Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thermal state of soils in the active layer and underlain permafrost at the kilometer post 304 site along the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline

  • Published:
Journal of Mountain Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

On-site monitoring is very important for understanding formation mechanisms of frost hazards frequently occurring in pipeline foundation soils and for designing and deploying according mitigative measures in permafrost regions. Significant thaw subsidence of ground surfaces along the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline (CRCOP) from Mo'he to Daqing, Heilongjiang Province, Northeast China have been observed at some segments underlain by ice-rich, warm (>1.0°C) permafrost since the official operation in January 2011. Recent monitoring results of the thermal states of foundation soils at the kilometer post (KP) 304 site along the CRCOP are presented in this paper. The results indicate that during the period from 2012 to 2014, shallow soils (at the depths from 0.8 to 4.0 m from ground surface) has warmed by approximately 1.0°C in the lateral range of 1.2 to 2.1 m away from the pipeline axis, and deeper permafrost (such as at the depth of 15 m, or the depth of zero annual amplitude of ground temperatures) by 0.08°C per year 4 m away from the pipe axis, and 0.07°C per year 5 m away from the pipeline axis. The results indicate an all-season talik has developed around and along the CRCOP. The thaw bulb, with a faster lateral expansion (compared with the vertical growth), enlarges in summer and shrinks in winter. This research will provide important references and bases for evaluating thermal influences of warm pipeline on permafrost and for design, construction, operation and maintenance of pipelines in permafrost regions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bradford JH, McNamara JP, Bowden W, et al. (2005) Measuring thaw depth beneath peat-lined arctic streams using ground-penetrating radar. Hydrological Processes 19(14): 2689–2699. DOI: 10.1002/hyp.5781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer MC, Jin HJ, Hu WZ, et al. (2006) The change of design of the Alyeska Pipeline and construction modes in permafrost areas, and their reasons and the philosophy behind it. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 28(6): 809–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrener L, Korin E (1999) Thawing and refreezing around a buried pipe. Chemical Engineering and Processing: Process Intensification 38(3): 239–247. DOI: 10.1016/S0255-2701(98)00084-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosten TR, Bradford JH, McNamara JP, et al. (2006) Profiles of temporal thaw depths beneath two arctic stream types using ground-penetrating radar. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 17(4): 341–355. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C-CORE (2012) Modelling of Thaw-Settlement Related to Mo’he-Daqing Crude Oil Pipeline. Memorial University of Newfoundland, Captain Robert A. Bartlett Building, Morrissey Road, Canda, C-CORE Report R-12-080-928, pp 1–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang XL, Jin HJ, Zhang YL, et al. (2015) Study of seasonal snow cover influencing the ground thermal regime on western flank of Da Xing’anling Mountains, Northeastern China. Sciences in Cold and Arid Regions 6): 666–674. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1226.2015.00666

    Google Scholar 

  • Doblanko RM, Oswell JM, Hanna AJ (2002) Right-of-way and pipeline monitoring in permafrost-the Norman Wells Pipeline experience. In: Proceedings of the International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA. Paper IPC02-27357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortier R, Le Blanc AM, Yu WB (2011) Impacts of permafrost degradation on a road embankment at Umiujaq in Nunavik (Quebec). Canadian Geotechnical Journal 48(5): 720–740. DOI: 10.1139/t10-101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He RX, Jin HJ (2010) Permafrost and cold-region environmental problems of the oil product pipeline from Golmud to Lhasa on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and their mitigation. Cold Regions Science and Technology 64(3): 279–288. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2010.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel KM, Doolittle JA, Bockheim JG, et al. (2001) Detection of subsurface permafrost features with ground-penetrating radar, Barrow, Alaska. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 12(2): 179–190. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin HJ, Hao JQ, Chang XL, et al. (2010) Zonation and assessment of frozen-ground conditions for engineering geology along the China-Russia crude oil pipeline route from Mo’he to Daqing, Northeastern China. Cold Regions Science and Technology 64(3): 213–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin HJ, Sun GY, Yu SP, et al. (2008) Symbiosis of marshes and permafrost in the Da and Xiao Hinggan Mountains in Northeastern China. Chinese Geographical Science 18(1): 62–69. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-008-0062-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin HJ, Yu QH, Lü LZ, et al. (2007) Degradation of permafrost in the Xing’anling Mountains, Northeastern China. Permafrost and Periglanial Processes 18: 245–258. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin HJ, Wang SL, Lü LZ, et al. (2009) Zonation and assessment of engineering geology for frozen-ground environments and conditions along the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline route. Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology 4: 102–107. (In Chinese) DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.12.003

