Skip to main content
Log in

A terrain openness index for the extraction of karst Fenglin and Fengcong landform units from DEMs

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Fenglin and Fengcong landform units are considered to be an important representation for defining the degree of development of Karst landforms. However, these terrain features have been proven difficult to delineate and extract automatically because of their complex morphology. In this paper, a new method for identifying the Fenglin and Fengcong landform units is proposed. This method consists of two steps: (1) terrain openness calculation and (2) toe line extraction. The proposed method is applied and validated in the Karst case area of Guilin by using ASTER GDEM with one arc-second resolution. The openness of both the positive and negative terrain and a threshold were used to extract toe lines for segmenting depressions and pinnacles in Fenglin and Fengcong landforms. A comparison between the extracted Fenglin and Fengcong landform units and their real units from high resolution images was carried out to evaluate the capability of the proposed method. Results show the proposed method can effectively extract the Fenglin and Fengcong landform units, and has an overall accuracy of 93.28%. The proposed method is simple and easy to implement and is expected to play an important role in the automatic extraction of similar landform units in the Karst area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang KT, Tsai BW (1991) The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartography and geographic information systems 18(1): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304091783805626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhry OZ, Mackaness WA (2008) Creating mountains out of mole hills: Automatic identification of hills and ranges using morphometric analysis. Transactions in GIS 12(5): 567–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zhang Y, Qin H, et al. (2015) The Karst Geomorphologic Regionalization in China. In From Geoheritage to Geoparks. Springer International Publishing. pp 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9671.2008.01116.x

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JD, Chojnacki JD (2017) Two-dimensional discrete fourier transform analysis of Karst and coral reef morphologies. Transactions in GIS 21(3): 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day MJ (2002) The role of valley systems in the evolution of tropical Karst lands. In: Gabrovsek F (eds) Evolution of Karst: From Prekarst to Cessation. Zalozba ZRC, Ljublana. pp 235–241.

  • Ford D, Williams P (2013) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles PT (2001) Remote sensing and cast shadows in mountainous terrain. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67(7): 833–840.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green JA, Marken WJ, Alexander CE, et al. (2002) Karst unit mapping using geographic information system technology, Mower County, Minnesota, USA. Environmental Geology 42(5): 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254–001–0505–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Gao T, Yang M, et al. (2012) Extraction of Relief Amplitude Based on Change Point Method: A Case Study on the Tibetan Plateau. Scientia Geographica Sinica 32(1): 101–104. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang S, Lan A, Ma J, et al. (2014a) Information extraction of typical Karst landform based on RS. In Remote Sensing of the Environment: 18th National Symposium on Remote Sensing of China. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 91580V. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2063696

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang W, Deng C, Day MJ (2014b) Differentiating tower Karst (fenglin) and cockpit Karst (fengcong) using DEM contour, slope, and centroid. Environmental earth sciences 72(2): 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665–013–2961–3

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienzle S (2004) The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives. Transactions in GIS 8(1): 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9671.2004.00169.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang F, Du Y (2013) An automated method to extract typical karst landform entities from contour lines on topographic maps. In Proceedings of Geomorphometry. pp 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang F, Xu B (2014a) Discrimination of tower-, cockpit-, and non-Karst landforms in Guilin, southern China, based on morphometric characteristics. Geomorphology 204(1): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang F, Du Y, Ge Y, et al. (2014b) A quantitative morphometric comparison of cockpit and doline karst landforms. Journal of Geographical Sciences 24(6): 1069–1082.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442–014–1139–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv G, Xiong L, Chen M, et al. (2017) Chinese progress in geomorphometry. Journal of Geographical Sciences 27(11): 1389–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442–017–1442–0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyew-Ayee P, Viles HA, Tucker GE (2007) The use of GISbased digital morphometric techniques in the study of cockpit Karst. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32(2): 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siart C, Bubenzer O, Eitel B (2009) Combining digital elevation data (SRTM/ASTER), high resolution satellite imagery (Quickbird) and GIS for geomorphological mapping: A multicomponent case study on Mediterranean Karst in Central Crete. Geomorphology 112(1): 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.05.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeting MM (1995) Karst Terminology and Karst Types in China. In Karst in China.Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp 42–57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tachikawa T, Hato M, Kaku M, et al. (2011) Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2011 IEEE International. IEEE. pp 3657–3660. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6050017

