Abstract
Mountain forests are managed for various purposes. Of these, recreation, leisure, and ecotourism are increasingly gaining prominence. Yet, with the development of new techniques for creating and managing urban forests, the perception of the public with regard to mountain forests and such urban forests is narrowing. For the purpose of this study, eight mountain forests and urban forests located in Zurich (Switzerland), Vienna (Austria) and Freiburg (Germany) were shortlisted. These places are renowned for their well-functioning management of mountain forests and creation of urban forests. As the study was to focus on the comparison of the perceptions of visitors in terms of their satisfaction in urban and mountain forests, the interview covered the following questions: (i) how satisfactory was the nature experience; (ii) how satisfactory were the outdoor recreational activities; (iii) whether the nature experiences influenced the mental and physical health of visitors. Responses thus received for each of the mountain forests and urban forests were assessed, with the total number of respondents being 247. Tourists visiting the selected areas were randomly chosen for a one-on-one interview survey. Results of the survey show that there is a clear perceptions of visitors differed between urban and mountain forests. However, the gap is insignificant or almost nonexistent with respect to satisfaction level of outdoor recreational activities and health benefits. These results are contrary to the findings of previous studies, which argued that the natural landscape of mountain areas is superior to other artificially built green spaces. Visitors did not perceive significant differences in outdoor recreational activities and health effects between the two spaces.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abello RP, Bernaldez FG, Galiano EF (1986) Consensus and contrast components in landscape preference. Environment and Behavior 18: 155–176. DOI: 10.1177/0013916586182001
Allendorf DT, Aung M, Songer M (2012) Using residents’ perceptions to improve park-people relationships in Chattin Wildlife Sanctuary, Myanmar. Journal of Environmental Management 99: 36–43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.01.004
Andersson K, Lindgren M, Lundgren P (2005) Customer and stakeholder analysis [Kund-och intressent analys]. In: Slutrapport, (Final report). Kairos Future AB (Kairos Future Inc.) (In Swedish)
Arnberger A (2006) Recreation use of urban forests: An interarea comparison. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4(3-4): 135–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.004
Arnberger A, Eder R (2012a) Exploring coping behaviours of Sunday and workday visitors due to dense use conditions in an urban forest. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11: 439–449. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.08.002
Arnberger A, Eder R (2012b) The influence of green space on community attachment of urban and suburban residents. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11: 41–49. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.11.003
Beza B (2010) The aesthetic value of a mountain landscape: A case study of the Mt. Everest Trek. Landscape and Urban Planning 97: 306–317. DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.003
Björk J, Albin M, Grahn P, et al. (2008) Recreational values of the natural environment in relation to neighbourhood satisfaction, physical activity, obesity and wellbeing. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 62: e2. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2007.062414
Brown TJ, Kaplan R, Quaderer G (1999) Beyond accessibility; preference for natural areas. Therapeutic recreation journal 33(3): 209–221.
Buijs A (2009) Public Natures: Social representations of nature and local practices. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Colvin B. (1990) Trees in the Countryside. In: Clouston B (ed.), Landscape design with plants. 2nd ed. Architectural Press, Oxford, UK. p 448.
De Chant T, Hernando Gallego A, Velazquez Saornil J, Kelly M (2010) Urban influence on changes in linear forest edge structure. Landscape and Urban Planning 96: 12–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.006
Eagly AH, Chaiken S (1993) The Psychology of Attitudes. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers, California, USA. p 794.
Edwards D, Jay M, Jenson F, et al. (2012) Public preferences across Europe for different forest stand types as sites for recreation. Ecology and Society 17(1): 1–11. DOI: 10.5751/ES-04520-170127
Eriksson L, Nordlund A, Olsson O, Westin K (2012) Beliefs about urban fringe forests in Sweden. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11(3): 321–328. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004
Eriksson L, Nordlund A (2013) How is setting preference related to intention to engage in forest recreation activities? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12: 481–489. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.07.004
Eyer H (1960) The forest as a counterweight to the damage by civilization [Der Wald als Gegengewicht gegen die Zivilisationsschäden unserer Zeit]. Jahresbericht des Bayerischen Forstvereins. pp 40–53. (In German)
Fiske ST (1981) Social cognition and affect. In: Harvey JH (ed.), Cognition, social behavior, and the environment. Lawrence Erlbaum, New Jersey, USA. p 624.