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ER, Hegdal LA (2008) Permafrost-related performance of the Trans-Alaska oil pipeline. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Permafrost. Fairbanks, USA. pp 857–864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachenbruch AH (1970) Some estimates of the thermal effects of a heated pipeline in permafrost. Circular 632. Washington, D.C.: US Geological Survey, USA. pp 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li GY, Ma W, Wang XL, et al. (2015) Frost hazards and mitigative measures following operation of the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline. Rock and Soil Mechanics 36(10): 2963–2973. DOI: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.10.030

    Google Scholar 

  • Li GY, Sheng Y, Jin H J, et al. (2010) Forecasting the oil temperatures along the proposed China-Russia Crude oil pipeline using quasi 3-D transient heat conduction model. Cold Regions Science and Technology 64(3): 235–242. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lü LZ, Jin HJ, Chang XL, et al. (2010) Interannual variations of the air temperature, surface temperature, and shallow ground temperature along the China-Russia crude oil pipeline. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 32(4): 794–802. (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman BJ, Robinson SD, Burgess MM (2003) Imaging periglacial conditions with ground-penetrating radar. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 14(4): 319–329. DOI: 10.1002/ppp.463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswell JM (2011) Pipelines in permafrost: geotechnical issues and lessons. Canadian Geotechnical Journal 48(9): 1412–1431. DOI: 10.1139/T11-045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oswell JM, Hanna AJ, Doblanko RM, et al. (2000) Instrumentation and geotechnical assessment of local pipe wrinkling on the NormanWells pipeline. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA. pp 923–930.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswell JM, Skibinsky D (2006) Thaw responses in degrading permafrost. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Pipeline Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, USA. Paper IPC06-10616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswell JM, Skibinsky D, Radmard S (2007) Porewater pressure response to thawing permafrost. In: Proceedings of the 60th Canadian Geotechnical Conference. Canadian Geotechnical Society, Richmond, USA. pp 2068–2075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman BJ (2000) Long-term variability of pipelinepermafrost interactions in north-west Siberia. Permafrost and Periglacial Processes 11(1): 5–22. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1530(200001/03)11:1<5::AID-PPP335>3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith SL, Burgess MM, Riseborough DW (2008) Ground temperature and thaw settlement in frozen peatlands along the Norman Wells pipeline corridor, NWT Canada: 22 years of monitoring. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Permafrost. Fairbanks, USA. pp 1665–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillard S, Dubois JC (1995) Analysis of GPR data: Wave propagation velocity determination. Journal of Applied Geophysics 33(1): 77–91. DOI:10.1016/0926-9851(95)90031-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang SZ, Jin HJ, Yu SP, et al. (2010) Environmental hazards and contingency plans along the proposed China-Russia Oil Pipeline route, Northeastern China. Cold Regions Science and Technology 64(3): 271–278. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009. 11.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, Jin HJ, Hao JQ, et al. (2015a) Pipe-laying technology in a subarctic permafrost region— a case study for the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline from Mo’he to Daqing, Northern Northeast China. In: Proceedings of the 68th Canadian Geotechnical Conference and 7th Canadian Permafrost Conference. Quebec, Canada, 24-26 September 2015, Paper No. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, Jin HJ, Li GY (2016) Investigation of the freeze-thaw states of foundation soils in permafrost areas along the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline (CRCOP) route using the ground penetrating radar. Cold Regions Science and Technology 126: 10–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YP, Jin HJ, Li GY, et al. (2015b) Secondary geohazards along the operating Mo’he-Jagdaqi section of the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline in permafrost regions: a case study on a seasonal frost mound at the site MDX 364 km. Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology 37(3): 731–739. (In Chinese) DOI: 10.7522/j.issn.1000-0240.2015.0082

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soils Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, 730000, China

    Yong-ping Wang, Guo-yu Li, Hui-jun Jin, Lan-zhi Lu & Rui-xia He

  2. Beifang University of Nationalities, Yinchuan, 750000, China

    Yong-ping Wang

  3. Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing, 210009, China

    Peng Zhang

Authors
  1. Yong-ping Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guo-yu Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui-jun Jin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lan-zhi Lu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rui-xia He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Peng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guo-yu Li.

Additional information

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9818-1038

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4651-6251

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8402-7897

http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8163-8396

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7855-9758

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-4206

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Yp., Li, Gy., Jin, Hj. et al. Thermal state of soils in the active layer and underlain permafrost at the kilometer post 304 site along the China-Russia Crude Oil Pipeline. J. Mt. Sci. 13, 1984–1994 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3908-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-3908-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation