Abstract
The Fenglin and Fengcong landform units are considered to be an important representation for defining the degree of development of Karst landforms. However, these terrain features have been proven difficult to delineate and extract automatically because of their complex morphology. In this paper, a new method for identifying the Fenglin and Fengcong landform units is proposed. This method consists of two steps: (1) terrain openness calculation and (2) toe line extraction. The proposed method is applied and validated in the Karst case area of Guilin by using ASTER GDEM with one arc-second resolution. The openness of both the positive and negative terrain and a threshold were used to extract toe lines for segmenting depressions and pinnacles in Fenglin and Fengcong landforms. A comparison between the extracted Fenglin and Fengcong landform units and their real units from high resolution images was carried out to evaluate the capability of the proposed method. Results show the proposed method can effectively extract the Fenglin and Fengcong landform units, and has an overall accuracy of 93.28%. The proposed method is simple and easy to implement and is expected to play an important role in the automatic extraction of similar landform units in the Karst area.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chang KT, Tsai BW (1991) The effect of DEM resolution on slope and aspect mapping. Cartography and geographic information systems 18(1): 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304091783805626
Chaudhry OZ, Mackaness WA (2008) Creating mountains out of mole hills: Automatic identification of hills and ranges using morphometric analysis. Transactions in GIS 12(5): 567–589.
Chen W, Zhang Y, Qin H, et al. (2015) The Karst Geomorphologic Regionalization in China. In From Geoheritage to Geoparks. Springer International Publishing. pp 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9671.2008.01116.x
Davis JD, Chojnacki JD (2017) Two-dimensional discrete fourier transform analysis of Karst and coral reef morphologies. Transactions in GIS 21(3): 521–545. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12277
Day MJ (2002) The role of valley systems in the evolution of tropical Karst lands. In: Gabrovsek F (eds) Evolution of Karst: From Prekarst to Cessation. Zalozba ZRC, Ljublana. pp 235–241.
Ford D, Williams P (2013) Karst hydrogeology and geomorphology. John Wiley & Sons.
Giles PT (2001) Remote sensing and cast shadows in mountainous terrain. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 67(7): 833–840.
Green JA, Marken WJ, Alexander CE, et al. (2002) Karst unit mapping using geographic information system technology, Mower County, Minnesota, USA. Environmental Geology 42(5): 457–461. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254–001–0505–8
Han H, Gao T, Yang M, et al. (2012) Extraction of Relief Amplitude Based on Change Point Method: A Case Study on the Tibetan Plateau. Scientia Geographica Sinica 32(1): 101–104. (In Chinese)
Huang S, Lan A, Ma J, et al. (2014a) Information extraction of typical Karst landform based on RS. In Remote Sensing of the Environment: 18th National Symposium on Remote Sensing of China. International Society for Optics and Photonics. 91580V. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2063696
Huang W, Deng C, Day MJ (2014b) Differentiating tower Karst (fenglin) and cockpit Karst (fengcong) using DEM contour, slope, and centroid. Environmental earth sciences 72(2): 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665–013–2961–3
Kienzle S (2004) The effect of DEM raster resolution on first order, second order and compound terrain derivatives. Transactions in GIS 8(1): 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9671.2004.00169.x
Liang F, Du Y (2013) An automated method to extract typical karst landform entities from contour lines on topographic maps. In Proceedings of Geomorphometry. pp 46–49.
Liang F, Xu B (2014a) Discrimination of tower-, cockpit-, and non-Karst landforms in Guilin, southern China, based on morphometric characteristics. Geomorphology 204(1): 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.07.026
Liang F, Du Y, Ge Y, et al. (2014b) A quantitative morphometric comparison of cockpit and doline karst landforms. Journal of Geographical Sciences 24(6): 1069–1082.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442–014–1139–6
Lv G, Xiong L, Chen M, et al. (2017) Chinese progress in geomorphometry. Journal of Geographical Sciences 27(11): 1389–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442–017–1442–0
Lyew-Ayee P, Viles HA, Tucker GE (2007) The use of GISbased digital morphometric techniques in the study of cockpit Karst. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 32(2): 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1399
Siart C, Bubenzer O, Eitel B (2009) Combining digital elevation data (SRTM/ASTER), high resolution satellite imagery (Quickbird) and GIS for geomorphological mapping: A multicomponent case study on Mediterranean Karst in Central Crete. Geomorphology 112(1): 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.05.010
Sweeting MM (1995) Karst Terminology and Karst Types in China. In Karst in China.Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp 42–57
Tachikawa T, Hato M, Kaku M, et al. (2011) Characteristics of ASTER GDEM version 2. In Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 2011 IEEE International. IEEE. pp 3657–3660. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2011.6050017
Tang T, Day MJ (2000) Field survey and analysis of hillslopes on tower Karst in Guilin, southern China. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 25(11): 1221–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/10969837(200010)25:11<1221::AID-ESP133>3.0.CO; 2-D
Waltham T (2008) Fengcong, fenglin, cone Karst and tower Karst. Cave and Karst Science 35(3): 77–88.
