Abstract
Background
The objective of the current study was to characterize the association between travel distance/hospital volume relative to outcomes following resection of cholangiocarcinoma.
Methods
Patients were identified using the 2004–2015 National Cancer Database and stratified into quartiles according to travel distance/hospital volume. Multivariable regression models were utilized to examine the impact of travel distance and hospital volume on quality-of-care metrics and overall survival.
Results
Among 5125 patients, the majority of patients had T1/2 (N = 2006, 41.1%) and N0 disease (N = 2498, 50.9%). Median hospital quartile surgical volumes in cases/year were low volume (LV) 6, intermediate low volume (ILV) 7, intermediate high volume (IHV) 12, and high volume (HV) 24 cases/year. Median travel distance quartiles in miles were short travel (ST) 2.7, intermediate short travel (IST) 7.9, intermediate long travel (ILT) 18.9, and long travel (LT) 84.7. Longer travel distances were associated with better overall survival, as every 10 miles was associated with a 2% decrease in mortality (p = 0.02). Differences in quality-of-care metrics were largely mediated through travel distance.
Conclusions
Travel distance and hospital volume were associated with certain quality-of-care metrics among patients with cholangiocarcinoma. After controlling for hospital volume and travel distance simultaneously, only travel distance was associated with decreased risk of mortality.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11605-019-04162-8/MediaObjects/11605_2019_4162_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11605-019-04162-8/MediaObjects/11605_2019_4162_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Razumilava N, Gores GJ. Cholangiocarcinoma. Lancet. 2014;383(9935):2168–79.
DeOliveira ML. Liver transplantation for cholangiocarcinoma: current best practice. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2014;19(3):245–52.
Squires MH, Cloyd JM, Dillhoff M, Schmidt C, Pawlik TM. Challenges of surgical management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;12(7):671–81.
Kimbrough CW, Cloyd JM, Pawlik TM. Surgical approaches for the treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18(7):673–83.
Macedo FIB, Jayanthi P, Mowzoon M, Yakoub D, Dudeja V, Merchant N. The Impact of Surgeon Volume on Outcomes After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: a Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(10):1723–31.
Gani F, Johnston FM, Nelson-Williams H, Cerullo M, Dillhoff ME, Schmidt CR, et al. Hospital Volume and the Costs Associated with Surgery for Pancreatic Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(9):1411–9.
Dimick JB, Cowan JA, Knol JA, Upchurch GR. Hepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database. Arch Surg. 2003;138(2):185–91.
Mukherjee S, Kocher HM, Hutchins RR, Bhattacharya S, Abraham AT. Impact of hospital volume on outcomes for pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single UK HPB centre experience. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2009;35(7):734–8.
Kagedan DJ, Goyert N, Li Q, Paszat L, Kiss A, Earle CC, et al. The Impact of Increasing Hospital Volume on 90-Day Postoperative Outcomes Following Pancreaticoduodenectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(3):506–15.
Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117–27.
Gani F, Azoulay D, Pawlik TM. Evaluating Trends in the Volume-Outcomes Relationship Following Liver Surgery: Does Regionalization Benefit All Patients the Same? J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(3):463–71.
Adam MA, Thomas S, Youngwirth L, Pappas T, Roman SA, Sosa JA. Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States. JAMA Surg. 2017;152(4):336–42.
Ross K, Patzer RE, Goldberg DS, Lynch RJ. Sociodemographic Determinants of Waitlist and Posttransplant Survival Among End-Stage Liver Disease Patients. Am J Transplant. 2017;17(11):2879–89.
Lidsky ME, Sun Z, Nussbaum DP, Adam MA, Speicher PJ, Blazer DG. Going the Extra Mile: Improved Survival for Pancreatic Cancer Patients Traveling to High-volume Centers. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):333–8.
Xia L, Taylor BL, Mamtani R, Christodouleas JP, Guzzo TJ. Associations Between Travel Distance, Hospital Volume, and Outcomes Following Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer. Urology. 2018;114:87–94.
Boffa DJ, Rosen JE, Mallin K, Loomis A, Gay G, Palis B, et al. Using the National Cancer Database for Outcomes Research: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(12):1722–8.
NCDB. Getting started—a user’s guide. 2015.
Jindal M, Zheng C, Quadri HS, Ihemelandu CU, Hong YK, Smith AK, et al. Why Do Long-Distance Travelers Have Improved Pancreatectomy Outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2017;225(2):216–25.
Desch CE, McNiff KK, Schneider EC, Schrag D, McClure J, Lepisto E, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(21):3631–7.
Bagante F, Gani F, Beal EW, Merath K, Chen Q, Dillhoff M, et al. Prognosis and Adherence with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines of Patients with Biliary Tract Cancers: an Analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018.
Reardon ZD, Patel SG, Zaid HB, Stimson CJ, Resnick MJ, Keegan KA, et al. Trends in the use of perioperative chemotherapy for localized and locally advanced muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a sign of changing tides. Eur Urol. 2015;67(1):165–70.
O’Connor SC, Mogal H, Russell G, Ethun C, Fields RC, Jin L, et al. The Effects of Travel Burden on Outcomes After Resection of Extrahepatic Biliary Malignancies: Results from the US Extrahepatic Biliary Consortium. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(12):2016–24.
Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Marth NJ, Goodman DC. Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2703–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
EWB, RM, JMH, AP, KM, MED, JC, AE, and TMP conceived of and designed this work. RM and EWB performed the data analysis. EWB drafted the manuscript. EWB, RM, JMH, AP, KM, MED, JC, AE, and TMP critically revised the manuscript, provided approval of the final version, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beal, E.W., Mehta, R., Hyer, J.M. et al. Association Between Travel Distance, Hospital Volume, and Outcomes Following Resection of Cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Surg 23, 944–952 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04162-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04162-8