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang T, Day MJ (2000) Field survey and analysis of hillslopes on tower Karst in Guilin, southern China. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25(11): 1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/10969837(200010)25:11<1221::AID-ESP133>3.0.CO; 2-D

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham T (2008) Fengcong, fenglin, cone Karst and tower Karst. Cave and Karst Science 35(3): 77–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltham T (2009a) Guangxi Karst: The Fenglin and Fengcong Karst of Guilin and Yangshuo. In Geomorphological Landscapes of the World.Springer Netherlands. pp 293–302.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Waltham T (2009b) The Karst lands of southern China. Geology Today 25(6): 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2451. 2009.00736.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PW (1987) Geomorphic inheritance and the development of tower Karst. Earth surface processes and landforms 12(5): 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp. 3290120503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolock DM, Price CV (1994) Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model. Water Resources Research 30(11): 3041–3052. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR01971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue XW, Chen X, Zhang ZC, et al. (2009) Categorization of Karst landform on the basis of landform factor eigenvalue. CarsologicaSinica 28 (2): 175–180. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang SW, Xie F, Feng GS, et al. (2012) Automatic extraction of Karst landscape elements based on SPOT5 image. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources 24(2): 56–60. https://doi.org/10.6046/gtzyyg.2012.02.11

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokoyama R, Shirasawa M, Pike RJ (2002) Visualizing topography by openness: a new application of image processing to digital elevation models. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 68(3): 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan DX, Drogue C, Aide D, et al. (1990) Hydrology of the Karst aquifer at the experimental site of Guilin in southern China. Journal of Hydrology 115(1–4): 285–296. https://doi. org/10.1016/0022–1694(90)90210-O

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan DX (2001) On the Karst ecosystem. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) 75(3): 336–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755–6724.2001.tb00541.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan DX (2004) Yangshuo Karst, China. Encyclopedia of caves and Karst science. Fitzroy Dearborn, New York. pp 781–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan DX (2016) Modern Karstology Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Z (1982) Characters of the Karst topography in southern China. Carsologica Sinica 1:27–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao WF, Xiong LY, Ding H, et al. (2017) Automatic recognition of loess landforms using Random Forest method. Journal of Mountain Science 14(5): 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629–016–4320–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu AX, Smith M, Wang RX, et al. (2008) The impact of neighbourhood size on terrain derivatives and digital soil mapping. In Advances in digital terrain analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 333–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Tang G, Qian K, et al. (2014) Extraction and analysis of gully head of Loess Plateau in China based on digital elevation model. Chinese Geographical Science 24(3): 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769–014–0663–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XW (1982) The corrosion morphology of limestone caves in Guilin area. Carsologica Sinica (2): 93. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XW (1988) Guilin Karst. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu XW (2009) Discussions on fenglin Karst in China. CarsologicaSinica 28(2): 155–168. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zylshal PD, Haryono E (2013) An Object Based Image Analysis Approach to Semi-Automated Karst Morphology Extraction. In Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Bali. Vol. 34. pp. 411–418. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2243.1609

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 41601411, 41671389, 41571398, 41701449); Open Fund of State Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University (Grant No. 17S02); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions-PAPD (Grant No. 164320H101). The authors express their gratitude the journal editor and the reviewers, whose thoughtful suggestions played a significant role in improving the quality of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li-yang Xiong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, X., Xiong, Ly., Yang, Xw. et al. A terrain openness index for the extraction of karst Fenglin and Fengcong landform units from DEMs. J. Mt. Sci. 15, 752–764 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4742-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4742-z

Keywords

Navigation