Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental and Numerical Study on Co-combustion Behaviors and NOx Emission Characteristics of Semi-coke and Coal in a Tangentially Fired Utility Boiler

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The utilization of powdery semi-coke as a power fuel in pulverized coal-fired power plants has become a new and potential technique to consume the excess powdery semi-coke. The characteristic of low volatile results in poor combustion performance and high NOx emission, and to co-fire with bituminous coal is a practical strategy to address this problem. However, the co-combustion characteristics and the inherent interaction between semi-coke and coal remain insufficiently understood. In addition, the influences of secondary air arrangement, the boiler operation load, and the fuel type on co-combustion process are still unclear, which is urgent to be further explored. In the present study, experiments and numerical simulations were jointly utilized to inquire into the co-combustion behaviors and NOx emission features of semi-coke and coal. The results demonstrated that the “out-furnace method” was a suitable choice for small-capacity boiler when the proportion of semi-coke was 33%, due to the limited combinations of the semi-coke injection position. It was recommended that semi-coke was preferred to be injected from the middle layers of the furnace under the “in-furnace method” to improve the overall co-combustion performance. The critical value of the separated over fire air ratio in this study was 27.5%, over which a slight drop of carbon content in fly ash could come about. Moreover, the elevation in the proportion of separated over fire air gave rise to the significant decline of NOx concentration. The constricted secondary air arrangement was preferred to be employed due to the high boiler efficiency. The separated over fire air and the surrounding air needed to maintain a wide-open degree to prevent the increase of NOx emissions and the coking of nozzles. For the load reduction regulation method adopted in this study, the NOx concentration first rose and then dropped, while the burnout ratio decreased obviously as the operation load was reduced. Different combinations of coal and semi-coke generated significant influences on co-combustion behaviors within the furnace. The NOx generated by high-volatile fuel (bituminous coal) combustion was mainly affected by volatile-N, while the NOx generated by low-volatile fuel (semi-coke) was mainly impacted by char-N. This study is of guiding significance for the efficient and clean utilization and beneficial to the large-scale application of powder semi-coke in power plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li Y., Huang S., Wu Y., et al., The roles of the low molecular weight compounds in the low-temperature pyrolysis of low-rank coal. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 92(2): 203–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Xia Y., Yang Z., Zhang R., et al., Performance of used lubricating oil as flotation collector for the recovery of clean low-rank coal. Fuel, 2019, 239: 717–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yi L., Feng J., Li W.Y., Evaluation on a combined model for low-rank coal pyrolysis. Energy, 2019, 169: 1012–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhong X., Kan L., Xin H., et al., Thermal effects and active group differentiation of low-rank coal during low-temperature oxidation under vacuum drying after water immersion. Fuel, 2019, 236: 1204–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ge L., Zhang Y., Wang Z., et al., Effects of microwave irradiation treatment on physicochemical characteristics of Chinese low-rank coals. Energy Conversion and Management, 2013, 71: 84–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xie K., Li W., Zhao W., Coal chemical industry and its sustainable development in China. Energy, 2010, 35(11): 4349–4355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li C.Z., Importance of volatile-char interactions during the pyrolysis and gasification of low-rank fuels — a review. Fuel, 2013, 112: 609–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pei P., Wang Q., Wu D., Application and research on regenerative high temperature air combustion technology on low-rank coal pyrolysis. Applied Energy, 2015, 156: 762–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kök M.V., Yildirim B., Gasification profiles of Thrace region coal under CO2, N2/CO2, and N2/DRY air environments. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 175: 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xin H., Wang H., Kang W., et al., The reburning thermal characteristics of residual structure of lignite pyrolysis. Fuel, 2020, 259: 116226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu S., Zhang Y., Tuo K., et al., Structure, electrical conductivity, and dielectric properties of semi-coke derived from microwave-pyrolyzed low-rank coal. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 178: 139–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ma L., Guo A., Fang Q., et al., Combustion interactions of blended coals in an O2/CO2 mixture in a drop-tube furnace: experimental investigation and numerical simulation. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2018, 145: 184–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang C.A., Liu Y., Zhang X., et al., A study on coal properties and combustion characteristics of blended coals in Northwestern China. Energy & Fuels, 2011, 25(8): 3634–3645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Muto M., Watanabe H., Kurose R., Large eddy simulation of pulverized coal combustion in multi-burner system-effect of in-furnace blending method on NO emission. Advance Powder Technology, 2019, 30(12): 3153–3162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mochizuki Y., Naganuma R., Uebo K., et al., Some factors influencing the fluidity of coal blends: particle size, blend ratio and inherent oxygen species. Fuel Processing Technology, 2017, 159: 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang W., Liao Y., Liu J., et al., Numerical simulation and optimization of staged combustion and NOx release characteristics in precalciner. Journal of Thermal Science, 2019, 28(5): 1024–1034.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Jayaraman K., Kok M.V., Gokalp I., Thermogravimetric and mass spectrometric (TG-MS) analysis and kinetics of coal-biomass blends. Renewable Energy, 2017, 101: 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mallick D., Mahanta P., Moholkar V.S., Co-gasification of coal and biomass blends: chemistry and engineering. Fuel, 2017, 204: 106–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lv Q., Wang C.A., Liu X., et al., Combustion and heat transfer characteristics of co-firing biomass and coal under oxy-fuel condition. International Journal of Energy Research, 2018, 42(13): 4170–4183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pérez-Jeldres R., Cornejo P., Flores M., et al., A modeling approach to co-firing biomass/coal blends in pulverized coal utility boilers: synergistic effects and emissions profiles. Energy, 2017, 120: 663–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Issac M., De Girolamo A., Dai B., et al., Influence of biomass blends on the particle temperature and burnout characteristics during oxy-fuel co-combustion of coal. Journal of the Energy Institute, 2019, 93(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Motyl P., Łach J., Computational modelling of retrofitting a coal fired boiler type OP-230 for predicting NOx reduction. Journal of Thermal Science, 2018, 27(5): 433–439.