Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toward designing sustainability education programs: a survey of master’s programs through semi-structured interviews

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the emergence of sustainability science as an academic field, sustainability education (SE) has increasingly been discussed in terms of nurturing students’ competencies to bring about environmental innovation and global sustainability. The requirements of SE include covering a wide spectrum of knowledge from diverse disciplines and collaborating with real-world stakeholders to solve the sustainability issues being faced in society. A number of SE programs have been implemented at university level, often teaching various methods and tools (e.g., life cycle assessment) and offering project-based learning. However, relatively less knowledge is available to understand how existing SE programs were designed, particularly in terms of the relationship between vision (e.g., expected competencies that students will obtain), curriculum, and admission policy. This paper aims to clarify the opportunities and challenges in designing SE programs at master’s level, through semi-structured interviews and online surveys at 14 leading universities that already run SE programs in Australia, Europe, North America, and Japan. Based on the interviews and surveys, the relationship between expected graduates’ careers, curriculum, and faculty organization was analyzed. The results of comparative analysis revealed that the existing SE programs can be classified into two categories according to graduates’ careers—specialist-oriented programs and generalist-oriented programs. Although the core competencies with which students are to be equipped vary depending on the program, curriculum contents across the categories share identical concepts in sustainability science. From an institutional perspective, it is important to incentivize faculty members to sustain and enhance SE programs. Arguably, fair evaluation systems need to be established for faculty members and SE programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adomßent M, Fischer D, Godemann J, Herzig C, Otte I, Rieckmann M, Timm J (2014) Emerging areas in research on higher education, sustainable consumption and perspectives from central and Eastern Europe. J Clean Prod 62:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azeiteiro UM, Bacelar-Nicolau P, Caetano FJP, Caeiro S (2015) Education for sustainable development through e-learning in higher education: Experiences from Portugal. J Clean Prod 106:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth M, Michelsen G (2013) Learning for change: an educational contribution to sustainability science. Sustain Sci 8:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bina O, Balula L, Varanda M, Fokdal J (2016) Urban studies and the challenge of embedding sustainability: a review of international master programmes. J Clean Prod 137:330–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brundiers K, Wiek A, Redman CL (2010) Real-world learning opportunities in sustainability: from classroom into the real world. Int J Sustain High Educ 11:308–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8059–8061

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese AD (2003) The critical role of higher education in creating a sustainable future. Plan High Educ 31:15–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Dlouha J, Burandt S (2015) Design and evaluation of learning processes in an international sustainability oriented study programme: in search of a new educational quality and assessment method. J Clean Prod 106:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiro PS, Raufflet E (2015) Sustainability in higher education: a systematic review with focus on management education. J Clean Prod 106:22–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo KY (2013) A vision on the role of environmental higher education contributing to the sustainable development in Malaysia. J Clean Prod 61:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gombert-Courvoisier S, Sennes V, Ricard M, Ribeyre F (2014) Higher education for sustainable consumption: case report on the human ecology master’s course (University of Bordeaux, France). J Clean Prod 62:82–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanning A, Abelsson AP, Lundqvist U, Svanström M (2012) Are we educating engineers for sustainability? Comparison between obtained competences and Swedish industry’s needs. Int J Sustain High Educ 13:305–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hara K, Uwasu M, Kurimoto S, Yamanaka S, Umeda Y, Shimoda Y (2013) Mapping research activities and technologies for sustainability and environmental studies—a case study at university level environmental studies and sciences. J Environ Stud Sci 3:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmberg J, Lundqvist U, Svanström M, Arehag M (2012) The university and transformation towards sustainability: the strategy used at Chalmers University of Technology. Int J Sustain High Educ 13:219–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasemir B, Jäger J, Jaeger CC, Gardner MT (2003) Public participation in sustainability science: a handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (2011) What kind of a science is sustainability science? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19449–19450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell R, Hall JM, Jäger CC, Lowe I, McCarthy JJ, Schellnhuber HJ, Bolin B, Dickson NM, Faucheux S, Gallopin GC, Grübler A, Huntley B, Jäger J, Jodha NS, Kasperson RE, Mabogunje A, Matson P, Mooney H, Moore B III, O’Riordan T, Svedin U (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292:641–642

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Komiyama H, Takeuchi K (2006) Sustainability science: building a new discipline. Sustain Sci 1:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koscielniak C (2014) A consideration of the changing focus on the sustainable development in higher education in Poland. J Clean Prod 62:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang DJ, Wiek A, Bergmann M, Stauffacher M, Martens P, Moll P, Swilling M, Thomas CJ (2012) Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and challenges. Sust Sci 7:25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuphana University of Lüneburg (2017) Sustainability science. http://www.leuphana.de/en/graduate-school/master/course-offerings/sustainability-science.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2017

  • Lockrey S, Johnson KB (2013) Designing pedagogy with emerging sustainable technologies. J Clean Prod 61:70–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maastricht University International Centre for Integrated Assessment and Sustainable Development (ICIS) (2017) Master programme: master sustainability science and policy http://www.icis.unimaas.info/education/master-program/. Accessed 4 Sept 2017

