Skip to main content
Log in

Asymptomatic vertebral fracture in Tunisian post-menopausal women at risk: prevalence and risk factors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

Data are still scarce regarding the prevalence and the associated factors of vertebral fractures (VF) in the North Africa and the Middle East region. In this study, VF were common in at risk Tunisian women with a prevalence of 26.19%. Lower total hip T-score, having severe back pain, and being physically inactive were independently associated with VF.

Introduction

Vertebral fractures are related to a marked increase in morbidity and mortality and they are associated with a definite risk of subsequent fracture. Nevertheless, they remain underdiagnosed and little is known about their epidemiology in the African countries. In this first Tunisian study, we aimed to assess the prevalence and the associated factors of asymptomatic VF among at risk Tunisian post-menopausal women.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, we included post-menopausal women without a previous diagnosis of VF and who were referred for bone mineral density (BMD) measurement. Each participant had had an extensive medical history investigation, a BMD assessment, and a vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) scan using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. VF were defined using Genant semi-quantitative method.

Results

Two hundred and ten post-menopausal women were included. The overall prevalence of VF was 26.19% and 9.52% of our participants had multiple VF. The prevalence of VF was significantly higher in older participants, those having a history of prior severe fragility fracture, or having at least one intrinsic fall. The percentage of low bone mineral density and osteoporosis were significantly higher in women with VF. After binary logistic regression analysis, severe back pain (OR = 3.016; 95% CI 1.304–6.974), regular physical activity (OR = 0.065; 95% CI 0.02–0.213), and total hip T-score (OR = 0.56; 95% CI 0.383–0.820) were independently associated with VF.

Conclusion

VF are very prevalent among at risk Tunisian post-menopausal women and their incorporation in a clinical and densitometric tool might identify more effectively subsequent fracture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kado DM, Duong T, Nevitt MC, Greendale GA, Cummings SR, Stone KL et al (2003) Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 14:589–594

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaptoge S, Armbrecht G, Felsenberg D, Lunt M, Weber K, Boonen S et al (2006) Whom to treat? The contribution of vertebral X-rays to risk-based algorithms for fracture prediction. Results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 17:1369–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Riggs BL, Melton LJ (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17:505S-511S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeytinoglu M, Jain RK, Vokes TJ (2017) Vertebral fracture assessment: enhancing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of osteoporosis. Bone 104:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roux C, Baron G, Audran M, Breuil V, Chapurlat R, Cortet B et al (2011) Influence of vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry on decision-making in osteoporosis: a structured vignette survey. Rheumatol Oxf Engl 50:2264–2269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Middleton ET, Steel SA (2008) Routine versus targeted vertebral fracture assessment for the detection of vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 19:1167–1173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Schousboe JT (2018) Vertebral fracture identification as part of a comprehensive risk assessment in patients with osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 16:573–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sellami S, Sahli H, Meddeb N, Hamza S, Chahed M, Ben M’Barek R et al (2006) Prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in Tunisian women. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 92:490–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fixed Risk Factors | International Osteoporosis Foundation [Internet]. [cited 16 Sept 2020]. Available on: http://iofbonehealth.net/fixed-risk-factors

  10. Rosen HN, Vokes TJ, Malabanan AO, Deal CL, Alele JD, Olenginski TP et al (2013) The official positions of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry: vertebral fracture assessment. J Clin Densitom 16:482–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2009) From relative risk to absolute fracture risk calculation: the FRAX algorithm. Curr Osteoporos Rep 7:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yang J, Mao Y, Nieves JW (2020) Identification of prevalent vertebral fractures using Vertebral Fracture Assessment (VFA) in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bone 136:115358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. El Maghraoui A, Morjane F, Nouijai A, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Ghozlani I (2009) Vertebral fracture assessment in Moroccan women: prevalence and risk factors. Maturitas 62:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diacinti D, Guglielmi G, Pisani D, Diacinti D, Argirò R, Serafini C et al (2012) Vertebral morphometry by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for osteoporotic vertebral fractures assessment (VFA). Radiol Med (Torino) 117:1374–1385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. El Hage R, Khairallah W, Bachour F, Issa M, Bedran F, Zakhem E et al (2014) Is obesity protective against vertebral deformities in Lebanese women? J Clin Densitom 17:433–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jager PL, Jonkman S, Koolhaas W, Stiekema A, Wolffenbuttel BHR, Slart RHJA (2011) Combined vertebral fracture assessment and bone mineral density measurement: a new standard in the diagnosis of osteoporosis in academic populations. Osteoporos Int 22:1059–1068

