Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The school in the state and the state in the school: the social re-production of education systems in a mobile modernity

Die Schule im Staat und der Staat in der Schule – Die soziale Reproduktion von Bildungssystemen in der mobilen Moderne

  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schools offer powerful scope for viewing and comprehending the wider society in which they are produced and replicated. The ways in which schools are structured, positioned, funded, managed, appreciated, critiqued, cared for and neglected, presents us with a means for seeing beyond the rhetoric of a nation state to the lived realities faced by its citizens. In this paper I want to link the development of Australian educational policies to shifts in socio-cultural thought and practice that reflect and reproduce a mobile modernity. I am interested in school funding policies as they relate to the private, or non-government education sector from the late colonial period to these so-called neo-liberal/late modern times. The interrogated scenes shift about amongst a complex of interrelated fields, from the urban to the rural, the public and the private, as well as the primary, secondary and tertiary layers of educational “offerings”. The periodization reveals a loosening of commitments to a secular, state-centred, welfare-focused modernity, towards a privatizing, individualizing “second modernity”. Drawing from a range of empirical studies of school choice I highlight the shifting ideas and practices of those involved in the re-production of both public and private schools either as professionals/workers in the system, or as “consumers” of the products available in education’s “quasi-markets”.

Zusammenfassung

Schulen bieten eine ausgezeichnete Möglichkeit zur Betrachtung und zum Verständnis der breiteren Gesellschaft, in welcher sie hervorgebracht und repliziert werden. Die Untersuchung der Art und Weise, in welcher Schulen strukturiert, positioniert, finanziert, verwaltet, wertgeschätzt, kritisiert, gepflegt und vernachlässigt werden, eröffnet uns – jenseits nationalstaatlicher Rhetorik – eine Sicht auf die von den Bürgern erlebten Realitäten. In diesem Artikel soll die Entwicklung der australischen Bildungspolitik zu Veränderungen in der soziokulturellen Theorie und Praxis, welche die mobile Moderne reflektieren und reproduzieren, in Beziehung gesetzt werden. Besonderes Interesse gilt dabei den Strategien zur Schulfinanzierung mit ihrem Bezug zum privaten bzw. nichtstaatlichen Bildungssektor von der späten Kolonialzeit bis in die sogenannten neoliberalen/spätmodernen Zeiten. Die vorgestellten Aspekte bewegen sich in einem Komplex wechselseitig verbundener Bereiche, vom Urbanen bis zum Ländlichen, vom Öffentlichen bis ins Private sowie in den primären, sekundären und tertiären Schichten von Bildungsangeboten. Die Periodisierung offenbart ein nachlassendes Engagement für eine säkulare, staatszentrierte und am Gemeinwohl orientierte Moderne zugunsten einer „zweiten Moderne“ der Individualisierung und Privatisierung. Mit Bezug auf eine Bandbreite verschiedener empirischer Studien zur Schulwahl werden die sich wandelnden Ideen und Praktiken der in die Reproduktion von öffentlichen und privaten Schulen Involvierten hervorgehoben. Im Fokus stehen dabei einerseits die Fachleute und Angestellten des Systems und andererseits die „Konsumenten“ der auf den „Quasi-Bildungsmärkten“ angebotenen Produkte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Colloquial term for government schools.

References

  • Ashbolt, A. (28. July 2006). Labor’s education policy buried by an untrue tale. New Matilda.

  • Ashenden, D. (2013). Competition, “autonomy”, and schools, inside story 17 July. http://inside.org.au/competition-autonomy-and-schools/. Accessed 18 July 2013.

  • Ball, S., Bowe, R., & Gewirtz, S. (1995). Circuits of schooling: A sociological exploration of choiceof school in social class contexts, Sociological Review, 43(1), 52–78.

  • Baumann, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Oxford: Polity Press.

  • Beck, U., & Lau, C. (2005). Second modernity as a research agenda: Theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘Meta-Change’ of modern society. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 525–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Bonns, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, J., & Dunstan, J. (1990). Introduction. In J. Chapman & J. Dunstan (Eds.), Democracy and bureaucracy: Tensions in public schooling (pp. 1–7). London: Falmer Press.

  • Connell, R. (1998). Equality in education: The issue of social justice and the practice of equity programs from schools in Australia to the present, schools in Australia: 1973–1998 the 25 years since the Karmel Report (Conference proceedings), Sydney: Australian Council for Educational Research.

