Skip to main content
Log in

Good Care Is Slow Enough to Be Able to Pay Attention”: Primary Care Time Scarcity and Patient Safety

  • Original Research: Qualitative Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is growing, widespread recognition that expectations of US primary care vastly exceed the time and resources allocated to it. Little research has directly examined how time scarcity contributes to harm or patient safety incidents not readily capturable by population-based quality metrics.

Objective

To examine near-miss events identified by primary care physicians in which taking additional time improved patient care or prevented harm.

Design

Qualitative study based on semi-structured interviews.

Participants

Twenty-five primary care physicians practicing in the USA.

Approach

Participants completed a survey that included demographic questions, the Ballard Organizational Temporality Scale and the Mini-Z scale, followed by a one hour qualitative interview over video-conference (Zoom). Iterative thematic qualitative data analysis was conducted.

Key Results

Primary care physicians identified several types of near-miss events in which taking extra time during visits changed their clinical management. These were evident in five types of patient care episodes: high-risk social situations, high-risk medication regimens requiring patient education, high acuity conditions requiring immediate workup or treatment, interactions of physical and mental health, and investigating more subtle clinical suspicions. These near-miss events highlight the ways in which unreasonably large patient panels and packed schedules impede adequate responses to patient care episodes that are time sensitive and intensive or require flexibility.

Conclusions

Primary care physicians identify and address patient safety issues and high-risk situations by spending more time than allotted for a given patient encounter. Current quality metrics do not account for this critical aspect of primary care work. Current healthcare policy and organization create time scarcity. Interventions to address time scarcity and to measure its prevalence and implications for care quality and safety are urgently needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The dataset analyzed for this study can be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.

References

  1. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health. Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Access to Primary Care. Accessed August 5, 2023. https://health.gov/healthypeople/priority-areas/social-determinants-health/literature-summaries/access-primary-care

  3. Bodenheimer T. Revitalizing Primary Care, Part 1: Root Causes of Primary Care’s Problems. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20(5):464-468. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2858

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Linzer M, Bitton A, Tu SP, et al. The End of the 15-20 Minute Primary Care Visit. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(11):1584-1586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-015-3341-3

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nguyen MLT, Schotland SV, Howell JD. From Individualized Interactions to Standardized Schedules: A History of Time Organization in U.S. Outpatient Medicine. Ann Intern Med. 2022;175(10):1468-1474. https://doi.org/10.7326/M22-1575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Linzer M, Manwell LB, Williams ES, et al. Working Conditions in Primary Care: Physician Reactions and Care Quality. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(1):28-36, w6-9. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-1-200907070-00006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bodenheimer T, Sinsky C. From triple to quadruple aim: care of the patient requires care of the provider. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12(6):573-576.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Willard-Grace R, Knox M, Huang B, Hammer H, Kivlahan C, Grumbach K. Burnout and Health Care Workforce Turnover. Ann Fam Med. 2019;17(1):36-41. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2338

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. National Center for Health Workforce Analysis (HRSA). Primary Care Workforce: Projections, 2020–2035.; 2022. Accessed August 5, 2023. https://bhw.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bureau-health-workforce/Primary-Care-Projections-Factsheet.pdf

  10. Gunja MZ, Gumas ED, Williams II RD, Doty MM, Shah A, Fields, Katharine. Stressed Out and Burned Out: The Global Primary Care Crisis. Commonwealth Fund; 2022. Accessed August 6, 2023. https://doi.org/10.26099/j2ag-mx88

  11. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Physician Burnout. Accessed September 19, 2023. https://www.ahrq.gov/prevention/clinician/ahrq-works/burnout/index.html

  12. Rocque R, Leanza Y. A Systematic Review of Patients’ Experiences in Communicating with Primary Care Physicians: Intercultural Encounters and a Balance between Vulnerability and Integrity. Harper DM, ed. PLOS ONE. 2015;10(10):e0139577. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Østbye T, Yarnall KSH, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL. Is There Time for Management of Patients With Chronic Diseases in Primary Care? Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(3):209-214. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yarnall KSH, Pollak KI, Østbye T, Krause KM, Michener JL. Primary care: is there enough time for prevention? Am J Public Health. 2003;93(4):635–641. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12660210