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Utamakul C, Sritara C, Bhumiwat M, Bua-ngam C, Sriudomporn K, Promma S et al (2016) Unsuspected vertebral fracture in older women undergoing screening bone mineral density assessment: prevalence, impact, and agreement with lateral spine radiography. Eur Geriatr Med 7:551–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. El Maghraoui A, Rezqi A, Mounach A, Achemlal L, Bezza A, Ghozlani I (2013) Systematic vertebral fracture assessment in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Bone 52:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baddoura R, Arabi A, Haddad-Zebouni S, Khoury N, Salamoun M, Ayoub G et al (2007) Vertebral fracture risk and impact of database selection on identifying elderly Lebanese with osteoporosis. Bone 40:1066–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Middleton ET, Gardiner ED, Steel SA (2009) Which women should be selected for vertebral fracture assessment? Comparing different methods of targeting VFA. Calcif Tissue Int 85:203–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Shetty S, John B, Mohan S, Paul TV (2020) Vertebral fracture assessment by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry along with bone mineral density in the evaluation of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 15:25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Greendale GA, Wilhalme H, Huang M-H, Cauley JA, Karlamangla AS (2016) Prevalent and incident vertebral deformities in midlife women: results from the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN). PloS One 11:e0162664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O’Neill TW, Felsenberg D, Varlow J, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Silman AJ (1996) The prevalence of vertebral deformity in European men and women: the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. J Bone Miner Res 11:1010–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Clark P, Cons-Molina F, Deleze M, Ragi S, Haddock L, Zanchetta JR et al (2009) The prevalence of radiographic vertebral fractures in Latin American countries: the Latin American Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (LAVOS). Osteoporos Int 20:275–282

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Roux C, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S, Briot K, Girard M (2007) Mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are risk factors for new fractures. Osteoporos Int 18:1617–1624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Johansson H, Odén A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA (2014) Mild morphometric vertebral fractures predict vertebral fractures but not non-vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 25:235–241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rea JA, Li J, Blake GM, Steiger P, Genant HK, Fogelman I (2000) Visual assessment of vertebral deformity by X-ray absorptiometry: a highly predictive method to exclude vertebral deformity. Osteoporos Int 11:660–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Domiciano DS, Machado LG, Lopes JB, Figueiredo CP, Caparbo VF, Takayama L et al (2014) Incidence and risk factors for osteoporotic vertebral fracture in low-income community-dwelling elderly: a population-based prospective cohort study in Brazil. The São Paulo Ageing & Health (SPAH) Study. Osteoporos Int 25:2805–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Kanterewicz E, Puigoriol E, Rodríguez Cros JR, Peris P (2019) Prevalent vertebral fractures and minor vertebral deformities analyzed by vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) increases the risk of incident fractures in postmenopausal women: the FRODOS study. Osteoporos Int 30:2141–2149

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Domiciano DS, Figueiredo CP, Lopes JB, Kuroishi ME, Takayama L, Caparbo VF et al (2013) Vertebral fracture assessment by dual X-ray absorptiometry: a valid tool to detect vertebral fractures in community-dwelling older adults in a population-based survey. Arthritis Care Res 65:809–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu W, Lin Q, Zhou X, Shao H, Sun P (2014) Reconsideration of the relevance of mild wedge or short vertebral height deformities across a broad age distribution. Osteoporos Int 25:2609–2615

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Reniu AC, Ong T, Ajmal S, Sahota O (2017) Vertebral fracture assessment in patients presenting with a non-hip non-vertebral fragility fracture: experience of a UK Fracture Liaison Service. Arch Osteoporos 12:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lopes JB, Danilevicius CF, Takayama L, Caparbo VF, Menezes PR, Scazufca M et al (2011) Prevalence and risk factors of radiographic vertebral fracture in Brazilian community-dwelling elderly. Osteoporos Int 22:711–719

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Roux C, Priol G, Fechtenbaum J, Cortet B, Liu-Léage S, Audran M (2007) A clinical tool to determine the necessity of spine radiography in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis presenting with back pain. Ann Rheum Dis 66:81–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Waterloo S, Søgaard AJ, Ahmed LA, Damsgård E, Morseth B, Emaus N (2013) Vertebral fractures and self-perceived health in elderly women and men in a population-based cross-sectional study: the Tromsø Study 2007–08. BMC Geriatr 13:102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Schneider J, Bundschuh B, Späth C, Landkammer C, Müller H, Sommer U et al (2004) Discrimination of patients with and without vertebral fractures as measured by ultrasound and DXA osteodensitometry. Calcif Tissue Int 74:246–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Vokes TJ, Gillen DL, Lovett J, Favus MJ (2005) Comparison of T-scores from different skeletal sites in differentiating postmenopausal women with and without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Clin Densitom 8:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Malgo F, Hamdy NAT, Ticheler CHJM, Smit F, Kroon HM, Rabelink TJ et al (2017) Value and potential limitations of vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) compared to conventional spine radiography: experience from a fracture liaison service (FLS) and a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 28:2955–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nejla El Amri or Cyrine Daldoul.

Ethics declarations

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Consent for publication was obtained from all authors. STATA 15.0 software was used for statistical analysis.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Amri, N., Daldoul, C., Lataoui, S. et al. Asymptomatic vertebral fracture in Tunisian post-menopausal women at risk: prevalence and risk factors. Arch Osteoporos 16, 139 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00989-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-021-00989-4

Keywords

Navigation