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu L., Zhang Y., Chen D., et al., Experimental study on the combustion and NOx emission characteristics of a bituminous coal blended with semi-coke. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2019, 160: 113993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang Y., Zhang M., Lyu J., et al., Modeling study of combustion process of oil shale semi-coke in a circulating fluidized bed boiler. Carbon Resources Conversion, 2018, 1(3): 273–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang Y., Lu X., Wang Q., Investigation on the co-combustion of low calorific oil shale and its semi-coke by using thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 2017, 136: 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Qin H., Wang W., Liu H., et al., Thermal behavior research for co-combustion of furfural residue and oil shale semi-coke. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 120: 19–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Q., Wang H., Sun B., et al., Interactions between oil shale and its semi-coke during co-combustion. Fuel, 2009, 88(8): 1520–1529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Man C., Zhu J., Ouyang Z., et al., Experimental study on combustion characteristics of pulverized coal preheated in a circulating fluidized bed. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 172: 72–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang Y., Wang Q., Lu X., et al., Combustion behaviors and pollutant emission characteristics of low calorific oil shale and its semi-coke in a lab-scale fluidized bed combustor. Applied Energy, 2018, 211: 631–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu Z., Li J., Zhu M., et al., Investigation into scavenging of sodium and ash deposition characteristics during co-combustion of Zhundong lignite with an oil shale semi-coke of high aluminosilicate in a circulating fluidized bed. Fuel, 2019, 257: 116099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Liu W., Ouyang Z., Cao X., et al., Effects of secondary air velocity on NO emission with coal preheating technology. Fuel, 2019, 256: 115898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ouyang Z., Liu W., Man C., et al., Experimental study on combustion, flame and NOx emission of pulverized coal preheated by a preheating burner. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 179: 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhu S., Lyu Q., Zhu J., et al., Preheating combustion characteristics of ultra-low volatile carbon-based fuel. Journal of Thermal Science, 2019, 28(4): 772–779.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang P., Wang C.A., Du Y., et al., Experiments and simulation on co-combustion of semi-coke and coal in a full-scale tangentially fired utility boiler. Energy & Fuels, 2019, 33(4): 3012–3027.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang C.A., Feng Q., Lv Q., et al., Numerical investigation on co-firing characteristics of semi-coke and lean coal in a 600 MW supercritical wall-fired boiler. Applied Sciences, 2019, 9(5): 889.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Du Y., Wang C.A., Wang P., et al., Computational fluid dynamics investigation on the effect of co-firing semi-coke and bituminous coal in a 300 MW tangentially fired boiler. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part A-Journal of Power and Energy, 2018, 233(2): 221–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sankar G., Kumar D.S., Balasubramanian K.R., Computational modeling of pulverized coal-fired boilers -a review on the current position. Fuel, 2019, 236: 643–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bhuiyan A.A., Naser J., Thermal characterization of coal/straw combustion under air/oxy-fuel conditions in a swirl-stabilized furnace: a CFD modelling. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2016, 93: 639–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Karim M.R., Naser J., CFD modelling of combustion and associated emission of wet woody biomass in a 4 MW moving grate boiler. Fuel, 2018, 222: 656–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Launder B.E., Spalding D.B., The numerical computation of turbulent flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics & Engineering, 2014, 3(2): 269–289.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Hill S.C., Modeling of nitrogen oxides formation and destruction in combustion systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2000, 26(4): 417–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lee B.H., Song J.H., Kim R.G., et al., Simulation of the influence of the coal volatile matter content on fuel NO emissions in a drop-tube furnace. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(8): 4333–4340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. De Soete G.G., Overall reaction rates of NO and N2 formation from fuel nitrogen. Symposium on Combustion, 1975, 1093(1): 1093–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Glarborg P., Fuel nitrogen conversion in solid fuel fired systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2003, 29(2): 89–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Drosatos P., Nikolopoulos N., Agraniotis M., et al., Numerical investigation of firing concepts for a flexible Greek lignite-fired power plant. Fuel Processing Technology, 2016, 142: 370–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Du Y., Wang C.A., Lv Q., et al., CFD investigation on combustion and NO emission characteristics in a 600 MW wall-fired boiler under high temperature and strong reducing atmosphere. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2017, 126: 407–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wu Y.P., Wen Z.Y., Shen Y.L., et al., Effects of over fire air on the combustion and NOx emission characteristics of a 600 MW opposed swirling fired boiler. Advanced Materials Research, 2012, 512–515: 2135–2142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Key R&D Program of China (2017YFB0602003).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chang’an Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Feng, Q., Jin, L. et al. Experimental and Numerical Study on Co-combustion Behaviors and NOx Emission Characteristics of Semi-coke and Coal in a Tangentially Fired Utility Boiler. J. Therm. Sci. 30, 1116–1131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1405-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-021-1405-8

Keywords

Navigation