  15. Porter J, Boyd C, Skandari MR, Laiteerapong N. Revisiting the Time Needed to Provide Adult Primary Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2023;38(1):147-155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07707-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Satterwhite S. Patients Are Waiting: Temporal Logics and Practices of Safety-Net Primary Care. UCSF; 2019. Accessed July 9, 2023. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8sn267pc

  17. Neprash HT, Mulcahy JF, Cross DA, Gaugler JE, Golberstein E, Ganguli I. Association of Primary Care Visit Length With Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing. JAMA Health Forum. 2023;4(3):e230052. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbo ED, Zhang Q, Zelder M, Huang ES. The Increasing Number of Clinical Items Addressed During the Time of Adult Primary Care Visits. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2058-2065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0805-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma AE, Yang J, Del Rosario JB, et al. What safety events are reported for ambulatory care? Analysis of incident reports from a patient safety organization. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. Published online August 21, 2020:S1553–7250(20)30213-0. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.010

  20. Gordon-Lipkin E, Foster J, Peacock G. Whittling Down the Wait Time: Exploring Models to Minimize the Delay from Initial Concern to Diagnosis and Treatment of Autism Spectrum Disorder. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2016;63(5):851-859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcl.2016.06.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Jayasooriya N, Baillie S, Blackwell J, et al. Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis: Time to Diagnosis and the Impact of Delayed Diagnosis on Clinical Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2023;57(6):635-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Walen S, Damoiseaux RA, Uil SM, van den Berg JW. Diagnostic Delay of Pulmonary Embolism in Primary and Secondary Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Br J Gen Pract J R Coll Gen Pract. 2016;66(647):e444-450. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X685201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chilton F, Bradley E, Mitchell T. ‘Lost time’. Patients with Early Inflammatory/Rheumatoid Arthritis and Their Experiences of Delays in Primary Care. Musculoskeletal Care. 2021;19(4):495-503. https://doi.org/10.1002/msc.1546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koch T, Iliffe S, EVIDEM-ED project. Rapid Appraisal of Barriers to the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Dementia in Primary Care: A Systematic Review. BMC Fam Pract. 2010;11:52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-11-52

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Perreault L, Vincent L, Neumiller JJ, Santos-Cavaiola T. Initiation and Titration of Basal Insulin in Primary Care: Barriers and Practical Solutions. J Am Board Fam Med JABFM. 2019;32(3):431-447. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Satterwhite S, Knight KR, Miaskowski C, et al. Sources and Impact of Time Pressure on Opioid Management in the Safety-Net. J Am Board Fam Med JABFM. 2019;32(3):375-382. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Modi HN, Singh H, Darzi A, Leff DR. Multitasking and Time Pressure in the Operating Room: Impact on Surgeons’ Brain Function. Ann Surg. 2020;272(4):648-657. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. ALQahtani DA, Rotgans JI, Mamede S, Mahzari MM, Al-Ghamdi GA, Schmidt HG. Factors Underlying Suboptimal Diagnostic Performance in Physicians Under Time Pressure. Med Educ. 2018;52(12):1288-1298. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Burgess DJ, Fu SS, van Ryn M. Why Do Providers Contribute to Disparities and What Can Be Done About It? J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19(11):1154-1159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30227.x

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsieh E. Not Just “Getting By”: Factors Influencing Providers’ Choice of Interpreters. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(1):75-82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3066-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McDonald KM, Rodriguez HP, Shortell SM. Organizational Influences on Time Pressure Stressors and Potential Patient Consequences in Primary Care. Med Care. 2018;56(10):822-830. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000974

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, ed. Near Miss. In: Patient Safety Network Glossary. Accessed September 14, 2023. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/glossary-0#glossary-heading-term-73808

