Skip to main content
Log in

Challenging Orthodoxy: beyond the Critical View of Safety

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

The critical view of safety (CVS) is the gold standard for performing safe cholecystectomies and minimizing common bile duct (CBD) injuries. It requires three criteria: complete clearance of the hepatocystic triangle, partial separation of the gallbladder from the cystic plate, and two structures alone entering the gallbladder. However, biliary anatomy varies widely, with frequent aberrant arterial supplies, which can mislead or disorient those attempting to acquire the CVS. This study was designed to examine the nature and frequency of cystic artery anatomic anomalies.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study from 2018 to 2020, compiling photos of the critical view of safety of 100 consecutive elective cholecystectomies performed at our institution. Gallbladders were dissected up to the parallel portion of the cystic plate to achieve a critical view of safety. All tubular structures were preserved and clipped. Operative reports were examined for mention of posterior cystic arteries or aberrant arterial supplies. Photos were reviewed for an adequate critical view of the safety and presence of aberrant arterial supplies. The rate of aberrant arterial supply was determined and photos were reviewed for patterns of common abnormalities.

Results

There were 121 patients who underwent an elective cholecystectomy; 21 lacked intraoperative pictures and were excluded from the study. Of the 100 patients included, 57 (57%) had an aberrant arterial supply with more than one cystic artery; seven had three concurrent arteries. Of those with more than one cystic artery, 21% had a recurrent cystic artery, 21% had a posterior dominant cystic artery, and 12% had a low-branching anterior cystic artery.

Conclusion

Even with appropriate dissection for the CVS, surgeons can expect to frequently visualize more than two structures entering the gallbladder when a posterior cystic artery is present. It is, therefore, integral to distinguish this aberrant anatomy to prevent inadvertent injury to the CBD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Avgerinos C, Kelgiorgi D, Touloumis Z, Baltatzi L, Dervenis C. One thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies in a single surgical unit using the “critical view of safety” technique. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 2009;13(3):498-503.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Connor SJ, Perry W, Nathanson L, Hugh TB, Hugh TJ. Using a standardized method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy to create a concept operation-specific checklist. HPB. 2014;16(5):422-429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ding Y-M, Wang B, Wang W-X, Wang P, Yan J-S. New classification of the anatomic variations of cystic artery during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG. 2007;13(42):5629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pucher PH, Brunt LM, Fanelli RD, Asbun HJ, Aggarwal R. SAGES expert Delphi consensus: critical factors for safe surgical practice in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgical endoscopy. 2015;29(11):3074-3085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michael Brunt L, Deziel DJ, Telem DA, et al. Safe cholecystectomy multi-society practice guideline and state-of-the-art consensus conference on prevention of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020;34(7):2827-2855.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Barrett M, Asbun HJ, Chien H-L, Brunt LM, Telem DA. Bile duct injury and morbidity following cholecystectomy: a need for improvement. Surgical endoscopy. 2018;32(4):1683-1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fong ZV, Pitt HA, Strasberg SM, et al. Diminished survival in patients with bile leak and ductal injury: management strategy and outcomes. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2018;226(4):568-576. e561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Strasberg SM, Eagon CJ, Drebin JA. The “hidden cystic duct” syndrome and the infundibular technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy—the danger of the false infundibulum. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2000;191(6):661-667.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Andall R, Matusz P, Du Plessis M, Ward R, Tubbs R, Loukas M. The clinical anatomy of cystic artery variations: a review of over 9800 cases. Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy. 2016;38(5):529-539.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang X, Shah RP, Maybody M, et al. Cystic artery localization with a three-dimensional angiography vessel tracking system compared with conventional two-dimensional angiography. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2011;22(10):1414-1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Suzuki M, Akaishi S, Rikiyama T, Naitoh T, Rahman M, Matsuno S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Calot's triangle, and variations in cystic arterial supply. Surgical endoscopy. 2000;14(2):141-144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sugita R, Yamazaki T, Fujita N, Naitoh T, Kobari M, Takahashi S. Cystic artery and cystic duct assessment with 64–detector row CT before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Radiology. 2008;248(1):124-131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fathy O, Zeid MA, Abdallah T, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report on 2000 cases. Hepato-gastroenterology. 2003;50(52):967-971.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Ostapenko.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ostapenko, A., Kleiner, D. Challenging Orthodoxy: beyond the Critical View of Safety. J Gastrointest Surg 27, 89–92 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05500-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05500-z

Keywords

Navigation