Skip to main content
Log in

Checkup Visits in Adult Federally Qualified Health Center Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Checkup visits (i.e., general health checks) can increase preventive service completion and lead to improved treatment of new chronic illnesses. After the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, preventive service completion decreased in many groups that receive care in safety net settings.

Objective

To examine potential benefits associated with checkups in federally qualified health center (FQHC) patients.

Design

Retrospective cohort study, from March 2018 to February 2022.

Patients

Adults at seven FQHCs in Illinois.

Interventions

Checkups during a two-year Baseline (i.e., pre-COVID-19) period and two-year COVID-19 period.

Main Measures

The primary outcome was COVID-19 period checkup completion. Secondary outcomes were: mammography completion; new diagnoses of four common chronic illnesses (hypertension, diabetes, depression, or high cholesterol), and; initiation of chronic illness medications.

Key Results

Among 106,114 included patients, race/ethnicity was most commonly Latino/Hispanic (42.1%) or non-Hispanic Black (30.2%). Most patients had Medicaid coverage (40.4%) or were uninsured (33.9%). While 21.0% of patients completed a checkup during Baseline, only 15.3% did so during the COVID-19 period. In multivariable regression analysis, private insurance (versus Medicaid) was positively associated with COVID-19 period checkup completion (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval, [CI], 1.10–1.19), while non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity (versus Latino/Hispanic) was inversely associated with checkup completion (aRR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.85–0.93). In secondary outcome analysis, COVID-19 period checkup completion was associated with 61% greater probability of mammography (aRR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.52–1.71), and significantly higher probability of diagnosis, and treatment initiation, for all four chronic illnesses. In exploratory interaction analysis, checkup completion was more modestly associated with diagnosis and treatment of hypertension and high cholesterol in some younger age groups (versus age ≥ 65).

Conclusions

In this large FQHC cohort, checkup completion markedly decreased during the pandemic. Checkup completion was associated with preventive service completion, chronic illness detection, and initiation of chronic illness treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liss D, Williams P, Linder J. Choosing Wisely – Five Things Physicians & Patients Should Question. Society of General Internal Medicine. 2022. https://www.sgim.org/File%20Library/SGIM/Publications/Choosing-Wisely%2D%2D-Checkups-Recs-20220923.final.authors%2D%2D-web-version.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  2. Liss DT, Uchida T, Wilkes CL, Radakrishnan A, Linder JA. General Health Checks in Adult Primary Care: A Review. JAMA. 2021;325(22):2294-306. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morrissey JP, Harris RP, Kincade-Norburn J, McLaughlin C, Garrett JM, Jackman AM, et al. Medicare reimbursement for preventive care. Changes in performance of services, quality of life, and health care costs. Med. Care. 1995;33(4):315-31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. German PS, Burton LC, Shapiro S, Steinwachs DM, Tsuji I, Paglia MJ, et al. Extended coverage for preventive services for the elderly: response and results in a demonstration population. Am. J. Public Health. 1995;85(3):379-86. doi:https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.85.3.379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Patrick DL, Beresford SA, Ehreth J, Diehr P, Picciano J, Durham M, et al. Interpreting excess mortality in a prevention trial for older adults. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1995;24 Suppl 1:S27-33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/24.supplement_1.s27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Belcher DW. Implementing preventive services. Success and failure in an outpatient trial. Arch. Intern. Med. 1990;150(12):2533-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.150.12.2533

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedman GD, Collen MF, Fireman BH. Multiphasic Health Checkup Evaluation: a 16-year follow-up. J. Chronic Dis. 1986;39(6):453-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9681(86)90112-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murray DM, Luepker RV, Pirie PL, Grimm RH, Jr., Bloom E, Davis MA, et al. Systematic risk factor screening and education: a community-wide approach to prevention of coronary heart disease. Prev. Med. 1986;15(6):661-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-7435(86)90071-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lindholt JS, Sogaard R. Population screening and intervention for vascular disease in Danish men (VIVA): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London, England). 2017;390(10109):2256-65. doi:https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32250-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kamstrup-Larsen N, Dalton SO, Gronbaek M, Broholm-Jorgensen M, Thomsen JL, Larsen LB, et al. The effectiveness of general practice-based health checks on health behaviour and incidence on non-communicable diseases in individuals with low socioeconomic position: a randomised controlled trial in Denmark. BMJ open. 2019;9(9):e029180. doi:https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Finkelstein MM. Preventive screening. What factors influence testing? Can. Fam. Physician. 2002;48:1494-501.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pill R, French J, Harding K, Stott N. Invitation to attend a health check in a general practice setting: comparison of attenders and non-attenders. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1988;38(307):53-6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Patrick DL, Grembowski D, Durham M, Beresford SA, Diehr P, Ehreth J, et al. Cost and outcomes of Medicare reimbursement for HMO preventive services. Health Care Financ. Rev. 1999;20(4):25-43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander GC, Tajanlangit M, Heyward J, Mansour O, Qato DM, Stafford RS. Use and Content of Primary Care Office-Based vs Telemedicine Care Visits During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(10):e2021476. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.21476

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Simon J, Mohanty N, Masinter L, Hamilton A, Jain A. COVID-19: Exploring the Repercussions on Federally Qualified Health Center Service Delivery and Quality. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021;32(1):137-44. doi:https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2021.0013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Fedewa SA, Star J, Bandi P, Minihan A, Han X, Yabroff KR, et al. Changes in Cancer Screening in the US During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(6):e2215490. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.15490

