Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region

  • Position Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Osteoporosis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 03 July 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

Summary

The Fracture Liaison Service (FLS) Consensus Meeting endorsed by the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF), Asian Federation of Osteoporosis Societies (AFOS), and Asia Pacific Osteoporosis Foundation (APOF) was hosted by the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association on October 14, 2017. International and domestic experts reviewed the 13 Best Practice Framework (BPF) standards and concluded that all standards were generally applicable in the Asia-Pacific region and needed only minor modifications to fit the healthcare settings in the region.

Purpose

To review and generate consensus on best practices of fracture liaison service (FLS) in the Asia-Pacific (AP) region.

Methods

In October 2017, the Taiwanese Osteoporosis Association (TOA) invited experts from the AP region (n = 23), the Capture the Fracture Steering Committee (n = 2), and the USA (n = 1) to join the AP region FLS Consensus Meeting in Taipei. After two rounds of consensus generation, the recommendations on the 13 Best Practice Framework (BPF) standards were reported and reviewed by the attendees. Experts unable to attend the on-site meeting reviewed the draft, made suggestions, and approved the final version.

Results

Because the number of FLSs in the region is rapidly increasing, experts agreed that it was timely to establish consensus on benchmark quality standards for FLSs in the region. They also agreed that the 13 BPF standards and the 3 levels of standards were generally applicable, but that some clarifications were necessary. They suggested, for example, that patient and family education be incorporated into the current standards and that communication with the public to promote FLSs be increased.

Conclusions

The consensus on the 13 BPF standards reviewed in this meeting was that they were generally applicable and required only a few advanced clarifications to increase the quality of FLSs in the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 03 July 2018

    In this article the name of the sixth author, E. Michael Lewiecki was rendered incorrectly. The publisher regrets this error and apologizes for the inconvenience caused.

References

  1. Ebeling PR, Mithal A, Kyer CS et al (2013) Asia-Pacific Regional Audit: epidemiology, costs & burden of osteoporosis in 2013. Switzerland: International Osteoporosis Foundation. (https://www.iofbonehealth.org/data-publications/regional-audits/asia-pacific-regional-audit)

  2. Harvey NC, McCloskey EV, Mitchell PJ, Dawson-Hughes B, Pierroz DD, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Cooper C, Kanis JA (2017) Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures. Osteoporos Int 28(5):1507–1529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kung AW, Fan T, Xu L, Xia WB, Park IH, Kim HS, Chan SP, Lee JK, Koh L, Soong YK, Soontrapa S, Songpatanasilp T, Turajane T, Yates M, Sen S (2013) Factors influencing diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture among postmenopausal women in Asian countries: a retrospective study. BMC Womens Health 13:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, AR ML, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD, Kyer C, Cooper C, IOF Fracture Working Group (2013) Capture the fracture: a Best Practice Framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24(8):2135–2152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Briot K (2017) Fracture Liaison Services. Curr Opin Rheumatol 29(4):416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, Chan DC, Chien JT, Lin CH, Singh S, Dasari M, Chen JF, Tsai KS (2017) Fracture Liaison Services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 3(Supp):S51–S52

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank JJ Yang, C Lee, J Wei, and our colleagues from the TOA for their assistance and Bill Franke for English language editing. We also thank the IOF, AFOS, and APOF for endorsing this meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rong-Sen Yang or Chih-Hsing Wu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

The original version of this article was revised to correct the name of the sixth author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chan, DC.(., Chang, LY., Akesson, K.E. et al. Consensus on best practice standards for Fracture Liaison Service in the Asia-Pacific region. Arch Osteoporos 13, 59 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0463-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-018-0463-3

Keywords

Navigation