  • Connell, R. (2012). Just education. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 681–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. (2013). The neoliberal cascade and education: An essay on the market agenda and its consequences. Critical Studies in Education, 54(2), 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, M. (2009). Rural schooling in mobile modernity: Returning to the places I’ve been. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 24(7), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, T. (2006). On the move: Mobility in the modern western world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuervo, H., & Wyn, J. (2012). Young people making it work: Continuity and change in rural places. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.

  • Dixson, M. (1996). The ‘Born Modern’ self: Revisiting the real Matilda: An exploration of women and identity in Australia. Australian Historical Studies, 27(106), 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duckett, S. (2007). Social policy at the 2004 election. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 42(3), 289–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M. (2006). Australian public schools and the eloquent fiction of the free market. In G. Willett (Ed.), Thinking down under: Australian politics, society and culture in transition (pp. 59–74). Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Trier.

  • Forsey, M. (2007). Challenging the system? A dramatic tale of neoliberal reform in an Australian high school. United States: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsey, M. (2008). No choice but to choose: Selecting schools in Western Australia. In M. Forsey, S. Davies, & G. Walford (Eds.), The globalisation of school choice? (pp. 73–93). Oxford: Symposium Books.

  • Forsey, M. (2010). Publicly minded, privately focused: Western Australian teachers and school choice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(1), 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillard, J. (2013). PM, Minister Garrett and Parliamentary Secretary Collins press conference on national plan for school improvement, Minister’s Media Centre, Education, Employment and Workplace Relations Portfolio, Canberra, 14 April, http://ministers.deewr.gov.au/gillard/pm-minister-garrett-and-parliamentary-secretary-collins-press-conference-national-plan. Accessed 25 July 2013.

  • Harman, G., Beare, H., & Berkeley, G. (1991). Restructuring school management: Recent administrative reorganisation of public school governance in Australia. Canberra: Australian College of Education.

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiatt, B. (12. January 2013a). Single-sex schools rate well in top 10. The West Australian.

  • Hiatt, B. (12. January 2013b). Bullsbrook charges into contention. The West Australian.

  • Higgs, P., & Gilleard, C. (2006). Departing the margins: Social class and later life in a second modernity. Journal of Sociology, 42(3), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Interim Committee for the Australian Schools’ Commission. (1973). Schools in Australia. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing House.

  • Kesselring, S. (2006). Pioneering mobilities: New patterns of movement and motility in a mobile world. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham, M. (2004). ALP 2004 Campaign launch speech. http://australianpolitics.com/2004/09/29/mark-latham-alp-campaign-launch-speech.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2013.

  • Larner, W, (2005). Neoliberalism in (regional) theory and practice: The stronger communities action fund in New Zealand. Geographical Research, 43(1), 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. (2010). School sector and socioeconomic inequalities in university entrance in Australia: The role of the stratified curriculum. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metherell, M. (25. September 2004). Schools tick can’t stop labor crash. Sydney Morning Herald.

  • Mirowski, P., & Plehwe, D. (Eds.). (2009). The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Peatling, S. (19. March 2007). Private schools to get fairer go. Sydney Morning Herald.

  • Plehwe, D. (2009). Introduction. In P. Mirowski & D. Plehwe (Eds.), The road from Mont Pelerin: The making of the neoliberal thought collective (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Preston, B. (2013). The social make-up of schools: Family income, indigenous status, family type, religion and broadband access of students. Southbank: Australian Education Union, www.aeufederal.org.au/Publications/2013/BPrestonApril13.pdf. Accessed 16 Dec 2013.

  • Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation-building state changes its mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (2003). The experience of Middle Australia: The dark side of economic reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert, M. (15. September 2004). Labor’s private school hit list. The Age.

  • Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherington, G., & Hughes, J. (in press). “Money Made Us”: A short history of government funds for Australian schools. In H. Procter, P. Brownlee, & P. Freebody (Eds.), New and enduring controversies in education: Orthodoxy and heresy in policy and practice. New York: Springer.

  • Tannock, P. D. (1979). Catholic education in Western Australia 1829–1979. In W. D. Neal (Ed.), Education in Western Australia. Perth: University of Western Australia Press.

  • Weston, M. (1994). Intergenerational class mobility among women and men, Australian and New Zealand. Journal of Sociology, 30(3), 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyn, J. (2007). Learning to “Become Somebody Well”: Challenges for educational policy. Australian Educational Researcher, 34(3), 35–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Forsey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forsey, M. The school in the state and the state in the school: the social re-production of education systems in a mobile modernity. Z Erziehungswiss 17 (Suppl 3), 95–112 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0524-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-014-0524-3

Keywords

Schlüsselwörter

Navigation