GALK [Ständige Konferenz der Gartenamtsleiter beim Deutschen Städtetag] (2010) Results of the 3rd nationwide internet survey for visitors satisfaction in urban green areas [Ergebnisse der dritten bundesweiten Internet-befragung zur Messung der Bürgerzufriedenheit mit kommunalen Grünflächen]. KGSt IKO-Netz, Koln, Germany. p 22 (In German)
Gunderson VS, Frivold LH (2008) Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 7: 241–258. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2008.05.001
Guduric I, Tomicevic J, Konijnendijk CC (2011) A comparative perspective of urban forestry in Belgrade, Serbia and Freiburg, Germany. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 10: 335–342. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.08.002
Hansmann R, Hug S-M, Seeland K (2007) Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6: 213–225. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004
Hartig T, Evans GW, Jamner LD, et al. (2003) Tracking restoration in natural and urban field settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23: 109–123. DOI: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00109-3
Hofmann M, Westermann RJ, Kowarik I, van der Meer E (2012) Perceptions of parks and urban derelict land by landscape planners and residents. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 11: 303–312. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.04.001
Jensen FS, Koch NE (2004) Twenty-five years of forest recreation research in Denmark and its influence on forest policy. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 19 (Suppl. 4): 93–102. DOI: 10.1080/14004080410034173
Karjalainen E, Sarjala T, Raitio H (2010) Promoting human health through forests: overview and major challenges. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 15: 1–8. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-008-0069-2
Kearney AR, Bradley GA (2011) The effects of viewer attributes on preference for forest scenes: contributions of attitudes, knowledge, demographic factors, and stakeholder group membership. Environment and Behavior 43: 147–181. DOI: 10.1177/0013916509353523
Kellomaki S (1978) Recreational potential of a forest stand. Silva Fennica 12(3): 179–186.
Kennedy JJ, Dombeck MP, Koch NE (1998) Values, beliefs and management of public forests in the Western world at the close of the twentieth century. Unasylva 49(192): 16–26.
Konijnendijk CC (2003) A decade of urban forestry in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics 5(2): 173–186. DOI: 10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00023-6
Konijnendijk CC (2006) Defining urban forestry - A comparative perspective of North America and Europe. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 4(3-4): 93–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2005.11.003
Küster H (1999) History of landscape in Central Europe [Geschichte der Landschaft in Mitteleuropa]. Verlag C.H.Beck, München, Germany. p 423. (In German)
Küster H (2008) History of the forest [Geschichte des Waldes]. Verlag C.H.Beck, München, Germany. p 266 (In German)
Lindhagen A, Hornsten L (2000) Forest recreation in 1977 and 1997 in Sweden: Changes in public preferences and behaviour. Forestry 73(2): 143–153. DOI: 10.1093/forestry/73.2.143
Lee JH (2011) Understanding the Healing Function of Urban Forests in German Cities. Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 15(3): 81–89.
Lee JH (2013) A Comparison of Perspectives on Urban Green Spaces in European Countries and South Korea. Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation 17(4): 41–48.
Loesch G (1980) Typology of forest visitors - a cross-sectional study by visitor’s behavior, motivation and attitude towards forest [Typologie der Waldbesucher - Betrachtung eines Bevölkerungsquerschnitts nach dem Besucherverhalten, der Besuchsmotivation und der Einstellung gegenüber Wald]. PhD thesis, Universität Göttingen, Goettingen, Germany. (In German)
Lo AYH, Jim CY (2012) Citizen attitude and expectation towards greenspace provision in compact urban milieu. Land Use Policy 29: 577–586. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.09.011
Maller C, Townsend M, Pryor A, et al. (2005) Healthy nature healthy people: contact with nature as an upstream health promotion intervention for population. Health Promotion International 21(1): 45–54. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/dai032
Mandler G (1984) Mind and Body: Psychology of emotion and stress. W W Norton & Co, New York, USA. p 346.
