Skip to main content
Log in

Actual 3-Year Survival After Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (RpLDG): a Propensity Score Matching Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Background

Total laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer has been widely accepted; however, reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy has not gained the same popularity because of technical difficulties and oncologic safety issues. This study aimed to analyze the oncologic safety and short-term surgical outcomes of patients who underwent reduced-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (RpLDG) for gastric cancer.

Methods

Consecutive patients who underwent surgical treatment between January 2016 and May 2018 were included in this study. Of the 833 patients enrolled, 158 underwent RpLDG and were propensity-matched with 158 patients who underwent conventional port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (CpLDG). The groups were compared in terms of short-term outcomes and disease-free and overall survival rates.

Results

The RpLDG group had shorter operation times (161.8 min vs. 189.0 min, p < 0.00) and shorter postoperative hospital stays (7.6 days vs. 9.1 days, p = 0.04) compared to the CpLDG group. Estimated blood loss was lower in the RpLDG group than in the CpLDG group (52.6 mL vs. 73.7 mL, p < 0.00), while hospital costs incurred by the RpLDG group were lower than those of the CpLDG group (10,033.7 vs. 11,016.8 USD, p < 0.00). No statistical differences were found regarding overall morbidity and occurrence of surgical complications of grade III or higher, as defined by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Furthermore, no significant differences between RpLDG and CpLDG were found in 3-year disease-free (99.4% vs. 98.1%; p = 0.42) and 3-year overall survival rates (98.7% vs. 96.8%; p = 0.25).

Conclusion

Patients who underwent RpLDG had better short-term surgical outcomes than those who underwent CpLDG in terms of operation time, estimated blood loss, duration of hospital stay, and hospital costs. The oncologic safety of RpLDG was satisfactory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4(2):146-8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guideline Committee of the Korean Gastric Cancer Association DWG, Review P. Korean Practice Guideline for Gastric Cancer 2018: an Evidence-based, Multi-disciplinary Approach, J Gastric Cancer. 2019;19(1):1-48. doi:https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2019.19.e8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW et al. Effect of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on Long-term Survival Among Patients With Stage I Gastric Cancer: The KLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(4):506-13. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6727.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW et al. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263(1):28-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Omori T, Oyama T, Akamatsu H, Tori M, Ueshima S, Nishida T. Transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2400-4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-1563-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Remzi FH, Kirat HT, Kaouk JH, Geisler DP. Single-port laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10(8):823-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01660.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn SH, Son SY, Lee CM, Jung DH, Park do J, Kim HH. Intracorporeal uncut Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy reconstruction in pure single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: unaided stapling closure. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218(1):e17-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.09.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee Y, Kim HH. Single-incision Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer. J Gastric Cancer. 2017;17(3):193-203. doi:https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Seo HS, Lee HH. Is the 5-ports approach necessary in laparoscopic gastrectomy? Feasibility of reduced-port totally laparoscopic gastrectomy for the treatment of gastric cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int J Surg. 2016;29:118-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.03.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seo WJ, Son T, Roh CK, Cho M, Kim HI, Hyung WJ. Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a modified technique using Single-Site((R)) and two additional ports. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(8):3713-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6208-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Park CH, Song KY, Kim SN. Treatment results for gastric cancer surgery: 12 years' experience at a single institute in Korea. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(1):36-41. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2007.03.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moriguchi S, Maehara Y, Korenaga D, Sugimachi K, Nose Y. Risk factors which predict pattern of recurrence after curative surgery for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Surg Oncol. 1992;1(5):341-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-7404(92)90034-i.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Otsuji E, Kuriu Y, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, Ochiai T, Hagiwara A et al. Time to death and pattern of death in recurrence following curative resection of gastric carcinoma: analysis based on depth of invasion. World J Surg. 2004;28(9):866-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7359-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amin MB, American Joint Committee on Cancer., American Cancer Society. AJCC cancer staging manual. Eight edition / editor-in-chief, Mahul B. Amin, MD, FCAP ; editors, Stephen B. Edge and 16 others ; Donna M. Gress, CTR - Technical editor ; Laura R. Meyer CAPM - Managing editor. ed. Chicago: American Joint Committee on Cancer, Springer; 2017.

  15. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(1):1-19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(2):101-12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394-424. doi:https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Son T, Hyung WJ. Laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery: Current evidence and future perspectives. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(2):727-35. doi:https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.727.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Network NCC. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. Gastric cancer (version 2.2019). https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/gastric.pdf. Accessed 01 Jan 2021.

  21. Smyth EC, Verheij M, Allum W, Cunningham D, Cervantes A, Arnold D et al. Gastric cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(suppl 5):v38-v49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw350.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2018 (5th). Gastric Cancer. 2020. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-020-01042-y.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J et al. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(12):1350-7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu J, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J et al. Effect of Laparoscopic vs Open Distal Gastrectomy on 3-Year Disease-Free Survival in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: The CLASS-01 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019;321(20):1983-92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.5359.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee HJ, Hyung WJ, Yang HK, Han SU, Park YK, An JY et al. Short-term Outcomes of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy With D2 Lymphadenectomy to Open Distal Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (KLASS-02-RCT). Ann Surg. 2019;270(6):983-91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kunisaki C, Makino H, Yamaguchi N, Izumisawa Y, Miyamato H, Sato K et al. Surgical advantages of reduced-port laparoscopic gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(12):5520-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4916-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jeong O, Park YK, Ryu SY. Early experience of duet laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (duet-LDG) using three abdominal ports for gastric carcinoma: surgical technique and comparison with conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(8):3559-66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4653-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Oh SH, Kim JS, Lee PS. A survey on training and working conditions of residents in 2015. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2015;58(12):1179. doi:https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2015.58.12.1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim SM, Ha MH, Seo JE, Kim JE, Choi MG, Sohn TS et al. Comparison of Reduced Port Totally Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy (Duet TLDG) and Conventional Laparoscopic-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(8):2567-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-4333-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sun-Hwi Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, K.H., Lee, SH., Choi, C.W. et al. Actual 3-Year Survival After Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer (RpLDG): a Propensity Score Matching Analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 26, 550–557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05097-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05097-9

Keywords

Navigation