Abstract
This study was intended to understand how smallholder farmers’ modifications improved agroforestry technologies’ usability in Uganda’s Mt. Elgon region. We used a case study approach to understand how smallholder farmers’ contextual realities informed their modifications and enhanced the usability of agroforestry technologies. Data was collected over four months of frequent and regular interaction with the cases using formal and informal methods that included in-depth interviews, conversations, discussions, and direct observations. Emerging themes and patterns were identified from the comprehensively reduced data. In addition, respondents’ direct quotes were used to emphasize the reasons for the modifications. The findings showed that smallholder farmers modified the recommended technologies to suit their biophysical and socio-economic realities. Differences and similarities in modifications existed among cases across the agroforestry technologies. The modifications were mainly done to diversify tree uses, optimize space utilization, and minimize production costs for farming households. These findings imply a need to critically examine the smallholder farmers’ modifications to make agroforestry technologies applicable and compliant to their contexts. This will inform the re-invention of technologies that will quickly diffuse into the community for broader impact. Findings also emphasize the need to rethink the linear model of technology transfer mainly applied in agroforestry technology development and dissemination because it offers limited space for the much-needed feedback from smallholder farmers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bassil S, Nyland RD, Kern CC, Kenefic L (2019) Dynamics of the diameter distribution after selection cutting in uneven-aged and even-aged northern hardwood stands: a long-term evaluation. Can J Forest Res 49(12): 1525–1539. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2019-0204
Bauw P de, van Asten P, Jassogne L, Merckx R (2016) Soil fertility gradients and production constraints for coffee and banana on volcanic mountain slopes in the East African Rift: A case study of Mt. Elgon. Agr Ecosyst Environ 231:166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.036
Crowe S, Cresswell K, Robertson A, et al. (2011) The case study approach. BMC Med Res Methodol 11:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Doddabasawa, Chittapur BM, Mahadeva Murthy M (2020) Economics and energy potential of traditional agroforestry systems under contrasting ecosystems in semi arid tropics. Agroforest Syst 94(6): 2237–2247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00545-y
Epila J, Verbeeck H, Otim-Epila T, et al. (2017) The ecology of Maesopsis eminii Engl. in tropical Africa. Afr J Ecol 55(4):679–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12408
Fritzen-Pedicini C, Bleasdale SC, Brosseau LM, et al. (2019) Utilizing the focused conversation method in qualitative public health research: a team-based approach. BMC Health Serv Res. 19(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4107-0
Fungo B, Buyinza J, Sekatuba J, et al. (2020) Forage biomass and soil aggregate carbon under fodder banks with contrasting management regimes. Agroforest Syst. 94(3):1023–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00473-6
Giller KE, Tittonell P, Rufino MC, et al. (2011) Communicating complexity: Integrated assessment of trade-offs concerning soil fertility management within African farming systems to support innovation and development. Agr Syst 104(2):191–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.07.002
Glover D, Venot JP, Harro M (2017) On the Movement of Agricultural Technologies: Packaging, unpackaging and situated reconfiguration. Agronomy for Development: The politics of Knowledge in Agricultural Research 14–30.
Gomez y Paloma S, Riesgo L, Louhichi K (2020) The Role of Smallholder Farms in Food and Nutrition Security. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. ISBN: 978-3-030-42148-9.
