Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Terminal Ileum or Cecum: Ileocecectomy Versus Right Hemicolectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Simple ileocecectomy and right hemicolectomy are two potential operative approaches to treat patients with neuroendocrine neoplasm in the terminal ileum and/or cecum (IC-NENs). We sought to define the long-term outcome of patients undergoing ileocecectomy versus right hemicolectomy for IC-NENs, as well as characterize number of nodes evaluated and lymph node metastasis (LNM) associated with each procedure.

Methods

Patients who underwent curative-intent resections for IC-NENs between 2000 and 2016 were identified from a multi-institutional database. The clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical procedures, and the overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared among patients who underwent formal right hemicolectomy versus ileocecectomy only.

Results

Among 127 patients with IC-NENs, median size of the largest tumor size was 2.0 (IQR 1.2–2.9) cm; 35 (27.6%) patients had multiple lesions. At the time of surgery, 93 (73.2%) patients underwent a right hemicolectomy, whereas 34 (26.8%) had ileocecectomy only. Every patient had a lymph node dissection (LND) with a median number of 16 (IQR 12–22) nodes evaluated. A majority (n = 110, 86.6%) of patients had LNM with a median number of 3 (IQR 2–5) LNM. Patients who underwent hemicolectomy had more lymph nodes evaluated versus patients who had an ileocecectomy only (median, 18 vs. 14, p = 0.004). Patients who underwent formal right hemicolectomy versus ileocecectomy had a similar OS (median OS, 101.9 vs. 144.5 months, p = 0.44) and RFS (median RFS, 70.3 vs. not attained, p = 0.80), respectively.

Conclusions

Ileocecectomy had similar long-term outcomes versus right hemicolectomy in treatment of IC-NENs despite a difference in the lymph node harvest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the Incidence, Prevalence, and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:1335-1342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kacmaz E, Klumpen HJ, Bemelman WA, Nieveen van Dijkum EJM, Engelsman AF, Tanis PJ. Evaluating Nationwide Application of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Treatment of Small Bowel Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. World J Surg. 2021;45:2463-2470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, et al. Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17:1109-1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah MH, Goldner WS, Benson AB, et al. Neuroendocrine and Adrenal Tumors, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021;19:839-868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Boudreaux JP, Klimstra DS, Hassan MM, et al. The NANETS consensus guideline for the diagnosis and management of neuroendocrine tumors: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the Jejunum, Ileum, Appendix, and Cecum. Pancreas. 2010;39:753-766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Salazar R, Wiedenmann B, Rindi G, Ruszniewski P. ENETS 2011 Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Digestive Neuroendocrine Tumors: an update. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:71-73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pedrazzani C, Conti C, Valdegamberi A, et al. Is Laparoscopic CME Right Hemicolectomy an Optimal Indication for NET of the Right Colon and Terminal Ileum? J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:333-336.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Broder MS, Cai B, Chang E, Neary MP. Epidemiology of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors in a U.S. Commercially Insured Population. Endocr Pract. 2017;23:1210-1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kulke MH, Shah MH, Benson AB, 3rd, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors, version 1.2015. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015;13:78-108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Pape UF, Perren A, Niederle B, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for the management of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms from the jejuno-ileum and the appendix including goblet cell carcinomas. Neuroendocrinology. 2012;95:135-156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Crown A, Simianu VV, Kennecke H, et al. Appendiceal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Does Colon Resection Improve Outcomes? J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:2121-2126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mehrvarz Sarshekeh A, Advani S, Halperin DM, et al. Regional lymph node involvement and outcomes in appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors: a SEER database analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8:99541-99551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang XF, Xue F, Wu Z, et al. (2020) Development and Validation of a Modified Eighth AJCC Staging System for Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg

  14. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187-196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ricci C, Ingaldi C, Alberici L, et al. Histopathological diagnosis of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms: when to perform a right hemicolectomy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Endocrine. 2019;66:460-466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Alabraba E, Pritchard DM, Griffin R, et al. The impact of lymph node metastases and right hemicolectomy on outcomes in appendiceal neuroendocrine tumours (aNETs). Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:1332-1338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Holmager P, Willemoe GL, Nielsen K, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the appendix: Characterization of 335 patients referred to the Copenhagen NET Center of Excellence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47:1357-1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rault-Petit B, Do Cao C, Guyetant S, et al. Current Management and Predictive Factors of Lymph Node Metastasis of Appendix Neuroendocrine Tumors: A National Study from the French Group of Endocrine Tumors (GTE). Ann Surg. 2019;270:165-171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pape UF, Niederle B, Costa F, et al. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Appendix (Excluding Goblet Cell Carcinomas). Neuroendocrinology. 2016;103:144-152.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasseri YY, Zhu R, Sutanto C, et al. Role of right hemicolectomy in patients with low-grade appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg. 2019;218:1239-1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu L, Su X, He Z, et al. Short-term outcomes of complete mesocolic excision versus D2 dissection in patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for right colon cancer (RELARC): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021;22:391-401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim MK, Warner RR, Ward SC, et al. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastases in small intestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Neuroendocrinology. 2015;101:58-65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zaidi MY, Lopez-Aguiar AG, Dillhoff M, et al. Prognostic Role of Lymph Node Positivity and Number of Lymph Nodes Needed for Accurately Staging Small-Bowel Neuroendocrine Tumors. JAMA Surg. 2019;154:134-140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chi W, Warner RRP, Chan DL, et al. Long-term Outcomes of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Pancreas. 2018;47:321-325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xu-Feng Zhang or Timothy M. Pawlik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, MX., Lopez-Aguiar, A.G., Poultsides, G. et al. Surgical Treatment of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Terminal Ileum or Cecum: Ileocecectomy Versus Right Hemicolectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 1266–1274 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05269-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-022-05269-1

Keywords

Navigation