Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Le fratture diafisarie in età pediatrica

Diaphyseal fracture during developmental age

  • Aggiornamenti
  • Published:
LO SCALPELLO-OTODI Educational

Abstract

In the last twenty years, the incidence of paediatric long bone diaphyseal fractures has increased, owing to changes in the daily-life activities of children.

The fracture pattern is different considering the child’s age, the increasing participation in sports and the large number of children involved in car accidents or who are victims of abuse. Healing times will be different depending on age, because younger children take less time to heal. Another characteristic of developmental age is the capacity of spontaneous correction of malalignment. Deformities can be spontaneously corrected in the frontal and sagittal planes, while this is not possible for rotational deformities: this peculiarity of children decreases with age.

Therefore, in the choice of therapy the child’s age and the type of fracture should be considered. The type of treatment has changed over the years from a large use of casting treatment to surgical approaches by means of instruments made specifically for the developmental age. The aim of this article is to describe the general characteristics of paediatric diaphyseal fractures of the humerus, forearm, femur and tibia and the principles of non-surgical and surgical treatment in the different age groups.

Speaking about non-surgical treatment, the principles of cast application for each anatomical area are described along with the timing of the treatment and the limits of tolerated deformities. The surgical treatment consists of intramedullary osteosynthesis (using elastic nail or Kirschner wires), external fixation and in selected cases plate and screws fixation. The indications for each technique are discussed together with the basics of application and the complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliografia

  1. Xian CJ, Foster BK (2006) Aspetti biologici delle fratture nei bambini. In: Beaty K (ed) Rockwood e Wilkins. Traumatologia Pediatrica. Verduci, Roma, pp 29–31

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng JC, Shen WY (1993) Limb fracture pattern in different pediatric age groups: a study of 3350 children. J Orthop Trauma 7:15–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shaw BA, Murphy KM, Shaw A et al. (1997) Humerus shaft fractures in young children: accident or abuse? J Pediatr Orthop 17:293–297

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ahn JI, Park JS (1994) Pathological fractures secondary to unicameral bone cysts. Int Orthop 18:20–22

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaty JH (1992) Fractures of the proximal humerus and shaft in children. AAOS Instr Course 41:369–372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klenerman L (1966) Fractures of the shaft of the humerus. J Bone Jt Surg Br 48:105–111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Rang M (1983) Children’s Fractures, 2nd edn. JB Linpincott, Philadelphia, pp 154–161

    Google Scholar 

  8. Webb L, Mooney J (2003) Fractures and dislocations about the shoulder. In: Green N, Swiontkowski M (eds) Skeletal Trauma in Children. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 322–343

    Google Scholar 

  9. Caviglia HH, Garrido CP, Palazzi FF, Meana NV (2005) Pediatric fractures of the humerus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 432:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wade Shrader M (2007) Proximal humeral and humeral shaft fractures in children. Hand Clin 23:431–435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bukvic N, Kvesic A, Brekalo Z et al. (2011) The validity of ESIN method of osteosynthesis compared to other active surgical method of treatment of diaphyseal fractures of long bones in children and adolescents. Coll Antropol 2:403–408

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kaelin A (2005) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of diaphyseal fractures in children. In: Efort European Instructional Course Lectures, vol 7, pp 37–39

    Google Scholar 

  13. Garg S, Dobbs MB (2009) Surgical treatment of traumatic pediatric humeral diaphyseal fractures with titanium elastic nails. J Child Orthop 3:121–127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Senes FM, Catena N (2012) Intramedullary osteosynthesis for metaphyseal and diaphyseal humeral fractures in developmental age. J Pediatr Orthop, B 21:300–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Asche G (1986) Use of external fixation in pediatric fractures. Zentralbl Chir 111:391–397

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Senes FM, Campus R, Becchetti F, Catena N (2009) Upper limb nerve injuries in developmental age. Microsurgery 29:529–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Melhman CT, Wall EJ (2006) Lesioni della diafisi del radio e dell’ulna. In: Beaty K (ed) Rockwood e Wilkins. Traumatologia Pediatrica. Verduci, Roma, pp 407–412

    Google Scholar 

  18. Noonan KJ, Price CT (1996) Forearm and distal radius fractures in children. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 6:146–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jones K, Weiner DS (1999) The management of forearm fractures in children: a plea for conservatism. J Pediatr Orthop 19:811–815

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Boero S, Michelis MB, Calevo MG, Stella M (2007) Multiple forearm diapsyseal fracture: reduction and plaster cast control at the end of growth. Int Orthop 31:807–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sinikumpu JJ, Lautamo A, Pokka T, Serlo W (2012) The increasing incidence of paediatric diaphyseal both bone forearm fractures and their internal fixation during the last decade. Injury 43:362–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Yung SH, Lam CY, Choi KY et al. (1998) Percutaneous intramedullary Kirschner wiring for displaced diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. J Bone Jt Surg Br 80:91–94