  33. Ballard DI, Seibold DR. Communicating and Organizing in Time: A Meso-Level Model of Organizational Temporality. Manag Commun Q. 2003;16(3):380-415. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318902238896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Olson K, Sinsky C, Rinne ST, et al. Cross-Sectional Survey of Workplace Stressors Associated with Physician Burnout Measured by the Mini-Z and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Stress Health. 2019;35(2):157-175. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Khanna N, Montgomery R, Klyushnenkova E. Joy in Work for Clinicians and Staff: Identifying Remedial Predictors of Burnout from the Mini Z Survey. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020;33(3):357-367. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2020.03.190458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Dedoose. Dedoose Version 8.3.45 web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data (2020). Published online 2020. www.dedoose.com

  37. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Improving Diagnosis in Health Care. National Academies Press; 2015. https://doi.org/10.17226/21794

  38. Commonwealth Fund. Primary Care Providers’ Views of Recent Trends in Health Care Delivery and Payment. https://doi.org/10.26099/3qrf-gb06

  39. Committee on Core Metrics for Better Health at Lower Cost, Institute of Medicine. Vital Signs: Core Metrics for Health and Health Care Progress. (Blumenthal D, Malphrus E, McGinnis JM, eds.). National Academies Press (US); 2015. Accessed September 20, 2023. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK316120/

  40. Mulligan J. It Gets Better If You Do? Measuring Quality Care in Puerto Rico. Med Anthropol. 2010;29(3):303-329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Raffoul M, Moore M, Kamerow D, Bazemore A. A Primary Care Panel Size of 2500 Is Neither Accurate nor Reasonable. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(4):496-499. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2016.04.150317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kowalski CP, McQuillan DB, Chawla N, et al. ‘The Hand on the Doorknob’: Visit Agenda Setting by Complex Patients and Their Primary Care Physicians. J Am Board Fam Med. 2018;31(1):29-37. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2018.01.170167

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sinsky CA, Willard-Grace R, Schutzbank AM, Sinsky TA, Margolius D, Bodenheimer T. In Search of Joy in Practice: A Report of 23 High-Functioning Primary Care Practices. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(3):272-278. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Olayiwola JN, Willard-Grace R, Dubé K, et al. Higher Perceived Clinic Capacity to Address Patients’ Social Needs Associated with Lower Burnout in Primary Care Providers. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):415-429. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2018.0028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Prasad K, Poplau S, Brown R, et al. Time Pressure During Primary Care Office Visits: A Prospective Evaluation of Data from the Healthy Work Place Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(2):465-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05343-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the physicians who participated in this study for their time and candor.

Funding

Dr. Sarkar holds current research funding from the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health, California Healthcare Foundation, the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. She has received prior grant funding from the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, the Blue Shield of California Foundation, HopeLab, the US Food and Drug Administration, and the Commonwealth Fund. She received gift funding from The Doctors Company Foundation. She holds contract funding from InquisitHealth and RecoverX. Dr. Sarkar serves as a scientific/expert advisor for nonprofit organizations HealthTech 4 Medicaid (volunteer) and for HopeLab (volunteer). She is a member of the American Medical Association’s Equity and Innovation Advisory Group (honoraria) and is on the Board of Directors of the Collaborative for Accountability and Improvement (volunteer). She is an advisor for Waymark (shares) and for Ceteri Capital I GP, LLC (shares). She has been a clinical advisor for Omada Health (honoraria), and an advisory board member for Doximity (honoraria, stock). Salary support for Dr. Michelle-Linh Nguyen was provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Dr. Aoife McDermott was a 2022–23 Commonwealth Fund Harkness Fellow in Health Care Policy and Practice. The views presented here are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Commonwealth Fund or its directors, officers, or staff.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urmimala Sarkar MD, MPH.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 91 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 25 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Satterwhite, S., Nguyen, ML.T., Honcharov, V. et al.Good Care Is Slow Enough to Be Able to Pay Attention”: Primary Care Time Scarcity and Patient Safety. J GEN INTERN MED (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08658-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08658-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation