Skip to main content
Log in

A SIMPLE Performance Assessment of Bariatric Procedures and Post-operative Weight Regain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

When assessing and reporting the performance of bariatric procedures, longitudinal total weight loss % (TWL%) is the preferred method of choice. This averages out significant individual weight regains. Due to no assessment of individual weight trajectories, numerous patients with weight recidivism are missed in the overall assessment of the applied procedures.

Materials and Methods

The SIMPLE acronym (Survival analysis of Interpolated weight trajectories in a Markov chain, assessing Predictors, Longitudinal TWL% and individual procedure success and relapse Events) provides a framework to assess the performance of bariatric procedures in everyday practice, identifying a procedures’ overall performance both in terms of longitudinal total weight loss % and individual events of weight regain. The SIMPLE approach is demonstrated on a cohort of 907 bariatric patients collected over 7 years. Six hundred eighteen patients received a primary RYGB, 81 a primary SG, while 208 were conversions to either a RYGB (n = 198) or SG (n = 10). Successful surgery was defined as 20% TWL; a weight regain as a 15% increase from the lowest individually attained weight post-surgery.

Results

The longitudinal TWL% performance at 5 years was 34.5%, 21.3%, and 22.9% for the primary RYGB, primary sleeve gastrectomy, and conversion operation, respectively. However, nearly 20% of the conversion operations never reached success, while 33.5% registered a relapse event within 5 years.

Conclusion

The combined approach of the SIMPLE assessment clearly showed that a non-trivial amount of individuals did not achieve success or regained significant weight after surgery. This indicates that a combined approach to reporting bariatric performance is preferred.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. 1.Grover BT, Morell MC, Kothari SN, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJ, Baker MT. Defining Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery: a Call for Standardization. Obesity Surgery. 2019;29(11):3493-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reinhold RB. Critical analysis of long term weight loss following gastric bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Sep.

  3. 3.Corcelles R, Boules M, Froylich D, Hag A, Daigle CR, Aminian A, et al. Total Weight Loss as the Outcome Measure of Choice After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass. Obesity Surgery. 2016;26(8):1794-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.Odom J, Zalesin KC, Washington TL, Miller WW, Hakmeh B, Zaremba DL, et al. Behavioral Predictors of Weight Regain after Bariatric Surgery. Obesity Surgery. 2010;20(3):349-56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.Peterli R, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Vetter D, Kröll D, Borbély Y, et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity. JAMA. 2018;319(3):255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.Hatoum IJ, Kaplan LM. Advantages of percent weight loss as a method of reporting weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obesity. 2013;21(8):1519-25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.Arterburn D, Gupta A. Comparing the Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Severe Obesity. JAMA. 2018;319(3):235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jenny H. Kang QAL. Effectiveness of bariatric surgical procedures: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. 2017 Nov 17.

  9. 9.Shimbo D. Dietary and lifestyle factors in hypertension. Journal of Human Hypertension. 2016;30(10):571-2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.Zuraikat FM, Thomas E, Roeshot D, Gallagher D, St‐Onge MP. Can Healthy Sleep Improve Long‐Term Bariatric Surgery Outcomes? Results of a Pilot Study and Call for Further Research. Obesity. 2019;27(11):1769-71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.Anderson C, Platten CR. Sleep deprivation lowers inhibition and enhances impulsivity to negative stimuli. Behavioural Brain Research. 2011;217(2):463-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.Barber LK, Munz DC. Consistent-sufficient sleep predicts improvements in self-regulatory performance and psychological strain. Stress and Health. 2011;27(4):314-24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurens de Vries.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study received approval from the Healthcare Ethics Committee on the 26th of January 2018, project numbers 2017/1625 and 2017/1626.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Vries, L., Van den Broecke, C., Decruyeneare, A. et al. A SIMPLE Performance Assessment of Bariatric Procedures and Post-operative Weight Regain. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 542–549 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05172-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05172-1

Keywords

Navigation