Matsuoka RH, Kaplan R. (2008) People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of landscape and urban planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning 84(1): 7–19. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
Meuser M, Nagel U (2010) Experteninterviews - wissenssoziologische Voraussetzungen und methodische Durchführung [Expert interview - sociology of knowledge and implementation method]. In: Friebertshäuser B, Langer A, Prengel A, (eds.), Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft [Qualitative analysis method of education]. JuventaVerlag, München, Germany. pp 457–473. (In German)
Miller MD (2012) The impacts of Atlanta’s urban sprawl on forest cover and fragmentation. Applied Geography 34: 171–179. DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.11.010
Mottet A, Ladet S, Coque N, Gibon A (2006) Agricultural landuse change and its drivers in mountain landscapes: a case study in the Pyrenees. Agricultural, Ecosystem and Environment 114: 296–310. DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.017
Neuvone M, Sievänen T, Tönnes S, Koskela T (2007) Access to green areas and the frequency of visits - a case study in Helsinki. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6: 235–247. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.003
Ode A, Fry G, Tveit M, Messager P, Miller D (2009) Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 375–383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013
Ottitsch A, Krott M (2005) Urban forest policy and planning. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds.), Urban Forests and Trees. Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp 119–148.
Otto HJ (1998) Urban forests - more understandable forest management? [Stadtnahe Wälder - Kann die Forstwirtschaft sich noch verständlich machen?] Forst und Holz 53: 19–22. (In German)
Peckham SC, Duinker PN, Ordonez C (2013) Urban forest values in Canada: Views of citizens in Calgary and Halifax. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12: 154–162. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.001
Purcell AT, Lamb RJ (1998) Preference and naturalness: an ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 42: 57–66. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00073-5
Qin J, Zhou X, Sun C, et al. (2013) Influence of green spaces on environmental satisfaction and physiological status of urban residents. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12: 490–497. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.05.005
Ribe RG (1989) The aesthecis of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us? Environmental Management 13: 55–74. DOI: 10.1007/BF01867587
Ribe RG (1994) Scenic beauty perceptions along the ROS. Journal of Environmental Management 42: 199–221. DOI: 10.1006/jema.1994.1069
Roovers P, Hermy M, Gulinck H (2002) Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanization in central Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning 59: 129–145.
Ryan RM, Weinstein N, Bernstein J, et al. (2010) Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30: 159–168. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp. 2009.10.009
Schipperijin J, Stigsdotter UK, Randrup TB, Troelsen J (2010) Influences on the use of urban green space - a case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 9(1): 25–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002
Schirpke U, Tasser E, Tappeiner U (2013) Predicting scenic beauty of mountain regions. Landscape and Urban Planning 111: 1–12. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.11.010
Serpa A, Muhar A (1996) Effects of plant size, texture, and color on spatial perception in public green areas - cross-cultural study. Landscape and Urban Planning 36: 19–25. DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(96)00330-1
Shin WS, Kwon HG, Hammitt WE, Kim BS (2005) Urban forest park use and psychosocial outcomes: a case study in six cities across South Korea. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 20: 441–447. DOI: 10.1080/02827580500339930
Tyrvainen L, Pauleit S, Seeland K, de Vries S (2005) Benefits and uses of urban forests and trees. In: Konijnendijk CC, Nilsson K, Randrup TB, Schipperijn J (eds.), Urban Forests and Trees. A Reference Book. Springer, Berlin, Germany. pp 81–114.
Ulrich RS (1986) Human responses to vegetation and landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 13: 29–44. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8
Van den Berg AE, Koole SL (2006) New wilderness in the Netherlands: an investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 78: 362–372. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.11.006
Waltert F, Schulz T, Schlapfer F (2011) The role of landscape amenities in regional development: Evidence from Swiss municipality data. Land Use Policy 28(4): 748–761. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005-8
White MP, Alcock I, Wheeler BW, Depledge MH (2013) Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? a fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science 24(6): 920–928. DOI: 10.1177/0956797612464659
Wilkie S, Stavridou A (2013) Influence of environmental preference and environment type congruence on judgments of restoration potential. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12: 163–170. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.004
Zhang H, Chen B, Sun Z, Bao Z (2013) Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening 12: 44–52. DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.001
Zirnstein G (1996) The history of ecology and environment [Ökologie und Umwelt in der Geschichte]. Metropolis Verlag, Marburg, Germany. p 416. (In German)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5614-8851
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0514-1414
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, Jh., Lee, Dj. Nature experience, recreation activity and health benefits of visitors in mountain and urban forests in Vienna, Zurich and Freiburg. J. Mt. Sci. 12, 1551–1561 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3246-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-014-3246-3