Hébert F, Krause C, Plourde PY, et al. (2016) Effect of Tree Spacing on Tree Level Volume Growth, Morphology, and Wood Properties in a 25-Year-Old Pinus banksiana Plantation in the Boreal Forest of Quebec. Forests 7(12):276 https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110276
Hockett M, Richardson RB (2018) Examining the drivers of agricultural experimentation among smallholder farmers in Malawi. Ex. Agric 54(1):45–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000673
Buyinza J, Nuberg IK, Muthuri CW, Denton MD (2020) Assessing smallholder farmers’ motivation to adopt agroforestry using a multi-group structural equation modeling approach. Agr Syst 94(6):2199–2211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-020-00541-2
Kabi F, Bareeba FB (2008) Herbage biomass production and nutritive value of mulberry (Morus alba) and Calliandra calothyrsus harvested at different cutting frequencies. Anim Feed Sci Tech 140(1–2):178–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2007.02.011
Kabiru S, Hassan S, Umar UA, Musab I (2017) An Inventory of Agroforestry Practices in Butta Sub-County, Manafwa District, Uganda. Asian J Environ Ecol 5(4):1–7. https://doi.org/10.9734/AJEE/2017/39518
Karshie EA, Ajayi OV, Gideon PK, et al. (2017) Farmers’ participation in agroforestry practices in Taraba State, Nigeria: Analysis of benefits. Greener J Agric Sci 7(8):182–188. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3030192
Le HD, Smith C, Herbohn J, Nguyen H (2020) A Comparison of Growth, Structure and Diversity of Mixed Species and Monoculture Reforestation Systems in the Philippines. J Sustain Forest 40(4): 401–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2020.1767145
Leeuwis C, Van den Ban A (2004) Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension. (3rd Edition). Oxford OX4 2DQ UK Blackwell Science Ltd.
Liu CLC, Kuchma O, Krutovsky KV (2018) Mixed-species versus monocultures in plantation forestry: Development, benefits, ecosystem services and perspectives for the future. Glob Ecol Conserv 15, e00419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00419
Marron N, Epron D (2019) Are mixed-tree plantations including a nitrogen-fixing species more productive than monocultures? Forest Ecol Manag 441:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.03.052
Marron N, Priault P, Gana C, et al. (2018) Prevalence of interspecific competition in a mixed poplar/black locust plantation under adverse climate conditions. Ann For Sci 75(1): 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-018-0704-z
Merriam SB (1998) Qualitative research and case study applications in education [Revised and Expanded from “Case Study Research in Education]. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Mucheru-muna M, Mugendi D, Pypers P, et al. (2014) Enhancing maize productivity and profitability using organic inputs and mineral fertilizer in central Kenya small-hold farms. Ex. Agric 50(2): 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479713000525
Muhammed T (2019) Tree-Crop Interaction Management in Agroforestry: A Review. J Ecol Nat Resour 3(5). https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000180
Muir J (2019) Leguminous forage shrubs: the underutilized canopy. J int Legum Soc: 5–6. http://www.ias.csic.es/grainlegumesmagazine/legum_perspect_17.pdf, accessed 2021 Jan 22
Mulyono A, Arisbaya I, Sudrajat Y (2020) Imaging tree root zone geometry using electrical resistivity tomography. Ris Geo Tam 30(1): 55–64. https://doi.org/10.14203/risetgeotam2020.v30.1048
Muthuri CW, Mukuralinda A, Abayneh D, et al. (2017) Improving sustainable productivity in farming systems and enhanced livelihoods through adoption of evergreen agriculture in eastern Africa shortened as ‘Trees for food security’ project (T4FS): Final report. Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers in cooperation with International Centre for Research in Agroforestry. xiv, 499. ISBN: 0792321340.
Namey E, Guest G, Thairu L, Johnson L (2008) Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. Handbook for Team-Based Qualitative Research 2(1):137–161.
Ndayambaje JD, Heijman WJM, Mohren GMJ (2013) Farm woodlots in rural Rwanda: purposes and determinants. Agroforest Syst. 87(4): 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-013-9597-x
Okia C, Buyinza J, Agaba H, et al. (2016) Trees for food security project: A glimpse of Uganda. World Agroforestry Centre. Nairobi Kenya.
Omona J (2013) Sampling in qualitative research: improving the quality of research outcomes in higher education. Mak J High Edu 4(2): 169–185. https://doi.org/10.4314/majohe.v4i2.4
Oyana TJ, Kayendeke E, Bamutaze Y, Kisanga D (2015) A field assessment of land use systems and soil properties at varied landscape positions in a fragile ecosystem of Mount Elgon, Uganda. African Geographical Review 34(1):83–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/19376812.2014.929970
Patric A, Raj AK, Kunhamu TK, et al. (2020) Productivity of tree fodder banks in a typical homegarden of Central Kerala. Indian J Agrofor 22(1): 17–23.