Waltham T (2009a) Guangxi Karst: The Fenglin and Fengcong Karst of Guilin and Yangshuo. In Geomorphological Landscapes of the World.Springer Netherlands. pp 293–302.
Waltham T (2009b) The Karst lands of southern China. Geology Today 25(6): 232–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365–2451. 2009.00736.x
Williams PW (1987) Geomorphic inheritance and the development of tower Karst. Earth surface processes and landforms 12(5): 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp. 3290120503
Wolock DM, Price CV (1994) Effects of digital elevation model map scale and data resolution on a topography-based watershed model. Water Resources Research 30(11): 3041–3052. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR01971
Xue XW, Chen X, Zhang ZC, et al. (2009) Categorization of Karst landform on the basis of landform factor eigenvalue. CarsologicaSinica 28 (2): 175–180. (In Chinese)
Yang SW, Xie F, Feng GS, et al. (2012) Automatic extraction of Karst landscape elements based on SPOT5 image. Remote Sensing for Land & Resources 24(2): 56–60. https://doi.org/10.6046/gtzyyg.2012.02.11
Yokoyama R, Shirasawa M, Pike RJ (2002) Visualizing topography by openness: a new application of image processing to digital elevation models. Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 68(3): 257–266.
Yuan DX, Drogue C, Aide D, et al. (1990) Hydrology of the Karst aquifer at the experimental site of Guilin in southern China. Journal of Hydrology 115(1–4): 285–296. https://doi. org/10.1016/0022–1694(90)90210-O
Yuan DX (2001) On the Karst ecosystem. Acta Geologica Sinica (English Edition) 75(3): 336–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755–6724.2001.tb00541.x
Yuan DX (2004) Yangshuo Karst, China. Encyclopedia of caves and Karst science. Fitzroy Dearborn, New York. pp 781–783.
Yuan DX (2016) Modern Karstology Beijing: Science Press. (In Chinese)
Zeng Z (1982) Characters of the Karst topography in southern China. Carsologica Sinica 1:27–31.
Zhao WF, Xiong LY, Ding H, et al. (2017) Automatic recognition of loess landforms using Random Forest method. Journal of Mountain Science 14(5): 885–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629–016–4320–9
Zhu AX, Smith M, Wang RX, et al. (2008) The impact of neighbourhood size on terrain derivatives and digital soil mapping. In Advances in digital terrain analysis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 333–348
Zhu H, Tang G, Qian K, et al. (2014) Extraction and analysis of gully head of Loess Plateau in China based on digital elevation model. Chinese Geographical Science 24(3): 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769–014–0663–8
Zhu XW (1982) The corrosion morphology of limestone caves in Guilin area. Carsologica Sinica (2): 93. (In Chinese)
Zhu XW (1988) Guilin Karst. Shanghai, China: Shanghai Scientific and Technical Publishers.
Zhu XW (2009) Discussions on fenglin Karst in China. CarsologicaSinica 28(2): 155–168. (In Chinese)
Zylshal PD, Haryono E (2013) An Object Based Image Analysis Approach to Semi-Automated Karst Morphology Extraction. In Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Bali. Vol. 34. pp. 411–418. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2243.1609
Acknowledgements
The research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 41601411, 41671389, 41571398, 41701449); Open Fund of State Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping and Remote Sensing, Wuhan University (Grant No. 17S02); A Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions-PAPD (Grant No. 164320H101). The authors express their gratitude the journal editor and the reviewers, whose thoughtful suggestions played a significant role in improving the quality of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meng, X., Xiong, Ly., Yang, Xw. et al. A terrain openness index for the extraction of karst Fenglin and Fengcong landform units from DEMs. J. Mt. Sci. 15, 752–764 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4742-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-017-4742-z