  • Müller-Christ G, Sterling S, van Dam-Mieras R, Adomßent M, Fischer D, Rieckmann M (2014) The role of campus, curriculum, and community in higher education for sustainable development: a conference report. J Clean Prod 62:134–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne D, Dripps W, Nicholas KA (2015) Teaching and learning sustainability: an assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustain Sci 10:43–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onuki M, Mino T (2009) Sustainability education and a new master’s degree, the master of sustainability science: the graduate program in sustainability science (GPSS) at the University of Tokyo. Sustain Sci 4:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repco A (2011) Interdisciplinary research: process and theory, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner G, Posch A (2006) Higher education for sustainability by means of transdisciplinary case studies: an innovative approach for solving complex, real-world problems. J Clean Prod 14:877–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinfeld JI, Mino T (2009) Education for sustainable development: the challenge of trans-disciplinarity. Sustain Sci 4:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura M, Uegaki T (2012) Development of an educational model for sustainability science: challenges in the mind-skills-knowledge education at Ibaraki University. Sustain Sci 7:253–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2005) United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005–2014): international implementation scheme. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (2017) Master’s degree in sustainability science and technology. http://cts.masters.upc.edu/en/general-information. Accessed 4 Sept 2017

  • Uwasu M, Yabar H, Hara K, Shimoda Y, Saijo T (2009) Educational initiative of Osaka University in sustainability science: mobilizing science and technology towards sustainability. Sustain Sci 4:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vale RD, DeRisi J, Phillips R, Mullins RD, Waterman C, Mitchison TJ (2012) Interdisciplinary graduate training in teaching labs. Science 338:1542–1543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals AEJ, Jickling B (2002) “Sustainability” in higher education: from doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. Int J Sustain High Educ 3:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Wang R, Shi H, Huisingh D, Hansson L, Hong J (2013) Special issue: green universities and environmental higher education for sustainable development in China and other emerging countries. J Clean Prod 61:1–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wever R, Peck D, de Eyto A (2013) Teaching strategic and sustainable design. In: Proceedings of EcoDesign 2013: the 8th international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, p 6

  • Wiek A, Withycombe A, Redman CL (2011) Key competencies in sustainability: a reference framework for academic program development. Sustain Sci 6:203–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiek A, Xiong A, Brundiers K, van der Leeuw S (2014) Integrating problem- and project-based learning into sustainability problems: a case study on the school of sustainability at Arizona State University. Int J Sustain High Educ 15:431–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong H, Fu D, Duan C, Liu C, Yang X, Wang R (2013) Current status of green curriculum in higher education of mainland China. J Clean Prod 61:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarime M, Trencher G, Mino T, Scholz RW, Olsson L, Ness B, Frantzeskaki N, Rotmans J (2012) Establishing sustainability science in higher education institutions: towards an integration of academic development, institutionalization, and stakeholder collaborations. Sustain Sci 7:101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the researchers who contributed to the investigations about sustainability education programs: Prof. Kiyoshi Shida and Prof. Yoshikazu Shusa from Yokohama National University (Japan); Prof. Lennart Olsson, Prof. Barry Ness, and Prof. Stefan Anderberg from Lund University (Sweden) (Prof. Anderberg is currently working at Linköping University, Sweden); Prof. Stig Irving Olsen from Technical University of Denmark (Denmark); Prof. Magdalena Svanström and Dr. Ulrika Lundqvist from Chalmers University of Technology (Sweden); Prof. Erik Millstone from University of Sussex (UK); Prof. Frans Berkhout from Vrije Universiteit in Amsterdam (the Netherlands) (currently working at King’s College London, UK); Prof. Tiina Laurila, Ms. Naoko Nakagawa, and Dr. Kirsi Niinimäki from Aalto University (Finland); Ms. Satie Airamé from University of California, Santa Barbara (USA); Prof. Arnim Wiek from Arizona State University (USA); Prof. John Robinson and Prof. Theresa Satterfield from University of British Columbia (Canada); Prof. Damien Giurco from University of Technology Sydney (Australia); Prof. Matthias Barth from Leuphana University of Lüneburg (Germany); Prof. Marti Rosas Casals from Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (Spain); Ms. Ceren Pekdemir from Maastricht University (the Netherlands). Without their fruitful input, this work could not have been done. The authors claim that the contents of this paper are the sole responsibility of the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Kishita.

Additional information

Handled by Jordi Segalas, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Research Institute for Sustainability Science and Technology, Spain.

Appendices

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 List of interviews about master’s sustainability education programs

Appendix 2

See Table 5.

Table 5 List of questions used in interviews

Appendix 3: evaluating the diversity of sustainability education programs with Shannon’s index

In order to evaluate the diversity of SE programs based on graduates’ careers, we use a diversity index or Shannon index (Shannon and Weaver 1949) by assuming an analogy of evaluating biodiversity as follows:

$${H_i}= - \sum\limits_{{c=1}}^{S} {{p_{i,c}}\ln {p_{i,c}}} ,$$
(1)

where H i is the diversity of SE program i according to graduates’ careers, p i is the proportion of total samples represented by career type c (e.g., private sector, public sector, and university), and S is the number of career types, respectively.

Finally, we obtain the normalized diversity of program i by the following equation:

$$\overline {{{H_i}}} =\frac{{{H_i}}}{{\sum\nolimits_{{k=1}}^{n} {({{{H_k}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{{H_k}} n}} \right. \kern-0pt} n})} }},$$
(2)

where n means the number of SE programs of concern.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kishita, Y., Uwasu, M., Hara, K. et al. Toward designing sustainability education programs: a survey of master’s programs through semi-structured interviews. Sustain Sci 13, 953–972 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0546-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-018-0546-5

Keywords

Navigation