Skip to main content
Log in

Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Better than Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aims and scope

Abstract

Background

It is unclear whether cholecystectomy is beneficial after percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis (AC).

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study included 202 patients aged >80 years with AC without common bile duct (CBD) stones who underwent PTGBD between January 2010 and December 2019.

Results

One hundred and forty-two patients underwent elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (ELC), and 60 underwent conservative treatment, specifically PTGBD removal (PTGBD-R) in 36 patients and PTGBD maintained (PTGBD-M) in 24 patients. The postoperative major complication (POMC) rate in the ELC group was 8.5%. The cumulative incidence for recurrence of biliary events (BE) in the PTGBD-R group was 22.2%. The cumulative incidence for PTGBD-related complication in the PTGBD-M group was 70.8%. Mortality after initial treatment was not significantly different between the three groups (2.8% vs. 2.8% vs. 8.3%, p=0.381). In multivariate analysis, a Charlson age comorbidity index ≥6 and body mass index ≤19 were significant risk factors for POMC after ELC, and a closed cystic duct was a significant risk factor for recurrent BE after PTGBD-R.

Conclusion

ELC is recommended in AC after PTGBD for selected patients aged >80 years without CBD stones due to the high recurrence rate of BE after PTGBD-R and the difficulty associated with PTGBD-M.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Strasberg SM. Clinical practice. Acute calculous cholecystitis. The New England journal of medicine. 2008;358(26):2804-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp0800929.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Okamoto K, Suzuki K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Endo I et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2018;25(1):55-72. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krasman ML, Gracie WA, Strasius SR. Biliary tract disease in the aged. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine. 1991;7(2):347-70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Horn T, Christensen SD, Kirkegård J, Larsen LP, Knudsen AR, Mortensen FV. Percutaneous cholecystostomy is an effective treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis: a 10-year experience. HPB 2015;17(4):326-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Turiño SY, Shabanzadeh DM, Eichen NM, Jørgensen SL, Sørensen LT, Jørgensen LN. Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis: a Cohort Study. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2019;23(2):297-303. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-4021-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lin D, Wu S, Fan Y, Ke C. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020;34(7):2994-3001. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuy S, Sosa JA, Roman SA, Desai R, Rosenthal RA. Age matters: a study of clinical and economic outcomes following cholecystectomy in elderly Americans. American Journal of Surgery. 2011;201(6):789-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.04.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hung YL, Chong SW, Cheng CT, Liao CH, Fu CY, Hsieh CH et al. Natural Course of Acute Cholecystitis in Patients Treated With Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage Without Elective Cholecystectomy. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2020;24(4):772-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04213-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Yokoe M, Hata J, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Asbun HJ, Wakabayashi G et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholecystitis (with videos). Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2018;25(1):41-54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiriyama S, Kozaka K, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Pitt HA, Gabata T et al. Tokyo Guidelines 2018: diagnostic criteria and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences. 2018;25(1):17-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/jhbp.512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62(1):102-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1994;47(11):1245-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(94)90129-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mayhew D, Mendonca V, Murthy BVS. A review of ASA physical status - historical perspectives and modern developments. Anaesthesia. 2019;74(3):373-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.14569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(2):187-96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schlottmann F, Gaber C, Strassle PD, Patti MG, Charles AG. Cholecystectomy Vs. Cholecystostomy for the Management of Acute Cholecystitis in Elderly Patients. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2019;23(3):503-9. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3863-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gurusamy K, Samraj K, Gluud C, Wilson E, Davidson BR. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on the safety and effectiveness of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The British Journal of Surgery. 2010;97(2):141-50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6870.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kamarajah SK, Karri S, Bundred JR, Evans RPT, Lin A, Kew T et al. Perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in elderly patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 2020;34(11):4727-40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-07805-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanjay P, Mittapalli D, Marioud A, White RD, Ram R, Alijani A. Clinical outcomes of a percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a multicentre analysis. HPB 2013;15(7):511-6. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00610.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang CH, Wu CY, Yang JC, Lien WC, Wang HP, Liu KL et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Acute Cholecystitis after Successful Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Treatment and the Risk Factors for Recurrence: A Decade Experience at a Single Center. PloS one. 2016;11(1):e0148017. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsieh YC, Chen CK, Su CW, Chan CC, Huo TI, Liu CJ et al. Outcome after percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a single-center experience. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2012;16(10):1860-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-012-1965-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data for the work: Seung Jae Lee, In Seok Choi, Ju Ik Moon, Dae Sung Yoon, Sang Eok Lee, Nak Song Sung, Sung Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Roh, and Won Jun Choi

Drafting the work or revising it critically for important intellectual content: Seung Jae Lee, In Seok Choi, and Ju Ik Moon

Final approval of the version to be published: Seung Jae Lee and In Seok Choi

Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved: Seung Jae Lee and In Seok Choi

Corresponding author

Correspondence to In Seok Choi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, S.J., Choi, I.S., Moon, J.I. et al. Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Is Better than Conservative Treatment in Elderly Patients with Acute Cholecystitis After Percutaneous Transhepatic Gallbladder Drainage. J Gastrointest Surg 25, 3170–3177 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05067-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-021-05067-1

Keywords

Navigation