–39.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. P.K. Taraphdar, R. Kumar, A. Giri, C. Pandey, M.M. Mahapatra, and K. Sridhar: J. Manuf. Process., 2021, vol. 68, pp. 1405–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Pandey.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, A., Pandey, C. Development and Evaluation of Dissimilar Gas Tungsten Arc-Welded Joint of P92 Steel/Inconel 617 Alloy for Advanced Ultra-Supercritical Boiler Applications. Metall Mater Trans A 53, 3245–3273 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-022-06723-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-022-06723-0

Navigation