Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The application of FRAX in Saudi Arabia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Assessment and treatment pathways based on age-specific intervention thresholds in Saudi Arabi can be used to identify patients at high risk of fracture and avoid unnecessary treatment in those at low fracture risk.

Purpose

Intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis have historically been based on the measurement of bone mineral density. The aim of the present study was to explore treatment paths and characteristics of women eligible for treatment in Saudi Arabia based on fracture probabilities derived from FRAX®.

Methods

The approach to the setting of intervention and assessment thresholds used the methodology adopted by the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group for FRAX-based guidelines in the UK but based on the epidemiology of fracture and death in Saudi Arabia. The methodology was applied to women age 40 years or more drawn from a tertiary referral population for skeletal assessment. Missing data for the calculation of FRAX was simulated using data from the referral and FRAX derivation cohorts.

Results

Intervention thresholds expressed as a 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture ranged from 2.0% at the age of 50 years increasing to 7.6% at the age of 70 years. A total of 163 of 1365 women (11.9%) had a prior fragility fracture and would be eligible for treatment for this reason. An additional 5 women were eligible for treatment in that MOF probabilities lay above the upper assessment threshold. A BMD test would be recommended for 593 women (43.4%) so that FRAX could be recalculated with the inclusion of femoral neck BMD. Of these, 220 individuals would be eligible for treatment after a BMD test and 373 women categorised at low risk after a BMD test.

Conclusion

Probability-based assessment of fracture risk using age-specific intervention thresholds was developed for Saudi Arabia to help guide decisions about treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanis JA, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, Reginster J-Y; Scientific Advisory Board of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis (ESCEO) and the Committees of Scientific Advisors and National Societies of the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) (2019) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 30: 3-44.

  2. Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2007) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary healthcare level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UK. Available at. http://www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX/pdfs/WHO_Technical_Report.pdf. Accessed 26 June 2021

  3. Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX™ and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19: 385-397

  4. Odén A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Johansson H (2015) Burden of high fracture probability worldwide: secular increases 2010–2040. Osteoporos Int 26:2243–2248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanis JA, Harvey NC, Cyrus Cooper C, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV, the Advisory Board of the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2016) A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX. A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation. Arch Osteoporos 11:25.

  6. Al-Saleh Y, Sulimani R, Sabico S, Raef H, Fouda M, Alshahrani F, Al Shaker M, Al Wahabi B, Sadat-Ali M, Al Rayes H, Al Aidarous S, Saleh S, Al Ayoubi F, Al-Daghri NM (2015) Guidelines for osteoporosis in Saudi Arabia: recommendations from the Saudi osteoporosis society. Ann Saudi Med 35:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Al-Saleh Y, Al-Daghri NM, Sabico S, Alessa T, Al Emadi S, Alawadi F, Al Qasaabi S, Alfutaisi A, Al Izzi M, Mukhaimer J, Suhaili AR, Reginster JY, Sulimani R (2020) Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women in Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries: consensus statement of the GCC countries’ osteoporosis societies under the auspices of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO). Arch Osteoporos 15(1):109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-020-00778-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV (2012) The distribution of FRAX® based probabilities in women from Japan. J Bone Miner Metab 30:700–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dawson-Hughes B, Looker AC, Tosteson ANA, Johansson H, Kanis JA, Melton LJ III (2010) The potential impact of new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment patterns. Osteoporos Int 21:41–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Compston J, McCloskey EV (2012) A comparison of case finding strategies in the UK for the management of hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 23:907–915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Johansson H, El Saleh Y, Liu E, Lorentzon M, Vandenput L, Harvey NC, McCloskey E, JA Kanis JA (2021) Epidemiology of hip fractures in Saudi Arabia: development of a country specific FRAX model. Osteoporos Int 32, P813.

  12. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Francis R, Kanis JA, Marsh D, McCloskey EV, Reid DM, Selby P, Wilkins M; National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas 62:105–108

  13. Lekamwasam S, Adachi JD, Agnusdei D, Bilezikian J, Boonen S, Borgström F, Cooper C, Diez Perez A, Eastell R, Hofbauer L, Kanis JA, Langdahl BL, Lesnyak O, Lorenc R, McCloskey E, Messina OD, Napoli N, Obermayer-Pietsch B, Ralston SH, Sambrook PN, Silverman S, Sosa M, Stepan J, Suppan G, Wahl DA, Compston JE for the Joint IOF-ECTS GIO Guidelines Working Group (2012) A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23: 2257-76.

  14. Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD; Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ 182:1864–1873.

  15. Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R, Foundation NO (2014) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 25:2359–2381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Johansson H, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Oglesby A, McCloskey EV, Kayan K, Jalava T, Kanis JA (2004) Optimisation of BMD measurements to identify high risk groups for treatment—a test analysis. J Bone Miner Res 19:906–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Johansson H, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, McCloskey E (2009) BMD, clinical risk factors and their combination for hip fracture prevention. Osteoporos Int 20:1675–1682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leslie WD, Majumdar SR, Lix L, Johansson H, Kanis MEV, JA, (2011) High fracture probability with FRAX® usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 23:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leslie WD, Lix LM, Morin S, Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2012) Fracture risk assessment without bone density measurement in routine clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 23:75–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanis JA, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Oden A, Leslie WD (2012) FRAX® with and without BMD. Calcif Tiss Int 90:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Torgerson DJ, Bell-Syer SE (2001) Hormone replacement therapy and prevention of nonvertebral fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA 285:2891–2897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cauley JA, Robbins J, Chen Z, Cummings SR, Jackson RD, LaCroix AZ, LeBoff M, Lewis CE, McGowan J, Neuner J, Pettinger M, Stefanick ML, Wactawski-Wende J, Watts NB (2003) Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the women’s health initiative randomized trial. JAMA 290:1729–1738

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McCloskey EV, Beneton M, Charlesworth D, Kayan K, deTakats D, Dey A, Orgee J, Ashford R, Forster M, Cliffe J, Kersh L, Brazier J, Nichol J, Aropuu S, Jalava T, Kanis JA (2007) Clodronate reduces the incidence of fractures in community-dwelling elderly women unselected for osteoporosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. J Bone Miner Res 22:135–141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kanis JA, Johansson H, Harvey NC, McCloskey EV (2021) An assessment of intervention thresholds for very high risk applied to the NOGG guidelines. A report for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG). Osteoporosis International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-021-05942-2

  25. Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, Hope S, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Poole KES, Reid DM, Selby P, Thompson F, Thurston A, Vine N: The National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) (2017) UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 12: 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5

  26. Leslie WD, Kanis JA (2021) Calibration of FRAX: a journey, not a destination. Calcif Tiss Int doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-021-00891-8.

  27. Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgström F, Cooper C, Jönsson B, Preedy D, Selby P, Compston J (2008) The cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the management of osteoporosis. Bone 42:4–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful the Researchers Supporting Project (RSP-2021/21) in King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nasser M. Al-Daghri or John A. Kanis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al-Daghri, N.M., Sabico, S., Al-Saleh, Y. et al. The application of FRAX in Saudi Arabia. Arch Osteoporos 16, 166 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-01024-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-01024-2

Keywords

Navigation