Abstract
In this study, the four-cycle accumulative roll bonding (ARB) process at room temperature was successfully used for grain refining in commercial pure copper. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) images revealed that the average grain size reduced from about 26 µm in the unprocessed material to about 180 nm after four cycles of ARB. Also, transmission electron microscopy image indicated that the average grain size reached to 200 nm after four cycles. The yield strength of the ultrafine-grained pure copper after fourth cycle (360 MPa) was about 400 pct higher than that of the annealed unprocessed sample (70 MPa). The contribution of dislocations in strengthening of the pure copper decreased from ~30 to ~3 pct whit increasing the number of ARB cycles from 1 to 4. Scanning electron microscopy micrographs of fractured surfaces of the tensile test specimens revealed that ductile fracture of annealed sample with deep equiaxed dimples replaced by shear ductile rupture with shallow and small elongated dimples in ARB-processed samples. Moreover, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Mott–Schottky analysis showed that the electrochemical behavior improved by increasing the number of ARB cycle.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
1. A. Fattah-alhosseini and O. Imantalab: J. Alloys Compd., 2015, vol. 632, pp. 48–52.
2. O. Imantalab and A. Fattah-alhosseini: J. Mat. Eng. Perf., 2015, vol. 24, pp. 2579–2585.
3. A. Fattah-alhosseini and S. Vafaeian: J. Alloys Compd., 2015, vol. 639, pp. 301–307.
4. H. Halfa: JMMCE, 2014, vol. 2, pp. 428–469.
5. Y. Zhu, R.Z. Valiev, T.G. Langdon, N. Tsuji, and K. Lu: MRS bulletin, 2010, vol. 35, pp. 977–981.
6. A. Fattah-alhosseini and S.O. Gashti: J. Mat. Eng. Perf., 2015, vol. 24, pp. 3386–3393.
7. M. Pourbaix: Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, 2nd ed., NACE, Houston, 1974.
8. Q.J. Zhong, L.B. Yu, Y. Xiao, Y. Wang, Q.Y. Zhou, and Q.D. Zhong: Advanc. Mater. Res., 2013, vols. 785-786, pp. 928–932.
9. S.H. Sanad and A.R. Taman: Surf. Tech., 1984, vol. 23, pp. 159–166.
10. R. Jamaati and M.R. Toroghinejad: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, vol. 606, pp. 443–450.
11. S.A. Hosseini and H. Danesh Manesh: Mater. Des., 2009, vol. 30, pp. 2911–2918.
12. M.R. Toroghinejad, F. Ashrafizadeh, and R. Jamaati: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2013, vol. 561, pp. 145–151.
13. M. Eizadjou, H. Danesh Manesh, and K. Janghorban: J. Alloys Compd., 2009, vol. 474, pp. 406–415.
14. Z.P. Xing, S.B. Kang, and H.W. Kim: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2006, vol. 33, pp. 1521–1530.
15. S.S. Satheesh Kumar and T. Raghu: Mater. Des., 2014, vol. 57, pp. 114–120.
16. L. Su, C. Lu, H. Li, G. Deng, and K. Tieu: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2014, vol. 614, pp. 148–155.
17. H. Pirgazi, A. Akbarzadeh, R. Petrov, and L. Kestens: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 497, pp. 132–138.
18. C. Kwan, Z.R. Wang, and S.B. Kang: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 480, pp. 148–159.
19. N. Hansen: Scr. Mater., 2004, vol. 51, pp. 801–806.
20. J. Gubicza, N.Q. Chinh, T. Csanadi, T.G. Langdon, and T. Ungar: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, vol. 462, pp. 86–90.
21. N. Hansen, X. Huang, and D.A. Hughes: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2001, vol. 317, pp. 3–11.
22. N. Hansen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2005, vol. 409, pp. 39–45.
23. F. Roters, P. Eisenlohr, L. Hantcherli, D.D. Tjahjanto, T.R. Bieler, and D. Raabe: Acta Mater., 2010, vol. 58, pp. 1152–1211.
24. J. Kratochvil, M. Kruzik, and R. Sedlacek: Acta Mater., 2009, vol. 57, pp. 739–748.
25. S.C. Yoon, Z. Horita, and H.S. Kim: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, vol. 201, 32–36.
26. X. Huang, N. Kamikawa, and N. Hansen: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 483, pp. 102–104.
A. Nazari, J. A. Mohandesi, and S. Tavareh: Comput. Mater. Sci., 2011, vol. 50, pp. 1781–1784.
28. S. Graça, R. Colaço, P.A. Carvalho, and R. Vilar, Mater. Lett., 2008, vol. 62, pp. 3812–3814.
29. R. Jamaati, M.R. Toroghinejad, S. Amirkhanlou, and H. Edris, Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2015, vol. 46, pp. 4013–4019.
30. M. Reihanian, R. Ebrahimi, N. Tsuji, and M.M. Moshksar: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 473, pp. 189–194.
31. W. Lojkowski: Acta Metall. Mater., 1991, vol. 39, pp. 1891–1899.
32. R. Jamaati, M.R Toroghinejad, and A. Najafizadeh: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, vol. 527, pp. 2720–2724.
33. D.H. Shin, J.J. Park, Y.S. Kim, and K.T. Park: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2002, vol. 328, pp. 98–103.
34. S. Pasebani and M.R. Toroghinejad: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, vol. 527, pp. 491–497.
35. M. Shaarbaf and M.R. Toroghinejad: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, vol. 473, pp. 28–33.
36. R.Z. Valiev, R.K. Islamgaliev, and I.V. Alexandrov: Prog. Mater. Sci., 2000, vol. 45, pp. 103-189.
37. G. Palumbo, K.T. Aust, U. Erb, Mater. Sci. Forum, 1996, vol. 225-227, pp. 281-286.
38. H. Maleki-Ghaleh, K. Hajizadeh, A. Hadjizadeh, M.S. Shakeri, S. Ghobadi Alamdari, S. Masoudfar, E. Aghaie, M. Javidi, J. Zdunek, and K.J. Kurzydlowski: Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2014, vol. 39, pp. 299–304.
39. A. Fattah-alhosseini and O. Imantalab: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2016, vol. 47, pp. 572–580.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Manuscript submitted October 17, 2015.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Imantalab, O., Fattah-Alhosseini, A., Mazaheri, Y. et al. Strengthening Mechanisms and Electrochemical Behavior of Ultrafine-Grained Commercial Pure Copper Fabricated by Accumulative Roll Bonding. Metall Mater Trans A 47, 3684–3693 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3519-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-016-3519-2