Qiao X, Sai L, Chen X, et al. (2019) Impact of fruit-tree shade intensity on the growth, yield, and quality of intercropped wheat. Plos One 14(4): e0203238. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203238
Rahn E, Liebig T, Ghazoul J, et al. (2018) Opportunities for sustainable intensification of coffee agro-ecosystems along an altitudinal. Agr Ecosyst Environ 263:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2018.04.019
Rais A, Poschenrieder W, van de Kuilen J-WG, Pretzsch H (2020) Impact of spacing and pruning on quantity, quality and economics of Douglas-fir sawn timber: scenario and sensitivity analysis. Eur J Forest Res 139(5): 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01282-8
Ramachandran Nair PK (2007) Agroforestry for Sustainability of Lower-Input Land-Use Systems. J Crop Improvement 19(1–2):25–47. https://doi.org/10.1300/J411v19n01_02
Ryan GW, Bernard HR (2000) Techniques to identify themes in qualitative data. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Sharma A, Bohn K, Jose S, Dwivedi P (2016) Even-aged vs. unevenaged silviculture: implications for multifunctional management of southern pine ecosystems. Forests 7(12):86. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7040086
Stake RE (1995) The Art of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Swain JM, Spire ZD (2020) The role of informal conversations in generating data, and the ethical and methodological issues they raise. In Forum Qualitative Social Research 21(1). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-21.1.3344
Tafere SM, Nigussie ZA (2018) The adoption of introduced agroforestry innovations: determinants of a high adoption rate — a case study from Ethiopia. For Trees and Livelihoods 27(3):175–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2018.1493954
Tayebwa (2013) East African Community Youth Policy. EAC Secretariat. p 39. http://meac.go.ke/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/EAC-Youth-Policy.pdf, accessed 2021 Jan 21
UNDP (2013) Ecosystem Based Adaptation in Mountain Elgon Ecosystem-Vulnerability Impact Assessment (VIA) for the Mt Elgon Ecosystem. Kampala Uganda: United Nations Development Programme. p76. https://www.adaptation-undp.org/sites/default/files/downloads/undp_ugandaunepunep-wcmc_2013_uganda_via_report.pdf, accessed 2021 Jan 21.
Vanlauwe B, Coe R, Giller KE (2016) Beyond the averages: new approaches to understand heterogeneity and risk of technology success or failure in smallholder farming. Expl Agric. 55(1):84–106. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479716000193
Vedeld P, Cavanagh C, Petursson J, et al. (2016) The political economy of conservation at mount elgon, Uganda: Between local deprivation, regional sustainability, and global public goods. Conservat Soc 14(3):183. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.191155
Vigulu V, Blumfield TJ, Reverchon F, et al. (2019) Growth and yield of 5 years old teak and flueggea in single and mixed species forestry systems in the Solomon Islands. New Forest 50(4):629–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9684-y
Vigulu VW, Blumfield TJ, Reverchon F, et al. (2017) Competition for nitrogen between trees in a mixed-species plantation in the Solomon Islands. Aust For 80(3):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049158.2017.1326093
Widyati E, Darwiati W, Yulianti M (2019) Land management in optimizing productivity of limited land to deal with Rural Food, Feed and Fuel (3F) Security. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 394(1): 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/394/1/012068
Yin RK (2018) Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. (Sixth edition). Los Angeles: SAGE. ISBN: 9781506336169.
Yoshida T, Kamitani T (2000) Interspecific competition among three canopy-tree species in a mixed-species even-aged forest of central Japan. Forest Ecol Manag 137:221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00330-8
Acknowledgements
We thank the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), ICRAF and NARO for funding this research. We are grateful to the smallholder farmers who participated in the study for their cooperation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalanzi, F., Isubikalu, P., Kyazze, F.B. et al. Dissemination paradox: how contextual realities influence smallholder farmers’ modifications of agroforestry technologies in Uganda’s Mt. Elgon region. J. Mt. Sci. 19, 1404–1418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7006-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-021-7006-x