Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Le fratture periprotesiche: scelta della sintesi nell’anca

Periprosthetic fractures: choosing the correct hip treatment

  • Aggiornamenti
  • Published:
LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

Abstract

Periprosthetic fractures are constantly increasing. The key to a correct treatment lies in an appropriate classification, preoperative planning and in different surgical options. The management of these fractures is rather demanding, as the surgeon has to face simultaneously a loose implant, poor bone quality or bone loss, in a frail, elderly patient. We suggest an algorithm for the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of femur, acetabulum and pelvis, and for interprosthetic fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Schema 1
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Capone A, Marongiu G, Planta M (2014) Trattamento delle fratture periprotesiche ed interprotesiche di femore. Capitolo 9. In: AAVV (eds) La fragilità scheletrica nell’osteoporosi e le sue conseguenze. CIC, Roma

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E et al. (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030 J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berry D (1999) Epidemiology: hip and knee. Orthop Clin North Am 30(2):183–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Chitre A, Jones HW, Shah N, Clayson A (2013) Complications of total hip arthroplasty: periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum. Curr Rev Muscoloskeletal Med 6:357–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duncan CP, Masri BA (1995) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Della Valle CJ, Momberger NG, Paprosky WG (2003) Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum associated with a total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 52:281–290

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duncan CP, Haddad FS (2014) The Unified Classification System (UCS): improving our understanding of periprosthetic fractures. Bone Joint J 96-B:713–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hanssen AD, Lewallen DG (2005) Modular acetabular augments: composite void fillers. Orthopedics 28:971–972

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Davidson D, Pike J, Garbuz D et al. (2008) Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(9):2000–2012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindahl H, Malchau H, Herberts P, Garellick G (2005) Periprosthetic femoral fractures classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. J Arthroplasty 20(7):857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Purtill JJ et al. (2004) Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Stoffel K, Dieter U, Stachowiak G et al. (2003) Biomechanical testing of the LCP—how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled? Injury 34(Suppl 2):B11–B19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Solarino G, Vicenti G, Moretti L et al. (2014) Interprosthetic femoral fractures—A challenge of treatment. A systematic review of the literature. Int J Care Injured 45:362–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friesecke C, Plutat J (2005) Block A revision arthroplasty with use of total femur prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2693–2701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Soenen M, Migaud H, Bonnomet F et al. (2011) Interprosthetic femoral fractures: analysis of 14 cases. Proposal for an additional grade in the Vancouver and SoFCOT classification. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97(7):693–698

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fulkerson E, Tejwani N, Stuchin S, Egol K (2007) Management of periprosthetic femur fracturs with a first generation locking plate. Injury 38:965–972

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ospedale Versilia, Lido di Camaiore, (LU), Italia

    Mario Manca, Rossella Sirianni, Alessandro Isola, Marco D’Arcangelo & Marco Iacopinelli

  2. Clinica Ortopedica, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Italia

    Giacomo Giachetti & Gianfilippo Caggiari

Authors
  1. Mario Manca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rossella Sirianni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alessandro Isola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giacomo Giachetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gianfilippo Caggiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marco D’Arcangelo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marco Iacopinelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Manca.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori M. Manca, R. Sirianni, A. Isola, G. Giachetti, G. Caggiari, M. D’Arcangelo e M. Iacopinelli dichiarano di non avere alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and Animal Rights

L’articolo non contiene alcuno studio eseguito su esseri umani e su animali da parte degli autori.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Manca, M., Sirianni, R., Isola, A. et al. Le fratture periprotesiche: scelta della sintesi nell’anca. LO SCALPELLO 32, 39–45 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-018-0244-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-018-0244-1

Search

Navigation