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Laffin LJ, Kaufman HW, Chen Z, Niles JK, Arellano AR, Bare LA, et al. Rise in Blood Pressure Observed Among US Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Circulation. 2022;145(3):235-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057075

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ettman CK, Cohen GH, Abdalla SM, Sampson L, Trinquart L, Castrucci BC, et al. Persistent depressive symptoms during COVID-19: a national, population-representative, longitudinal study of U.S. adults. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022;5:100091. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lana.2021.100091

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen RC, Haynes K, Du S, Barron J, Katz AJ. Association of Cancer Screening Deficit in the United States With the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(6):878-84. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.0884

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kelkar AH, Zhao J, Wang S, Cogle CR. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal and Prostate Cancer Screening in a Large U.S. Health System. Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Jan 29;10(2):264. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10020264

  21. Rutter CM, Knudsen AB, Lin JS, Bouskill KE. Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2021;30(1):3-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ahmed AT, Welch BT, Brinjikji W, Farah WH, Henrichsen TL, Murad MH, et al. Racial Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(2):157-65 e9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.07.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fedewa SA, Cotter MM, Wehling KA, Wysocki K, Killewald R, Makaroff L. Changes in breast cancer screening rates among 32 community health centers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cancer. 2021;127(23):4512-5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.33859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Velazquez AI, Hayward JH, Gregory B, Dixit N. Trends in Breast Cancer Screening in a Safety-Net Hospital During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(8):e2119929. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.19929

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Network Members. AllianceChicago, Chicago, IL. https://alliancechicago.org/network-members/. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  26. Uniform Data System Reporting Requirements for 2022 Health Center Data. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration 2022 April 15, 2022 Contract No.: OMB Number: 0915-0193. https://bphc.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/bphc/data-reporting/2022-uds-manual.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  27. Final Recommendation Statement. Recommendation: Colorectal Cancer: Screening. United States Preventive Services Taskforce. May 18, 2021. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  28. Final Recommendation Statement. Recommendation: Breast Cancer: Screening. United States Preventive Services Taskforce. January 11, 2016. https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/breast-cancer-screening. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  29. Illinois Register: Rules of Governmental Agencies. Secretary of State. Springfield, IL 2020. p. 5,542-5,872. https://www.ilsos.gov/departments/index/register/volume44/register_volume44_issue_14.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  30. Frontz AJ. Illinois generally complied with requirements for claiming Medicaid reimbursement for telehealth payments during COVID-19. Springfield, IL: Illinois Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General 2022 December 2022. https://oig.hhs.gov/oas/reports/region5/52100035.pdf. Accessed December 6, 2023.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chronic Conditions. Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). 2023. https://www2.ccwdata.org/web/guest/condition-categories-chronic. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  32. Electronic Clinical Quality Improvement (eCQI) Resource Center. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). https://ecqi.healthit.gov/. Accessed December 6, 2023.

  33. About eCQI | eCQI Resource Center. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). https://ecqi.healthit.gov/about-ecqi. Accessed May 10 2023.

  34. Zou G. A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(7):702-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwh090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Burton LC, German PS, Shapiro S. A preventive services demonstration. Health status, health behaviors, and cost outcomes 2 years after intervention. The Johns Hopkins Medicare Preventive Services Demonstration Team. Med. Care. 1997;35(11):1149-57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199711000-00006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Hutchins HJ, Wolff B, Leeb R, Ko JY, Odom E, Willey J, et al. COVID-19 Mitigation Behaviors by Age Group - United States, April-June 2020. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 2020;69(43):1584-90. doi:https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6943e4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Badri S, Sarda V, Moncada JS, Mercon M, Rezai K, Weinstein RA, et al. Disparities and Temporal Trends in COVID-19 Exposures and Mitigating Behaviors Among Black and Hispanic Adults in an Urban Setting. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9):e2125187. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.25187

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Krogsboll LT, Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD009009. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD009009.pub3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Uy C, Lopez J, Trinh-Shevrin C, Kwon SC, Sherman SE, Liang PS. Text Messaging Interventions on Cancer Screening Rates: A Systematic Review. J. Med. Internet Res. 2017;19(8):e296. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.7893

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Rubin L, Okitondo C, Haines L, Ebell M. Interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening adherence in low-income settings within the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev. Med. 2023;172:107522. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Glazier RH, Bajcar J, Kennie NR, Willson K. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(7):1675-88. doi:https://doi.org/10.2337/dc05-1942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Howell CR, Harada CN, Fontaine KR, Mugavero MJ, Cherrington AL. Perspective: Acknowledging a Hierarchy of Social Needs in Diabetes Clinical Care and Prevention. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Obes. 2023;16:161-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S389182

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Banerjee D, Chung S, Wong EC, Wang EJ, Stafford RS, Palaniappan LP. Underdiagnosis of hypertension using electronic health records. Am. J. Hypertens. 2012;25(1):97-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/ajh.2011.179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements:

We wish to acknowledge and thank all of the FQHCs that contributed data to this study. Funding support was provided through institutional funds at AllianceChicago. Interim results were presented at the Illinois Primary Health Care Association Annual Leadership Conference in Chicago, IL on October 6, 2022.

Funding

Funding support was provided through institutional funds at AllianceChicago.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David T. Liss PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest:

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liss, D.T., Yang, TY., Hamielec, M. et al. Checkup Visits in Adult Federally Qualified Health Center Patients: a Retrospective Cohort Study. J GEN INTERN MED (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08561-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-023-08561-1

KEY WORDS

Navigation