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dietz JF, Bae DS, Reiff E et al. (2010) Single bone intramedullary fixation of the ulna in pediatric both bone forearm fractures: analisys of short term clinical and radiographic results. J Pediatr Orthop 30(5):420–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Patel A, Lily L, Anand A (2014) Systematic review: functional outcomes and complications of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for both bone diaphyseal forearm fractures in children. Injury 45(8):1135–1143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Weiss J, Mencio GA (2012) Forearm shaft fracture: does fixation improve outcomes? J Pediat Orthop 32(1):22–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Colaris JW, Allema JH, Reijman M et al. (2014) Which factors affect limitation of pronation/supination after forearm fractures in children? A prospective multicentre study. Injury 45(4):696–700

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kasser JR, Beaty JH (2006) Fratture della diafisi femorale. In: Beaty K (ed) Rockwood e Wilkins. Traumatologia Pediatrica. Verduci, Roma, pp 894–896

    Google Scholar 

  28. Staheli LT (1967) Femoral and tibial growth following femoral shaft fracture in childood. Clin Orthop Relat Res 55:159–163

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kamenaga M, Saisu T, Segawa Y et al. (2012) Remodeling of angulation in diaphyseal femorale fracture in children. J Orthop Sci 17:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Catena N, Senes FM, Riganti S, Boero S (2014) Diaphyseal femoral fractures below the age of six years: results of plaster application and long term follow up. Indian J Orthop 48(1):30–34

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Reynolds RA, Legakis JE, Thomas R et al. (2012) Intramedullary nails for pediatric diaphyseal femur fractures in older, heavier children: early results. J Child Orthop 6:181–188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Aslani H, Tabrizi A, Sadighi A, Mirbolook AR (2013) Treatment of pediatric open femoral fractures with external fixator versus flexible intramedullary nails. Arch Bone Jt Surg 1(2):64–67

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Ramseier LE, Janicki JA, Weir S, Narayam UG (2010) Femoral fractures in adolescents: a comparison of four methods of fixation. J Bone Jt Surg Am 92:1122–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Heinrich SD, Mooney JF III (2006) Fratture della diafisi tibio peroneale. In: Beaty K (ed) Rockwood e Wilkins. Traumatologia Pediatrica. Verduci, Roma, pp 1039–1044

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stilli S, Magnani M, Lampasi M et al. (2008) Remodelling and overgrowth after conservative treatment for femoral and tibial shaft fractures in children. Chir Organi Mov 91:13–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jung ST, Park H, Lee JH, Kim JR (2014) Residual angulation of distal tibial diaphyseal fractures in children younger than ten years. J Orthop Surg Res 9:84

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chotel F, Berard J, Parot R (2002) Fractures de jambe. In: Clavert JM, Karger C, Lascombes P et al. (eds) Fractures de l’enfant. Sauramps Medical, Montpellier, pp 247–259

    Google Scholar 

  38. Griffet J, Leroux J, Boudjouraf N et al. (2011) Elastic stable intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures in children. J Child Orthop 5:297–304

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Gordon JE, Gregush RV, Schoenecker PL et al. (2007) Complications after titanium elastic nailing of pediatric tibial fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 27(4):442–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Monsell FP, Howells NR, Lawniczak D et al. (2012) High energy open tibial fractures in children. J Bone Jt Surg Br 94B:989–993

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. UOC Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Istituto G. Gaslini, Genova, Italia

    Nunzio Catena, Valentina Camurri, Filippo M. Sénès & Silvio Boero

Authors
  1. Nunzio Catena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valentina Camurri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Filippo M. Sénès
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Silvio Boero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nunzio Catena.

Ethics declarations

Conflitto di interesse

Gli autori Nunzio Catena, Valentina Camurri, Filippo M. Sénès e Silvio Boero dichiarano di non aver alcun conflitto di interesse.

Consenso informato e conformità agli standard etici

Tutte le procedure descritte nello studio e che hanno coinvolto esseri umani sono state attuate in conformità alle norme etiche stabilite dalla dichiarazione di Helsinki del 1975 e successive modifiche. Il consenso informato è stato ottenuto da tutti i pazienti inclusi nello studio.

Human and animal rights

Per questo tipo di studio non è richiesto l’inserimento di alcuna dichiarazione relativa agli studi effettuati su esseri umani e animali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Catena, N., Camurri, V., Sénès, F.M. et al. Le fratture diafisarie in età pediatrica. LO SCALPELLO 29, 36–43 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0101-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11639-015-0101-4

Search

Navigation